473, Construct a cabana, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 92-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A POOL CABANA AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TENNIS COURT IN ZONING
CASE NO. 473.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. William R. Hoover
with respect to real property located at 1 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 170-1-
MS) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a pool cabana and
requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a tennis court.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications for the Conditional Use Permits on February
18, 1992, March .17, 1992, and April 28, 1992 and at field trip visits on February
29, 1992 and March 28, 1992.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and hereby adopt the Negative Declaration
which accompanied this item, which was prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. The applicant has submitted plans for the construction of a
proposed detached 742 square foot pool cabana approximately 22 feet west of the
existing residence as shown in Exhibit A. Section 17.16.012.G of the Municipal
Code provides for the discretion of the Planning Commission to grant a
Conditional Use Permit for a detached pool cabana provided no kitchen or cooking
facilities are provided.
Section 5. The Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan and would be desirable to the public convenience and welfare because the
proposed pool house would be located on the westerly edge of the building pad
which is not visually prominent and cannot be viewed from Morgan Lane.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with similar recreational uses in the community. The area proposed
for the cabana will be located in an area of the property where such use will not
impact surrounding properties and will be in back of and screened by the
existing single family residence.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan, because the proposed project will comply with the low profile residential
development pattern of the City.
•
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
PAGE 2
Section 7. The applicant has . submitted plans for the construction of a
7,150 square foot tennis court as shown in Exhibit A. Section 17.16.012.E of the
Municipal Code provides for the discretion of the Planning Commission to grant
a Conditional Use Permit for a tennis court under certain conditions.
Section 8. The Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a tennis court would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the
use is consistent with similar recreational uses in the community, the area
proposed for the court will be located in an area of the property where such use
will be least intrusive to surrounding properties.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, because the
tennis court will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of
the community and is located on a 2.62 acre parcel of property that is adequate
in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use.
C. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, because the
tennis court will not impact the view or the privacy of neighbors and will not
be visible from neighboring properties. The tennis court will have a baffle
screen which will be obscured by landscaping. The new court will be 35 feet
from the north property line and adjacent to a paddle tennis court on
neighboring property at 3 Morgan Lane.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for a 7,150 square foot tennis court
in accordance with the Development Plan attached hereto for a tennis court in
Zoning Case No. 473 subject to the conditions contained in Section 10.
Section 10. The Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana, and the
Conditional Use Permit for a 7,150 square foot tennis court as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, and
approved in Sections 6 and 9, are subject to the following conditions:
A. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110 of the
Municipal Code.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit
approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be
suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the
applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to
do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
PAGE 3
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone in which the
subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in
the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these
conditions.
E. The property on which the cabana and court are located shall contain
an area of sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a
stable and corral with vehicular access thereto.
F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 15.0% and total lot coverage
of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 22.9%.
G. The pool cabana shall have no kitchen or cooking facilities.
H. All grading required for the construction of the court shall be
balanced, as regards cutting and filling and shall not exceed one thousand seven
hundred (1,700) cubic yards.
I. The area graded for the court shall not exceed 7,150 square feet in
size.
J. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent possible.
K. A drainage system shall be incorporated into the overall plan of the
court and landscaping, which drainage system shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
L. Existing shrubs and trees along the north side of the tennis court
shall be retained and maintained during construction of the court.
M. A sound baffle screen, along with landscape screening, shall be
provided for the tennis court and shall be maintained so as not to interfere with
the viewscape of the owners of surrounding property, nor shall it interfere with
the views of users of community easements.
N. A landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by the City of
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of any grading and
building permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose
and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature
trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible,
plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of
the community.
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
PAGE 4
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the
landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a
grading and building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than
two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the
City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was
installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such
landscaping is properly established and in good condition.
O. Court lighting shall not be permitted.
P. All retaining walls incorporated into the court shall not be greater than
two and a half (2.5) feet in height. Exposed exterior retaining walls shall not be
permitted.
Q. Noise from persons using the tennis court shall be kept to a minimum
so as not to unreasonably disturb the quiet enjoyment of persons on surrounding
properties.
R. The tennis court shall not be used for purposes of providing tennis
lessons by a tennis professional to persons outside the immediate family of the
owner.
S. Separate building permits shall be obtained for the pool cabana and the
tennis court.
T. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the Development Plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to
the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio.
U. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
V. The working drawings 'submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved
with this application.
W. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of this Conditional Use Permit to Section 17.32.087, or the approval shall not be
effective.
X. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit approval, except for
Condition B, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading
permit from the County of Los Angeles.
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 92-17
PAGE 5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH 2ND DAY OF MAY, 1992.
GALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
460.,AL,
td DIA E SAWYER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A POOL CABANA AND GRANTING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TENNIS COURT IN ZONING
CASE NO. 473.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the Planning
Commission on May 2, 1991 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay, Raine and
Chairman Roberts
None
None
ABSTAIN: None
degAArAdt, "i0,4a;)69.1.404.4.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK U
2017557
DEC 3 0 1992
CORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
d
By
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
1.
PIN'
PAST 4 P.M. NOV *2 1992
Recorder's Use
FEE $20 F�
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. .473A SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT X
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described
follows:
1 Morgan Lane (Lot 170-1-MS)
Rolling Hills, CA
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are)
said
aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions
ZONING CASE NO.
473A SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT y
as
in
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Print I�
Owner-,nGS.V`GC f't�f O ! W"
Name
G(/i//,$9Ri( '` /474p0 ignature
Address / iIitc ,,,'t}-N t N.
d/41; �,7/s C#
City/State
Address
City/State /I%G'��j �•�
U
�J
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of C, u cb(w13
County 0; ..PS 4\1)o cLss ,
OFFICIAL SEAL
ALANNA D. HANTGIN •
NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN •
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commislon Expires Nov. 16, 1993 •
SS.
er,:12
OQ
9veV t
On this the )._,day of F. -1 r1rn(3199Z, before me,
the Undersigned Notary Public, personally ;.appeared
t,0 1 f a L prrn . csg,
Ypersonally known to me
0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
O,inXin
Notary s Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
4 / /
92-2017557
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS REAPPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A POOL CABANA, REAPPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TENNIS COURT, AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 92-17 IN ZONING CASE NO. 473.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. William R. Hoover
with respect to real property located at 1 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 170-1-
MS) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a pool cabana and
requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a tennis court. The Planning
Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications
for the Conditional Use Permits on February 18, 1992, March 17, 1992, and April
28, 1992 and at,field trip visits on February 29, 1992 and March 28, 1992.
Section 2. The Commission approved Resolution No. 92-17 in Zoning Case
No. 473 on May 9, 1992. The City Council took the subject zoning case under
jurisdiction on May 11, 1992 and conducted a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the appeal of the applications on May 26, 1992, and June 8, 1992, and
at a field trip visit on May 26, 1992. The City Council remanded the subject case
back to the Planning Commission for consideration based on the Planning
Commission's policy related to structural calculations and building pad coverage,
and other similar projects previously proposed in the vicinity.
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on July 21, 1992 and August 18, 1992, and at a field trip visit on August
6, 1992. The purpose of the hearing was to reconsider the Development Plan for
the applications for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a pool cabana and a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a tennis court.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and adopted a Negative Declaration in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. The applicant has submitted plans for the construction of a
proposed detached 742 square foot pool cabana approximately 22 feet west of the
existing residence as shown in Exhibit A. Section 17.16.012.G of the Municipal
Code provides for the discretion of the Planning Commission to grant a
Conditional Use Permit for a detached pool cabana provided no kitchen or cooking
facilities are provided.
Section 6. With respect to the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
detached pool cabana, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan and would be desirable to the public convenience and welfare because the
proposed pool house would be located on the westerly edge of the building pad
which is not visually prominent and cannot be viewed from Morgan Lane.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
PAGE 2
92-2017557
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with similar recreational uses in the community. The area proposed
for the cabana will be located in an area of the property where such use will not
impact surrounding properties and will be in back of and screened by • the
existing single family residence.
C. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan, because the proposed project will comply with the low profile residential
development pattern of the City.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana in Zoning Case No.
473 subject to the conditions contained in Section 11.
Section 8. The applicant has submitted plans for the construction of a
7,082 square foot tennis court as shown in Exhibit A. Section 17.16.012.E of' the
Municipal Code provides for the discretion of the Planning Commission to grant
a Conditional Use Permit for a tennis court under certain conditions.
Section 9. With respect to the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a
tennis court, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for a tennis court would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the
use is consistent with similar recreational uses in the community, the area
proposed for the court will be located in an area of the property where such use
will be least intrusive to surrounding properties.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, because the
tennis court will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of
the community and is located on a 2.62 acre parcel of property that is adequate
in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use. This application is
distinguished from other tennis court applications because it will not result in
the overdevelopment of the building pad, will not encroach into a required side
or rear yard setback, and will not be visually obtrusive to surrounding and
adjacent residences.
C. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the
purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, because the
tennis court will not impact the view or the privacy of' neighbors and will not
be visible from neighboring properties. The tennis court will not be visible from
Morgan Lane and the gentle slope of the land still gives a feeling of spaciousness
to the pad. The tennis court will have a baffle screen which will be obscured
by landscaping. The new court will be 35 feet from the north property line and
adjacent to a paddle tennis court on neighboring property at 3 Morgan Lane.
92-P2017557
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
PAGE 3
Section 10. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for a 7,082 square foot tennis court
in accordance with the Development Plan attached hereto for a tennis court in
Zoning Case No. 473 subject to the conditions contained in Section 11.
Section 11. The Conditional Use Permit for a pool cabana, and the
Conditional Use Permit for a 7,082 square foot tennis court as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, and
approved in Sections 7 and 10, are subject to the following conditions:
A. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110 of the
Municipal Code.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit
approval, that if any conditions thereof' are violated, the Permit shall be
suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the
applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to
do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone in which the
subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in
the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these
conditions.
E. The property on which the cabana and court are located shall contain
an area of sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a
stable and corral with vehicular access thereto.
F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 15.0% and total lot coverage
of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 22.9%.
G. The overall building pad coverage, including the tennis court, shall not
exceed 34.89%.
H. The pool cabana shall have no kitchen or cooking facilities.
I. All grading required for the construction of the court shall be
balanced, as regards cutting and filling and shall not exceed one thousand seven
hundred (1,700) cubic yards.
J. The area graded for the court shall not exceed 7,082 square feet in
size.
K. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora and natural
features to the greatest extent possible.
•
92--2017557
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
PAGE 4
L. A drainage system shall be incorporated into the overall plan of the
court and landscaping, which drainage system shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
M. Existing shrubs and trees along the north side of the tennis court
shall be retained and maintained during construction of the court.
N. A sound baffle screen, along with landscape screening, shall be
provided for the tennis court and shall be maintained so as not to interfere with
the viewscape of the owners of surrounding property, nor shall it interfere with
the views of users of community easements.
0. A landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by the City of
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff prior to the issuance of any grading and
building permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose
and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature
trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible,
plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of
the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the
landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a
grading and building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than
two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the
City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was
installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such
landscaping is properly established and in good condition.
P. Court lighting shall not be permitted.
Q. All retaining walls incorporated into the court shall not be greater than
two and a half (2.5) feet in height. Exposed exterior retaining walls shall not be.
permitted.
R. Noise from persons using the tennis court shall be kept to a minimum
so as not to unreasonably disturb the quiet enjoyment of persons on surrounding
properties.
S. The tennis court shall not be used for purposes of providing tennis
lessons by a tennis professional to persons outside the immediate family of the
owner.
T. Separate building permits shall be obtained for the pool cabana and the
tennis court.
U. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the Development Plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be. submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to
the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio.
r
92-2017557
RESOLUTION NO. 92-26
PAGE 5
V. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
W. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved
with this application.
X. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of this Conditional Use Permit to Section 17.32.087, or the approval shall not be
effective.
Y. All conditions of this Conditional Use Permit approval, except for
Condition B, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading
permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED T - D DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
n-Ntr,LAy2A,„ kLeA/y.)
MARILYN KERNy DEPUTY CITY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-26 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS REAPPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A POOL CABANA, REAPPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TENNIS COURT, AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 92-17 IN ZONING CASE NO. 473.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the Planning
Commission on September 3, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioner Frost, Hawkins and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Lay and Raine
ABSTAIN: None
DEPUTY CIYY CLERK