915, Construct new stable (5368 sq , Application0\vb •
City of Rolling Hills
1 Middleridge Lane North
December 19, 2016
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24,1957
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are
required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove
any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this
application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which
would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be
subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
Property :i r (s) signature
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Certain uses of property are permitted in the City only upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Such uses
are set forth in Sections 17.16.040 and 17.20.040 of the Municipal Code. Conditional Use Permits are decided
upon by the Planning Commission following a public hearing.
APPLICATION AND REOUEST FOR HEARING
In order to obtain a Conditional Use Permit, a property owner or his or her agent must submit an application and
request a hearing before the Planning Commission. To do so, the applicant should complete the requirements
enumerated herein, assemble the necessary application documents and call to make an appointment with
Planning staff at (310) 377-1521. Making an appointment will assure that someone is available to explain the
necessary procedures and review the case material for completeness and accuracy.
PLAN SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Complete and submit with each application:
1. Request for Hearing application.
Seven copies of the plan MUST accompany the initial application. Plans must be FOLDED to
approximately 8 1/2" x 11" with title block visible. Additional plans will be required prior to City
Council meeting.
• •
2. Owner's Declaration.
3. Plan submittal using the "Checklist" as guide. Each plan must have a vicinity map, computation of lot
coverage, building and pad sizes, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot disturbance printed on the plot
plan and be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor.
4. Property owner's radius map and property owner's labels. A map is required showing the existing
properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under
consideration, including the subject property. Prepare three complete lists of property owners of each
parcel with mailing address on mailing labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond
with the map numbers.
5. Certified Property Owners List Affidavit.
6. Filing fee made payable to City of Rolling Hills.
PLAN SUBMITTAL PROCESS
Applications must be submitted to the Planning Department as shown on the "Planning Application Filing
Deadline Schedule". Applications shall be deemed complete only after all required information is submitted and
the application fees are paid. The Planning staff will meet with the applicant to discuss the proposal.
Once an application has been accepted as complete by the City, a hearing will be set before the Planning ,
Commission. Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Planning Commission, which are held
the third Tuesday of each month. Provide sufficient time in your schedule to attend at least four meetings to
allow the Planning Commission to study the facts presented and to make a field trip to review the physical
conditions. Prior to the field trip a silhouette of the project will have to be erected. The applicant or a
representative must appear at all meetings. The City's review process takes a minimum of 3-4 months from
submittal. City Council reviews the project following Planning Commission action.
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
In reviewing a request, the Planning Commission must consider the following:
1. The Planning Commission shall consider all matters presented to it fairly and impartially, recognizing the
rights of the applicant as well as its obligation to enforce all zoning ordinances and resolutions adopted by
the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills. The Conditional Use Permit Review Process is intended to
assist in the orderly development of property, in conformance with objectives of the General Plan and other
ordinances and codes.
2. The development and use of all land within the City of Rolling Hills should be directed to the continuation of
the existing rural open areas surrounding the existing residences in the City, and each new improvement or
use of land should be carefully examined to determine what effect the proposed improvement or use of land
will have on the terrain, trees and natural flora in the City.
3. The granting of Conditional Use Permits shall be carefully scrutinized utilizing the criteria set forth in
Section 17.42.050.
-2-
• •
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The decision of the Planning Commission will be final unless, within thirty (30) days following the adoption of
the resolution, a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk by:
1. The applicant.
2. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the
Planning Commission on the matter and who, in addition, received or was entitled to receive the written
notice specified in Subdivision 2 of Subsection A of Section 17.34.030 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council, upon the affirmative vote of three members of the City Council.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE AND BUILDING PERMITS
In order to obtain building permits, it will be necessary for the applicant to record an affidavit with a resolution
of the findings and the conditions of approval. Building and/or grading permit shall not be issued unless the
resolution and affidavit are recorded.
Initial CC,
Property Owner
Date: 3-10 `r-
Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Conditional Use Permit Application rev. 2016.doc
-3-
• •
REOUEST FOR HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure
on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any
use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be
subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: Chaz & Emily Cinolla
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
TELEPHONE NO: 562-760-1545
EMAIL: ChazBCinolla@email.com
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. Portions of Lots 15,16 & 17 Tract 12866
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 019 PARCEL 006
AGENT'S NAME: Tavisha Nicholson (Bolton Engineering) & Tony Inferrera (Architect)
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue Ste. 210 Lomita, CA 90717
TELEPHONE NO: (310) 325-5580
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning` Ordinance the
conditional use is permitted in the zone.
The nature of the proposed project includes the following:
• Expansion of easterly driveway to a width of 20' to comply with fi e department requirements.
o Two driveways on one lot. Allowed per Zoning Code 17.1 . 10.A.1 (Greater than 100'
separation verified)
• New stable of 5,368 sf. with a 3,840 s.f. loft.
o Allowed per Zoning Code 17.16.210.A.4
New 54' diameter riding ring
o Allowed per Zoning Code 17.18.100
OThiLe
-11-
• •
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage
1,750 s.f. basement under residence is shown on plans
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in
detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the proposed conditional use consistent with the General Plan? Explain how.
Yes. The proposed conditional uses are consistent with the General Plan. The proposed stable will be
used for equestrian purposes as will the riding ring and both will meet all requirements for the
Conditional Use Permit. The two driveway configuration is existing, but due to the proposed garage
we are proposing to widen a portion of the easterly driveway to comply with Fire Department
requirements. There is a third access way for the stable but since it is strictly for agricultural purposes
it is not counted towards the total number of driveways on the lot per 17.18.030.B.
B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been
considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses,
building or structures. Explain how.
The lot to the South at 1 Middleridge Lane -`Stilt-has already been developed in a similar manner to
this project in that they have a riding ring and a larger stable, so the general area is already used to
equestrian amenities. The stable will be located below the house in a manner which limits the impact
on view sheds and it is outside of any setbacks so there is a separation between the adjacent residences
and the equestrian uses. The detached garage will not adversely affect adjacent uses, in a way it will
help to reduce the amount of cars parked in the easements on Middleridge Lane and therefore open
up trails and improve the safety of pedestrians.
C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and
buildings proposed.
Explain how
The existing site is comprised of portions of three lots and has a gross lot area of -4.2 acres and a net
lot area of 2.8 acres. The proposed stable and riding ring will be located on the same pad in order to
create more space for the horses and to allow for more continuity in the equestrian uses for the lot.
The stable is designed with a loft in order to minimize the footprint and help with massing.
D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district.
Explain how.
Other than the garage being located in the front setback and encroachment of some residential
additions, all other development standards for RAS-1 zone are met. The two driveway configuration is
an existing condition which we are working to legalize through the Conditional Use Permit and all
requirements are met.
E. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Explain how.
N/A
-13-
• •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date:
FILING FEE
0 -
Signature
For:
Applicant
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
• •
Ad -dress
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at �q ��� �� �,� 4S \ c9
this i 0 day of r ``i ( C
By: z C
By:
7 o
, California
,20 (
vkALAI ea ! 1,4 [3 ✓ )
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application
is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the
signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that
he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to
the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: Chaz & Emily Cinolla DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: Tavisha Nicholson FEE:
COMPANY NAME: Bolton Engineering Cora RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Ste 210 BY:
Lomita. CA 90717 ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310) 325-5580
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
-20-
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(PLEASE READ)
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean, imply or ensure approval by the other.
Separate building permit(s) from the City's contracted Building and Safety Department shall be required prior to
commencement of any work.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is
completely understood.
Executed at t 0 v
, California this k 0 i l iday of tric4r 20 ( .
By: � Z cYo
By:
111%,\ tip Ur- at I kIc I
Address
L-1)
-21-
• •
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Cc
f7.0,
§§
declare under penalty of perjury that
the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear
on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand
(1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Executed at \ V V , California, this t
Signatur
0-\ day of VA`'r �, 20 n
Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Conditional Use Permit Application rev. 2016.doc
-22-
• •
City of Rolling Hills
VARIANCE APPLICATION
1 Middleridge Lane North
December 19, 2016
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24,1957
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are
required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove
any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this
application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which
would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be
subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
OVA -/
Properiowner (s) signature
VARIANCE
A variance is a form of permit that is required of any property owner who seeks to vary from the provisions
of the City's zoning ordinance in the development of property in the City. In order to obtain a variance, the
applicant must be able to demonstrate that practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships result through the
strict and literal interpretation and enforcement of the zoning provisions. Variances are considered and
decided upon by the Planning Commission following a public hearing.
APPLICATION AND REOUEST FOR HEARING
In order to obtain a variance, a property owner or his or her agent must submit an application and request a
hearing before the Planning Commission. To do so, the applicant should complete the requirements
enumerated herein, assemble the necessary application documents and call to make an appointment with
Planning staff at (310) 377-1521. Making an appointment will assure that someone is available to explain
the necessary procedures and review the case material for completeness and accuracy.
PLAN SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Complete and submit with each application:
1. "Request for Hearing" application. Seven copies of currently surveyed plan MUST accompany the
final application. Plans must be FOLDED to approximately 8 1/2" x 11" with title block visible.
Additional plans will be required prior to City Council meeting.
2. Owner's Declaration.
1
• •
3. Plan submittal using the "Checklist" as guide. Each plan must have a vicinity map, computation of lot
coverage, building pad sizes, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot disturbance printed on the plot
plan and be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor.
4. Property owner's radius map and property owner's labels. A map is required showing the existing
properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under
consideration, including the subject property. Prepare three complete lists of property owners of each
parcel with mailing address on mailing labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond
with a number of the lot on the map.
5. Certified Property Owners List Affidavit.
6. Filing fee made payable to City of Rolling Hills
PLAN SUBMITTAL PROCESS
Applications must be submitted to the Planning Department as shown on the "Planning Application Filing
Deadline Schedule" (attached). Applications shall be deemed complete only after all required information
is submitted and the application fees are paid. The Planning staff will meet with the applicant to discuss the
proposal.
Once an application has been accepted as complete by the City, a hearing will be set before the Planning
Commission. Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Planning Commission, which are
held the third Tuesday of each month. Provide sufficient time in your schedule to attend at least four meetings
to allow the Planning Commission to study the facts presented and to make a field trip to review the physical
conditions. Prior to the field trip a silhouette of the project will have to be erected. The applicant or a
representative must appear at all meetings. The City's review process takes a minimum of 3-4 months from
submittal. City Council reviews the project following Planning Commission action.
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
In reviewing a request, the Planning Commission must consider the following:
1. The Planning Commission shall consider all matters presented to it fairly and impartially, recognizing
the rights of the applicant as well as its obligation to enforce all zoning ordinances and resolutions adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills.
2. The development and use of all land within the City of Rolling Hills should be directed to the continuation
of the existing rural open areas surrounding the existing residences in the City, and each new
improvement or use of land should be carefully examined to determine what effect the proposed
improvement or use of land will have on the terrain, trees and natural flora in the City.
3. The granting of a variance shall be carefully scrutinized utilizing the criteria set forth in Section
17.38.050.
-2-
• •
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The decision of the Planning Commission will be final unless, within thirty (30) days following the adoption
of the resolution, a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk by:
1. The applicant.
2. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the
Planning Commission on the matter and who, in addition, received or was entitled to receive the written
notice specified in Subdivision 2 of Subsection A of Section 17.34.030 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council, (within 45 days) upon the affirmative vote of three members of the City Council.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE AND BUILDING PERMITS
In order to obtain building permits, it will be necessary for the applicant to record an affidavit with a
resolution of the findings and the conditions of approval. Building and/or grading permit shall not be issued
unless the resolution and affidavit are recorded.
Initial:
Cc_
Property Owner
Date:
PUBLIC:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Variance Application Rev. 2016.doc
-3-
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR VARIANCE
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or
structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City
Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said
permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: Chaz & Emily Cipolla
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
TELEPHONE NO: 562-760-1545 EMAIL: ChazBCipolla@gmail.com
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. Portions of Lots 15,16 & 17 Tract 12866
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 019 PARCEL 006
AGENT'S NAME: Tavisha Nicholson (Bolton Engineering) & Tony Inferrera (Architect)
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue Ste. 210 Lomita, CA 90717
TELEPHONE NO: (310) 325-5580
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a variance:
The nature of the proposed project includes the following:
• New residential addition to the main residence of 1,750 s.f. with a 1,750 s.f. basement
o Variance required due to a portion (360 s.f.) being in the front yard setback with an 11'
maximum encroachment
• New covered porches of 380 sf. for the residential addition
o Variance required due to a portion of covered porch for residence (30 s.f.) being in the
front setback with a 6' maximum encroachment. Attached covered porch at garage (95
s.f.) being in the front setback with 10' maximum encroachment.
• New attached garage of 441 s.f.
o Variance required due to a portion of the proposed garage (175 sf.) being in the front
setback with a 9' maximum encroachment.
• New 120 sf. covered entry
o Variance required due to all of the proposed entryway (120 sf.) being in the front
setback with a 21' maximum encroachment and 8' of that being further encroachment.
• Disturbed area > 40%
o The disturbed area is proposed to be at 55.6% which requires a variance. The existing lot
disturbance is already at 47.9%. This calculation includes disturbance from grading of
the lower path along the drainage course.
• •
VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property
that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Explain how.
The existing residence was constructed largely towards the front of the lot and partially in the setback,
therefore by adding onto the house on either end would be building in the setback. We are proposing to
keep the encroachment below that of the existing residence for both the addition and the proposed
garage. The disturbance is currently at 47.9% when including the previously disturbed area for the lower
pathway, so any development would create additional disturbance and require a Variance. The proposed
increase of -9% will be for equestrian purposes for the stable and riding ring. Due to the steep
topography of the lot, it is not possible to utilize 3:1 slopes and thereby qualify for the allowed increase
in disturbance.
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question.
Explain how.
Due to the layout of the lot and existing house there are minimal places to add on while still maintaining
the existing house. The existing house is 2,900 s.f. which by comparison is much smaller than the homes
in the vicinity. The proposed addition will bring the new house to 4,650 s.f. with a 1,750 s.f. basement
which is more in -line with surrounding residences. The existing garage is only a two car garage and due
to minimal parking on Middleridge it is desired to increase the garaged parking to keep all vehicles
indoors.
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Explain how.
No. The variance will not be detrimental due to the fact that it will be located below the existing residence
and away from Middleridge Lane. The proposed residential addition will not encroach further into the
setback than the existing residence and therefore will not have an impact.
D. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Explain how
N/A
E. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Explain
how.
The proposed residence, garage, and stable area compatible with the general plan and zoning
ordinance, other than being located in the front yard setback, and exceeding the allowable disturbance.
• •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts,
statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: (b — [ (`
Signature
For: C k Gt. 7 C (Tel) RS
Applicant
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS.
-12-
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at \ M d 0 cC(A c Lc-< <.- OUD r 11 . California
this ( day of r C (\ , 20 %
By: In cA"L C c(0K
By: C v.c, 2 Coe, c«
Address
f Zo ,_) ( 5
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment
here.
APPLICANT: Chaz & Emily Cipolla DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: Tavisha Nicholson FEE:
COMPANY NAME: Bolton Engineering Corp RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Ste 210 BY:
Lomita, CA 90717 ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310) 325-5580
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
-20-
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(PLEASE READ)
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean, imply or ensure approval by the
other. Separate building permit(s) from the City's contracted Building and Safety Department shall be
required prior to commencement of any work.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at 1""
, California this D day of o\r C L
By: QC ?61 kxC
By:
/PA cfA ()\ WidA c(1-Vh
Address
Po
City )
20 1% .
-21-
•
City of Rolling Hills
SITE PLAN REVIEW
1 Middleridge Lane North
December 19, 2016
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24,1957
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are
required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove
any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this
application, (regardless of when or by whom they were constructed). In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900
of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted
without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is
subject to higher application fee. , .
Property owner (s) signature
SITE PLAN REVIEW PURPOSE
The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects
in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan
and Municipal Codes. A site plan review is a form of permit which is required of any property owner who
plans any grading or who seeks to construct, with certain exceptions, a new building, structure, swimming
pool, above grade deck, or expand, add to, alter or repair an existing residence, which involves changes to
grading or an increase in the size of the residence by more than 999 square feet.
In order to obtain a site plan review permit, the applicant must be able to demonstrate the proposed site
development can comply with the criteria set forth in Section 17.46.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
Site plan review permits are considered and decided upon by the Planning Commission following the
submittal of appropriate application, reports and studies; and public hearings and site investigation are
held.
APPLICATION AND REOUEST FOR HEARING
In order to obtain a site plan review, a property owner or his or her agent must submit an application and
request a hearing before the Planning Commission. To do so, the applicant should complete the requirements
enumerated herein, assemble the necessary application documents and call to make an appointment with
Planning staff at (310) 377-1521. Making an appointment will assure that someone is available to explain
the necessary procedures and review the case material for completeness and accuracy.
- 1 - SPR Application Rev. 2016
City of Rolling Hills
•
PLAN SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Complete and submit with each application:
1. "Request for Hearing" application. Seven copies of currently surveyed plan MUST accompany the
final application. Plans must be FOLDED to approximately 8 1/2" x 11" with title block visible.
Additional plans will be required prior to City Council meeting.
2. Owner's Declaration.
3. Plan submittal using the "Checklist" as guide. Each plan must have a vicinity map, computation of lot
coverage, building pad sizes, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot disturbance printed on the plot
plan and be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor.
4. Property owner's radius map and property owner's labels. A map is required showing the existing
properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under
consideration, including the subject property. Prepare three complete lists of property owners of each
parcel with mailing address on mailing labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond
with a number of the lot on the map.
5. Certified Property Owners List Affidavit.
6. Filing fee made payable to City of Rolling Hills
PLAN SUBMITTAL PROCESS
Applications must be submitted to the Planning Department as shown on the "Planning Application Filing
Deadline Schedule" (attached). Applications shall be deemed complete only after all required information is
submitted and the application fees are paid. The Planning staff will meet with the applicant to discuss the
proposal.
Once an application has been accepted as complete by the City, a hearing will be set before the Planning
Commission. Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Planning Commission, which are
held the third Tuesday of each month. Provide sufficient time in your schedule to attend at least four meetings
to allow the Planning Commission to study the facts presented and to make a field trip to review the physical
conditions. Prior to the field trip a silhouette of the project will have to be erected. The applicant or a
representative must appear at all meetings. The City's review process takes a minimum of 3-4 months from
submittal. City Council reviews the project following Planning Commission action.
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
In reviewing a request, the Planning Commission must consider the following:
1. The Planning Commission shall consider all matters presented to it fairly and impartially, recognizing the
rights of the applicant as well as its obligation to enforce all zoning ordinances and resolutions adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills. The site plan review process is intended to assist in the
orderly development of property, in conformance with objectives of the General Plan and other
ordinances and codes.
-2-
SPR Rev. 2016
City of Rolling Hills
• •
2. The development and use of all land within the City of Rolling Hills should be directed to the
continuation of the existing rural open areas surrounding the existing residences in the City, and each
new improvement or use of land should be carefully examined to determine what effect the proposed
improvement or use of land will have on the natural slopes, terrain, trees and natural flora in the City.
3. The granting of site plan review permits shall be carefully scrutinized utilizing the criteria set forth in
Section 17.46.050.
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The decision of the Planning Commission will be final unless, within thirty (30) days following the adoption
of the resolution, a written appeal is filed with the City Clerk by:
1. The applicant.
2. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the
Planning Commission on the matter and who, in addition, received or was entitled to receive the written
notice specified in Subdivision 2 of Subsection A of Section 17.34.030 of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council, (within 45 days) upon the affirmative vote of three members of the City Council.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE AND BUILDING PERMITS
In order to obtain building permits, it will be necessary for the applicant to record an affidavit with a
resolution of the findings and the conditions of approval. Building and/or grading permit shall not be issued
unless the resolution and affidavit are recorded.
Initial
Property Owner
Date:
1b-17
Public: PLANNING MASTERS: City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2016.doc
-3-
SPR Rev. 2016
City of Rolling Hills
• •
REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR
SITE PLAN REVIEW
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on
your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use
or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject
to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: Chaz & Emily Cipolla
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
TELEPHONE NO: 562-760-1545 EMAIL: ChazBCipolla@gmail.com
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. Portions of Lots 15,16 & 17 Tract 12866
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 019 PARCEL 006
AGENT'S NAME: Tavisha Nicholson (Bolton Engineering) & Tony Inferrera (Architect)
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue Ste. 210 Lomita, CA 90717
TELEPHONE NO: (310) 325-5580
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan
Review:
The nature of the proposed project includes the following:
• New residential addition to the main residence of 1,750 sf. with a 1,750 s.f. basement
• New covered porches of 380 sf. for the residential addition
• New attached garage of 441 sf.
• Expansion of easterly driveway to a width of 20' to comply with fire department requirements.
• New stable of 5,368 s.f. with a 3,840 s.f. loft.
• New covered porches of 840 s.f. for the proposed stable.
• New 54' diameter riding ring
• New Retaining walls of 5' maximum height 2.5' average 1,810 lineal feet.
• New 20' wide stable access
• Grading for stable and residential additions.
• New covered entryway of 120 sf.
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage:
1,750 s.f. under new residential addition. See plans.
-1 1- SPR Rev. 2016
City of Rolling Hills
• •
• SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe
in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
The proposed residential addition and garage are located partially in the front yard setback, however the
existing residence is already partially located in said front yard setback. Both of these encroachments into
the setback will not project farther than the existing residence. There is also a proposed covered entryway
which will encroach into the front setback but not farther than the existing garage.
The project is compatible with the general plan and zoning ordinance in that it is an addition to a
residential structure and a stable which will further the equestrian nature of the community.
The property to the south at 1 Middleridge Lane South has recently had a riding ring approved along with
having an existing barn of approximately 3,500 s.f. so the general area is already developed in an
equestrian manner.
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing
natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage
courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates
existing natural features.
We have concentrated the development to the western side of the lot and have designed the site to limit the
amount of fill slopes required and utilizing retaining walls where practical to reduce the overall impact.
The area of development was also previously developed and used for horse keeping purposes so we are re-
working this area to meet the project goals. The existing drainage course will not be impacted and slope
stabilization and erosion control measures will aid in preventing erosion in the long term. All native
vegetation in the area of development has been eaten and / or destroyed by goats which are currently on
the property. The development will ensure slope stability by doing new slope planting and creating a
maintenance program for this landscaping.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive
grading and re -contouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes
shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing
drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the
impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots.
The site development plan follows the natural contours of the site by concentrating the development in an
area that is flatter and previously developed. Contours are rounded and no drainage courses will be re-
directed. Walls have been used, where practical, to aid in reducing disturbance.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves
native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
The area of proposed structrues was previously developed as a corral for horses and goats so there is
minimal to no native vegetation lost through this development. The new graded areas will be landscaped to
protect against slope erosion and also to help mask the tiered retaining walls.
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot
coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
Building coverage is minimized by utilizing a loft for the stable which decreases the building pad footprint.
Additionally, the residential addition will have a basement which also reduces the overall building
footprint.
City of Rolling Hills
• •
F Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with
the existing setbacks of neighboring properties.
Due to the configuration of the lot, and how the residence already encroaches into the front yard setback,
this proposed addition will be harmonious with the existing development as it is not encroaching further
into the setback than the existing residence. The stable meets all zoning requirements for structural
coverage and is on a pad with a large corral which will help to reduce the mass appearance. The stable is
outside of all setbacks and meets the City requirements for being 35 feet away from buildings.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location,
design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas
We are proposing to widen the easterly driveway in order to comply with Fire Department requirements for
access to the new garage but will keep the portion in the easement roughened. Additionally, the new horse
access to the west will have a roughened surface for the first 20' and will not be detrimental to convenience
and safety of circulation.
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
The Site Plan is sensitive conforms with the requirements of C.E.Q.A and will not have any significant
impacts to the environment.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts,
statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: 3 ° � (?.. ] -----
Signature
For: Le (V
t
Applicant
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at k G vA ,` k �k,--, C 1 4'
this
day of it''- - 1 c-,
By: CLt- � \FIA
By:
0.#11v.t
Address
4,,( (5.
City 2
. California
,20
Le-, 1\16rT
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the
State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: Chaz & Emily Cinolla DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: Tavisha Nicholson PEE:
COMPANY NAME: Bolton Enaineerina Corp RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Ste 210 BY:
Lomita, CA 90717 ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310) 325-5580
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 Middleridae Lane North
-20-
•
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(PLEASE READ)
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean, imply or ensure approval by the
other. Separate building permit(s) from the City's contracted Building and Safety Department shall be
required prior to commencement of any work.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition
is completely understood.
Executed atA)Nv -
`1 L
, California this �c� day of V �7 `1 20 1
By: ( 14G12— (( (C
By:
Address
City
0 )fic(5
SPR Rev. 2016
Planning Information for New Development/Redevelopment Projects
Project Address
Parcel ID
Zonin@/U*eCode:
Project Developer
Project Owner
Owner Phone
Owner address
Owner email
Site acreage:
Project acreage/disturbed area (may beless than site acreage
' for redevelopment oro|ects)
Planned impervious surface area (square feed(indudesbuilding
footprint aswell asimpervious driveways, patios, sport courts,
etc.)
StoteVVD|D No.
f if subject to Construction General Permit),
R U
h6ff WcUlations for Project
OSthpercentile, Z4'hourstorm (inches)
Project design storm (inches)
(Greater ofASthpercentile, 24'hourstorm and O.7S)
Storm Water Quality Design volume (cubic ft)
Percent ofdesign storm toberetained onsite
Biofi|tration ByWPsbeing used 7(Yes/No)
Bio0|tration BW1PTreatment Volume
(l.Stimes the SVVO\Dvnot reliably retained onsite)
f������`��U�� pati6fi.mmea$Ures'wwilU'beuiem�the, owin'
Design volume for water quality mitigation treatment BW1Ps
(cubic ft)
if flow -through water quality 8MPsare approved,
provide the 1'year,1'hourstorm intensity (inches per hour)
Percent ofdesign storm volume tobeinfiltrated otoff-site
mitigation site
Percent ofdesign storm tobetreated with bio8|tradonat
offsite retrofit
Name/address ofoff-site mitigation orretrofit sites
G|Scoordinates for off -site mitigation project
OWSP
Permanent Structural BMP|D
[provide additional columns for BNYPsasnecexsonvl
Structural BK8PType and Description
8K8PLocation onSite (Coordinotes)
BW1P Location Description (or attach map)
BK8PDesign Capture Volume (cubic ft)
lyNiddleridgeLane North
7569'019'006
RAS1
TavishaN|cho|son:Bo|tonEngineering Corp
Chaz&Emily CipoUa
562'760'1545
1K8idd|erid8eLane North
\\
4.3
iofiltratonplanter box: 250sl
33.775601,'118.348903
Below Stable
3,750
•
SitOa
tot &"54-5
Date
Zoning Case
Address
Calculation of Lot Coverage
Existing
Gross Lot Area
Net Lot Area
Residence
Garage
Swimming Pool / Spa
Pool Equiptment
Guest House
Cabana
Stable
Recreation Court"
Attached Covered Porches Primary
Attached Covered Porches Accessory: stable
Attached Covered Porches Accessory: Stable
Entrayway Porte Cochere
Attached Trelliss
Detached Structures: Tree House
Detached Structures: Shed
Detached Structures: KITCHEN
Detached Structures: Fire
Service Yard
Other:
Basement Area
Depth of Basement
Primary Driveways
Paved Walks, Patio Areas, Courtyards
Pool Decking
y Other paved driveways
Disturbed Area
Unpermitted Disturbed Area
Building Pad 1
Building Pad 2
Building Pad 3
Building Pad 4
,'D//l//%D%/ioii/orV/gi,
' / 7 140
Proposed
4.196694215
a// ?., (r
2.82238292 %���^, %%%%///�.,,,rj
Pad No. 1 '%;:!, %%O/%%2;/(3' tc
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 3
Pad No. 4
1 Pad No. 1
2 Pad No. 2
%% poi/% „ 44,
%/;
zoning
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 1
Pad No. 1
MA Pad No.1
Pad No. 2
Pad No. 3
Pad No. 4
• •
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT.COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 122,943 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 122,943
RESIDENCE 2,900 sq.ft 1,750 sq.ft 4,650 sq.ft
GARAGE 468 sq.ft 441 sq.ft 909 sq.ft
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
STABLE (dirt volume to be 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft
included in grading quantities
RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 0 sq.ft 380 sq.ft 380 sq.ft
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 0 sq.ft 350 sq.ft 350 sq.ft
BREEZEWAYS
ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
Tree House 75 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 75 sq.ft
Sheds 162 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 162 sq.ft
Outdoor BBQ 140 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 140 sq.ft
Outdoor Fire Pit 15 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 15 sq.ft
over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq.ft. in area
SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 96 . sq.ft
OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
BASEMENT AREA: 0 sq.ft 1,750 sq.ft 1,750 sq.ft
(Volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT
0 sq.ft 13 ft 13 ft
TOTAL STRUCTURE 3,856 sq.ft 3,371 sq.ft 7,227 sq.ft
%STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 3.14% sq.ft 2.74% sq.ft 5.88% sq.ft
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 AND UP TO 800 sq.ft. 3,721 sq.ft
detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 3.03% sq.ft
16
3,371 sq.ft 7,092 sq.ft
2.74% sq.ft 5.77% sq.ft
• •
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
PRIMARY DRIVEWAY
ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
2,445 sq.ft 500 sq.ft 2,945
PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS,
COURTYARDS 2,800 sq.ft 1,350 sq.ft 4,150 sq.ft
POOL DECKING
OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD
EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS
TOTAL FLATWORK
%TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
%TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
Excl. the allowance of up to 5- 800 sq.ft.
structures from previous page.
% TOTAL COVERAGE
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
5,245 sq.ft 1,850 sq.ft 7,095 sq.ft
4.27% 1.50% 5.77%
9,101 sq.ft 5,221 sq.ft 14,322 sq.ft
7.40% 4.25% 11.65%
8,966 sq.ft 5,221 sq.ft 14,187 sq.ft
7.29% 4.25% 11.54%
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 43,575 sq.ft 2,250 sq.ft 61,075 sq.ft
% DISTURBED AREA 35.44% 1.83% 49.68%
GRADING QUANTITY PERMITTED 15,250 sq.ft 6,010 C.Y.
UN(include future stable, corral, GRADING 12.40%
and access way; basement and
all other areas to be graded)
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.
*Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fireplace,
etc. are not counted towards coverage and disturbed area unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq.ft., or if there are
more than 5 such structures on the property.
17
• •
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO.1- MAIN RESIDENCE
BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
STRUCTURES
BUILDING PAD 5,800 sq.ft 1,415 sq.ft 7,215
RESIDENCE 2,900 sq.ft 1,750 sq.ft 4,650 sq.ft
GARAGE 468 sq.ft 441 sq.ft 909 sq.ft
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft sq.ft
POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft sq.ft
GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft - sq.ft
CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
STABLE sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 96 sq.ft
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 380 sq.ft 380 sq.ft
Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF
RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 0 sq.ft 350 sq.ft 350 sq.ft
BREEZEWAYS
ATTACHED TRELLISES' 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
*DETACHED STRUCTURES: 230 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 230 sq.ft
(From 1st page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 95 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 95 sq.ft
(From 1st page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1
%BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
3,694 sq.ft
63.69% sq.ft
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1
Not incl. attached trellises,
Not incl. allowed deductions, 3,559 sq.ft
and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the
size of the residence / accs structures
2,921 sq.ft
40.49% sq.ft
6,615 sq.ft
91.68% sq.ft
2,541 sq.ft 6,100 sq.ft
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 61.36% sq.ft 35.22% sq.ft 84.55% sq.ft
18
• •
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 2-- STABLE PAD
BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
STRUCTURES
BUILDING PAD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0
RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
GUEST HOUSE sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
STABLE 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft
SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF
RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
BREEZEWAYS
ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
*DETACHED STRUCTURES: 162 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 162 sq.ft
(From 1st page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
(From 1st page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER: sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2
%BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
162 sq.ft
#DIV/0! sq.ft
450 sq.ft
#DIV/0! sq.ft
612 sq.ft
#DIV/0! sq.ft
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2
Not incl. attached trellises,
Not incl. allowed deductions, 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft
and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the
size of the residence / accs structures
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0.00% sq.ft #DIV/0! sq.ft #DIV/0! sq.ft
19
• •
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
PAD 1: HOUSE
Grading Quantities:
GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION
Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location
CUT/EXCAVATION
For house/addition Residence 0 0
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List Garage 0 0
Covered Porch 0 0
For driveway(s) 0 0
For yard areas 25 5'
For basement excavation 775 15
For pool/spa excavation -
Overexcavation 500 2
TOTAL CUT 1,300 800
TOTAL Export
Export
FILL
For house/addition Residence 0 0
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List Garage 15 3.5
Covered Porch 20 3'
For driveway(s) 25 1.5
For yard areas 550 0
For basement excavation
For pool/spa excavation
Recompaction 600
TOTAL FILL 1,210 610
TOTAL GRADING (Sum 2,510
of total cut and total fill):
PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS
90
90
Existing pad elevations House Other Pad: Stable Loft Stable
Finished Floor 541.00
Finished Grade 540.00
Proposed pad elevations
Finished floor
Finished grade
541.00
540.00
21
• S
DATE: 4/5/2017 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 1 Middleridge Lane North
GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION
PAD 2: Pathway
Grading Quantities: Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location
CUT/EXCAVATION
For house/addition Pathway
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basement excavation
For pool/spa excavation
Overexcavation
TOTAL CUT
1,500
250
1,750 1,500
TOTAL OVERALL SITE BALANCED 0
0
FILL
For house/addition Pathway
For other structures (i.e. walls)
List
For driveway(s)
For yard areas
For basement excavation
For pool/spa excavation
1,500
Recompaction 250
TOTAL FILL 1,750
TOTAL GRADING (Sum 3,500
of total cut and total fill):
PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS
1,500
Existing pad elevations House Other Pad: Tennis Court Stable
Finished Floor
Finished Grade
Proposed pad elevations
Finished floor
Finished grade
jT
• •
Dec
\%1oio
Gas Rae" qieed
Date Filed
GENERAL INFORMATION
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Zoning Case No.
1. Applicant(s) Chaz & Emily Cipolla Tel. ( 562 ) 760-1545
Address 1 Middleridge Lane North
2. Legal Owner(s) Chaz & Emily Cipolla Tel. ( 562) 760-1545
Address
1 Middleridge Lane North
3. Project Address 1 Middleridge Lane North
Assessor's Book No. 7569 _ 019
006 Lot No. Por Lots 15 / 16 / 17 Tract 12866
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
N/A
5. Existing zoning district
RAS-1
6. Proposed project/use of site Residential
PROTECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 189,8(18 S F / 4 90 Aorac
8. Net lot area 122.943 s.f. . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot
or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the
area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten
(10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that
provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 12,788 s.f.
10. Number of floors of construction Two (Main Level + Basement)
11. Basement square footage 1,750 s.f.
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage
krige8-7317. 2 2- Li IS
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? No
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? Yes
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? Yes (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? Two Proposed? One (Stable)
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 15' & 11' Proposed? 20' & Widen 11' to 20'
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? Yes / No
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 14% /16%
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
Proposed? Yes
Proposed? 18%
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current
driveway access requirements? No.
Explain Will get Fire Approval at Permit Stage.
g.
Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located?
No
Explain Very large front yard
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? No.
Explain No designated uncovered parking in yards
Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less?
Yes Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 18% .
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? Yes With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? N/A
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 9Pg5=MY• . Amount fill 9,640
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities). Iw ,195 �l�' �,�
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where
impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet 68.325 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 55.57% .
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4,650 s.f.
2
i
• •
21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
n/a
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
N/A
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling. Planning Commission January 2017
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required.
Site Plan Review for Grading / Walls / and new Structure.
Variance: Disturbance & Building in Setback
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or
polaroid photos will be accepted.
The existing site is composed of a single family residence with an attached
garage. There are facilities for horse keeping and various other farm animals.
ear the
proprety line. There is minimal vegetation on the lot, as the animals have eaten it all.
There are no known cultural, historical, or scenic aspects to the lot.
3
• •
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of
land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set-
back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be
accepted.
The surrounding sites mimic the property in question. The adjacent properties
have a variety of encroachments into setbacks and are in the "Over -Lay zone".
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
_ Geology Report
Hydrology Report
Soils Report
_ Traffic Study
Noise Study
_ Biological Study
Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
Solid Waste Generation Report
_ Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
Yes
No
Historical Report
Archaeological Report
_ Paleontological Study
Line of Sight Exhibits
Visual Analysis
_ Slope Map
_ Fiscal Impact Analysis
Air Quality Report
Hazardous Materials/
Waste
N/A
4
t
• •
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.
A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors
as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based
on a project -specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence
that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when
the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
5
r'
Potentially
Significant,
Impact
Issues:
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but ❑ ❑ ❑ Cit
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ❑ ❑
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ❑
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ ❑
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
- shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ ❑ ❑
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
111. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Less Than
Potentially Significant
Significant With Mitigation
Impact Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
❑ ❑ 0
o ❑ ❑ ig
❑ 0 0
❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑15K❑
The stream at the lower portion of the lot was
determined by Fish and Game to not be impacted by
previous gradingPuture Development will be located
farther awa and include additional measures to ensure
compliances
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
0 0 0
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
9C
7
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of
the State CEQA Guidelines?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-
1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life and property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
mess Than
Potentially Significant With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact ` Impact
0
0
0
❑ ❑ ❑
0 0
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
There is the potential for an earthquake however
project will use values provided by soils engineer
to design all buildings
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
O ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ g
The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will detail
how the project is reducing erosion.
❑ l 0 CI
It is not known yet if he soil is expansive however if it is
design measures will be put in place to ensure compliance
with current codes.
❑ 0 ❑
8
Potentially
Significant
Impact_
Less Than
Significant Less Than
With Significant No
Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would
the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 I:
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ 0 0
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 IX
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) Fora project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 0 0
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ 0 0
an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Less Than
Potentially • Significant With
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporation..
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste 0 0 0
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 0 0 0 [�
substantially with groundwater recharge such that
there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the
production rate of preexisting nearby wells would
drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 ❑
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 ❑
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 0
the capacity of existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide substantial additional The runoff from the corral will be treated to ensure
sources of polluted runoff? water quality leaving the site is not impaired.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
0 0 0
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 ❑ 0
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 ❑ ❑
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 ❑ )S(
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 ❑ 0
10
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Less Than
Significant
With Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact. Impact
❑ 0 ❑
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 0 ($
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ o (
❑ ❑ ❑ l5k
Xl. NOISE — Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ ❑ ❑
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 l
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels 0 0 0
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 ❑ l ❑
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing Construction will produce noise during allowable hours.
without the project? There is no additional noise after construction.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ 0 0
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ 0 0
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
11
Less Than
Potentially, Significant Less Than'
Significant With Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact `Impact
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ 0 ❑
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 ❑ 0 l2
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 ❑ 0
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? ❑ 0 ❑
Police protection? 0 0 ❑
Schools? 0 0 ❑
Parks? 0 ❑ ❑
Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ 0
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require 0 '❑ 0
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
12
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ILK
❑ ❑ ❑ IX
❑ ❑ ❑ ,�
❑ ❑ ❑
Less Than
Potentially Significant
Significant With Mitigation
Impact Incorporation
0
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
CI
❑ ❑
CI
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
A new septic system may be required for the new addition. II
will be designed to meet all current codes.
0
❑ ❑
Underground drainge will be desinged for the site and will
outlet off the site through an erosion control outlet structure.
❑ ❑ ❑
13
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation. ..Impact Impact
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ ❑ 0
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ❑ ❑
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0 ❑ 0
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the A SWPPP will be implmented during construction to reduce
project: pollution during and after construction.
a) During construction result in potential impact on storm 0 ❑
water runoff?
A SWPPP will be implmented to reduceollution during and after construction.
b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm 0 IX 0 0
water runoff
c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from ❑ 0 0
areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including
washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir
or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other
outdoor work areas?
d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 0 EA 0
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha
provide water quality benefit?
e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 ❑ Pk ❑
significant harm on the biological integrity of the
waterways and water?
f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ Cik 0 0
velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause
environmental harm: The outlet structure will be designed to keep runoff volumes at that of previous conditions.
g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of ❑ Pt ❑ ❑
the project site or surrounding areas?
A SWPPP will be implmented during construction to reduce
erosion during and after construction.
14
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
•
Less Than
Potentially Significant
Significant With
Impact Mitigation
Incorporation
0
0
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable future
projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will 0 0 0
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
r
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared
pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and
any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement
which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant: Chaz & Emily Cipolla
2. Address: 1 Middleridge Lane North Rolling Hills, CA 90274
3. Phone Number: 562-760-1545
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
1 Middleridge Lane North Rolling Hills, CA 90274
5. Local Agency (city/county): Roling Hills / Los Angeles County
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7569-019-006
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS
WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Ham.
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List: JULY 1992
Date
For
Signature
Applicant
-16-
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section
65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the
development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists.
Date
For
Signature
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached. exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date
For
Signature
Applicant
Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc
-17-
4
P • 0 0
B.O.D. Meeting Minutes 1/9/14
License Agreement Request — Cibola. 1 Middleridee Lane North for a Three -Rail Fence in the Road,
Easement
Director Frykman stated that Mr. Cipolla is requesting a license to install a new fence in the road
easement at the top of the slope in the easement at the rear of the property, approximately 35 feet
beyond the stream. Mr. Cipolla explained that the fence was needed to corral his goats and horses.
After discussion of the properly line in relation to the easement line and the location of the fence, a
motion was made to approve the license agreement for a three rail fence in the rear easement and road
easement of the property; m. Director McKinnie, s. Director Frykman, the motion passed unanimously.
VED
APR 0 5 2016
City of Rolling Hills
By
• •
5ET 2' IRON PIPE
tiT PG, RGE 24881
TPIRON PIPE
r PG, R E 2456
PROP05150
LO' oi5 Top OP SLOPE
C IFtX1A
I LN 1�1
_.pizovE'r r/ SINE
�_,, .... eAsefriENT Lli�1
IN 1456MENT
ATPG,RGI1
SET HAS S $1.4.5,LEP
AT PG, RCE 245%51
PROPOSED, P 7JG
1.O' 0J5 rap or SLOPE
SET HAS t 1451.eR
AT PG, -ROE 295.51
1' 1RON PIPE
.52' N40 242b E
PG, L5 5544
2" IRON PIPE
SI0'5102125,1
OP PG, L5 (421
2'' IRON PIPE
Oil' 1476 42 k,t
OP PPG L5 1424
5ET MA5 l N 45,45ER
A PG, ROE29ab1
....
RECORDING REQUEST &
Rolling Hills Community Association
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
NAME Sidney F. Croft
MAILING 314 Tejon Place
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
ZIP CODE
• •
OF' „20,4
i
3141aI,
*20140458489*
pro.
LOS - KtDE' v VVVfe�
a .
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
TITLE(S)
License Agreement
0 • O
CENED
APR 0 5 2016
City of Rolling Hills
By
Ir
..,
• •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Rolling Hills Community Association
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
Sidney F. Croft, Esq.
314 Tejon Place
Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
LICENSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made by and between ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a non-profit California corporation,
sometimes hereinafter referred to as "LICENSOR" or "ASSOCIATION", and CHAZ B.
CIPOLLA, sometimes hereinafter referred to as "LICENSEE".
WITNESSETH:
RECITALS:
I
LICENSEE are the owners of the hereinafter described parcels of land situated in the
City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, commonly known by street
and number as 1 Middleridge Lane North, Rolling Hills, California 90274, and more
particularly described in Exhibit "A".
The above -described real property is under the control and jurisdiction of
ASSOCIATION and is subject to the terms and conditions of that certain document entitled '\
"Agreement and Declaration No. 150 of Establishment of Basic Protective Restrictions,
Covenants, Conditions, Reservations, Liens, Charges and Certain Local Restrictions",
recorded May 14, 1936, in Book 14065, page 345, Official Records of Los Angeles County,
California. Said Agreement is sometimes hereinafter referred to in this document as
"Declaration 150."
II
Declaration 150 reserved certain easements on, over, under, across and along all
strips of land described in said Declarations easements were reserved for roads, streets,
bridle trails, parkways, park areas, poles, wires and conduits for the transmission of elec-
tricity for lighting, hearing, power, telephone and other public utility purposes and the
necessary attachments in connection therewith; public and private sewers, storm water
drains, land drains and pipes, water systems, water, heating and gas mains, pipes and
other methods of conducting and performing any public or quasi -public service or function
Page 1of3
CIPOLLA
License Agreement
beneath the surface of the ground. ASSOCIATION by the provisions of said Declaration
No. 150, has jurisdiction and control over said easements so reserved.
III
LICENSEE needs to make use of a portion of said easements for the purpose of
constructing and maintaining a white 3 rail fence in portions of the easements
owned by the ASSOCIATION; and the ASSOCIATION finds that the proposed use by the
Licensee of the portion of said easement, on a non-exclusive basis, is necessary; it will
enable LICENSEE to make better use of his property.
IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, AGREED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, as
follows:
A. ASSOCIATION grants LICENSEE the right and privilege to utilize a portion
of the easement to construct and maintain a white 3 rail fence in the portions of
the easements owned by the ASSOCIATION, as depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
B. Except as provided for herein, this Agreement is subject to the condition that
LICENSEE shall not, during the term hereof, make a use of the area above -described, in
such a way as to conflict with any of the Rules and Regulations of the ASSOCIATION, its
By -Laws, laws, said Declarations as the same are now constituted or as they may
hereinafter be amended or modified or changed.
C. If ASSOCIATION has reasonable need for the use of the easement the
ASSOCIATION expressly reserves the right to terminate said Agreement by giving the
LICENSEE (or his transferee) one hundred eighty (180) days' written notice of its intended
use of the easement and its intention to so terminate the Agreement and thereafter all
rights of LICENSEE (or his transferee) to use the real property which is the subject of this
License, described in paragraph A, shall immediately terminate and end.
D. In the event the Agreement has terminated for any of the reasons provided for
in paragraph C above, LICENSEE agrees to remove any obstruction or structure which
may have been constructed or which may have been extended into the area described in
paragraph A above, at LICENSEE'S own cost and expense; and if such structures or fences
are not so removed upon demand of the ASSOCIATION, then ASSOCIATION shall have
the right, within a reasonable length of time, after notice to LICENSEE (or his transferee),
to go upon said property and remove the same and the cost of the removal incurred by
the ASSOCIATION shall immediately become a lien upon the real property described in
Recital I hereof, in favor of ASSOCIATION, to secure to it the payment of all sums of
money expended by the ASSOCIATION in connection with the removal of said obstruction
or structure as provided for herein.
Page 2 of 3
CIPOLLA
License Agreement
••.., ••
Arbitration of Dispute.
Any controversy between the LICENSOR and LICENSEE arising between them out of
this agreement shall be settled by arbitration.
The arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with rules and procedures that are
fair and reasonable to LICENSOR and LICENSEE. The American Arbitration Association
Commercial Rules of Arbitration in effect as of the date of this agreement shall be deemed
in compliance with this requirement.
Licensor
ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES,
a non-profit California corporation
Dated: `i � �—)' l q Dated: u • (-1• I -
By
By , 2 244tt�
DAVID McKINNIE OIAN STARINIE
President Secretary
Ytk
Licensee L�
Dated: { F
CHAZ B. CIPOLLA
Page 3 of 3
CIPOLLA
License Agreement
e -1L?2t,P,A.i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Los A .J E LE S
On LS'• i5 • li-1
before me, ¢1-1vNTlcNEr DAqFt'g(
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared C 11fl2 i2) . (' .i POU .A
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(g) whose name(s'jis/pfe
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/safe/tVey executed the same in
his/hgr/therfr authorized capacity(is), and that by his/Ir/their signature(() on the instrument the
person(%), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(,sf acted, executed the instrument.
,I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
• 10 10 •
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of LOS ANGELES
On ' I before me, lJN7l&JCT %7 ,rat '-`-1 Pbt U('
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared (n Ifi-x)Gi)uo S�r tNIt ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(%) whose name(%) is/O
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sp(eltt)e 1 executed the same in
hisit)er/thciir authorized capacity(ie4), and that by his/46r/thptr signature( on the instrument the
person), or the entity upon behalf of which the personK acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
• • 0 •
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of LOS ANGELES
On I�?
before me, A-1\1 4,-1 i 1 oN 1 )A`1, o t t..Li Punt CitA C .
(insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared U t J t D frt
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(f4 whose name(%) isla(e
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sKe/tt}dy executed the same in
his/IA-190 authorized capacity(i s), and that by hisli'r/tttdir signatures) on the instrument the
person(), or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Seal
) nature
g ( )
•O ••
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL NO. 1:
THAT PORTION OF TRACT NO. 12866, IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 246 PAGES 20 AND 21 OF
MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT, SAID ANGLE POINT
BEING THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF A STRAIGHT LINE THEREIN BEARING NORTH 34° 11' 10"
WEST; THENCE NORTH 77° 32' 45" WEST 62.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56° 38' 25' WEST 164.82
FEET; SOUTH 37° 03' 10" WEST 200.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12° 49' 55" WEST 30.00 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE CENTER LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 60.00 FOOT STRIP ON SAID MAP OF TRACT
NO. 12866 AS "PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT"; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THE FOLLOWING
COURSES AND DISTANCES: SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 515.71 FEET; SOUTH 3° 17' 55" EAST 115.31
FEET; SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET, A
DISTANCE OF 69.76 FEETTO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 12866; THENCE
ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND
DISTANCES: NORTH 24° 25' 30" EAST 262.70 FEET; NORTH 9° 43' S0" WEST 314.02 FEET;
NORTH 2° 23' 10" WEST 164.76 FEET; NORTH 34° 11' 10" WEST 118.13 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT 12866 REVERTED TO ACREAGE BY TRACT 13173 AS SHOWN IN MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
'252 PAGE 6, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL NO. 2:
EASEMENTS FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROADS NO. 1 AND 2 AND PARCEL
A, B, C, D AND E, IN SECTION 6(A), ARTICLE V OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
RECORDED IN BOOK 14065 PAGE 345, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND AS AMENDED IN
DESCRIPTION BY THE MODIFICATION OF SAID DECLARATION, RECORDED IN BOOK 14311 PAGE 58,
OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROAD NO. 3 IN
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN BOOK 14710 PAGE 166 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY.
PARCEL NO. 3:
AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER LOTS 42, 45 AND 46 OF ROLLING HILLS, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 201 PAGES 29 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND OF SAID TRACT NO. 12866, BEING A STRIP OF LAND 60.00
FEET WIDE, 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES OR RADIALLY, ON EACH SIDE OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE:
BEGINNING AT STATION NO. 203 ON THE CENTERLINE OF ROAD NO. 2 AS DESCRIBED IN
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE PARCEL NO. 2; THENCE SOUTH 38°
50' 15" WEST 45.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 66.59
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57° 54' 55" WEST 82.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
DESCCTFI-09/oe(eabu
Exhibit "A"
•
• •
41k
LAST MENTIONED CURVE 180.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 6° 08' 00" WEST 45.00 FEET TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE 227.94 FEET TO A POINT
IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 17 IN TRACT NO. 12866 AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
246 PAGES 20 AND 21 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED CURVE AND THE CENTERLINE OF THAT SAID
60.00 FOOT ROAD EASEMENT SHOWN ON MAP OF SAID TRACT NO. 12866, NORTHERLY 69.76 FEET
TO THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS THEREOF: THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF
SAID 60.00 FOOT EASEMENT; THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES: NORTH 3° 17' 55" WEST
115.31 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE THEREIN CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET; NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST
MENTIONED CURVE 820.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 14 OF SAID TRACT
NO.12866.
EXCEPTING FROM PARCEL NO. 3 THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED WITHIN THE LINES OF THE
HEREINBEFORE DESCRIBED PARCEL NO. 1.
ALSO EXCEPTING FROM SAID PARCEL NO. 3 THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE LINES OF
SAID ROAD NO. 2.
AT PG, 'ROE
SET 2' IRON PIPE
AT 'ROE 24661
Mr Per
mh eao+
rI'IRON PIPE
r PC, RCE 2166
46 t WASFJR
. P.GE 29561
PROF'0 EO
lA' 0/5 TOP OP SLOPE
C1FOL.A
I Fir'R11IE LN
::Psorrr)' LINE
seMENT LIKE
—X THREE "FEuc
IN .7,‘SEMENT
SET MA6 t WA56Z
AT P1; TLGE2,061
PROPOfiED:PENG.
LO0/5 TOP OP SLOPE
SET 14.45 t WASHER
AT PG, Y2Clr 2g66I
1' IKON PIPE
. 2' 1440 2426'E
PC, LS 5344
2' IRON PIPE
.10' S10. 12511
�F PG, L5 ,427
2' NZON PIPE
0.I!' N76'42E0 W
OF PG, L5 142 f
5ET HA6 t ?ASHE¢
AT PO,'RCE 2986!
I