457, Addition to existing SFR, vari, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 92-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD .SETBACK TO
PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 457.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Harry
Keegan with respect to real property located at 15 Georgeff Road,
Rolling Hills (Lot 29-GF) requesting a modification to the
condition of approval for a Variance to the front yard setback to
permit a living room addition. The modification requested is to
extend the allowable time period for the residential addition.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at its meeting
on July 21,. 1992 at which time information was presented indicating
that the extension of time is necessary to complete work on an
alternate residence where the Keegans plan to live during
renovations at the subject property.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the
Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 5 of
Resolution No. 91-21 to read as follows:
"A. The Variance approval shall expire within two years
of the approval of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of
Resolution No. 91-21 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY ULY, 1992.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SgWYER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 92-23
PAGE 2
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-23 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 457.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on July 21, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay and Chairman
Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raine
ABSTAIN: None
I)
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NO. 201
State of 0 1.t Vr)( U\ i 0__
County of
}SS.
91, 1537849
OFFICIALSEAL
ESTELA RAMOS
;7, NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIPORNIA`
LOS ANGELES COUNTY Ti
MY COMM. EXP. APR. 20,1993
On this the 11 day of
E _
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
-%iClrr� 1 • V 101,4n('in-
❑ personally known to me
l( proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person94 whose name( subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that 1 lG executed it.
WITNESS my hand d o al.
19qf,before me,
Notary'
ATTENTION NOTARY: Although the information requested below i
THIS CERTIFICATE
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE DOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
2120122 -
Title or Type of Document
Number of Pages
AS„ -it could preterit fraudulent attachment of this certificate to another document.
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
-0-ept-n'n ck&—)
Date of ocument t )"�` 1-I
)
1
}
)
,40
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 8236 Remmet Ave. • P.O. Box 7184 • Canoga Park, CA 91304-7184
RECORDED IN OFFICI& L RECORD
RECORDER'S O`=FICE
LOS ANGELES COUNT'(
CALIFORNI
31 PAST.
9 A.M.S E P 301991
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
91 1537849
Recorder's Use
[FEE$8 N
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. &S7 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT•
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows: /---e) it" 2 7—
c-o rY ' if" - 1 aJl" ni //Ns (A - `j�c� �".7 �/
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
(Where the owner and the applicant are not the same, both must
sign).
TYPE OR PRINT
Applicant Parry F. _ xAAgan
Address 15 Georgeff Road
City/State Rolling Hills, CA.90274
TYPE OR PRINT
Owner Har. ry E. Keeaan
Address 15
City/State
Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA. 90274
8/ ?; /9� / /r
Si natt/� res must be ackfio�.fled ed b
appropriate acknowledgement, g y a otary p lic. Attach
RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING
CASE NO. 457.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs.
Harry Keegan with respect to real property located at 15 Georgeff
Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 29-GF) requesting a Variance to the front
yard setback to permit a living room addition to encroach into the
front yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application for a Variance on June
25, 1991 and July 16, 1991, and at a field trip visit on July 13,
1991.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct the proposed living room addition in the fifty (50) foot
front yard setback. Total additions will be 806 square feet. The
applicant is requesting an addition of 136 square feet that will
encroach a maximum of twenty-three (23) feet into the front yard
setback. The Planning Commission finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the existing legal
nonconforming residence was built within the front yard setback
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent
residences.
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied t.o the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
existing development pattern on the lot precludes the requested
additions from being built into the rear yard.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
PAGE 2
Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to construct a 136 square foot living room addition to
a maximum of 23 feet as indicated on the Development Plan attached
hereto as Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section
5. The Planning Commission also finds that the project conforms
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in
Section 4, as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, is subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance
approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit
shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall
lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice
to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the Development Plan on file marked Exhibit A
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
F. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
G. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance, pursuant to Section 17.32.087,
or the approval shall not be effective.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-21
PAGE 3
H. All conditions of this Variance approval, except for the
maintenance requirement of Paragraph D, must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of
Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1991.
ALLAN ROBER T, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
Sca-J----,_-__\_9_,--
DIANE SAWxr ,,E , DEPUTY C TY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 91-21 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING
CASE NO. 457.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the
Planning Commission on August 20, 1991 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay, Raine;
Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
DEPUTY C't TY CLERK