Loading...
621 MOD, Remodel and add 1154 sq ft to , Staff Reports• Ci1y a1) r� erns �u.ea • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4B Mtg. Date: 7/28/03 DATE: JULY 28, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING pIRECTOR SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. 2003-12. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 AND AMENDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION TO: (1) MODIFY THE VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND (3) TO MODIFY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT 9 MAVERICK LANE, (LOT 27-SK), IN ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION, (SHOEMAKER). BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003-12, which is attached, on July 15, 2003 at their regular meeting granting a request for modification of a previously approved Site Plan and Variances. The vote was 4-1, with Commissioner DeRoy abstaining due to the proximity of subject property to Commissioner's DeRoy property. 2. In November of 2000, the Planning Commission approved, by Resolution No. 2000-28, a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances to encroach with a wall into the front and side yard setbacks, to encroach with the addition into the side yard setback and to exceed the coverage of the front yard with the driveway in Zoning Case No. 621. The wall Variances consisted of permission to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height located on ZC NO. 621Mod. CC 7/28/03 1 0 Printed on Recycled 1'a{rcrr • • the south portion of the property, which would encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branched off. into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which was a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height and the central 17- foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that would encroach into the 35 foot side yard setback. Also approved was a Site Plan Review for a new 3,866 square foot residence, 769 square foot garage, 1,595 square foot basement, and a 640 square foot stable. The house and stable are under construction. 3. The applicant is proposing to relocate the 99-foot long retaining wall further away from the front and side property lines. This wall will be approximately 47 feet from the roadway easement and closer to the required 50 foot front yard setback line, and will encroach between 23 feet and 30 feet into the required 35 foot south side yard setback. In addition, the applicant is proposing to continue the retaining wall into the west side yard setback for a distance of 102 feet. This new wall would encroach between 25 feet and 12 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The applicant is also requesting modification to allow for widening of the driveway. The previous approval included a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted coverage of the front yard with a driveway. 33.3% coverage of the 11,800 square foot front yard area was approved, (20% coverage permitted of the yard in which the driveway is located). The applicant is proposing 35.5% front yard coverage with the driveway. 4. The retaining walls will vary in height from 4 feet to one foot, for an average of 2.49 feet. The areas behind the proposed retaining walls along the south side of the property and along most of the west side of the property will be landscaped. The exposed part of the wall will be facing the residence. 5. Since the original approval, the Fire Department required that the driveway be widened to 15 feet. Due to this requirement, it became necessary to re -design the retaining wall. In addition, the Fire Department required 5 foot walkways on the west and south side of the residence (originally approved at three feet). Due to the slope differential between the walkway and the driveway along the west side of the property the wall is necessary. The applicant stated that this wall was not foreseen when the original application was submitted. He also stated that the re- design of the originally approved wall works much better with the development, eliminates several short walls and is necessary to provide adequate turn around area and walking area, as was required by the Fire Department. 6. No additional grading is proposed for this project. The previously approved quantities are adequate to accomplish this project. Grading for the project was approved at 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. 7. Since the original approval, the applicant has paved the accessway to the stable and created a concrete parking pad above and to the side of the stable. The ZC NO. 621Mod. CC 7/28/03 2 • • increase in the impervious surfaces, and the disturbed area, are included with this application, and include 2,700 square feet for the access road and parking pad, 384 square feet for the driveway and 577 square feet for additional walkways. 8. Staff received verbal concerns from Mr. Bertram Balch, 6 Hackamore Road and Mr. Cosimo Cataldi, 4 Hackamore Road about the paved access to the stable and the parking pad. The neighbors were concerned about the aesthetics of the concrete road and pad. City allows paved accessways to stables, and no additional grading was required to develop this access. Therefore, this construction was approved administratively. The applicant met with the neighbors and agreed to screen the paved accessway and pad from the neighbors' view with landscaping. 9. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 10. The net lot area of the property is 160,420 square feet (3.68 acres). The structural lot coverage approved at 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) will not change. The total lot coverage will increase by 3,661 square feet for a total of 14,029 square feet or 8.7% of the net lot area. (Previously approved at 10,368 square feet or 6.5%), (35% permitted). 11. The disturbed area of the lot will be 16,700 square feet or 10.4% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. The previously approved disturbed area was 7.5%. 12. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the staff report and receive and file the report. ZC NO. 621Mod. CC 7/28/03 A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC NO. 621Mod. CC 7/28/03 ZOr NG; CASE .NO.621:: w`:moDwICA'TIoN SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE, (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL). STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Residence to encroach into • west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence 3,866 sq. Garage -769 sq. Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% 6.5% PROPOSED Modification to move retaining wall and to construct an additional wall; and to modify driveway coverage in the front yard area. ft. Residence ft. Garage 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Bsmnt. 1,595 sq.ft. Total 5,371 soft. 3.4% (No change) 8.7% No change No change No change No change No change 10.4% No change Same access, but paved No change N/A N/A ZC NO. 621Mod. CC 7/28/03 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 AND AMENDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION TO: (1) MODIFY THE VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND (3) TO MODIFY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT 9 MAVERICK LANE, (LOT 27-SK), IN ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION, (SHOEMAKER). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jack Shoemaker with respect to real property located at 9 Maverick Lane (Lot 27-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting modifications to conditions imposed for previously approved application to: (1) modify the Variance for encroachment of retaining wall into the front yard setback, (2) a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the side yard setback, and (3) to modify the Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard at a single family residence, which is currently under construction. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a duly noticed public hearing on May 20, 2003, June 17, 2003, and at a site visit on June 3, 2003 at which time information was presented indicating the need for the modification. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project to modify Zoning Case No. 621 qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption, (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.16.120 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 Zone to be thirty-five (35) feet, and Section 17.16.110 requires that front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line. Except for the required rear yard setback under certain conditions, all other required setbacks must remain unobstructed by structures. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Code when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. The applicant is requesting permission to move the previously approved 99-foot long, maximum 5 feet high retaining wall, which encroaches into the front and south side yard setback, closer to the residence in order to widen the driveway and to construct a new retaining wall in the west side yard setback, approximately 102 feet long, which vary in height from 2'5" to 4 feet. With respect to the requests for a Variance for the retaining wall in the west side yard setback and the modification of the wall in the south side yard setback and the front yard, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. When the application was originally approved, the then existing residence was built with a driveway that had a steep 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have an average 8.7% slope that is less steep and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. During construction of the originally approved driveway, the applicant was required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department to widen the driveway and to widen the walkways around the proposed residence. This resulted in the need to move the retaining wall and to construct a new retaining wall in the west side yard setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity and is necessary for fire safety reasons. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. Other parcels in the vicinity, which have such a steep slope, were also granted Variances to construct retaining walls. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The proposal allows the owner to reduce the steep slope at the front of the property to bring it in compliance with Section 17.16.160 (3) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Except as permitted in this Resolution, the proposed development complies with lot coverage requirements, preservation of the natural environment, and all other standards of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Section 5. Section 17.16.150(B) requires that driveways in the RA-S zones shall not cover more than twenty (20) percent of the area of the yard in which they are located. The applicant requests to modify the previously approved coverage of 33.3 percent of the area of the front yard with a driveway to 35.5% coverage. With respect to the request for modification of the previously approved Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. 2 A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The proposed driveway design will provide safer access to the residence by providing an average 8.7% slope which is less steep than the existing 20% slope and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. The additional lot coverage is necessary to achieve the reduced slope of the driveway. During construction of the originally approved driveway, the applicant was required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department to widen the driveway. This resulted in greater coverage of the driveway in the side yard setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the modification to Variances to encroach with retaining walls into the front and west side yard setbacks and to permit a driveway to cover a maximum of 35.5 percent of the area of the front yard, in Zoning Case No. 621 Modification, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated April 25, 2003, subject to the amended conditions specified in Section 8 of this Resolution. Section 7. Slight changes to the total net lot coverage and disturbed area resulted from the original proposal due to the proposed walls and from the paving over of the access road to the stable. Based upon information submitted and evidence in the record, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Resolution No. 2000-28, to read as follows: A. Paragraph A of Section 12 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development and maintain sufficient open space between surrounding structures. With the Variances Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. • • granted herein, the project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 160,420 square feet. The proposed residence (3,866 sq. ft.), garage (769 sq. ft.), stable (640 sq. ft.), and service yard (96 sq. ft.) will have 5,371 square feet which constitutes 3.4% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway, including the paved access road to the stable, will be 14,029 square feet which equals 8.7% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. B. Paragraph D of Section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit "A," dated October 13, 2000, except as otherwise provided in these conditions, and with the site plan on file marked Exhibit "A" MODIFIED Zoning Case No. 621, dated April 25, 2003." C. Paragraph K of Section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: " The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 3.4% and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 8.7%." D. Paragraph M of section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "Maximum disturbed area shall not'exceed 10.4% of the net lot area." Section 9. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 2000-28 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF JULY 2003. "'.e'cll Jam') EVIE HANKtNS, CHAIRWOMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KE ,DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-12 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 AND AMENDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION TO: (1) MODIFY THE VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND (3) TO MODIFY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT 9 MAVERICK LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION. (SHOEMAKER) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 15, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Margeta, Witte, Sommer and Chairwoman Hankins. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioner DeRoy. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. 5Qv DATE: TO: FROM: • eiiy 0/ Rolling Jl'QP • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com JULY 15, 2003 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MAY 10, 2003 A request for modification to a previously approved Site Plan and Variances to relocate a previously approved retaining wall further away from the property lines and to construct an additional retaining wall, which would encroach into the west side yard setback, and to further exceed the previously approved coverage of the front yard with the driveway. The original approval consisted of a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances, which included encroachment of retaining walls into the front and side yard setbacks, encroachment of a residential addition into the side yard setback and exceedance of the maximum permitted driveway coverage in the front yard. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission at the June 15, 2003 meeting, directed staff to prepare a Resolution of approval regarding the above request in Zoning Case No. 621 Modification. The vote was 4-0, with Commissioner DeRoy abstaining, due to the proximity of subject property to Commissioner's DeRoy property. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2003-12, approving Zoning Case No. 621 Modification. • • RESOLUTION NO. 2003-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 AND AMENDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION TO: (1) MODIFY THE VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND (3) TO MODIFY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT 9 MAVERICK LANE, (LOT 27-SK), IN ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION, (SHOEMAKER). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jack Shoemaker with respect to real property located at 9 Maverick Lane (Lot 27-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting modifications to conditions imposed for previously approved application to: (1) modify the Variance for encroachment of retaining wall into the front yard setback, (2) a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the side yard setback, and (3) to modify the Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard at a single family residence, which is currently under construction. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a duly noticed public hearing on May 20, 2003, June 17, 2003, and at a site visit on June 3, 2003 at which time information was presented indicating the need for the modification. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project to modify Zoning Case No. 621 qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption, (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.16.120 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 Zone to be thirty-five (35) feet, and Section 17.16.110 requires that front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line. Except for the required rear yard setback under certain conditions, all other required setbacks must remain unobstructed by structures. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Code when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. \J • • properties in the same vicinity. The applicant is requesting permission to move the previously approved 99-foot long, maximum 5 feet high retaining wall, which encroaches into the front and south side yard setback, closer to the residence in order to widen the driveway and to construct a new retaining wall in the west side yard setback, approximately 102 feet long, which vary in height from 2'5" to 4 feet. With respect to the requests for a Variance for the retaining wall in the west side yard setback and the modification of the wall in the south side yard setback and the front yard, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. When the application was originally approved, the then existing residence was built with a driveway that had a steep 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have an average 8.7% slope that is less steep and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. During construction of the originally approved driveway, the applicant was required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department to widen the driveway and to widen the walkways around the proposed residence. This resulted in the need to move the retaining wall and to construct a new retaining wall in the west side yard setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity and is necessary for fire safety reasons. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. Other parcels in the vicinity, which have such a steep slope, were also granted Variances to construct retaining walls. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The proposal allows the owner to reduce the steep slope at the front of the property to bring it in compliance with Section 17.16.160 (3) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Except as permitted in this Resolution, the proposed development complies with lot coverage requirements, preservation of the natural environment, and all other standards of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Section 5. Section 17.16.150(B) requires that driveways in the RA-S zones shall not cover more than twenty (20) percent of the area of the yard in which they are located. The applicant requests to modify the previously approved coverage of 33.3 percent of the area of the front yard with a driveway to 35.5% coverage. With respect to the request for modification of the previously approved Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. 2 A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The proposed driveway design will provide safer access to the residence by providing an average 8.7% slope which is less steep than the existing 20% slope and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. The additional lot coverage is necessary to achieve the reduced slope of the driveway. During construction of the originally approved driveway, the applicant was required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department to widen the driveway. This resulted in greater coverage of the driveway in the side yard setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the modification to Variances to encroach with retaining walls into the front and west side yard setbacks and to permit a driveway to cover a maximum of 35.5 percent of the area of the front yard, in Zoning Case No. 621 Modification, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated April 25, 2003, subject to the amended conditions specified in Section 8 of this Resolution. Section 7. Slight changes from the original proposal to the total net lot coverage and disturbed area resulted the proposed walls and from the paving over of the access road to the stable. Based upon information submitted and evidence in the record, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Resolution No. 2000-28, to read as follows: A. Paragraph A of Section 12 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development and maintain sufficient open space between surrounding structures. With the Variances granted herein, the project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 160,420 square feet. The Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. • • proposed residence (3,866 sq. ft.), garage (769 sq. ft.), stable (640 sq. ft.), and service yard (96 sq. ft.) will have 5,371 square feet which constitutes 3.4% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway, including the paved access road to the stable, will be 14,029 square feet which equals 8.7% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. B. Paragraph D of Section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit "A," dated October 13, 2000, except as otherwise provided in these conditions, and with the site plan on file marked Exhibit "A" MODIFIED Zoning Case No. 621, dated April 25, 2003." C. Paragraph K of Section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: " The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 3.4% and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 8.7%." D. Paragraph M of section 14 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 10.4% of the net lot area." Section 9. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 2000-28 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF JULY 2003. EVIE HANKINS, CHAIRWOMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-12 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 AND AMENDING CONDITIONS IMPOSED FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION TO: (1) MODIFY THE VARIANCE FOR ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALL INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, AND (3) TO MODIFY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY BEING CONSTRUCTED AT 9 MAVERICK LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION. (SHOEMAKER) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 15, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution 2003-12 ZC No. 621Mod. 5 DATE: TO: FROM: • City opeollin9. JUL JUNE 17, 2003 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: PUBLISHED: REOUEST NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MAY 10, 2003 A request for modification to a previously approved Site Plan and Variances to relocate a previously approved retaining wall further away from the property lines and to construct an additional retaining wall, which would encroach into the west side yard setback, and to further exceed the previously approved coverage of the front yard with the driveway. The original approval consisted of a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances, which included encroachment of retaining walls into the front and side yard setbacks, encroachment of a residential addition into the side yard setback and exceedance of the maximum permitted driveway coverage in the front yard. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission viewed the project on June 3, 2003. Mr. Shoemaker pointed out where the new walls will be located. Staff mentioned that two neighbors on Hackamore Road brought up a concern to staff about the paved road to the stable and the parking pad, which was approved administratively. City allows paved access to stables, and no additional grading was required to develop this access. Staff explained that the applicant met with the neighbors and agreed to screen the paved accessway. 2. In November of 2000, the Planning Commission approved, by Resolution No. 2000-28, a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances to encroach with a wall into the front and side yard setbacks, to encroach with the addition into the side yard setback and to exceed the coverage of the front yard with the driveway in Zoning Case No. 621. 3. The request for modification of Zoning Case No. 621 is for the previously approved Variance, which consisted of permission to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height located at the south portion of the ZC No. 621 Mod. 1 PC 6/17/03 ®Prnrletl nn Fir.•<Yr: d P.1uu:1 • • property, which would encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branched off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which was a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height and the central 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that would encroach into the 35 foot side yard setback. The applicant is also requesting modification to allow for widening of the driveway. The previous approval included a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted coverage of the front yard with a driveway. 33.3% coverage of the 11,800 square foot front yard area was approved, (20% coverage permitted of the yard in which the driveway is located). The applicant is proposing 35.5% front yard coverage with the driveway. 4. Also approved in November of 2000, was a Site Plan Review for a 640 square foot stable and substantial additions for a total of 3,866 square foot residence, 769 square foot garage and 1,595 square foot basement, and Variances to permit proposed residential additions to encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The house and stable are under construction. 5. The applicant is proposing to relocate the 99-foot long retaining wall further away from the front and side property lines. This wall will be approximately 47 feet from the roadway easement and closer to the required 50 foot front yard setback line, and will encroach between 23 feet and 30 feet into the required 35 foot south side yard setback. In addition, the applicant is proposing to continue the retaining wall into the west side yard setback for a distance of 102 feet. This new wall would encroach between 25 feet and 12 feet into the 35-foot west side yard setback. 6. The retaining walls will vary in height from 4 feet to one foot, for an average of 2.49 feet. The areas behind the proposed retaining walls along the south side of the property and along most of the west side of the property will be landscaped. The exposed part of the wall will be facing the residence. 7. Since the original approval, the Fire Department required that the driveway be widened to 15 feet. Due to this requirement, it became necessary to re -design the retaining wall. In addition, the Fire Department required 5-foot walkways on the west and south side of the residence (originally approved at three feet). Due to the slope differential between the walkway and the driveway along the west side of the property the wall is necessary. The applicant stated that this wall was not foreseen when the original application was submitted. He also states that the re- design of the originally approved wall works much better with the development, eliminates several short walls and is necessary to provide adequate turn around area and walking area, as was required by the Fire Department. 8. No additional grading is proposed for this project. The previously approved quantities are adequate to accomplish this project. Grading for the project was approved at 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. ZC No. 621 Mod. 2 PC 6/17/03 • 9. Since the original approval, the applicant has paved the accessway to the stable and created a concrete parking pad above and to the side of the stable. The increase in the impervious surfaces, and therefore the disturbed area, is included with this application, and includes 2,700 square feet for the. access road and parking pad, 384 square feet for the driveway and 577 square feet for additional walkways. 10. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 11. The net lot area of the property is 160,420 square feet (3.68 acres). The structural lot coverage approved at 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) will not change. The total lot coverage will increase by 3,661 square feet for a total of 14,029 square feet or 8.7% of the net lot area. (Previously approved at 10,368 square feet or 6.5%), (35% permitted). 12. The disturbed area of the lot will be 16,700 square feet or 10.4% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. The previously approved disturbed area was 7.5%. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. ZC No. 621 Mod. 3 PC 6/17/03 ) • • 'VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS' A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC No. 621 Mod. 4 PC 6/17/03 ZONING CASE .NO. 621 `MODIFICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Residence to encroach into west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% 6.5% 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition PROPOSED Modification to move retaining wall and to construct an additional wall; and to modify driveway coverage in the front yard area. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% (No change) 8.7% No change No change No change No change No change 10.4% 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. No change Same access, but paved No change N/A N/A ZC No. 621 Mod. 5 PC 6/17/03 DATE: TO: FROM: • Ci1y 0/ RO/A J/h JUNE 3, 2003 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: PUBLISHED: REOUEST NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MAY 10, 2003 A request for modification to a previously approved Site Plan and Variances to relocate a previously approved retaining wall further away from the property lines and to construct an additional retaining wall, which would encroach into the west side yard setback, and to further exceed the previously approved coverage of the front yard with the driveway. The original approval consisted of a Site Plan Review for substantial addition to an existing house and Variances, which included encroachment of retaining walls into the front and side yard setbacks, encroachment of a residential addition into the side yard setback and exceedance of the maximum permitted driveway coverage in the front yard. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission, at the May 20, 2003 public hearing scheduled a field visit to view the project on June 3, 2003. 2. In November of 2000, the Planning Commission approved, by Resolution No. 2000-28, a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances to encroach with a wall into the front and side yard setbacks, to encroach with the addition into the side yard setback and to exceed the coverage of the front yard with the driveway in Zoning Case No. 621. The wall Variances consisted of permission to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height located on the south portion of the property, which would encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branched off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which was a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height and the central 17- foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that would encroach into the 35 foot side yard setback. ZC No. 621 Mod. 1 PC 6/3/03FT ®Prix ed or, ficr. r;l' • • Also approved was a Site Plan Review for substantial additions for a total of 3,866 square foot residence, 769 square foot garage, 1,595 square foot basement, and a 640 square foot stable. The house and stable are under construction. 4. The applicant is proposing to relocate the 99-foot long retaining wall further away from the front and side property lines. This wall will be approximately 47 feet from the roadway easement and closer to the required 50 foot front yard setback line, and will encroach between 23 feet and 30 feet into the required 35 foot south side yard setback. In addition, the applicant is proposing to continue the retaining wall into the west side yard setback for a distance of 102 feet. This new wall would encroach between 25 feet and 12 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The applicant is also requesting modification to allow for widening of the driveway. The previous approval included a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted coverage of the front yard with a driveway. 33.3% coverage of the 11,800 square foot front yard area was approved, (20% coverage permitted of the yard in which the driveway is located). The applicant is proposing 35.5% front yard coverage with the driveway. 5. The retaining walls will vary in height from 4 feet to one foot, for an average of 2.49 feet. The areas behind the proposed retaining walls along the south side of the property and along most of the west side of the property will be landscaped. The exposed part of the wall will be facing the residence. 6. Since the original approval, the Fire Department required that the driveway be widened to 15 feet. Due to this requirement, it became necessary to re -design the retaining wall. In addition, the Fire Department required a 5 foot walkways on the west and south side of the residence (originally approved at three feet). Due to the slope differential between the walkway and the driveway along the west side of the property the wall is necessary. The applicant stated that this wall was not foreseen when the original application was submitted. He also states that the re- design of the originally approved wall works much better with the development, eliminates several short walls and is necessary to provide adequate turn around area and walking area, as was required by the Fire Department. 7. No additional grading is proposed for this project. The previously approved quantities are adequate to accomplish this project. Grading for the project was approved at 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. 8. Since the original approval, the applicant has paved the accessway to the stable and created a concrete parking pad above and to the side of the stable. The increase in the impervious surfaces, and therefore the disturbed area, is included with this application, and includes 2,700 square feet for the access road and parking pad, 384 square feet for the driveway and 577 square feet for additional walkways. 9. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case ZC No. 621 Mod. 2 PC 6/3/03FT a • • No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 10. The net lot area of the property is 160,420 square feet (3.68 acres). The structural lot coverage approved at 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) will not change. The total lot coverage will increase by 3,661 square feet for a total of 14,029 square feet or 8.7% of the net lot area. (Previously approved at 10,368 square feet or 6.5%), (35% permitted). 11. The disturbed area of the lot will be 16,700 square feet or 10.4% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. The previously approved disturbed area was 7.5%. 12. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission the view project. VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of.the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC No. 621 Mod. 3 PC 6/3/03FT ZONING CASE NO.. 621= MODIFICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. _STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Residence to encroach into west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% 6.5% 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition PROPOSED Modification to move retaining wall and to construct an additional wall; and to modify driveway coverage in the front yard area. Residence Garage 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Bsmnt. 1,595 sq.ft. Total 5,371 sq.ft. 3.4% (No change) 8.7% No change No change No change No change No change 10.4% No change Same access, but paved No change N/A N/A ZC No. 621 Mod. 4 PC 6/3/03FT MEMORANDUM MAY 20, 2003 ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION. 9 MAVERICK LANE. ROLLING HILLS. (SHOEMAKER). DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF COMMISSIONER DEROY'S PROPERTY TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, (WITHIN 500-FEET), COMMISSIONER DEROY SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM DELIBERATION AND VOTING IN ZONING CASE NO. 621- MODIFICATION. DATE: TO: FROM: • City MAY 20, 2003 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 621 MODIFICATION 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MAY 10, 2003 A request for modification to a previously approved Site Plan and Variances to relocate a previously approved retaining wall further away from the property lines and to construct an additional retaining wall, which would encroach into the west side yard setback, and to further exceed the previously approved coverage of the front yard with the driveway. The original approval consisted of a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances, which included encroachment of retaining walls into the front and side yard setbacks, encroachment of a residential addition into the side yard setback and exceedance of the maximum permitted driveway coverage in the front yard. BACKGROUND 1. In November of 2000, the Planning Commission approved, by Resolution No. 2000-28, a Site Plan Review for substantial addition and Variances to encroach with a wall into the front and side yard setbacks, to encroach with the addition into the side yard setback and to exceed the coverage of the front yard with the driveway in Zoning Case No. 621. 2. The request for modification of Zoning Case No. 621 is for the previously approved Variance, which consisted of permission to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height located at the south portion of the property, which would encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branched off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which was a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height and the central 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that would encroach into the 35 foot side yard setback. The applicant is also requesting modification to allow for widening of the driveway. The previous approval included a Variance to exceed the maximum NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com • ZC No. 621 Mod. 1 PC 5/20/03 • • permitted coverage of the front yard with a driveway. A 33.3% coverage of the 11,800 square foot front yard area was approved, (20% coverage permitted of the yard in which the driveway is located). The applicant is proposing 35.5% front yard coverage with the driveway. Also approved was a Site Plan Review for substantial additions for a total of 3,866 square foot residence, 769 square foot garage and 1,595 square foot basement, and Variances to permit proposed residential additions to encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. A 640 square foot stable was also approved. The house and stable are under construction. 3. The applicant is proposing to relocate the 99-foot long retaining wall further away from the front and side property lines. This wall will be approximately 47 feet from the roadway easement and closer to the required 50 foot front yard setback line, and will encroach between 23 feet and 30 feet into the required 35 foot south side yard setback. In addition, the applicant is proposing to continue the retaining wall into the west side yard setback for a distance of 102 feet. This new wall would encroach between 25 feet and 12 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. 4. The retaining walls will vary in height from 4 feet to one foot, for an average of 2.49 feet. The areas behind the proposed retaining walls along the south side of the property and along most of the west side of the property will be landscaped. The exposed part of the wall will be facing the residence. 5. Since the original approval, the Fire Department required that the driveway be widened to 15 feet. Due to this requirement, it became necessary to re -design the retaining wall. In addition, the Fire Department required a 5 foot walkways on the west and south side of the residence (originally approved at three feet). Due to the slope differential between the walkway and the driveway along the west side of the property the wall is necessary. The applicant stated that this wall was not foreseen when the original application was submitted. He also states that the re- design of the originally approved wall works much better with the development, eliminates several short walls and is necessary to provide adequate turn around area and walking area, as was required by the Fire Department. 6. No additional grading is proposed for this project. The previously approved quantities are adequate to accomplish this project. Grading for the project was approved at 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. 7. Since the original approval, the applicant has paved the accessway to the stable and created a concrete parking pad to the side of the stable. The increase in the impervious surfaces, and therefore the disturbed area, is included with this application, and includes 2,700 square feet for the access road and parking pad, 384 square feet for the driveway and 577 square feet for additional walkways. 8. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case ZC No. 621 Mod. 2 PC 5/20/03 No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 9. The net lot area of the property is 160,420 square feet (3.68 acres). The structural lot coverage approved at 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) will not change. The total lot coverage will increase by 3,661 square feet for a total of 14,029 square feet or 8.7% of the net lot area. (Previously approved at 10,368 square feet or 6.5%), (35% permitted). 10. The disturbed area of the lot will be 16,700 square feet or 10.4% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. The previously approved disturbed area was 7.5%. 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report and take public testimony. VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC No. 621 Mod. 3 PC 5/20/03 ZONING CASE NO. 621- MODIFICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS UNDER CONSTRUCTION PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Residence to encroach into west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% 6.5% 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition PROPOSED Modification to move retaining wall and to construct an additional wall; and to modify driveway coverage in the front yard area. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Bsmnt. Total 3.4% (No change) 8.7% No change No change No change No change No change 10.4% 3,866 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 1,595 sq.ft. 5,371 sq.ft. No change Same access, but paved No change N/A N/A ZC No. 621 Mod. , 4 PC 5/20/03 • • City `eolf,.y INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4.B. Mtg. Date: 11/27/2000 DATE: NOVEMBER 27, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF . ROLLING HILLS (1) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK, (3) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, (4) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD, AND (5) GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE GRADING TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 9 MAVERICK LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 621. Mr. and Mrs. Jack Shoemaker, 9 Maverick Lane (Lot 27-SK) BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted the attached Resolution No. 2000-28 on November 21, 2000 at their regular meeting. The vote was 5-0. 2. The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit retaining walls that are incorporated into the construction of a stairway and a proposed driveway located within the front, and side yard setbacks. A 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height at the south will encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branches off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which is a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback and the central 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. Printed. on Recycled Paper. • • The applicants state that the Variances are necessary because, "The minor retaining walls that vary from 0 —.5' in height (averaging 2.5 feet) are required to re -build an extreme driveway so that it is less steep and safer. There will be no impact to any surrounding properties. This driveway improvement will add to the safety and welfare of the owner and any visitors (this includes public, government and private visitors)." The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit proposed residential additions that will encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The existing residence encroaches up to 10.5 feet into the setback. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary because, "As is clear with the existing residence, the current setback is significantly encroached. With the new design, the home is brought significantly closer to being within the intent of the planning guidelines. Due to the small size of the building pad and limitations of the site, as well as the new plan being less than 1000 sgft. larger than the existing, some encroachment is required to further the goals of the planning guidelines. This encroachment is in a non - visible and very low impact area and will result in no negative impacts to the surrounding community." The applicants are requesting a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard which is 3,928 square feet or 33.3% of an 11,800 square foot front yard (20% maximum of the area of the yard in which they are located). The existing driveway covers 1,342 square feet or 23% of the 5,922 square foot front yard. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary "Due to the extreme slope of the existing driveway and the unmanageable and unsafe conditions .related to accessing the current residence, the re -grading of the driveway is proposed. By the proposed design, a safer access and off street parking area is created. This will require a 10% increase of the current front yard coverage from the existing driveway. This small increase will allow for the safe use and enjoyment of the property without any negative impact, visual or otherwise, on the surrounding community." The applicants also request Site Plan Review to construct 750 square feet of additions to the existing 3,116 square foot residence for a total of 3,866 square feet and the addition of 157 square feet of garage space for a total of 769 square feet. Proposed structures include a 640 square foot stable on a lower building pad and a 96 square foot service yard. A 1,595 square foot basement is also proposed. The project entails the demolition of the front section of the residence, locating the residential additions further back on the building pad, and the use of the basement cut soil to fill and rework the existing steep driveway that has a 20% slope to be an 8.7% average slope with a 10% maximum slope within the lot. 3. Grading for the project site will require 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. The cut and fill will be balanced and includes the cut basement quantities. 4. Criteria for Site Plan Review and a table of Nearby Properties are attached. 5. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved for Mrs. Sally S. Cornell and Mr. and Mrs. Mark Dessy by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 6. The existing driveway access off Maverick Lane will remain. The existing driveway has a 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have a 7% slope for the first 20 feet of the driveway, an 8.7% average slope, and a 10% maximum slope in accordance with code requirements. The driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to 14 feet. The proposed driveway was approved in concept by the County Fire Department. 7. A 640 square foot barn is proposed along with a more than 550 square foot existing corral on a lower level than the residence and will be accessed by an existing trail that has a maximum slope of 25% slope from Maverick Lane at the western side of the property. 8. The structural lot coverage proposed is 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 10,368 square feet or 6.5% (35% permitted). 9. The 8,785 square, foot residential building pad will have proposed coverage of 4,731 square feet or 53.9%. The 3,840 square foot stable pad coverage will be 640 square feet or 16.7%. There is a third 2,600 square foot building pad below the stable pad that does not have structural development. All three building pads total 15,225 square feet for a total structural building pad coverage of 5,371 square feet or 35.3%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 10. The disturbed area of the lot will be 12,000 square feet or 7.5% (40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas,/and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 2000-28. • • VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. NEARBY PROPERTIES i ADDRESS I LOT NO. I OWNER I RESIDENCELOT SIZE/ I (SQ.FT.) I ACRES (GROSS) 4 Maverick Lane' 24-SK Virtue 5392 1.100 6 Maverick Lane 25-SK Mendez 3028 1.086 8 Maverick Lane 26-SK Dessy 3364 2.859 9 Maverick Lane 27-SK Shoemaker, J. 3049 4.049 (Existing) 7 Maverick Lane 28-SK Howroyd 4964 2.912 5 Maverick Lane 29-SK I Brogdon 2517 ' 2.576 3 Maverick Lane 30-SK I Makita I 2855 I 2.560 1 Maverick Lane 31-SK I Mirsaidi I 3081 i 2.493 AVERAGE I 3531 I 2.454 I PROPOSED I 3,866 I 4.049 • • SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by morethan 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS EXISTING I PROPOSED Existing residence encroaches into west side yard setback. Residence Garage Stable Service Total 2.2% 4.8% 40.7% of 8,785 sq.ft. pad Residence to encroach into west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. 2,870 sq.ft. Residence 3,866 sq.ft. 612 sq.ft. Garage 769 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. Service 96 sq.ft. 3,578 sq.ft 0% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 23.5% of 15,225 sq.ft. pads N/A 6.5% N/A Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane IN/A PLANTS AND ANIMALS I N/A Total 5,371 sq.ft. 1 3.4% 16.5% 53.9% of 8,785 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad I 0% of 2,600 soft. pad 1 35.3% of 15,225 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral INo change No change IPlanning Commission review IPlanning Commission review • • t RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS (1) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, (2) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK, (3) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, (4) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MA)QMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD, AND (5) GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS THAT . REQUIRE GRADING TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 9 MAVERICK LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 621. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jack Shoemaker with respect to real property located at'9 Maverick Lane (Lot 27-SK), Rolling Hills, requesting the following: (1) a Variance to permit encroachment .of retaining walls into the front yard setback, (2) a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the south side yard setback, (3) a Variance to permit encroachment of proposed residential additions into the west side yard setback, (4) a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard, and (5) Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions that require grading to an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on August 15, 2000, September 19, 2000, October 17, 2000, November 21, 2000, and at a field trip visit on September. 9, 2000. The applicants were notified of . the public hearing in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting - said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed,. analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants were in attendance at the hearing. During the hearing process, plans were revised to accurately portray the location of the existing residence on the building pad and the reconfigured residence to the west so that the proposed building would be 3 feet away from the edge of the building pad at the east. . Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills, Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent ' the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar • • properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires the front yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S zone to be fifty (50) feet. The applicants are requesting to encroach up to a maximum of 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up. to 5 feet in height at the south. With respect to this request fora Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The existing residence was built with a driveway that has a steep 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have an average 8.7% slope that is less steep and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. The required grading to reduce the slope necessitates a retaining wall to preserve the integrity of the slope. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. This lot has an existing driveway that exceeds the maximum permitted slope. Other parcels in the vicinity do not have such a steep slope. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The proposal allows the owner to reduce the steep slope at the front of the property to bring it in compliance with Section 17.16.160 (3) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Except as permitted in this Resolution, the proposed development complies with lot coverage requirements, preservation of the natural environment, and all other standards of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 621 to permit the encroachment of up to a maximum of 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback to constructa 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated October 13, • 2000, subject to the conditions specified in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 6. Section 17.16.120(B) . requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicants are requesting to encroach up to a maximum of 17 feet into the 35 foot south side yard setback to construct a 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The existing residence was built with a driveway that, has a steep 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have an average 8.7% slope that is less steep and will enlarge the open RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 2 0F10 • • space near the front of the residence. The required grading to reduce the slope necessitates a retaining wall to preserve the integrity of the slope. B. .. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the useof the lot.. to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. This lot has an existing driveway that exceeds the maximum permitted slope. Other parcels in the vicinity do not have such a steep slope. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious tothe property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The proposal allows the owner to reduce the steep slope at the front of the property to bring it in compliance with Section 17.16.160 (3) of the Rolling Hills .Municipal Code. Except aspermitted in this Resolution, the proposed development complies with lot coverage requirements, preservation of the natural environment, and all other standards of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 621 to permit the encroachment of . up to a maximum of 17 feet into the '35 foot south side yard setback to construct a 99- foot long curvilinear retaining wall, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated October 13, 2000, subject to the conditions specified in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 8: Section 17.16.120(B) requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicants are requesting to encroach up to a maximum of 20 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback to construct residential additions. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. . There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstance's and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The existing legal nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 11 feet into the west side yard setback. This addition will encroach 9 feet beyond existing encroachments, a total of 20 feet, and is limited in area so as to expand existing open space near the front and rear of the residence. The existing residence and proposed addition are modest in size. Due to the severity of slope on the property, the existing building pad cannot be increased in size. Accordingly, the encroachment is necessary becaise the proposed addition cannot be located elsewhere on the lot. B. . The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,. but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits. the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 3 OF10 permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 621 to permit the encroachment of up to a maximum of 20 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback to construct residential additions, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated October 13, 2000, subject to the conditions specified in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 10. Section 17.16.150(B) "requires that driveways in the RA-S zone shall not cover more than twenty (20) percent of the area of the yard in which they are located. The applicants are requesting to 'cover a maximum 'of 33.3 percent of the area of the front yard with a driveway. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as. follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply ' generally to the other property or . class of use in the same zone because ,of the topography and irregular shape of the lot. The proposed driveway design will provide safer access to the residence by providing an average 8.7% slope which is less steep than the existing 20% slope and will enlarge the open space near the front of the residence. The additional lot coverage is necessary to achieve the reduced slope of the driveway. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property, in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. . Section 11. ' Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 621 to permit a driveway to cover a maximum of 33.3 percent of the area of the front yard, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated October 13, 2000, subject to theconditions specified in Section 14 of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO.2000-28 PAGE 4OF10 • • Section 12. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development and maintain sufficient open space between surrounding structures. With the Variances granted herein, the project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 160,420 square feet. The proposed residence (3,866 sq. ft.), garage (769 sq. ft.), stable (640 sq. ft.), and service yard (96 sq. ft.) will have 5,371. square feet which constitutes 3.4% of the lot which is within the. ma?cimum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage includingpaved areas and driveway will be 10,368 square feet which equals 6.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. B. The proposed development, as modified, by the conditions of approval, preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading. The natural drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the northeastern side of this lot. D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and other residences on Maverick Lane. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coveragemaximum will not be exceeded. The proposed project is also consistent with the scale of other large homes in the immediate neighborhood. Grading will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage compares to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 5 OF1 0 pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the existing driveway accessway. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 13. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 621 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development, plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 14. The Variances approved in Sections 5, 7, 9, and 11 and the Site Plan Review approved in Section 13 are subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.38.070(A) and 17.46.080, or otherwise extended the approvals pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation,theopportunity for a hearing' has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located shall be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan dated October 13, 2000, and marked Exhibit A,except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of. Building and.Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. G. Grading for the project shall not exceed 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. H. Any retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 5 feet in height, averaging no more than 2-1/2 feet. I. The residential structure shall have a pad elevation of 475 feet. • RESOLUTION NO. 200028 PAGE 6 OF10 J. The project shall include a basement that shall not exceed a total of 1,595 square feet. K. The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 3.4% and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 6.5%. L. The residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 53.9%, stable pad building pad coverage shall not exceed 16.7%, a third building pad below the stable pad shall not have any structural development and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 35.3%. M. The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 7.5% of the net lot, area. N. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the residential building pad. O. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. P. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to obstruct the views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the residence. Q. . The property owner shall not plant any species of plants that are likely at mature height to impair the views of neighboring properties. R.. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the residence and thebuilding pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. S. At maturity, the new landscape plantings around the proposed residence shall not exceed the ridge height of the residence. T. Two copies of a preliminary landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted shall comply with the purpose and . intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with, the rural character of the community. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of . the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a drainage, grading RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 7 OF10 • • and building permit and shall be retained with the. City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. U. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. V. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. W. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday. through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. The property owners shall conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. Z. The property owners shall conform ' with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. AA. The property owners shall conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid.waste. AB. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth is Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. AC. Prior to the submittal of anapplicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and. approval. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed, a steepness of a 2 to .1 slope ratio. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 8 OF10 • • t AD. The project shall be reviewed andapproved by the. Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. AE. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AF. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance and Site Plan approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective. AG. All conditions of the Variance and Site Plan approvals that apply shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY ATTEST: MARILYN RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 PAGE 9 OF10 ER, 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) • COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-28 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS (1) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, . (2) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF RETAINING WALLS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD. SETBACK, (3) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS INTO THE WEST SIDE YARD SETBACK, (4) GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY COVERAGE IN THE FRONT YARD, AND (5) GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS THAT REQUIRE GRADING TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 9 MAVERICK LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 621. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on November 21, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. . ��-- .1%A11.0J-Grirk ;I DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-28 • PAGE 10 OF10 i C14 oP • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2000 TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. ZONING CASE NO. 621 SITE LOCATION: 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) ZONING AND SIZE: RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES APPLICANT: MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER REPRESENTATIVE: MR. THOMAS A. BLAIR, BLAIR ASSOCIATES PUBLISHED: AUGUST 5, 2000 REOUEST Request for a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the front yard setback, request to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit encroachment of proposed residential additions into the west side yard setback, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard, and request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires grading. BACKGROUND 1. Plans were revised to accurately portray the location of the residence on the building pad and the relocation of the residence to the west so that the building is 3 feet away from the edge of the building pad at the east. 2. The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit retaining walls that are incorporated into the construction of a stairway and a proposed driveway located within the front and side yard setbacks. A 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height at the south will encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard. setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branches off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which is a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback and the central 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 1 S Pririted on Recycled Paper. • • The applicants state that the Variances are necessary because, "The minor retaining walls that vary from 0 — 5' in height (averaging 2.5 feet) are required to re -build an extreme driveway so that it is less steep and safer. There will be no impact to any surrounding properties. This driveway improvement will add to the safety and welfare of the owner and any visitors (this includes public, government and private visitors)." The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit proposed residential additions that will encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The existing residence encroaches up to 10.5 feet into the setback. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary because, "As is clear with the existing residence, the current setback is significantly encroached. With the new design, the home is brought significantly closer to being within the intent of the planning guidelines. Due to the small size of the building pad and limitations of the site, as well as the new plan being less than 1000 sq.ft. larger than the existing, some encroachment is required to further the goals of the planning guidelines. This encroachment is in a non -visible and very l o w impact area and will result in no negative impacts to the surrounding community." The applicants are requesting a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard which is 3,928 square feet or 33.3% of an 11,800 square foot front yard (20% maximum of the area of the yard in which they are located). The existing driveway covers 1,342 square feet or 23% of the 5,922 square foot front yard. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary "Due to the extreme slope of the existing driveway and the unmanageable and unsafe conditions related to accessing the current residence, the re -grading of the driveway is proposed. By the proposed design, a safer access and off street parking area is created. This will require a 10% increase of the current front yard coverage from the existing driveway. This small increase will allow for the safe use and enjoyment of the property without any negative impact, visual or otherwise, on the surrounding community." The applicants also request Site Plan Review to construct 750 square feet of additions to the existing 3,116 square foot residence for a total of 3,866 square feet and the addition of 157 square feet of garage space for a total of 769 square feet. Proposed structures include a 640 square foot stable on a lower building pad and a 96 square foot service yard. A 1,595 square foot basement is also proposed. The project entails the demolition of the front section of the residence, locating the residential additions further back on the building pad, and the use of the ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 2 • • basement cut soil to fill and rework the existing steep driveway that has a 20% slope to be an 8.7% average slope with a 10% maximum slope within the lot. 3. Grading for the project site will require 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. The cut and fill will be balanced and includes the cut basement quantities. 4. Criteria for Site Plan Review and a table of Nearby Properties are attached. 5. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved for Mrs. Sally S. Cornell and Mr. and Mrs. Mark Dessy by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 6. The existing driveway access off Maverick Lane will remain. The existing driveway has a 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have a 7% slope for the first 20 feet of the driveway, an 8.7% average slope, and a 10% maximum slope in accordance with code requirements. The driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to 14 feet. The proposed driveway was approved in concept by the County Fire Department. 7. A 640 square foot barn is proposed along with a more than 550 square foot existing corral on a lower level than the residence and will be accessed by an existing trail that has a maximum slope of 25% slope from Maverick Lane at the western side of the property. 8. The structural lot coverage proposed is 5,371 square feet or 3.4% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 10,368 square feet or 6.5% (35% permitted). 9.. The 8,200 square foot residential building pad will have proposed coverage of 4,635 square feet or 56.5%. The 3,840 square foot stable pad coverage will be 640 square feet or 16.7%. There is a third 2,600 square foot building pad below the stable pad that does not have structural development. All three building pads total 14,640 square feet for a total structural building pad coverage of 5,372 square feet or 36.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 10. The disturbed area of the lot will be 12,000 square feet or 7.5% (40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 3 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. VARIANCE REQUIRED; FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does. not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 4 • SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS IEXISTING I Existing residence encroaches into west side yard setback. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Total 2.2% 4.8% 2,870 sq.ft. 612 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 3,578 sq.ft. 51.4% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 0% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 24.4% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads N/A 6.5% N/A Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane N/A N/A PROPOSED Residence to encroach into west side yard setback, and retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence 3,866 sq.ft. Garage 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Total 3.4% 6.5% 5,371 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral No change No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 5 DATE: TO: FROM: i Cry 0/ leof?.,.q.JdFe • Ioe INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMIS NtY°frn@ao'.c0m LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 621 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MR. THOMAS A. BLAIR, BLAIR ASSOCIATES AUGUST 5, 2000 Request for a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the front yard setback, request to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit encroachment of proposed residential additions into the west side yard setback, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard, and request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires grading. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission viewed the site on September 9, 2000. The Commission was concerned about the east side of the proposed residence which appeared to be too close the edge of the building pad. Plans had been revised to eliminate the upper pad off-street parking area and its attendant retaining wall in the front yard and correct the previous plans that showed the roof outline of the existing residence, not the residence itself. This explains the disparity in appearance of the size of the existing house and proposed house on the plan exhibited on August 15t. The driveway was approved in concept by the County Fire Department. 2. The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit retaining walls that are incorporated into the construction of a stairway and a proposed driveway located within the front and side yard setbacks. A 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height at the south will encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branches off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which is a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback and the central ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • ti 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. The applicants state that the Variances are necessary because, "The minor retaining walls that vary from 0 — 5' in height (averaging 2.5 feet) are required to re -build an extreme driveway so that it is less steep and safer. There will be no impact to any surrounding properties. This driveway improvement will add to the safety and welfare of the owner and any visitors (this includes public, government and private visitors)." The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit proposed residential additions that will encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The existing residence encroaches up to 10.5 feet into the setback. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary because, "As is clear with the existing residence, the current setback is significantly encroached. With the new design, the home is brought significantly closer to being within the intent of the planning guidelines. Due to the small size of the building pad and limitations of the site, as well as the new plan being less than 1000 sq.ft. larger than the existing, some encroachment is required to further the goals of the planning guidelines. This encroachment is in a non -visible and very l o w impact area and will result in no negative impacts to the surrounding community." The applicants are requesting a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard which is 3,928 square feet or 33.3% of an 11,800 square foot front yard (20% maximum of the area of the yard in which they are located).. The existing driveway covers 1,342 square feet or 23% of the 5,922 square foot front yard. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary "Due to the extreme slope o f the existing driveway and the unmanageable and unsafe conditions related to accessing the current residence, the re -grading of the driveway is proposed. By the proposed design, a safer access and off street parking area is created. This will require a 10%. increase of the current front yard coverage from the existing driveway. This small increase will allow for the safe use and enjoyment of the property without any negative impact, visual or otherwise, on the surrounding community." The applicants also request Site Plan Review to construct 997 square feet of additions to the existing 2,870 square foot residence for a total of 3,867 square feet and the addition of 157 square feet of garage space for a total of 769 square feet. Proposed structures include a 640 square foot stable on a lower building pad and a 96 square foot service yard. A 1,595 square foot basement is also proposed. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 2 • • The project entails the demolition of the front section of the residence, locating the residential additions further back on the building pad, and the use of the basement cut soil to fill and rework the existing steep driveway that has a 20% slope to be an 8.7% average slope with a 10% maximum slope within the lot. 3. Grading for the project site will require 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. The cut and fill will be balanced. and includes the cut basement quantities. 4. Criteria for Site Plan Review and a table of Nearby Properties are attached. 5. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved for Mrs. Sally S. Cornell and Mr. and Mrs. Mark Dessy by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 6. The existing driveway access off Maverick Lane will remain. The existing driveway has a 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have a 7% slope for the first 20 feet of the driveway, an 8.7% average slope, and a 10% maximum slope in accordance with code requirements. The driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to 14 feet. 7. A 640 square foot barn is proposed along with a more than 550 square foot existing corral on a lower level than the residence and will be accessed by an existing trail that has a maximum slope of 25% slope from Maverick Lane at the western side of the property. 8. The structural lot coverage proposed is 5,372 square feet or 3.3% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 10,369 square feet or 6.5% (35% permitted). 9. The 8,200 square foot residential building pad will have proposed coverage of 4,636 square feet or 56.5%. The 3,840 square foot stable pad coverage will be 640 square feet or 16.7%. There is a third 2,600 square foot building pad below the stable pad that does not have structural development. All three building pads total 14,640 square feet for a total structural building pad coverage of 5,372 square feet or 36.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 10. The disturbed area of the lot will be 12,000 square feet or 7.5% (40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 3 • • RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 4 • SITE PLAN REVIEW EXISTING RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS No encroachments. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Total 2.2% 4.8% 2,870 sq.ft. 612 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 3,578 sq.ft. 51.4% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 0% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq_ft. pad 24.4% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads N/A 6.5% N/A Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane N/A N/A PROPOSED Retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence 3,867 sq.ft. Garage 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Total 3.3% 6.5% 5,372 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral No change No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 5 ADDRESS 4 Maverick Lane 6 Maverick Lane 8 Maverick Lane 9 Maverick Lane 7 Maverick Lane 5 Maverick Lane 3 Maverick Lane 1 Maverick Lane NEARBY PROPERTIES LOT NO. I OWNER j:RESIDENCE (SQ.FT.) 24-SK Virtue 5392 25-SK Mendez 3028 26-SK Dessy 3364 27-SK Shoemaker, J. 3049 (Existing) 28-SK Howroyd 4964 29-SK Brogdon 2517 30-SK Makita 2855 31-SK Mirsaidi 3081 AVERAGE I 3531 PROPOSED I 3,867 LOT.SSIZE/ ACRES (GROSS) 1.100 1.086 2.859 4.049 2.912 2.576 2.560 2.493 2.454 4.049 ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 6 S • Ci1y 0/ R0ffi JUL DATE: TO: FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 SEPTEMBER 9, 2000 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIMy0"@a01.c0m APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 621 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MR. THOMAS A. BLAIR, BLAIR ASSOCIATES AUGUST 5, 2000 Request for a Variance to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the front yard setback, request to permit encroachment of retaining walls into the side yard setback, request for a Variance to permit encroachment of proposed residential additions into the west side yard setback, request for a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard, and request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires grading. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission will view the site on Saturday, September 9, 2000 following visits to 12 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road and 7 Packsaddle Road West beginning at 8 AM. Since the August 15, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, plans were revised to eliminate the upper pad off-street parking area and its attendant retaining wall in the front yard and correct the previous plans that showed the roof outline of the existing residence, not the residence itself. This explains the disparity in appearance of the size of the existing house and proposed house on the plan exhibited on August 15th. In addition, the driveway was approved in concept by the County Fire Department. 2. The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit retaining walls that are incorporated into the construction of a stairway and a proposed driveway located within the front and side yard setbacks. A 99-foot long curvilinear retaining wall up to 5 feet in height at the south will encroach up to 25 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback and up to 17.0 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. That same retaining wall branches off into two retaining walls; the most westerly of which is a 16-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback and the central 17-foot long retaining wall up to 5 feet in height that will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. The applicants state that the Variances are necessary because, "The minor retaining walls that vary from 0 — 5' in height (averaging 2.5 feet) are required to re -build an extreme driveway so that it is less steep and safer. There will be no impact to any surrounding properties. This driveway improvement will add to the safety and welfare of the owner and any visitors (this includes public, government and private visitors)." The applicants are requesting a Variance to permit proposed residential additions that will encroach up to 15 feet into the 35 foot west side yard setback. The existing residence encroaches up to 10.5 feet into the setback. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary because, "As is clear with the existing residence, the current setback is significantly encroached. With the new design, the home is brought significantly closer to being within the intent of the planning guidelines. Due to the small size of the building pad and limitations of the site, as well as the new plan being less than 1000 sq.ft. larger than the existing, some encroachment is required to further the goals of the planning guidelines. This encroachment is in a non -visible and very l o w impact area and will result in no negative impacts to the surrounding community." The applicants are requesting a Variance to exceed the maximum driveway coverage in the front yard which is 3,928 square feet or 33.3% of an 11,800 square foot front yard (20% maximum of the area of the yard in which they are located). The existing driveway covers 1,342 square feet or 23% of the 5,922 square foot front yard. The applicants state that the Variance is necessary "Due to the extreme slope of the existing driveway and the unmanageable and unsafe conditions related to accessing the current residence, the re -grading of the driveway is proposed. By the proposed design, a safer access and off street parking area is created. This will require a 10% increase of the current front yard coverage from the existing driveway. This small increase will allow for the safe use and enjoyment of the property without any negative impact, visual or otherwise, on the surrounding community." The applicants also request Site Plan Review to construct 997 square feet of additions to the existing 2,870 square foot residence for a total of 3,867 square feet and the addition of 157 square feet of garage space for a total of 769 square feet. Proposed structures include a 640 square foot stable on a lower building pad and a 96 square foot service yard. A 1,595 square foot basement is also proposed. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 2 The project entails the demolition of the front section of the residence, locating the residential additions further back on the building pad, and the use of the basement cut soil to fill and rework the existing steep driveway that has a 20% slope to be an 8.7% average slope with a 10% maximum slope within the lot. 3. Grading for the project site will require 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. The cut and fill will be balanced and includes the cut basement quantities. 4. Criteria for Site Plan Review and a table of Nearby Properties are attached. 5. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved . for Mrs. Sally S. Cornell and Mr. and Mrs. Mark Dessy by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway in 1998. 6. The existing driveway access off Maverick Lane will remain. The existing driveway has a 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have a 7% slope for the first 20 feet of the driveway, an 8.7% average slope, and a 10% maximum slope in accordance with code requirements. The driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to 14 feet. 7. A 640 square foot barn is proposed along with a more than 550 square foot existing corral on a lower level than the residence and will be accessed by an existing trail that has a maximum slope of 25% slope 'from Maverick Lane at the western side of the property. 8. The structural lot coverage proposed is 5,372 square feet or 3.3% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 10,369 square feet or 6.5% (35% permitted). 9. The 8,200 square foot residential building pad will have proposed coverage of 4,636 square feet or 56.5%. The 3,840 square foot stable pad coverage will be 640 square feet or 16.7%. There is a third 2,600 square foot building pad below the stable pad that does not have structural development. All three building pads total 14,640 square, feet for a total structural building pad coverage of 5,372 square feet or 36.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 10. The disturbed area of the lot will be 12,000 square feet or 7.5% (40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 3 • • 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 4 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING No encroachments. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Total 2.2% 4.8% 2,870 sq.ft. 612 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 3,578 sq.ft. 51.4% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 0% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 24.4% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads N/A 6.5% N/A Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane N/A N/A PROPOSED Retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence Garage 3,867 sq.ft. 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Total 3.3% 6.5% 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 5,372 sq.ft. 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral No change No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 5 ADDRESS 4 Maverick Lane 6 Maverick Lane 8 Maverick Lane 9 Maverick Lane 7 Maverick Lane 5 Maverick Lane 3 Maverick Lane 1 Maverick Lane NEARBY PROPERTIES LOT NO. I OWNER I RESIDENCE (SQ.FT.). 24-SK Virtue 5392 25-SK Mendez 3028 26-SK Dessy 3364 27-SK Shoemaker, J. 3049 (Existing) 28-SK Howroyd 4964 29-SK Brogdon 2517 30-SK Makita 2855 31-SK Mirsaidi 3081 AVERAGE I 3531 PROPOSED I 3,867 LOT SIZE/ ACRES (GROSS) 1.100 1.086 2.859 4.049 2.912 2.576 2.560 2.493 2.454 4.049 ZONING CASE NO. 621 PAGE 6 DATE: TO: FROM: • City 0/ AUGUST 15, 2000 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIE511yofrh@aol.com LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 621 9 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 27-SK) RA-S-2, 4.07 ACRES MR. AND MRS. JACK SHOEMAKER MR. THOMAS A. BLAIR, BLAIR ASSOCIATES AUGUST 5, 2000 Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires grading. BACKGROUND 1. The applicants are requesting Site Plan Review to construct 997 square feet of additions to the existing 2,870 square foot residence for a total of 3,867 square feet. The project also includes the addition of 157 square feet of garage space for a total of 769 square feet. Proposed structures include a 640 square foot stable on a lower building pad and a 96 square foot service yard. A 1,595 square foot basement is also proposed. The project entails the demolition of the front section of the residence, locating the residential additions further back on the building pad, and the use of the basement cut soil to fill and rework the existing steep driveway that has a 20% slope to be an 8.7% average slope with a 10% maximum slope within the lot. Retaining walls incorporated in the proposed driveway that are located within the front and side yard setbacks came to the attention of staff during staff report preparation that will require a Variance application along with required noticing. There will be a 24-foot long retaining wall up to 4 feet in height at the west side of the front yard that will encroach up to 20 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. There will be a second 116-foot long retaining wall up to 4 feet in height at the south that will encroach up to 27 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. That same retaining wall branches off into two retaining walls, the southernmost of which will encroach up to 21 feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. ZONING CASE NO. 619 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • 2. Grading for the project site will require 856 cubic yards of cut soil and 856 cubic yards of fill soil. The cut and fill will be balanced and includes the cut basement quantities. 3. Criteria for Site Plan Review and a table of Nearby Properties are attached. 4. The existing residence was constructed in 1956. A Lot Line Adjustment was approved for Mrs. Sally S. Cornell and Mr. and Mrs. Mark Dessy by the Planning Commission in by Resolution No. 98-9 in Zoning Case No. 576 to include a 735.28 square foot elongated triangle -shaped portion of land at the west side of the driveway. 5. The existing driveway access off Maverick Lane will remain. The existing driveway has a 20% slope. The proposed driveway will have a 7% slope for the first 20 feet of the driveway, an 8.7% average slope, and a 10% maximum slope in accordance with code requirements. The driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to 14 feet. 6. A 640 square foot barn is proposed along with a more than 550 square foot existing corral on a lower level than the residence will be accessed by an existing trail that has a maximum slope of 25% slope from Maverick Lane at the western side of the property. 7. The structural lot coverage proposed is 5,372 square feet or 3.3% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 10,369 square feet or 6.5% (35% permitted). 8. The 8,200 square foot residential building pad will have proposed coverage of 4,636 square feet or 56.5%. The 3,840 square foot stable pad coverage will be 640 square feet or 16.7%. There is a third 2,600 square foot building pad below the stable pad that does not have structural development. All three building pads total 14,640 square feet for a total structural building pad coverage of 5,372 square feet or 36.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 9. The disturbed area of the lot will be 12,000 square feet or 7.5% (40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. 10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. ZONING CASE NO. 619 PAGE 2 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-2 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 35 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) I STABLE BUILDING PAD COVERAGE I THIRD BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING No encroachments. Residence Garage Stable Service Yard Total 2.6% 5.2% 2,870 sq.ft. 612 sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 4,218 sq.ft. 51.4% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 28.8% of 14,640 sq.ft. pad N/A 6.5% N/A Existing accessway from west side of the property with a maximum 25% slope. Existing access from the end of the cul-de-sac off Maverick Lane N/A N/A PROPOSED Retaining walls incorporated in proposed driveway that encroach into front and side yard setbacks. Residence 3,867 sq.ft. Garage 769 sq.ft. Stable 640 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Total 3.3% 6.5% 5,372 sq.ft. 56.5% of 8,200 sq.ft. pad 16.7% of 3,840 sq.ft. pad 0% of 2,600 sq.ft. pad 36.7% of 14,640 sq.ft. pads 856 cu. yds cut soil 856 cu. yds fill soil 7.5% 640 sq.ft. stable >550 sq.ft. corral No change No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 619 PAGE 3 • ADDRESS, 4 Maverick Lane 6 Maverick Lane 8 Maverick Lane 9 Maverick Lane 7 Maverick Lane 5 Maverick Lane 3 Maverick Lane 1 Maverick Lane NEARBY PROPERTIES LOT NO. 24-SK 25-SK 26-SK 27-SK 28-SK 29-SK 30-SK 31-SK OWNER I RESIDENCE (SQ,FT:) Virtue 5392 Mendez 3028 Dessy 3364 Shoemaker, J. 3049 (Existing) Howroyd 4964 Brogdon 2517 Makita 2855 Mirsaidi 3081 AVERAGE I 3531 PROPOSED I 3,867 LOT SIZE/ ACRES (GROSS) 1.100 1.086 2.859 4.049 2.912 2.576 2.560 2.493 2.454 4.049 ZONING CASE NO. 619 PAGE 4 MEMORANDUM APRIL 13, 2007 TO: NAN HUANG, FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR V7 SUBJECT: RELEASE — CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT FOR LANDSCAPING 9 MAVERICK LANE, SHOEMAKER Please release the Certificate of Deposit No. 118-0431718 to Mr. Jack Shoemaker. Mr. Shoemaker has successfully completed the landscaping that was bonded for with this Certificate of Deposit.