839, 83 sq ft addition to existing , Correspondence• •
C1t ol /Qo//in9
September 11, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
This letter shall serve to notify you that the City Council at their regular meeting
on September 9, 2013 received and filed the Planning Commission's resolution
granting your request in Zoning Case No. 839.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the
resolution by the Planning Commission, unless an appeal has been filed to the
City Council within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's
decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance
with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Before this case takes effect you are required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance
Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder.
I have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2013-13, specifying the conditions
of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Please complete the enclosed
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and
forward, (or hand deliver), the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to:
LAX Courthouse
11701 S. La Cienega Blvd. 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-727-6142
OR
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
800-815-2666
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
Please call them for their hours and the cost of recordation, as it changes
frequently.
Please assure that during construction the contractor adheres to the conditions of
the resolution. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety
Division to issue permits only after the Affidavit of Acceptance and the
Resolution are recorded and received by the City and after any conditions of the
Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
The approval of this project is valid for two years. Therefore, construction must
commence within that two-year period, unless an extension is requested prior to
expiration of this approval and is approved by the Planning Commission.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Yolta Schwartz
P1a ing Director
cc: Charles Belak-Berger, Architect (Cover letter only)
Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-13
• •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE NO. 839
XX VARIANCE
I (We) the undersigned state
) §§
(SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED)
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
16 GEORGEFF ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 6GF)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 839
XX VARIANCE
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
• •
See Exhibit A, attached
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On before me,
(Insert Name of Notary Public and Title)
Personally
appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ she/ they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/ her /their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary ( Seal)
• om-t( or-
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO
CONSTRUCT A BASEMENT, A PORTION OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AND AN 83 SQUARE FOOT
ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE ON A LOT WITH A CONDITION THAT
ANY DEVELOPMENT BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
IN ZONING CASE NO. 839 AT 16 GEORGEFF ROAD, (LOT 6-GF), (BEILKE).
THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke with
respect to real property located at 16 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 6-GF) requesting
a Variance to construct a 1,483 square foot basement, of which 215 square feet would
encroach into the front setback and 10 square feet would encroach into the side setback,
however, the entire basement would be located underneath the footprint of the existing
residence, which also encroaches into the setbacks. In addition, an 83 square foot
addition to the first story is proposed. 476 cubic yards of dirt from excavation of the
basement is proposed to be exported. With a previous application, a condition was
placed on the property that any further development must be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application at a field trip on June 18, 2013 and their regular meeting on
July 16, 2013. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class
mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said
proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission who
reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representative
were in attendance at the hearings. Several neighbors attended the field trip and
expressed concerns regarding access to the construction area and location of a
construction fence.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and consists of 1.14 acres gross (49,658
square feet) and 37,120 square feet net lot area for development purposes. The property is
developed with 3,624 square foot residence with 572 square foot garage, 655 square foot
swimming pool, 330 square feet porches, barbeque area, pool equipment area and service
yard. A stable and corral (currently play area) are located on the lot. With the 83 square
foot addition the residence would be 3,707 square feet.
Reso. 2013-13
16 Georgeff Road
-1-
V ^ •
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
9.P
Approved
) 3 `7?
PLANNING• comm ISSiDti
44--iA, co-K-6)4;0w/
Date 7
e,a4'p/y43
AREA LEGEND
Z/A
iX-a--0--
LOWER BASEMENT ADDITION
BASEMENT & 1ST FLR ADDITION
EXISTING VINYL FENCING
( �T
E 014-
0
01)
Z C nJ
•
QC) 0
s..
a_ —D TY
Use Description:
SITE PLAN
DATE: 08/O6/2o13
Revision
Date:
Drawing
By: CBB STAFF
Scale:
VARIES
Sheet
A '
•
C1t ojleo P1.9 Jdll,
August 21, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839. RESOLUTION No. 2013-13
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
2013-13, granting your request for Variance in Zoning Case No. 839, with conditions.
That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will
be reported to the City Council on SEPTEMBER 9, 2013 at their regular meeting
beginning at 7:30 PM. You or your representative should be present to answer any
questions the Council may have.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days
after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed
or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal
period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an
appeal or Council takes jurisdiction of this case, the Commission's decision will be
stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of
the Municipal Code. You or anyone else 2013 appeal the Planning Commission's
decision.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final.
A copy of the staff report to the City Council will be forwarded to you on Friday,
September 6, 2013. Following the City Council's action, I will mail to you instructions for
recordation of the Resolution and of an Affidavit of Acceptance of the conditions.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Si�icrely,
d
Ygnta Schwartz
Planning Director
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO
CONSTRUCT A BASEMENT, A PORTION OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AND AN 83 SQUARE FOOT
ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE ON A LOT WITH A CONDITION THAT
ANY DEVELOPMENT BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION,
IN ZONING CASE NO. 839 AT 16 GEORGEFF ROAD, (LOT 6-GF), (BEILKE).
THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
(CEQA).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke with
respect to real property located at 16 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 6-GF) requesting
a Variance to construct a 1,483 square foot basement, of which 215 square feet would
encroach into the front setback and 10 square feet would encroach into the side setback,
however, the entire basement would be located underneath the footprint of the existing
residence, which also encroaches into the setbacks. In addition, an 83 square foot
addition to the first story is proposed. 476 cubic yards of dirt from excavation of the
basement is proposed to be exported. With a previous application, a condition was
placed on the property that any further development must be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Commission.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application at a field trip on June 18, 2013 and their regular meeting on
July 16, 2013. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class
mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said
proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission who
reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representative
were in attendance at the hearings. Several neighbors attended the field trip and
expressed concerns regarding access to the construction area and location of a
construction fence.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and consists of 1.14 acres gross (49,658
square feet) and 37,120 square feet net lot area for development purposes. The property is
developed with 3,624 square foot residence with 572 square foot garage, 655 square foot
swimming pool, 330 square feet porches, barbeque area, pool equipment area and service
yard. A stable and corral (currently play area) are located on the lot. With the 83 square
foot addition the residence would be 3,707 square feet.
Reso. 2013-13
16 Georgeff Road
-1-
• •
City oik2 �f.,.g
August 5, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 839, Variance for basement
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
The agenda for the August 20, 2013 Planning Commission meeting includes a
Resolution of approval of your basement with conditions. At the July 16 meeting,
you requested that the Commission postpone adoption of the Resolution to allow
you time to resolve the access and easement condition with the Community
Association and your neighbor. Should you require continuation of the adoption
of the Resolution, the delay requires the city to obtain your written consent to a
ninety (90) day extension to the statutory time period to review and take action
on your project. Accordingly, please execute the enclosed letter of consent to
extend the review period by 90-days and return the executed letter to the City.
Should you be ready to proceed at the August 20, 2013 Planning Commission
meeting, please inform me of the resolve by no later than Monday, August 12,
so that I may recommend amended condition(s) to the Planning Commission.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
oifanta Schwartz
Planning Director
Enclosure
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
LETTER OF CONSENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME
Government Code Section 65957
Application: Zoning Case No. 839 - 16 Georqeff Road, (LOT 6-GF)
Department of Planning
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Attn: Yolanta Schwartz
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65957, Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
hereby request and consent to a ninety (90) day extension to the time period specified in
Government Code Sections 65950, 65950.1 and 65952 for the City of Rolling Hills
Planning Commission to take action on the above referenced application at 16 Georgeff
Road, Rolling Hills, CA.
Date:
Signature of Applicant (1)
or Applicant's Representative
Printed Name of Applicant (1)
or Applicant's Representative
Signature of Applicant (2)
or Applicant's Representative
Printed Name of Applicant (2)
or Applicant's Representative
Received by: Date:
•
City el/Rolling
fl.,.s Jdfl
July 17, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
This is to notify you that the Planning Commission at their July 16 meeting
postponed the adoption of a Resolution to approve your project until such time
as information is provided on how you are planning to access the side of your
property for construction purposes.
Please submit a letter from RHCA and/or your neighbor regarding an agreement
for the access. Once this issue is resolved, staff will bring the Resolution of
approval back to the Planning Commission for a vote.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Yolanta Schwartz
1;1 nning Director
cc: Kristen Raig, Manager RHCA
Co
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
Tuesday, July16, 2013 10:35:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Subject: RE: proposed basement project at 16 Georgeff Road
Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:54:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Gary Trovinger
To: Yolanta Schwartz, info@rhca.net
CC: 'Kristen Raig - RHCA'
Yolanta:
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 2013
City of Rolling Hills
By
Thank you for your email clarifying the status of Planning Commission approval' of the proposed project at 16
Georgeff Road. You have been very helpful in explaining the process to me, as well as providing to members
of the Planning Commission letters I have written regarding this project and ensuring that I was given a voice
at the field trip meetings.
I will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting this evening, July 16. If you would please
convey to the Commission our message that it is within our rights as City of Rolling Hills property owners that
a project of this scope, and involving the large equipment that will be employed, not be allowed to cross over
our property line, nor onto the easement along that property line provided to the RHCA for other purposes.
We agree that the best time to address this is now during the planning process, so the owners and
contractors on the project are fully aware, and can plan to conduct the project accordingly. We also know
that the nature of construction, and the workers involved, is to take the path of least resistance, and our
open easement and property make an inviting path to the project. So to keep us from having to play the role
of construction police, the best way to enforce this is a sufficient barrier to define and prevent
encroachment.
Thank you,
Gary Trovinger with
Karl and Anne Trovinger
2 El Concho Lane
PS: My only comment regarding your email is that your wording of "construction of a temporary fence" may
convey to the RHCA a more involved barrier that the placement of temporary green fabric covered rental
fence panels on the shared property line. These panels and their supporting hardware are structurally
sufficient enough to define the property line and prevent encroachment, but their construction (...if you will)
is minimal and would have no impact on the soil or structure of the easement, which I am sure would be a
concern to the RHCA when considering their approval.
•
City Eie0i lin9 .�ru
June 20, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their
field trip meeting on June 18, 2013 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to
approve your request in Zoning Case No. 839, with conditions, and shall be
confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning
Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with
conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting on July 16, 2013 and make its
final decision on your application.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded
to you before the Planning Commission meeting.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council
takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section
17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the
Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings
in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
As stated above, the Planning Commission's action taken by resolution
approving the development application is scheduled for Tuesday, July 16, 2013
at 6:30 p.m. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the
Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City
Council agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Monday, August 12, 2013.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sin •r,ly
Yglaa Schwartz, Plan g Director
cc: Charles Belak-Berger, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
June 17, 2013
After attending the Planning Commission Field Trip on May 21 at 16 Georgeff Road, and reviewing the
incomplete architectural plot of the proposed project presented on that date, it is apparent that the
proposed basement project will not exceed the building easement encroachments that already exist. In
addition, although not specifically addressed in the drawing presented, we also understand that the
building height will not be changed.
As such, our previous stated concerns with regard to further easement encroachment with this project
are not an issue. We still believe that the easement rules help to define the overall feel within the
Rolling Hills community, and for that reason, and for fire and stable access, those rules should continue
to be honored.
Our main concern now, after reviewing the scope of the proposed proiect at 16 Georgeff Road, is to
ensure that the construction aspects of the proiect occur within the boundaries of that property, and
that our property at 2 El Concho Lane is not to be used for construction vehicles access to the iobsite,
vehicle storage, or as a deposit area for building material and debris. We maintain, given our experience
with past construction projects at 16 Georgeff Road and the general nature of construction workers to
take the path of least resistance, this is best done by erecting a temporary barrier on the shared
property line, sufficient enough to define and prevent physical encroachment onto 2 El Concho Lane
until the project at 16 Georgeff Road has been completed, and that this barrier is a condition of the
issuance of a building permit.
Also, we would like that the hours the Associations rules permit construction noise and activity to occur
be clearly defined and honored by the owners and contractors at 16 Georgeff Road.
Thank you for addressing our concerns,
Gary Trovinger
for Karl Trovinger and Anne Trovinger
2 El Concho Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
RECEIVED
JUN 1 7 2013
City of Rolling Hills
By
rf
1111 •
City oil �Dllin, _J4 11L3 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
May 22, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
This is to inform you that at the May 21 field trip public hearing, the Planning
Commission continued the public hearing to Tune 18, 2013 at 7:30 a.m. to view
the project.
Please be prepared to answer the question of access of construction equipment to
the construction site and where will you stockpile the dirt as well as how much
of the dirt will be exported. Please note that any activity in the easement,
including using the easement as access for construction has to be approved by
the Community Association.
At the meeting, the Planning Commission requested that you prepare more
accurate plans showing all structures on the lot including the equipment area,
location of fences, eave overhang of the house in the area of the proposed
construction, etc. Please submit 8 sets of site plan by Tune 10, 2013.
The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction
Guidelines and the following requirements:
Stake and flag the addition including the ridge line
Stake the basement light well.
Stake/tape the side setback line and side easement line
near the area of the project;
Stake/tape the front setback line and front roadway
easement line near the area of the project;
Incomplete depiction will result in postponement of the review.
The meeting will continue on June 18 at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills
City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your
designated representative must attend both meetings to present your project and to
answer questions.
0
Printed on Recycled Paper
ti
Sjtj
Y. nta Schwartz
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Si ce :ely,
P anning Director
cc: Charles Belak-Berger, Architect
Air
50TH ANNIVERSARY
1957 - 2007
•
,p
�. 1.2�-
140. 2 PORI UGUESF- BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
A silhouette of proposed construction must be erected the week preceding the designated
Planning Commission or City Council meeting/field trip.
Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable.
Bracing should be provided.
Lumber, wire or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves.
Flags in close proximity to each other must be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the
visualization of the proposed construction.
Property lines, setback lines and easement lines must be staked along the areas of
construction. 21/2 - 3' high wooden stakes must be used to delineate the lines. Such stakes must
be flagged and marked on their sides:
• Property line ( red or pink flag)
• Setback line (green flag)
• Easement line (yellow flag)
and remain in the ground throughout the entire review and approval process as well as
during the entire construction process, when required by the Commission.
The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed.
If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521.
Uit
SECTION PLAN
4$
0
nnte:lvnR,c'cl oPtpe,
•
We, as the property owners at 2 El Concho Lane, have several issues surrounding the proposed project
at 16 Georgeff Road.
1. Just like the other architectural and building standards that exist behind the gates and
contribute to the overall feel and makeup of the community, the set back and easement rules in
Rolling Hills quantify the space and openness that is a large part of the graceful living that we all
enjoy as members of this community. As such, the building set back and Association easement
rules should be honored for this proiect at 16 Georgeff Road.
2. Our house at 2 El Concho Lane, and the House at 16 Georgeff Road, are both positioned at the
minimum building set back on the property line we share. Neither of us has the luxury of
neighboring a larger property with a house that is positioned well back from the minimum
building setback. We rely on the Rolling Hills set back regulations to give us the space that
makes for good neighbors. This project should not be granted an exemption. To do so would
compromise one neighbor (2 El Concho Lane) solely for the benefit of another (16 Georgeff
Road).
3. In addition, as a matter of principle for firefighting and stable access, the easements should not
be encroached upon. There is a fire hydrant located at the top of this shared easement. The
responsibility for an open easement should rest with both property owners, and it should
remain open for fire equipment access to the canyon.
4. The lot at 16 Georgeff Road is a filled in canyon, and the suitability of excavating for a
basement should be subject to the extra engineering assessment that a project of this scale, in
that type of soil, dictates. This is to insure that a large excavation will not undermine the soil
supporting the whole house and send it sliding down the canyon, or impact our house at 2 El
Concho Lane and cause a similar fate.
5. When the swimming pool was constructed at 16 Georgeff Road, the construction equipment
accessed the jobsite by driving across our property at 2 El Concho Lane (without permission).
There were construction vehicles parked on our property at 2 El Concho Lane (without
permission) and there were construction materials and debris deposited on our property at 2 El
Concho Lane (without permission). Even after talking directly with the homeowners at 16
Georgeff Road and asking them to instruct their contractor to stop such activity, the
encroachments persisted.
As such, any future construction project at 16 Georgeff Road will need to include, as a condition
of permit approval, construction fencing at the shared property line of 2 El Concho Lane and for
a distance along El Concho Lane, suitable to prevent construction vehicles from using 2 El
Concho Lane as access to the jobsite, vehicle storage, or as a material and debris storage area.
Gary Trovinger
for
Karl Trovinger and Anne Trovinger
2 El Concho Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
May 20, 2013
:7
MAY 2 0 2013
Cit�. of Rolling Hills
By ,i n
•
C1t o/Ro lli,.y.Jdtlf
STATUS OF APPLICATION
& NOTIFICATION OF FIELD TRIP
May 8, 2013
Mr. and Mrs. Jared Beilke
16 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 839.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Beilke:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the
application noted above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be
processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify,
correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional
information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to
avoid any delay in the processing of the application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 839 has been set for public hearing consideration
by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday , MAY 21, 2013 at your
property at 7:30 AM.
Your neighbors within 1,000-foot radius of your property will be notified of this
meeting.
The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction
Guidelines and the following requirements:
Stake and flag the addition including the ridge line
Stake/tape the side setback line and side easement line
near the area of the project;
•
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
Stake/ tape the front setback line and front roadway
easement line near the area of the project;
Incomplete depiction will result in postponement of the review.
The meeting will continue on May 21 at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills
City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your
designated representative must attend both meetings to present your project and to
answer questions.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Si t e :-1
Yolnta Schwartz
Pla 4 ing Director
cc: Charles Belak-Berger, Architect
50TH ANN VERSA Y
1957 — 2007
;r.
NO. 2 PC)R1UG1JLSL. BEND ROAD
ROLLING. IIILL.>, eAL IF.90274
(310)377-3521
FAX (21.0? '77-72 0
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
• A silhouette of proposed construction must be erected the week preceding the designated
Planning Commission or City Council meeting/field trip.
Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable.
Bracing should be provided.
Lumber, wire or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves.
Flags in close proximity to each other must be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the
visualization of the proposed construction.
Property lines, setback lines and easement lines must be staked along the areas of
construction. 21/2 - 3' high wooden stakes must be used to delineate the lines. Such stakes must
be flagged and marked on their sides:
• Property line ( red or pink flag)
• Setback line (green flag)
• Easement line (yellow flag)
and remain in the ground throughout the entire review and approval process as well as
during the entire construction process, when required by the Commission.
The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed.
If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521.
sia
SECTION PLAN
#i
e;llll:aiViRe PiLdPopo