360, Construct a new garage within , Resolutions & Approval ConditionsGENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of (roar ,�'c rniq—
� %q
County of .fps /r/V,6ESS.
•.3
88 1002401
OFFICIAL SEAL
���,, LOUTS OBERMAN
+i* NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
,'ft* LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My comm. expires JAN 28, 1991
�—
On this the / 9 day of ONE
2 00, (0l'r:R/1,C-N
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
19 O ?, before me,
N. sWART- vivo SkL V 54/1.7 ,
personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) AWL subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that -%E,Y executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official gal
Call
Notary's Signat'Ire
NO. 201
Accentmitil0/4
1
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91365-4625
For Recorder's Use
88 1004101.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
d
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA
JUN 24 1988 AT 8 A.M.
Recorder's Office
Please record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to:
f FEE $13
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized
before recordation.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
• .Acceptance Form
ss •
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO:
VARIANCE CASE NO. 360
I (We) the undersigned state:
5
I am (We are) the owner(s),=of the real property described as follows:
Hf2i3W1_/l L/-N -
Rot-L./A[- #ILLS" , 90,274
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions
Conditional Use Permit Case No.
Variance Case No. 360-
in said
I (We). certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true'and correct:
(Where the owner and applicant are
Applicant Name
Address,
City, State
Signature
Owner Name
Address
City, State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
not the same, both must sign.)
Type or print
if , 5vV�/�T -
R I-1'1/GGS. Gib 9��7
SA
. S'> 1�1F
s
1
i
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)
In the Matter of the Application )
of )
)
Mr. & Mrs. Ed Swart )
)
Lot 23-RH )
)
FINDINGS AND REPORT
Zoning Case No. 360
The application of Mr. & Mrs. Ed Swart, Lot 23-RH, Rolling
Hills Tract, for a Variance under Section 17.32.010 of the City of
Rolling Hills Municipal Code, came for hearing on the 19th day of
April 1988, and the 17th day of May, 1988, in the Council Chambers of
the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California. The Planning Commission, after being properly advised,
now makes its Findings and Report as required by the Municipal Code
of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicants, Mr. & Mrs. Ed Swart,
are the owners of that certain real property described as Lot 23-RH,
located at 2 Meadowlark Lane in the City of Rolling Hills, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Section 17.32.080 of the Municipal Code of the
City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further,
that verbal comment, was received in support of the request.
Further, that there was no comment in opposition to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicants have requested a
88 1002401
• •
'Variance from Section 17.16.060 front yard setback requirement. The
property is a non -conforming lot of .89 net acres (38,593 sq. ft.) in
size, which is located in the RAS - 1 zone (43,560 sq. ft.). The lot
has a non -conforming front yard setback of 10'.0". The applicants
have requested an additional 23'.0" foot encroachment into the
minimum front yard setback. The applicants indicate that the'690 sq.
ft. garage addition to the existing residence is most logically
expanded within the established building pad area. Therefore, the
applicants request the granting of the Variance so that they may have
the same rights to property as others in the same vicinity and zone,
which would otherwise be denied if they were not able to fully
utilize the existing building pad area. The applicants assert that
there are significant topographical and physical conditions which
exist on the property, which impinge upon the applicants' ability to
fully utilize their property, without damaging the environment. The
applicants assert that a Variance should be granted in order to
preserve substantial property rights in the same vicinity and zone,
and that the granting of such Variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the
same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing, it is concluded that a Variance should be
granted to Mr. & Mrs. Ed Swart, Lot 23-RH, 2 Meadowlark Lane, under
Section 17.32.010 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code for a
Variance from Section 17.16.060 front yard setback requirements
subject to the following conditions:
1) The front yard encroachment into the minimum front yard
setback, at the garage not extend beyond 23.0 feet; 2) The
landscaping plan be approved by the City; and, a bond in the amount
of estimate for the cost of landscaping, plus 15%, be posted after
88 1002401.
5
landscape installation, for not less than two years; 3) The
variance approval be contingent upon the approval of the applicant's
architectural plans by the Rolling Hills Community Association
Architectural Committee; 4) This project is categorically exempt
under the California Environmental Quality Act. It is, therefore, so
ordered.
/s/ Terrence L. Belanger
Secretary, Planning Commission
/s/ Allan Roberts
Chairman, Planning Commission
88 1002401