642, Convert existing garage in bed, Correspondence• •
Ciiy (Pelting JUL
CERTIFIED MAIL
March 12, 2002
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request fora Site Plan Review to permit construction of
additions at an existing single family residence.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on January
26, 2002, granting a request for a Site Plan Review to permit construction of substantial additions to
an existing single family residence. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before
the Commission was reported to the City Council on March 11, 2002.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the
adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council
takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) dav appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the
Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed
until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be
recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form toaether with the subiect resolution in the Office of the
County Recorder.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04 specifying the conditions of approval set
forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your
files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF
ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy
of the Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the
Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to
issuance of building permits are met.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
anta Schwartz
lanning Director
Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 04
EXHIBIT "A" DEVELOPMENT PLAN
cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
--CITY ORROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 6 4 2
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
7 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA (LOT 56-EF)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 642. SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
+ Recorder's Use Only
X X
X X
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles)
On before me,
personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•
Erk;10;+ A
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL
ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7
EASTFIELD DRIVE IN ZONING CASE NO. 642. (SURPRENANT)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant with
respect to real property located at 7 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 56-EF) requesting
a Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to a single family
residence. The proposed project consists of 1,009 square foot addition to the existing
residence and a construction of a new 1,167 square foot attached garage.
Section 2. A. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on November 18, 2001, January 15, 2002, and at a
field trip on January 12, 2002. The applicant was notified of the hearings in writing by
first class mail. The applicant was in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard
from members of the City staff, the applicant's representative, and all persons interested
in affecting the proposal. The Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied
the project.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for
site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or
any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which
involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at
least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more
than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. . With respect to the
Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of
fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with
the General Plan requitement of low profile, low density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning
Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of
113,580 square feet. The proposed residence (5,211 sq.ft.), garage (1,167 sq.ft.), the
existing pool (800 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.) and the future stable (450 sq.ft) will be
7,724 square feet which constitutes 6.8% coverage of the lot which is within the
maximum 20`)/0 structural net lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including
structures, paved areas and driveway will be 15,139 square feet or 13.3°/0 of the net lot
area. The residential building pad consists of 30,300 square feet and will have a
structural coverage of 25.5%. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642
of the proposed structures located behind an existing hedge so as to reduce the visual
impact of the development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot
including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, and drainage courses. The lot is
relatively flat. Grading will consist of 30 cubic yards of cut soil and 30 cubic yards of fill
and will be balanced on site. A short, not to exceed 36 inches block wall will be
constructed in an area of the proposed garage.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the existing natural drainage courses will continue.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves
several mature shrubs.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The project
will be located on a relatively flat lot where significant portions of the lot will be left
undeveloped. The development plans will minimize impact on Eastfield Drive.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in
Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project
is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. The ratio of the proposed structure to
lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. The applicant
proposes to utilize the existing double driveway and turn around. The applicant will
remove a portion of the existing motor court and landscape the area to provide for a
softer effect near the front of the residence.
H. The project conforms to the requirement of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 642 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan dated
November 7, 2001 incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the conditions
contained in Section 6.
Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080(A), unless construction on the
applicable portions of the structure have commenced within that time period.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 2
•
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, the approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall be subject to revocation; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty
(30) days and has been provided additional notice and a hearing prior to the revocation
of the Permit.
C. All requirements of the Buildings Code of the City of Rolling Hills and the
Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the
Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with
the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, dated November 7, 2001 except as otherwise
, provided in these conditions.
E. Grading shall not exceed 30 cubic yards of cut soil and 30 cubic yards of fill,
and shall be balanced on site.
F. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural
features to the greatest extent possible,
G. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 25.5%. The structural net lot
coverage shall not exceed 6.8°/0 and the total structural and flatwork coverage shall not
exceed 13.3% of the net lot area.
H. The disturbed area of the net lot shall not exceed 25,442 square feet or
22.4`Yo.
I. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing trees and shrubs. Any future trees and shrubs shall be of native
type, which at full maturity shall not exceed 25 feet in height or the ridge height of the
residence, whichever is lower, so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties.
J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic
controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope
factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water
efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
K. A portion of the existing motor court, as shown on the Development Plan
stamp dated November 7, 2001, shall be removed and landscaped with non- impervious
surface.
L. All utility lines shall be placed underground.
M. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality
management district reqUirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county
and local ordinances and engineering practices sothat people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows,
erosion, or land subsidence.
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 3
N. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
O. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project
site.
P. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of septic tanks.
Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities.
R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
S. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010
of the 1998 County of• Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution as
may be required by the County of Los Angeles.
T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
U. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approval shall not be effective.
V. All conditions 'of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2002.
ATTEST:
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2002-04 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 EASTFIELD DRIVE IN ZONING CASE NO. 642.
(SURPRENANT)
was approved on February 26, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: NOne
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
oe
nt3f:(5lEI*CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-04
ZC 642 5
Ok;:l ,1117;)
CERT FIE
(g-d-a izoitora(corf co e !,13
Aria:4fff
Postage $ ,2-
Certified Fee / o
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required) /
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Total Postage & Fees $ e,
0 1
• W.))
Postmark
Here
-dr* .0).11111,
1 1 • 1•••11,1•Vi7-51!!
. _
Recipient's Name (Please Print Clearly) (to be completeeAby mailer)
• _
reet, Apt. No.; or PO Box No.
7t/75,,, C/19 411.4.X 71/
Ci State, IP+4
itfr/
t
10q01.49.01ViaaiggiaSECTIO
a Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
O Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
▪ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
cpt, Eatcrr-Slegrek
'7
J/Q-eir/1-/,s, ag 912 7(
CO P
MAR t4 22
orry c1F.OLLINq 14kLLS
rtv
rigt),,,a0C1i1pliZaW
A. Received by (Please Print Clear/ Dat$ of elivery
3 tJ
0 Agent
0 Addressee
D. Is delivery addresidifferent from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
'
C. Si nature
3. Service Type
El Certified Mail
0 Registered
0 Insured Mail
0 Express Mail
0 Return Receipt for Merchandise 1
0 C.O.D.
C. n/Li• 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
-70,99 3/-A00 ce9iS
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt
0 Yes
102595-99-M-1789
•
City ol Rolling JUL
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF TIME
March 5, 2002
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310)377-1521
FAX: (310)377-7288 .
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request for a Site Plan Review to permit
construction of additions at an existing single family residence.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant:
Please be advised that the Rolling Hills City Council will meet on Monday, March 11,
2002 at 6:30 PM and not at their usual time of 7:30 PM. Zoning Case No. 642, your
proposed additions, will be presented to the Council at that meeting.
We are sorry if this change of time causes you any inconvenience.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
erely,
lanta Schwartz,
anning Director
Cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
Pririted on Recycled raper.
•
City opeolling JJdf
February 27, 2002
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Easffield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request for a Site Plan Review
construction of additions at an existing single family residence.
to permit
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant:
Please be informed that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on February 26,
2002, granting a request for a Site Plan Review to permit construction of an addition at your
property. That action, accompanied by the record of thelprogeedings before the Commission will be
reported to the City Council on March 11, 2002. You or your representative should attend that
meeting.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after
the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City
Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day ameal period. (Section 17.54.010(B)
of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be
stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to
be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the
County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect.
The Affidavit of Acceptance, Resolution No. 2002-04, specifying the conditions of approval set forth
by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files
will be forwarded to you after the Council meeting.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sinc r ly,
Yol a Schwartz,
Prin pal Planner
Cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper.
January 17, 2002
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
City INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request for a Site Plan Review to permit construction of
additions at an existing single family residence.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on
January 15, 2002 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for a Site Plan
Review. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with
conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that
subsequent meeting.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being
signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that
thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there
be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in
accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is
tentatively scheduled for Tuesday. February 26. 2002. (Please note that the February 19. 2002
regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be postponed to February 26, 2002, due to lack of
auorum). That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is
tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's
regular meeting on Monday, March 11, 2002.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Y nta Schwartz,
Principal Planner
cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper.
City 0/ leollin9, _AA
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
December 19, 2001
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request for a Site Plan Review to permit construction of
additions at an existing single family residence.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant:
The Planning Commission at their December 18, 2001 meeting voted to conduct a field
inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on JANUARY 12, 2002 at
8:00 AM.
The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the
following requirements:
A. A full-size silhouette in conformance with the
attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL OF
THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES of the project showing
the footprints and roof ridges.
B . Stake the front and side property lines and setback
lines. In addition, on the east side indicate the 2 5 -
foot RHCA easement line.
C . Show the height of the finished floor of the proposed
addition and stable.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any, questions regarding the
proposal.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
erely,
Lrlanta Schwartz
Principal Planner
cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect (letter only)
Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
City 0/ 12./16,1ihii
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310)377-7288
E-mail: cltyofrh@aol.com
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of
proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the
designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting.
Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not
acceptable.
Bracing should be provided where possible.
Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges
and eaves.
Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in
the visualization of the proposed construction.
The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are
constructed.
If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at
(310) 377-1521.
SECTION
PLAN
Printed on Recycled Paper
•
City 0/ Rolling -Affo
November 5, 2001
Dr. and Mrs. Surprenant
#7 Eastfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 642. Request for a Site Plan Review to permit substantial additions
at an existing single family residence.
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted
above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed.
Please submit a letter confirming that the property lines are in the process of being surveyed/verified
and a survey will be completed prior to the Commission's scheduling a field trip.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly
suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the
application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 642 has been set for public hearing consideration by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. November 20. 2001.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend
to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, November 16,
2001. We will forward a copy to you.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sinc r ly,
Y. anta Schwartz
lincipal Planner
cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper.
From: Criss Gunderson Fax: +1(310)373-8277 To: Fax: +1(310)377-7288 1 of 1 Monday, November 05, 2001 10:49 AM
_41)
CRISS C GUNDERSON ARCHITECT
2024 Via Pacheco, Palos Verdes Estates, California 90274
TEL (310) 373-8077 FAX (310) 373-8277
Monday, November 05, 2001
Ms. Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner
City of Rolling Hills
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Regarding: Surprenant Site Review
No. 7 Eastfield Drive
Dear Ms. Schwartz,
As discussed on the phone last week, Bolton Engineering is in the process of certifying the
existing conditions at the Surprenant's property. Ross believes that his work will be completed
before the Planning Commission might take any actions.
Thank you for flexibility on this matter,
Criss Gunderson
Transmitted via fax
cc: Ross Bolton
Dr. and Mrs. Sutprenant