422, Construct a gazebo in side yar, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 9n- zq
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO THE REQUIRED COMPLETION TIME
AS SPECIFIED IN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
IN ZONING CASE NO. 422
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Orrin
Pollock with respect to real property located at 6 Morgan Lane,
Rolling Hills (Lot 170-6-MS) requesting an extension to the required
completion time for Conditions of approval D,E, and F of Resolution
90-11, dated June 30, 1990. The completion time for such conditions
was to expire September 28, 1990.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to consider the application on September 18,
1990.
Section 3. After receiving public testimony and carefully
considering the facts and merits of Zoning Case No. 422, the Planning
Commission hereby approves a 60 day extension to November 27,1990 on
the completion time to comply with conditions D, E, and F of
Resolution 90-11.
1990.
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of October,
Deputy City Cle
� V
Allan Roberts, Chairman
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 90-11
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 422
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND. ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Orrin
Pollock with respect to real property located at 6 Morgan Lane,
Rolling Hills (Lot 170-6-MS) requesting a variance to the side yard
setback requirement to construct a detached accessory structure
(gazebo) and install mechanical equipment.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application on March 20, 1990, April
18, 1990, May 15, 1990 and June 19, 1990 and conducted a field site
review on April 7, 1990.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. Section 17.16.070 (A) requires a side yard setback in
the RAS- 2 to be 35 feet. The applicant is requesting to encroach
nine (9') feet into the westerly side yard setback to construct a
residential addition.
findings:
Section 4. The Planning Commission makes the following
A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property or to the intended
use that do not apply generally to the other property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone because the
location of the accessory structure and mechanical
equipment is suitable for the Site and there are no
appropriate alternative locations at the rear of the site
due to the topography of the site.
B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by
other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is
denied to the property in question because granting of the
variance will not be a special privilege since the subject
site is large and can accommodate detached accessory
structures that have been commonly constructed in the
neighborhood.
• •
C. The granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is located because th e improvements will have
only minor visual impact to the roadway and surrounding
properties, and other conditions have been incorporated to
address concerns of the Community Association.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 422 to
permit an encroachment to a maximum of nine (9') feet into the
westerly side yard as indicated in the Development Plan submitted
with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit
A, subject to the following conditions:
A. The variance to the side yard setbacks shall expire if
not used in one year from the effective date of approval as
defined and specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal
Code.
B. The building plan and mechanical plan must be approved
by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural
Committee before the applicant receives a building permit
from the County of Los Angeles.
C. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check must conform to the
Development Plan approved with the variance.
D. The existing entry gate shall be replaced subject to
approval of the Community Association. This matter shall
be resolved within ninety (90) days after the adoption of
this Resolution.
E. The existing masonry mailbox structure shall be removed
and replaced to a type subject to approval of the Community
Association. This matter shall be resolved within ninety
(90) days after the adoption of this Resolution.
F. The front easement shall be cleared of obstructions to
the satisfaction of the Community Association. This matter
shall be resolved prior to a period of ninety (90) days
after the adoption of this Resolution.
G.'Any modifications to the project which would constitute
a modification to the Development Plan as approved by the
Planning Commission, shall require the filing of an
application for modification of the Development Plan
pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code.
1990.
H. Applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of
all conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or this
variance shall not be effective.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 30th day of June ,
Chairman
ATTEST:
�GGr,2�L-Gravy
/City Clerk°