397, Extend kitchen area 82 sq ft, , Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
For Recorder'
•
. Use
l
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
89=1102618
Please record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's
before 'recordation.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
Office and
JFEE $7
Office requires that the form be notarized
Acceptance Form
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NOT
VARIANCE CASE NO. 3 9 -
I (We) the undersigned state_:
I -am(We are) the owner(s),- of the real property described
Ai- Age q :77AnA t
as follows:
This -property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
Conditional Use PermitCase No.*
Variance .Case No.
I (We) certify (or declare) under
foregoing is true' and correct
•
(Where the owner 'and applicant are
397
the penalty. of perjury that the
not the same, both must sign.)
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS Applicant Name
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
31 PA T12 P M. JUL
. 111
•
Type or/print
JaJ; • � , ./`'�oole.-e 04)e
Address 0 7 / ) b6' ,4) 04.4
•
1989 �
amity, State / / ` //-f-k`/J' (19a�75E
Signature
a �r c'
Owner NameLI'ZIJthJ A A. /'7,.�e, 5 1
said
1
Gf
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
Address""`0 ' `e3,8 /h 4,1 o
City, State a // /7/ 6.)-7
Signatur
9&2 71
•
CAT. NO. NN00627
TO 1944 CA (9-84)
(Individual)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF X2f a
(7,aer
a - /� a/Qd'q.
J TICOR TITLE INSURANCE
}ss.
89-1102618
n �v j ,before e, th u dersigned, a Vary Public in and for
said State, personally appeared
, personally known to me or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the persona whose name S ae subscrib d to the
within instrument and acknowledged that / cf exe-
cuted the same.
WITNESS my official seal.
Signa
OFFICIAL SEAL
BONINA M MAVAR
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES'CGUNTY
My comm. expires JUL 17, 1992
(This area for official notarial seal)
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LY DESCRIBED AS:
•
Those portions of Lot "H" of the Rancho Los Palos Verdes, in the City of .Rolling
Hills, in the county of Los Angeles, state of California, allotted to Jotham Bixby
by Decree of Partitiion in the action "Bixby, et al, vs Bent, et al," Case No. 2373
in the District Court of the 17th Judicial District of said State of California,
in and for said county of Los Angeles and entered in Book 4, Page 57 of Judgements,
in the Superior Court of saie county, described as follows:
Parcel 1:
Beginning at the Northeasterly corner of the land shown as Parcel No. 109, on map
filed in Record of Survey Book 58, Pages 6 to 10 inclusive, in the office of the
county recorder of said county; thence North 8.1°09'16" West 320.00 feet to the most
Northerly corner of said parcel and the center line of Road No. 15-A, as described
in Declaration of Restrictions No. 150-AF, recorded in Book 24097 Page 227, Official
Records of said county; thence along the Westerly boundary of_ said parcel and the
center line of said Road No. 15-A, the following courses and distances; Southerly
along a curve concave Easterly, having a radius of 250.00 feet and a radial line
of which passing through said last mentioned corner bears North 81°09'16" West, a
distance of 108.83 feet; South 16°05"43" East 28.84 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; Southeasterly
along said last mentioned curve 161.07 feet to the Southwesterly prolongation of the
center line of Road No. 17-A, as described in Declaration of Restrictions No. 150-AF;
thence, along said center line and prolongation, North 67°57'50" East 146.17 feet to
the beginning of a tangent curve in said last mentioned center line concave
Southeasterly and having a radius of 200.00 feet; thence along said last mentioned
curve 81.31 feet; to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel; thence, North 1°
15'29" East 152.61 feet, tb the point of beginning.
Said land is also known as Parcel 109, in Book 58, Page 6 of Record of Surveys.
Parcel 2:
An easement for road purposes, over the roads described in Declaration, of
Restricitons No. 150.AF, recorded in Book 24097, Page 227, Official Records of
said county.
Excepting therefrom that portion thereof lying within the above described Parcel
No. 1.
Said land is also known as Zero Open Brand Road, Rolling Hills, California.
89--110261
RESOLUTION NO. 89-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK IN ZONING
CASE NO. 397
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Dennis
Moore with respect to real property located at 0 Open Brand,
Rolling Hills (Lot 109-EF) requesting a variance to the front
yard setback requirement to construct a garage addition to the
existing nonconforming structure.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing to consider the application on May 16,
1989, and June 20, 1989 and conducted a field site review on
June 6, 1989.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030
permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to
other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from
making use of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. Pursuant to these Sections, the Planning Commission
finds that:
A. The existing residential structure already
encroaches into the front yard setback. The proposed
encroachment involves an expansion of the southeast
portion of the garage so that it will encroach twenty-
seven (27) feet into the front yard setback, which is
less than the existing nonconforming encroachment of
forty (40) feet.
B. Due to the shape and topography of the lot
and the existing developmental pattern, the garage can
not be expanded except in an easterly direction. The
proposed expansion would not extend the new structure
beyond the point at which the nonconforming
residential structure presently exists, meaning that
there will be no greater incursion into the front yard
than already exists on the property at this time.
C. In view of the topographical situation and
the presence of an existing incursion in the front
yard, there exists unique circumstances not generally
applicable to other properties in the same zone that
justify the continued encroachment.
• •
D. The grant of a variance under these
circumstances will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety and welfare and will be compatible with
surrounding properties and will be consistent with the
goals of the Zoning Ordinance.
Section 4. Based on the foregoing findings, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Case No. 397
with respect to real property located at 0 Open Brand Road to
permit an encroachment of 27 feet into the front yard setback as
indicated in the Development Plan submitted with this
application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A,
subject to the following conditions:
A. The variance to the front yard setback as
indicated on the Development Plan shall not be
effective if the existing residential structure is
demolished.
B. The variance to the front yard setback shall
expire if not used in one year from the effective
date of approval as defined and specified in
Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code.
C. The proposed building plan must be approved by the
Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural
Committee before the applicant receives a grading
permit from the County of Los Angeles.
D. Prior to the submittal of a final grading
plan to the County of Los Angeles, the
grading plan shall be submitted to the
Rolling Hills Planning Department Staff for
their review, along with related geology,
soils and hydrology reports. This grading
plan must conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission.
E. A landscape plan must be submitted to the City of
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for
approval. The landscaping plan submitted must
comply with the purpose and intent of the Site
Plan Review Ordinance. The landscaping plan shall
incorporate existing mature trees and native
vegetation. A bond in the amount of the cost
estimate for the landscaping plus 15% shall be
posted and retained with the City for not less
than two years after landscape installation. The
retained bond will be released by the City after
the City Manager determines that the landscaping
was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as
-2-
890707 lj 1680021 (2)
July
approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of
, 1989.
/s/ Allan Roberts
Chairman
ATTEST:
Deputy
-3-
890707 lj 1680021 (2)