Loading...
503, Construct 2 trellis, one on th, Correspondence• Cify /20fA4 .wee, CERTIFIED MAIL February 15, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 503, 7 MORGAN LANE (LOT 170-4-MS) DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT TWO SEPARATE TRELLISES TO BE CONSTRUCTED, ONE AT THE EAST END OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WITH EACH TRELLIS ENCROACHING. INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS. APPEAL PERIOD - RESOLUTION NO. 94-5 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dodson: This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission's decision to deny the subject application was reported to the City Council at their meeting on February 14, 1994. The denial will become effective thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code attached). We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 94-5, specifying the findings for the denial set forth by the Planning Commission and the denied site plan to keep for your files. You may call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO. 94-5, Denied Site Plan, and Appeal Section of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code cc: Mr. Jim Bartz RESOLUTION NO. 94-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO SEPARATE TRELLISES, ONE AT THE EAST END OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WITH EACH TRELLIS ENCROACHING INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS IN ZONING CASE NO. 503. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson with respect to real property located at 7 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 170-4-MS) requesting Variances to construct two separate trellises, one at the east end of the existing single-family residence and one at the west side of the property. The east trellis would be attached to the house and encroach 15 feet into the side yard setback. The west trellis would be detached from the house and encroach 17 feet into the side yard setback. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for a Variance on December 21, 1993 and January 18, 1994, and at a field trip visit on January 15, 1994. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 3 exemption provided by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Section 17.38.010(A) permits approval of a Variance. from the standards and requirements of the Zoning 'Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.120(B)(1) is required to construct a trellis addition to the residence in the thirty-five (35) foot side yard setback along the east side of the property. The applicant is requesting a 320 square foot trellis addition at the east end of the residence that will encroach up to a maximum of 15 feet into the east side yard setback. The Planning Commission finds: A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The Variance is not necessary because most of the residence is not constructed within required setbacks, the trellis addition as proposed would create a visual impact from easements and trails, • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-5 PAGE 2 and there is ample space outside of setback areas to construct a trellis. B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because most surrounding properties are developed within required setbacks and trellis structures in side yard setbacks are not a predominant development pattern in the City. In addition, the proposedtrellis addition would result in a building pad coverage of 45% that the Planning Commission finds to be excessive. C. The granting of this Variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located because the proposed additions do not minimize structural encroachments. The proposed Variance would allow the proposed trellis addition to be closer to other existing residences than appropriate for the required setbacks and leaves even less open space between easements and structures. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies the request for a Variance approval for a 320 square foot trellis addition at the east end of the residence that will encroach up to a maximum of 15 feet into the east side yard setback. Section 6. A Variance to Section 17.16.120(B)(1) is required to construct a free-standing trellis in the thirty-five (35) foot side yard setback along the west side of the property. The applicant is requesting a 190 square foot trellis at the west end of the pool deck that will encroach up to a maximum of 17 feet into the west side yard setback. The Planning Commission finds:. A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The Variance is not necessary because most of the residence is constructed within required setbacks, the trellis as proposed would visually impact the adjacent easement and trail, and would be visible from the street. There is ample space outside the setback areas to construct a trellis. B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because most surrounding properties are developed within required setbacks and trellis structures in side yard setbacks are not a predominant develo ment pattern i the City. In addition, the proposed trellis would result in abuilding • i RESOLUTION NO. 94-5 PAGE 3 pad coverage of 45% that the Planning Commission finds to be excessive. C. The granting of this Variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located because the proposed additions do not minimize structural encroachments. The proposed Variance would allow the proposed trellis to be closer to other existing residences than appropriate for the required setbacks and leaves even less open space between easements and structures. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies the request for a Variance to permit the construction of a trellis at the west side of the property within the side yard setback and denies a request for a Variance to permit the construction of a trellis addition at the east end of the residence within the side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 503. PASSED., APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI TRDAY OFnFEBRUARY, 1994. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYINII‘dgr4 DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ss I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-5 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO SEPARATE TRELLISES, ONE AT THE EAST END OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WITH EACH TRELLIS ENCROACHING INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS IN ZONING CASE NO. 503. • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-5 PAGE 4 was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission. on February 5, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: Chairman Lay ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY CLERK 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 17.54.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 P 852 865 110 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to m , Y- mrs . 1 ism., Street and No. 77 /2,4 r5a 4-P-71- -1 P. State and ZIP Code Postage Si, G 7 /.O0. Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered /e©O N cowReturn Receipt sh6wrrtg,xo-Whorii,„ v- Date, and Address o�Deliver , S I TOTAL Postage_antl FeeeS S i,,, 3,<,7 o t; ow Postmark or Date E r',,. 0 LL n. a O SENDER: :0 • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the H • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra h • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): > h. return this card to you. '' a. d • • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address coa. does not permit. a d ▪ • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date v c delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. ar. O • 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Art cle Number " o. /'• &its, j-e,'-97&.1, l-S 4b. Service Type ❑ Registered ❑Insured cc 8/���Yrto �" " " �) G��a mac/ Certified ❑ COD y cn l• ei/4 - /47�3 / / ❑ Express Mail CI Return Receipt for o cc Merchandise c oo 7. Date o Delive y 4- a Z, C. /1/o . 5® 3 cr S..--Sig ture (Ad ssee) 8. Address e's Ad re s ( my if requested ,ote I- / �G -l-_ and fee is paid) _ W H 6. nature (Agent) o . u) PS Form 3811, December 1991 * U.S.G.P.O.: 1992-307-530 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • • w C1i ofieoffing J/f January 21, 1994 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 503, 7 MORGAN LANE (LOT 170-4-MS) REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT TWO SEPARATE TRELLISES TO BE CONSTRUCTED, ONE AT THE EAST END OF THE EXISTING SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WITH EACH TRELLIS ENCROACHING INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dodson: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 503 was DENIED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on January 18, 1994. The final Resolution and findings of DENIAL will be forwarded to you after they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on February 8, 1994. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty days after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. OLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLA cc: Mr. James Bartz tor Printed on Recycled Paper. • 111 Ci1 o RJ in December 28, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 503: A request for Variances to permit two separate trellises to be constructed, one at the end of the existing single-family residence, with each trellis encroaching into the side yard setbacks at 7 Morgan Lane (Lot 170-4-MS). Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dodson: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection 'of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, January 15, 1994. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at 14 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road and then proceed to your project site. Do not expect the Commission at 7:30 AM, but be assured that the field trip will take place before 11 AM. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the proposed pro-iect showing the roof ridge and posts. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 041‘. ZZG LOLA M .. UNG PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Jim Bartz Mr. Rudy Alegre ®Panted on R.2ov^.Ied Pap. r, • City o/ RO// Jl•Ff, INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. • • • • i SECTION tit PLAN M la • • o� �o Cu.o//E'J/ Alto IC v NOTIFICATION LETTER December 9, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 503: A request for Variances to permit two separate trellises to be constructed, one at each end of the existing single-family residence, with each trellis encroaching into the side yard setback for property at 7 Morgan Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 170-4-MS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dodson: Yourr application for Zoning Case No. 503 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, December 21, 1993. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Roiling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, December 17, 1993. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLAI(ER cc:. Mr. Jim Bartz Printed on Recycled Paper. • • C1iy opeolli,.g Jd,PP, November 18,.1993 Mr. and Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: STATUS OF APPLICATION FOR ZONING CASE NO. 503, 7 MORGAN LANE (LOT 170-4-MS) SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 28, 1993: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO PERMIT TWO SEPARATE TRELLISES TO BE CONSTRUCTED, ONE AT EACH END OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE, WITH EACH TRELLIS ENCROACHING INTO SIDE YARD SETBACKS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Dodson: After submittal of the subject application., further preliminary review has been completed by the City's staff and pursuant to state law we find that the information submitted is: X Not Complete. The application has been held in abeyance because certain information is missing, you failed to comply with certain requirements, or both. The information needed to complete the application is listed below, and must be supplied before the application can be deemed complete. Additional Information/Requirements': 1. Include computation of pad coverage for each individual building pad in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (Form attached). 2. Provide vicinity map drawn to scale. Requested improvements should be dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 3. Please provide 15 sets of a revised plot plan stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor OR provide Requirement No. 2 (above) on sticky -back paper to fit space at bottom left-hand corner of submitted plot plans. If you can provide these requirements by Monday, December 6, 1993, there will be time to advertise your project for a public hearing for the December Planning Commission meeting. ® Prnnted on Recycled Pan.r PAGE 2 You may call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions about the application process. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Jim Bartz COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenc l osed) , stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Ccmrnmity Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purpose of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress- and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. C.CMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA." Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing buildina pad and any other contiguous potion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or Less. Site Plan Review Application -6- • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVE.A E BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CTOTA L) BUILDING PAD(S) sq.ft. sa.ft. sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sa.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. ' sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % % % % PAD COVERAGE(WT,4L) _. -__Q Q DRIVEWAY sq.ft. . sa.ft. sa.ft. PAVED WALKS & PATIO AREAS sa.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. -7- • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD.NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA --_— . _-- sQ • f } . RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE. sq.ft.