Loading...
827, Conversion of existing stable , ApplicationThis page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD i iu 20100257200 U 01111 UI 111111011 I 011 101011011 Recorded/Fled in Off cia Records Recorder's Off'ce, Los Angeles County, California I IA 01 225192000 1111 00197767 11111111 uni 002557233 SEQ: 01 1111 02/26/10 AT 01:47PM i i DAR - Counter (Hard Copy) 11110101 IIllIllIlllI0I 111 01111 01101111 1111011 111110111101111101111111111 1111011111111111 11111 111111111111111110111111011111111 11111111111 01111 11 1111 THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED E48$723 P0011: FEES: 45.00 TAXES: 0.00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 45.00 RECORDING REQUESTED BY ANC MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 021'E1201(, \\I � *20100257200* T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE NO. 776 SITE PLAN REVIEW XX I (We) the undersigned state: ) §§ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT XX I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 1 LOWER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 46-RH) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said SITE PLAN REVIEW XX ZONING CASE NO. 776 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT XX I (We) certify (or d lare) under the penalty of perjury that t foregoing is tru--a d orrect. ---D13-.:f?,, -') .f--"------g=1"..__._. Of' ,- _ S �nature D e Name typed or pri d Name typed o printed ress City/State Addres �,G Q2 (//4 fl// ' (J i(/A ,942.725 City/State • • Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 2010-03 State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On - ,214‘ /U before me, � r r�Tlok/ 14141lEL - ►" -i1-1 L n,4/ — Meng -KW POSUC Personally appeared Q4v10. L. n lfJf AEIC HRI6 t_&_1 A • nEkiEF who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/ her /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary ( Seal) ANNTIONET HAZEL-MAE DAY Commission 0 1832870 z Notary Public - California a Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Jan 24, 2013 r "+.✓ ..r•,•yy.-r•yY'V"'y'•W yr w V REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: IM. . . s4 1,v(Z5 . Nat ) OWNER'S ADDRESS: C I- L) N, TELEPHONE NO: 31O - 540 `- O 4" 7 EMAIL: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: t"IeIU1{ ON. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: C t j• 4 t J _ L 11,E • AGENT'S ADDRESS: iSVoc fp 4)Art_p‘PWILkas `rO2 11 TELEPHONE NO: 3 (Q ~ S 41 — P 4 cl 0 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: A 3 bk- c rt tit i1`I4 ! + ..3-7- in IL Vv.- -12- VITM [�DS AU6 2 0 2012 City of Rolling Hills By Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footagelL-. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. -13- E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. -14- I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria eval ation to th- best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true an co e• '(o est of� my knowledge and belief. Date: �� l ► Signatu w For: C • 'RAN 1Z 1 L 0, Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -15- OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare u rider penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this day of /Cl� By: By: ✓ U`� , California, ,20 t� 4t at -kJ -LION. Address City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: G' 440tlie.1 t DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: D 0 '3 3 tei ZONING CASE NO jz 43n {erg > 9- NI t TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (V )54-1 -MAD PROJECT ADDRESS: .'.l Lflri,r - t ' - ctt--n--fU -22- • s OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this (k Ci9 day of Address O L LI! k H LL.S City , California ,2012-- -23- 01-d Reeeeft9 qieed INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed Zoning Case No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) G CU,9 } (j 1 Es (ilx _ Tel. (310 ) 5 4-1 " 7490 Address ID. (al C29-%$C Q PA -ten 9 0271- 2. Legal Owner(s) l it * b . 1)140a. b Tel. (31 L9) 5 4 ^ O 11"3 7 Address L U Li N 3. Project Address ) L„E L). b( G 9IV Assessor's Book No. Lot No. 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site At ill lN, PROTECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 8. Net lot area I 1 l c f�e.1 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures s� 10. Number of floors of construction 1 11. Basement square footage P� • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? Proposed? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? Proposed? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? Explain g• Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Explain h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a. maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Explain Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or Tess? Stable and corral average vehicular access slope Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut . Amount fill (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet . Percentage of Net Lot Area 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 2 i 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 3 • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 29. Is the proposed protect consistent with: City of Rolling Hilts General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the followina studies been submitte ii? Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report _ Traffic Study Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 4 Yes No _ Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis _ Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 5 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 6 Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than • Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact • Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including ❑ 0 but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character 0 ❑ or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare ❑ ❑ which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 0 ❑ CI ❑ ❑ IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 ❑ ❑ resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997).prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ❑ ❑ CI 0 Ill. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ 0 0 ❑ applicable air quality plan? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporation b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially 0 0 0 0 to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ❑ Cl 0 ❑ criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ 0 0 ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ❑ ❑ ❑ of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any .riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ ❑ 0 0 wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 ❑ ❑ 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting ❑ biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ❑ ❑ Less 19't�ii Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 ❑ 0 of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ 0 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ iv) Landslides? 0 ❑ 0 ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 ❑ 0 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use 0 ❑ ❑ 0 of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 ❑ ❑ 0 loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 • Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste 0 0 0 ❑ discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0 ❑ interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would 0 0 0 ❑ exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area 0 ❑ 0 as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area . structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? CI ❑ ❑ ❑ i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ 0 0 ❑ Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Potentially Significant Impact 11111 Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important ❑ ❑ 0 0 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 0 0 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 ❑ ❑ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ❑ 0 0 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 12 • Potentially Significant Impact • Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 13 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 0 ❑ relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ 0 0 ❑ service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 ❑ 0 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a). Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 14 • • Potentially Significant Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XCVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from ❑ areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair ❑ the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause ❑ significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ El CI ❑ ❑ 12 CI CI CI Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7.Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE. AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date For Signature Applicant -17- NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date For Signature Applicant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -18- CERTIFED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, MARIA ISLAS declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as follows: Property address: #1 Lower Blackwater Canyon, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 APN #: 7569-014-001 Legal description: Lots 45 & 46, Rolling Hills Tract Date: Signed: Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 20th day of August 20 12 , by Maria Islas , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Signature (Seal) 0 FRANCENE 0. URALMAN NOTARY PUSLIO• CALIFORNIA 0 Commission No. 1922081 LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Exp. February 12, 2015 F • • SROUR & ASSOCIATES, LLC Business and Real Estate Development Services 1001 Sixth Street, Suite 110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Email address srourllc@esrour.com 310/372-8433 • FAX 310/372-8894 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 20, 2012 TO: City of Rolling Hills Attn: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 ' FROM: Maria Islas RE: Submitted on behalf of C.W. Howe, Inc. #1 Lower Blackwater Canyon ATTACHMENT: Radius Map and Ownership Materials Give me a call if anything further is needed. THANK YOU! Maria Islas RECE[VED AUG 211 2C 2 City or Moiling Hills By . attachment cc: PA W ORD\MAPPING\MASTERS\Mmo-RH.DOC August 20, 2012 OSROUR & ASSOCIATES, LL Business and Real Estate Development Services 1001 Sixth Street, Suite 110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 e-mail address: srourllc@esrour.com 310/372-8433 ■ Fax 310/372-8894 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION for Property address: #1 Lower Blackwater Canyon, Rolling Hills Legal: Lots 45 & 46, Rolling Hills Tract APN: 7569-014-001 PREPARED FOR: C.W. HOWE, INC. PO Box 3369 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 ATTACHMENTS: Notarized affidavit dated August 20, 2012 Updated List of property owners and mailing addresses within 1000' of subject property prepared in format required by the City Map dated October 29, 2009, depicting properties within affected area and keyed to owners list Triplicate sets of mailing labels to affected owners File copy for City and Architect P:\WORD\MAPPING\MASTERS\p jcv-rh update.DOC [5) C w V� L !f// AUG 2 0 2012 City of Rolling Hills By LOG NUMBER F Exec,Eilf�/e Express 1-800-540-0600 ORANGE CO. RIVERSIDE CO. LONG BEACH (949) 852-0600 (909) 275-0600 (562) 437-0600 LOS ANGELES CO. LOS ANGELES CO. SAN DIEGO CO. (310) 558-0800 (213).272-2086 (619) 280-0600 DAT CUSTOMER CODE AUTHORIZED BY Type of Service — Please Mark Below 0 SPRINT: Package is picked up and delivered directly or as soon as possible. ❑ SPECIAL: Package is picked up and delivered within three hours. ❑ STANDARD: Package is picked up and delivered within five hours. 0 MID -DAY: Package ready by 11:00 a.m. wit be delivered the same day by 5:00 p.m. 0 OVERNIGHT: Package ready for pick up by 5:00 p.m. will be delivered the following day by noon. 0 ROUTE: Pre -schedule contract service. Charge To: Name (OLL( 'ASSoc c ' �LC.. Address 16 — s�'4 1 l 6 Pick -Up Location: Name City k�",ct.A\v,+-t (a1 Address City Deliver To: 11 Z g i `Lkriu( ( VDe I it6IICy Name Address REC ;X RETURN (PLEASE SIGN LEGIBLY) AEI' (A,((L, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS +I' 11 TITLE DRIVER I D. DEL. CHG. RETURN WT. TM. LBS. MISC. Total Charge D0 NOT WRITE IN SPACE BELOW "Our liability for loss or damage to items described hereon is limited to $250.00. The maximum liability stated herein may be increased by notifying Executive Express Inc. in advance that the items to be delivered have a value in excess of $250, at a cost of $2 per $100 value declared in excess of $250. We shall make all reasonable effort for prompt delivery but assume no responsibility for delivery at a given time or loss arising from late delivery." RECEIVER • • COURIER SROUR & ASSOCIATES, LLC Business and Real Estate Development Services 1001 6th Street, Suite 110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 E-mail address: srourllc@esrour.com (310) 372-8433 Fax (310) 372-8894 Log # 1222586 Executive Express DATE 8/20/2012 Project Address Client #1 Lower Blackwater Canyon, RB CW Howe Destination Deliver attached package to: City of Rolling Hills Reimburse No Attn: Yolanta Schwartz Planning Director #2 Portuguese Bend Rd Rolling Hills, Ca. 90274 HAND DELIVER 310/377-1521 Excel/Forms/courier • DATE E21111 1 Z- ZONING CASE NO. AREA AND STRUCTURES ADDRESS 1 LOW _ W 0t(br4 ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOUSPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: AZEBO, R KITCHEN, Y EQUP.- over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. SERVICE YARD OTHER _5_VAISE.E.46201t�'. BASEMENT AREA (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT EXISTING I l [(061 sq.ft. 2 E15 2— sq.ft. ct 2 sq.ft. 4S sq.ft. t4- sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 4 sq.ft. 327 sq.ft. sq.ft. 25S sq.ft. a Z- sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 7 (O sq.ft. (0(05 sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES . 5b42 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 4'. % TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE ,54-b5 sq.ft. PROPOSED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL 1116i, l sq.ft. 2.1 to sq.ft. 7 c _ sq.ft. Ip4-3 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Forum. sq.ft. 4 5© sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 445 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 3 27 sq.ft. �)-c;.s- sq.ft. &5 1 sq.ft. sq.ft.. ( 0 ?_:- sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. C?b sq.ft. sq.ft. 6263 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 1052. sq.ft. % 5, % sq.ft. Gin►5 % 5� sq.ft. % -16-. AUG 2 0 2012 City of Rolling Hills By ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS 1 Q 5 2-. sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK ,5/3I S sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. hi' t 5 sq.ft. sq.ft. T.2 % % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE % TOTAL DISTURBED .AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) I2015 sq.ft. l©,�f % S 2 81571, sq.ft. (Q52 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. i 3 , 8 �• � % i Lci 3 cr % sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 4 155 sq.ft. _ cubic yards Fiiwe /P-PL All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. -17- • • DATE Z.C. NO. ADDRESS CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO.1 RTJTI,DART,F PAT) AREA EXISTING PROPOSED_ TOTAL ANT) STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD tOliftsq ft sq.ft. IV14 sq ft RESIDENCE 265'sq ft sq ft .'DN 2.110 sq.ft. GARAGE 19 2— sq ft sq.ft. 1 ` Z. sq.ft. POOL/SPA & 43 sq.ft, sq.ft. 00+3 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 1p4 sq ft sq.ft. Q ' sq ft CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft. SERVICE YARD 9 6 sq.ft. sq.ft. R t , sq ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence 415 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4Q sq ft Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 120 sq.ft. sq.ft. I Z° sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED to% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY 3�sq ft sq.ft. 32- 1 sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (from 1" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. (from 1"page not including allowed deductions) OTHER 1©.7-. sq.ft. sq.ft. l Z. sq ft sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 15) ' sq ft L cIf sq.ft. 5 sq ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4.7 % % S© % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 1-597 sq ft sq.ft. sq.ft. Nor incl attached trellises, Not incl allowed deductions, and incl the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 42 % 4b % -18-