642, Convert existing garage in bed, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
fii I I A I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
LEAD SHEET
02 1184149
RECORDED/FILE D IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
1:01 PM MAY 22 2002
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
TITLE(S)
FEE FEE $22 RR
DAF $2
C-20 6
CODE
20
CODE
19
CODE
_9
D.T.T.
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN)
To. Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown
THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
• 02 1184149
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT O F ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. 642.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
7 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA (LOT 56-EF)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 642.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true end correct.
rrwi
Signature 4 d
Z.::-D6 4 is L. g u it (72 e iu 9 .c'r
Name typed or printed
7 C,q-s r-f/E LO DiZ
Address
KDki-,N411rc.(-5 (4
City/State... --- ._ — -
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary [public.
T Recorder's Use Only
XX
XX
Signat e "
M'I 2 r /j-NN e p/� N , � i-
Name typed or printed
'7 G 09 5r%` / �L i7 //C
Address /pa L « )6 II/`-S CA
City State
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On 2( 7e02b�U�Y
before me, YCCAurii. Lunn irrirellekrin
personally appeared �Gl�
Sorpr.Qt, - a ltr 4n 1<. So(przu J
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
snk�$�.eu t srun�ent.
TAMARA LYNN MICHE .SON
COMM, # 1307773
NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA L6
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commission Expires JUN. 5, 2005
• SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Witness r hand and .At ial seal.
Signature 'f Notary
• n h; b;. *A
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL
ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7
EASTFIELD DRIVE IN ZONING CASE NO. 642. (SURPRENANT)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant with
respect to real property located at 7 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 56-EF) requesting
a Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to a single family
residence. The proposed project consists of 1,009 square foot addition to the existing
residence and a construction of a new 1,167 square foot attached garage.
Section 2. A. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on November 18, 2001, January 15, 2002, and at a
field trip on January 12, 2002. The applicant was notified of the hearings in writing by
first class mail. The applicant was in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard
from members of the City staff, the applicant's representative, and all persons interested
in affecting the proposal. The Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied
the project.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for
site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or
any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which
involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at
least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more
than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the
Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of
fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with
the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning
Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of
113,580 square feet. The proposed residence (5,211 sq.ft.), garage (1,167 sq.ft.), the
existing pool (800 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.) and the future stable (450 sq.ft) will be
7,724 square feet which constitutes 6.8% coverage of the lot which is within the
maximum 20% structural net lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including
structures, paved areas and driveway will be 15,139 square feet or 13.3% of the net lot
area. The residential building pad consists of 30,300 square feet and will have a
structural coverage of 25.5%. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642
• •
of the proposed structures located behind an existing hedge so as to reduce the visual
impact of the development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot
including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, and drainage courses. The lot is
relatively flat. Grading will consist of 30 cubic yards of cut soil and 30 cubic yards of fill
and will be balanced on site. A short, not to exceed 36 inches block wall will be
constructed in an area of the proposed garage.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the existing natural drainage courses will continue.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves
several mature shrubs.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The project
will be located on a relatively flat lot where significant portions of the lot will be left
undeveloped. The development plans will minimize impact on Eastfield Drive.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in
Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project
is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. The ratio of the proposed structure to
lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. The applicant
proposes to utilize the existing double driveway and turn around. The applicant will
remove a portion of the existing motor court and landscape the area to provide for a
softer effect near the front of the residence.
H. The project conforms to the requirement of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 642 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan dated
November 7, 2001 incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the conditions
contained in Section 6.
Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080(A), unless construction on the
applicable portions of the structure have commenced within that time period.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 2
• •
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, the approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall be subject to revocation; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty
(30) days and has been provided additional notice and a hearing prior to the revocation
of the Permit.
C. All requirements of the Buildings Code of the City of Rolling Hills and the
Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the
Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with
the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, dated November 7, 2001 except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
E. Grading shall not exceed 30 cubic yards of cut soil and 30 cubic yards of fill,
and shall be balanced on site.
F. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural
features to the greatest extent possible,
G. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 25.5%. The structural net lot
coverage shall not exceed 6.8% and the total structural and flatwork coverage shall not
exceed 13.3% of the net lot area.
•
H. The disturbed area of the. net lot shall not exceed 25,442 square feet or
22.4%.
I. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing trees and shrubs. Any future trees and shrubs shall be of native
type, which at full maturity shall not exceed 25 feet in height or the ridge height of the
residence, whichever is lower, so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties.
J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic
controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope
factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water
efficientlandscaping requirements of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
K. A portion of the existing motor court, as shown on the Development Plan
stamp dated November 7, 2001, shall be removed and landscaped with non- impervious
surface.
L. All utility lines shall be placed underground.
M. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality
management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county.
and local ordinances and engineering practices so. that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows,
erosion, or land subsidence.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 3
• •
N. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
O. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project
site.
P. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control. Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of septic tanks.
Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities.
R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
S. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010
of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution as
may be required by the County of Los Angeles.
T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
U. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approval shall not be effective.
V. All conditions 'of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2002. _
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST: j , \< )
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 . 4
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES :` ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )•
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2002-04 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 EASTFIELD DRIVE IN ZONING CASE NO. 642.
(SURPRENANT)
was approved on February 26, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Ndne .
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPU CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 5
•
This is a true and certified copy of the record
ifitbears the seal, imprinted in purple ink,
Of the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk
MAY, 22 2002
er/i.REGISTRARRECORDERI000NTYCLERK
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA