Loading...
422, Construct a gazebo in side yar, Correspondencegr 10 • City O/ /eO/fLfl y J /11/6 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 October 31, 1990 Mr. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 422; Request for an Extension to the required completion time as specified in conditions of approval D, E and F of Resolution 90-11, dated June 30, 1990 in regards to the above stated property. Dear Mr. Pollock: This is to inform you that the City Council, at their meeting on October 29, 1990, received and filed the Planning Commission's approval of the above referenced planning/zoning case application. Pursuant to Section 17.32.087, Ordinance No. 207, an Affidavit of Acceptance form must be executed before the above approval becomes effective. A copy of the Resolution of Approval, specifying conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission, is enclosed for your information. Once you have reviewed the Resolution of Approval, please complete the enclosed Affidavit of Acceptance form, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the Affidavit to the Office of the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012, with a check in the amount of $ 7.00. When the Affidavit of Acceptance has been returned to the City, duly executed and recorded, the Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety will be notified that a permit can be issued. Please feel free to call Mr. Ray Hamada, Principal Planner, at 377-1521, if you have any questions. /jr Encls. Very truly, 7R Hamada P incipal Planner For Recor's Use RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's before recordation.) Office requires that the form be notarized Acceptance Form STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. VARIANCE CASE NO. 422 (Resolution #90-33) I (We) the undersigned state: I am"(We are) the owner(s). of'the real property described as follows: 6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, CA '90274 (Lot 170-6-MS) This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said Conditional Use Permit Case No. Variance Case No. 422 (Resolution 490-33) I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of "perjury that the foregoing is true'and correct; (Where the owner•.and applicant. are not the same, both must sign.) Type or print Applicant Name Address City, State Signature Owner Name Address City, State Signature This signature must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach appropriate acknowledgement. • c Nu�r C14( DD��'o� g s October 10, 1990 Mr. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377.1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 422; Request for an extension to the required completion time to expire September 28, 1990 as specified in Conditions of Approval D, E and F of Resolution 90-11 Dear Mr. Pollock: Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 (enclosed) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter shall serve as official notification that the above -stated Zoning Case application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of September 18, 1990. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted to approve the request for an extension to the required completion time to expire September 28, 1990 as specified in Conditions of Approval D, E and F of Resolution 90-11. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on October 29, 1990. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code. A copy of Resolution 614, establishing the fee for filing an appeal, is also enclosed for your information. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, CI Y OF LLING HILLS ay amada Principal Planner Encls /jr CC: Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager • • Orrin L. Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 August 28, 1990 Mr. Allan Roberts City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Ref: Compliance with Conditions for Zoning Case #422 Dear Mr. Roberts, This letter is to let the Planning Commission know that been working to solve the three conditions of compliance as stated in your letter of August 21, 1990, within the 90 day time period. Following is the current status: I have 1. The front easement has been cleared of obstruction to the satisfaction of the Community Association. It was cleared months before the July 9, 1990, approval of the gazebo. 2. The mailbox condition was submitted to the Architectural Committee and Community Association and has been approved as submitted (See Exhibit #1). 3. The entry gate condition has been turned down by the Architectural Committee and Community Association. I am, at this time, trying to find a solution. My next step is to go before the Rolling Hills Community Association Board of Directors to appeal the decision made by the Architectural Committee. At this time I am requesting an extension of my 90 days as my wife and I have planned a vacation from September 10, 1990 to October 10, 1990. I am under the assumption that since the Community Association brought the three matters of concern to you in a letter dated June 7, 1990, that if they approve these items, the matter will be put to rest. I should then be able to file the variance with the County of Los Angeles, take a permit out with the County Building Department and end the matter in good standing. Sincerely, Orrin L. Pollock Ciiy 0/ leo/tiny Jiiit August 21, 1990 Mr. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS AS PER RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR ZONING CASE NO. 422; 6 Morgan Lane,Lot 170-6-MS Dear Mr. Pollock: This letter shall serve to remind you regarding the compliance of conditions attached to the Resolution of Approval for your request in Zoning Case No. 422. As you are aware, three (3) conditions of approval called out a period of ninety (90) days from the adoption of the Resolution (June 30, 1990) in order to resolve the stated concerns. The three conditions of approval are as follows and a copy of the Resolution is again attached for your reference: 1. [Ref: Section 5 (D)] The existing entry gate shall be replaced subject to approval of the Community Association. This matter shall be resolved within ninety (90) days after the adoption of this Resolution. 2. [Ref: Section 5 (E)] The existing masonry mailbox structure shall be removed and replaced to a type subject to approval of the Community Association. This matter shall be resolved within ninety (90) days after the adoption of this Resolution. 3. [Ref: Section 5 (F)] The front easement shall be cleared of obstructions to the satisfaction of the Community Association. This matter shall be resolved within ninety (90) days after the adoption of this Resolution. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at City Hall. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Hamada Principal Planner Attachment c?otL'in9 c tLZZ. Community of CRQ/2efio atos. ` VE'LQC1 No. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. • ROLLING HILLS. (213) 377-1521 ROLLING HILLS 3 TO: PROPERTY OWNER ARCHITECT • lloeiafion CALIF. 90274 CALIFORNIA FROM: DOLORES COSENZA ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE SECRETARY Enclosed are Architectural Committee Minutes concerning plans submitted for the Committee's review. If you have any questions concerning the Minutes, please call me at 377-1521. ORRIN POLLOCK 6 Morgan Lane r1-(1 -Ok 170-6-MS "As built" mailbox is consistent with neighborhood. "As built" entry gate not approved. Refer to previously submitted approved design. �i`u O /eOfffl4„ALLY INCORPORATE[ JANUARY 24, 1957 0 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 July 12, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RE: ZONING CASE NO. 422: For approving a Variance to the side yard setback requirement to construct a detached accessory structure (gazebo) and install mechanical equipment located at 6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, Lot 170-6-MS Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pollock: This is to inform you that the City Council, at their meeting on July 9, 1990, voted to ratify the Planning Commission's approval of the above referenced planning/zoning case application. Pursuant to Section 17.32.087, Ordinance No. 207, an Affidavit of Acceptance form must be executed before the above approval becomes effective. A copy of the Resolution of Approval, specifying conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission, is enclosed for your information. Once you have reviewed the Resolution of Approval, please complete the enclosed Affidavit of Acceptance form, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the Affidavit to the Office of the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012, with a check in the amount of $ 9.00. When the Affidavit of Acceptance has been returned to the City, duly executed and recorded, the Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety will be notified that a permit can be issued. Please feel free to call Mr. Ray Hamada, Principal Planner, at 377-1521, if you have any questions. /jr Encls. Very tru Ray (iamada Principal Planner For Recorder's use RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.) Acceptance Form STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE N0: VARIANCE CASE NO. 422 SITE PLAN REVIEU CASE NO. I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s). of the real property described as follows: 6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (lot 170-6-MS) This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I_ am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said Conditional Use Permit Case No. Variance Case No. Site Plan Review Case No. 422 • I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct:. (Where the owner .and applicant.are not the same, both must sign.) Type or print Applicant Name Address City, State City ol Rolling June 27, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 422; Request for Variance to encroach into the Side Yard Setback to construct a detached accessory structure and to install mechanical equipment at the property located at 6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, Lot 170-6-MS. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Pollock: Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 (enclosed) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter shall serve as official notification that the above -stated Zoning Case application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of June 19, 1990. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted to approve the request for a Variance. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on July 9, 1990. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code. A copy of Resolution 614, establishing the fee for filing an appeal, is also enclosed for your information. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray 4iamada Principal Planner Encls /jr cc: Mr. Douglas Mc Hattie, South Bay Engineering Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager edv June 11, 1990 Mr. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 a� R0f1L Jd•fF, Subject: Zoning Case No. 422 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 Dear Mr. Pollock: The City has corresponded with you previously in an effort to confirm resolution of violations specified by the Rolling Hills Community Association and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. The City is in receipt of a letter (attached) from the Community Association indicating that some of the violations have been taken care of, but three violations remain unresolved. To this date, the City has not received any further confirmation from you that the said violations regarding the gate and mail box have been corrected. As you will recall, in the letter sent to from the City, dated May 17, 1990, the Planning Commission continued your application indefinitely. A revised legal advertisement has now been published for public hearing to have the Commission address the installation of the mechanical equipment within the side yard setback of your lot. The date set for the revised public hearing is Tuesday, June 19, 1990 at 7:30 p.m., and you should have already received by mail the revised notice. Yourself and/or a representative should be present. As previously corresponded, the Commission directed staff to confer with you regarding the correction of violations prior to an action of the Commission. Your immediate attention is required on this matter in order for Zoning Case No. 422 to proceed. Please contact this office should you have any further questions. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS - Ray 'iamada Principal Planner Attachment • c?ofLin9 c4fifil Community lloaiation of S'aneizo Jn-aLos. (Vezc&es. No. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. • ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 ROLLING HILLS Mr. Allan Roberts Chairman, Planning Commission 7 Southfield Drive Rolling Hills, CA. 90274 RE: Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Dear Allan: CALIFORNIA In response to your staff's request, the Association's Architectural Inspector has reviewed the Pollock file and property and can confirm that the fencing, rocks, and sprinklers have been removed from the easements. Three violations remain unresolved: 1) Gazebo built without a building permit; 2) Gate installation of an unapproved iron gate, (the gate columns and another gate design were submitted and approved; however, Mr. Pollock installed an elaborate gate that is not aesthetically acceptable for Rolling Hills use.) 3) Mail Box: Building Regulations state "mail box posts shall be 4" X 4" posts painted approved white." Complaints have been received that the mail box support structure is large and interferes with access uses preserved for all Members of the Association. Please let us know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, t Peggy R. Minor Manager do cc: Sid Croft, Attorney r., • C'ily 0/ Ailing _WS, May 17, 1990 Mr. Orrin Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT:ZONING CASE NO. 422 Dear Mr. Pollock: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting held May 15, 1990, continued the above -stated application indefinitely, and directed staff to confer with the applicant regarding the request for correction of violations specified by the Rolling Hills Community Association in their letter dated March 27, 1990 (attached) and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works in their letter dated May 3, 1990 (attached). Please arrange a meeting with City staff to discuss this matter. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS teli Ray Hamada Principal Planner cc Peggy Minor, RHCA (2131 377-1521 e ., „„ cRo((in9 &ti s. Community o'gss.ociation of Si'ane&o Palos %sells No. 2 PORTUGUCSC BEND Ro. • ROLLING HILLS. CALIF-. 90274 ROLLING HILLS March 27, 1990 CALIFORNIA FILE Mr. Allan Roberts Chairman, Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills Dear Allan: Re: Orrin Pollock - 6 Morgan Lane It is my understanding that Mr. Orrin Pollock has submitted an application for approval of an accessory structure on his pro- perty. As Terry and I frequently discuss violations of joint concern, he suggested I relay areas of concern the Association has with respect to Mr. Pollock's property. 1) A satellite antenna was approved April 18, 1988 provided "it was screened with 7' high myroporums 3' wide and 5' high, planted in semi -circle behind satellite antenna as discussed with Elwood Landscaping". In fact, the antenna was installed shortly thereafter; however, inadequate planting still has not screened the antenna despite numerous contacts with the property owner. 2) Entry posts and gate were approved April 18, 1988. The posts were built per plan; however, the.gate installed has no re- semblance to the approved gate. 3) Fencing, rocks and sprinklers were placed across the front of the Pollock property in the easement. Roger gave notice to Mr. Pollock on November 4, 1988 to remove a 20' section of fence. Another notice was given on August 18, 1989. When no response was forthcoming, the matter was referred to the Association Legal Counsel. The fence section was removed following contact by Mr. Croft; however, the large rocks still remain in the easement. In the summer of 1989, Planning Commissioners informed Association Board members about the easement obstructions on the property. It is my understanding they saw them when tak- ing a field trip to the adjacent property. • March 27, 1990 Mr. Allan Roberts Chairman, Planning Commission Page Two Mr. Pollock's violations caused much confusion to the other new residents on the street as he was the first resident when the other homes were sold. The new residents saw his fence, rocks and sprinklers in the easement and proceeded to follow his lead. Each resident has been contacted about fence locations and have complied by removing their fences from the easements. They have not removed their rocks to date. At the present time, the matter is in the hands of the Associa- tion Legal Counsel, Sid Croft, as follows: 1) Unscreened Satellite Antenna (the City also has an Ordinance requiring screening); 2) Large Rocks in Easement; 3) Unapproved Front Entry Gate. Please let me know if you have any questions or need to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, Peggy R. Minor Manager CC: CC: Sid Croft Terry Belanger • COUNTY Y OF W, A1VGELES TOARTMENT OF PUBLIC WAS 144 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMIRA, CALIFORNIA 11an-1331 Telephone:MR 45$ 31M THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director CECIL E. RUCH, add Deputy Director MAS NACAMI, Assistant Director May 3, 1990 City of Rolling Hills #2 Portugese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Attention Mr. Ray Hamada ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1/6. ALHAMBRA. CALIFORNIA 11M2•14N M REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: Dear Ray: As per your telephone request of April 26, 1990, we have coduct- ed a permit records search of #6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, California to determine if an air conditioning permit has been issued. Our records show the approval of the installation of a 250,000 BTU forced air heater with a 2,000 CFM fan as part of the construction of a new residence finaled August 29, 1988. There is no permit for the installation of an air conditioning compressor in our files. Air conditioning compressors do require a mechanical permit as per the uniform mechanical code. Very truly yours, T.A. TIDEMANSON Director of Public Works Ed Acos District Engineer Associate !pigmy-% MAY 0 7 1990 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS BY Ate- TO: FROM: i i Cii.y `/e0/14, Jl'fL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1321 MR. ORRIN POLLOCK, 6 MORGAN LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The plan for: ZONING CASE NO. 422 Applicant: POLLOCK Address: (a) (b) (c) (d) 6 MORGAN LANE, ROLLING HILLS Complies with City Zoning requirements Needs Variance ( Contact City for application and Contact City for application and Contact City for application and Needs Conditional Use Permit Needs Site Plan Review (e) XX Other (see below) submittal submittal submittal requirements. requirements. requirements. The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting to be held Tuesday, May 15, 1990 at 7:30 p.m., will hear Zoning Case No. 422 as a continued public hearing. The property owner and/or a rep- resentative should be present. MAY 7, 1990 ku /Ray Hamada Principal Planner CCIVNTY OF LOS ANGE140S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director CECIL E. BUGH, Chief Deputy Director MAS NAGAMI, Assistant Director May 3, 1990 City of Rolling Hills #2 Portugese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Attention Mr. Ray Hamada ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802.1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: Dear Ray: As per your telephone request of April 26, 1990, we have coduct- ed a permit records search of #6 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, -California to determine if an air conditioning permit has been issued. Our records show the approval of the installation of a 250,000 BTU forced air heater with a 2,000 CFM fan as part of the construction of a new residence finaled August 29, 1988. There is no permit for the installation of an air conditioning compressor in our files. Ail" conditioning compressors do require a mechanical permit as per the uniform mechanical code. Very truly yours, T.A. TIDEMANSON Director of Public Works Ed Acos District Engineer Associate gTgw1E).-0 MAY 0 7 1990 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS BY (213) 377-1521 • c�o��in9 dilln Community of J?ancI o Jn- aLos (%vcdes NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. • ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 ROLLING HILLS March 27, 1990 Mr. Allan Roberts Chairman, Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills- lloeiation CALIFORNIA ':G Dear Allan: Re: Orrin Pollock - 6 Morgan Lane It is my understanding that Mr. Orrin Pollock has submitted an application for approval of an accessory structure on his pro- perty. As Terry and I frequently discuss violations of joint concern, he suggested I relay areas of concern the Association has with respect to Mr. Pollock's property. 1) A satellite antenna was approved April 18, 1988 provided "it was screened with 7' high myroporums 3' wide and 5' high, planted in semi -circle behind satellite antenna as discussed with Elwood Landscaping". In fact, the antenna was installed shortly thereafter; however, inadequate planting still has not screened the antenna despite numerous contacts with the property owner. 2) Entry posts and gate were approved April 18, 1988. The posts were built per plan; however, the gate installed has no re- semblance to the approved gate. 3) Fencing, rocks and sprinklers were placed across the front of the Pollock property in the easement. Roger gave notice to Mr. Pollock on November 4, 1988 to remove a 20' section of fence. Another notice was given on August 18, 1989. When no response was forthcoming, the matter was referred to the Association Legal Counsel. The fence section was removed following contact by Mr. Croft; however, the large rocks still remain in the easement. In the summer of 1989, Planning Commissioners ,informed. Association Board members .about .the.easdment obstructions on the property. It is my :understanding they saw them .when 'tak- ing a field tripto the adjacent property. • • March 27, 1990 Mr. Allan Roberts Chairman, Planning Commission Page Two Mr. Pollock's violations caused much confusion to the other new residents on the street as he was the first resident when the other homes were sold. The new residents saw his fence, rocks and sprinklers in the easement and proceeded to follow his lead. Each resident has been contacted about fence locations and have complied by removing their fence from the easements. They have not removed their rocks to date. At the present time, the matter is in the hands of the Associa- tion Legal Counsel, Sid Croft, as follows: 1) Unscreened Satellite Antenna (the City also has an Ordinance requiring screening); 2) Large Rocks in Easement; 3) Unapproved Front Entry Gate. Please let me know if you have any questions or need to discuss this matter further. Very truly yours, Peggy R. Minor Manager CC: CC: Sid Croft Terry Belanger TO: • aly • ./ leoffin9. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 MR. ORRIN POLLOCK, 6 MORGAN LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 FROM: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SUBJECT: The -plan -for: GAZEBO STRUCTURE IN FRONT YARD AREA PROPERTY OWNER: ApplIsanf: ORRIN POLLOCK Address: 6 MORGAN LANE (a) Complies with City Zoning requirements (b) Needs Variance ( Contact City for application (c) Needs Conditional Use Permit Contact City for application (d) Needs Site Plan Review Contact City for application (e) xx Other (see below) and submittal requirements, and submittal requirements. and submittal requirements. SUBMIT SITE PLAN, WHICH INDICATES LOCATION AND SIZE OF GAZEBO STRUCTURE TO CITY FOR REVIEW. (Aith. K 5 iu.,# 76 G e1/-g' /1-7.e G022164,014�. /J!/ .5;4 pal -AD /US.,i,A xvLi•T 001,410 4.4we. eltdit2 f t , S% /c ao 4,4719fAree. ate_A)AkeL- FEBRUARY 5. 1990 ku 13(ay Hamada Principal Planner 1�' 2c33t"