Loading...
830, A 385 sq ft addition to existi, ApplicationUf VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to he made conforming or shall he removed. Therefore, you may he required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawd use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit hut which is conducted without the acquisition gfsaid permit, shall he subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENTS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: W Nmee. e (',key (p Poa-\ jesc ze4,13, 2.0. us3 \\\,S C.A q02 -{ (\o) gttct- AV EMAIL:-CA\l'`rt 5303@.) 1 c L . Com (o Potijves€ gO. 12.awc3Ms cA ao27y LOT NO. 2-2.- ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. IStA PAGE 003 PARCEL O tAo M P i•V\I MOOMS Va.. Los Pest esl CP% 6(OOto3 (323) 2.53 - O5 O (0 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. AV % Mas . G615 (0P0--ku fiC. o "R'o O. M\\ k\i‘\S 1 C . 9eVesk' P. 0\12\c 4ce, tOsk9.0c} . z513 P1/4,o0A-lot.‘ t\ 1ct2L SclXV, \kooSE OF taticA 13$(0 sct". 't1-h; 1•45.0 Avoi oN) woo\c ev.)LaoAc\\ tNko `h\v C.114)1 - yrk...(Q seV&NcV-. 1 Z2 3 sc. F exis\iNt Gptattv W `M pAtte.rstj si\-s W1\ iOre f-ok)o data-c Se.'i eNcV-- wa Qae Vs\Vr, p,N1\ Qe,Ao\\k V•oc-' \\ - Ocs si7Vikce 11.i"\, \as. n. W Qtic.\1, wk\\ 11*. sE k-zo,c,\L_ 5 ►/2 r- - 1;ywr‘ wk exi sk ctc k s Gc) 13-4-t76N t` \cx t'sAca . i\ "e-Nc t S Aso jOes\ec% kr) czNs'Nwck A to Munn 5 Fmk tk%\\ 'cz Utvt vet# fib. S01/4sv SzA W. W k\ic1\ kkA \ USLO \, c --ki\G fQmzrtz . `Vie 'RegqJ Nb k.tto.\\ kut\\ %ec� St•APAee.. 'tNi S+2e ReP•c» e.s The., 5109-e • -12- • Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage Wo Si secatc\A- \ S i i (7t�SFd SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. (tz:e �k\-P.Jed) B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. XeVINcVm' C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. (sEE Pc .d11 D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. -13- • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. ( E (ss'CCIN-asel F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. (cam F c.k\e6) G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. (SeC ^Q \ H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. (5ee MR C ) -14- I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: , Z.o j �--� Signature / For: \A za C-eA Jt,t) (' Q— Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -15- Site Plan Review Criteria 6 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills, CA A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The project is compatible with the general plan and the surrounding uses. Many homes around the area range between 4000 — 5000 sq.ft. The existing residence is located inside the 50 foot front yard setback, however, this residence has been in place since 1940 without any problems or negative impact on the surrounding properties or neighborhood and the use of a single family residence is consistent with surrounding uses. The existing garage will be demolished and reconstructed (45) forty-five feet further to the rear and in its place will be the new kitchen and living room which will set back five and a half feet further from where the existing garage was located so that it lines up with the bedroom wall facing the front yard. The size of the project is both under the structural, lot coverage and lot disturbance limit. The residence will also continue to have a ranch style look at the exterior of the building. The proposed project is compatible with all other zoning ordinances including height restrictions, parking requirements and other development standards will apply. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The proposed additions are considered in areas that work well with the existing floor plan and in locations that have the least amount of sloped area on the site. We also designed the additions as to not disturb the mature trees on the property. The majority of the vegetation and small trees on the site will not be affected and we are proposing a new landscape design that will surround the building. The drainage pattern will also remain the same, draining into a natural basin as before. The proposed project is placed in an area that preserves the natural trees and shrubs located throughout the site and maintains the same natural terrain valley. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and re -contouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Grading slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on Tots. The proposed additions are placed in areas that affect the existing contours at a minimum level and follow the shape of the property maintaining a nice outdoor private courtyard. The garage will be stepped down from the finish floor of the house allowing the driveway to follow the existing contours as much as possible. All the new grading has a smooth flow and minimizes the amount of cut that will be required. The impact of the grading will be small. We do propose to move an existing retaining wall further down but all the cut that will be done at the south-western part of the building will be relocated to fill the driveway area. • D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The projects focus is to not disturb the existing trees located on the property. We are providing a proposed landscape plan that will surround the residence. The design will have an outdoor private courtyard that faces the rear property. Most of this private area is enclosed with the walls from the new addition. The rest of the property contains existing tall trees around the perimeter of the property giving a buffer from the street and adjacent neighbors. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The proposed addition is carefully placed as to be sensitive to the terrain and natural features of the site. Also, our building and lot coverage are both under the maximum limit allowed. The building coverage will be 15.6% of the site out of an allowable maximum of 20% and the lot coverage will be 30.9% of the site out of an allowable maximum of 35%. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass of the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The project takes advantage of both the shape of the site and the location of the existing residence. It blends in harmoniously with the site providing a private courtyard and lovely views of the entire property. The existing house is lower than the street level elevation but slopes down as it nears the driveway approach creating a more private area and noise reduction level for the bedrooms located on the south western area of the house. Half of the existing residence is located within the front setback. We are proposing to demolish an existing portion of the building and rebuild it about 6 feet further back to line up with the existing bedroom wall. Many properties within the area have the same situation where the house is built within their front setback. This is due to the odd shapes of the properties and the buildable area due to the existing terrain slope. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The driveway entry is proposed to be widen from 10 feet to 20 feet and will be defined by concrete pavement that leads them towards the rear where the garage is located. The driveway has ample space so one could backup and exit the property without backing up onto the road as they do now. Also, the trash enclosure will be located at the end of the driveway and will be easily accessible. • • 1 H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The site development does conform because the only part of the building that will be demolished will be a small accessory structure (a garage). This small demolition will not impact the environment in a significant manner. Therefore CEQA will be exempt from this project. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 1 ---j1- 1 �" Signature REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition ofsaid permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: - TSu1 i C; CA OWNER'S ADDRESS: Cp Pcxt.\vciiesc i c Q4>,.?,-AX00 MS to 902 '4 TELEPHONE NO: (310) 5\ 5 EMAIL: Ck, 5303 . CQNV1 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: (v cta..)NroVe SE &VA Qx) • gAl 1J5 ON 90219 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2.2. ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 15C4011 PAGE OCZ PARCEL 0b(o AGENT'S NAME: \`fir N- Mote AGENT'S ADDRESS: '4 21 99c-c&\ 'Oa—. t 4s44teS CW C100CP3 TELEPHONE NO: � Z3> 253^ 050(0 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: V10-. W. aftt,X7 ( Pdn_'wbus€ %Ot D RoAO R-civNb k it t$ I C,A - P.etiuCs'r 1 P-tvteW P"a_ 6u.acS.ct of 60 cv oc= C.0 iflo cy of Fi\\ kb CoNskwck A NP,t) 2S 13 s`'u x�'� AO ►kic 1 isc-IN ►.\ W 11 \ -t to P'\Thc cc-. Gin a �c. Ac cd -'n '11�e irZ. tgLt-i 'Facie Ncv Rest e cep Wopose tie IS Z. Co can cA_Rut,c.1\ t A; Nevi 265 s -. case -ec\ couR-' p„Nt4 , tJo ?AsEMCN - va.. 51/401 Aci ttt ?too\ is pro t:`O . `1\e- G - .saw\ck Amino\iskVe0 . We.. p,\sQ w000s€ \-t) ta►Ce,4 Pq40 tiiwexo iO &&_i_ -12- • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. (ce. immaNseid Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because Iswt-c eo1 FILING FEE. A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance 6 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills, CA A. Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The property has an existing 1,924 sq.ft. single family residence and a 385 sq.ft. garage where 809 sq.ft. of house and 385 sq.ft. of the garage are within the front yard setback. The structure's closest wall currently is 21'-6" from the front property line. This residence has been in place since 1940 without any problems or negative impact on the surrounding properties or neighborhood and the use as a single family residence is consistent with the surrounding uses. I am requesting a minimum front setback of (27) twenty-seven feet, which would line up with the existing bedroom wall. We are proposing to remove the existing garage which has a front setback of 21'- 6" and relocate it further back on the lot. Approval of a variance to the minimum front setback of (27) twenty-seven feet would allow me to maximize the development potential of the lot without having a negative impact on the surrounding residents. In addition, I am requesting a retaining wall to be located (10) ten feet from the north-east side property line. The retaining wall will be used to hold a leveled pavement for the car backup requirement from the garage. No structure will be built within the side setback. Presently there are other homes around the area have been constructed within the 50 foot front setback. The shape of the lot requires a very large front and rear yard if the full setback is to be followed according to code, much larger than on a lot with side lot lines perpendicular to the street frontage. The proposed home additions are strategically positioned to work with the existing floor plan, minimize the amount of grading cut and fill, and preserve the existing trees located within the property. The site is on a sloped lot and because of the properties irregular shape, limits us of where we can position the new additions. The construction of the new additions will add value to the parcel and enhance the neighborhood. B. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The proposal will include adequate parking, landscaping, maintenance requirements, and lot coverage provisions. The proposed enhancements will further integrate the property into the surrounding community. Approval of the request would permit me to construct a home on the property reasonably consistent in size and character with other homes in the vicinity and same zone. The property is zoned for residential development. A residential structure is the most appropriate development for the property. As mentioned before, half of the existing house was constructed within the required setback and for the past 72 years has never had a single problem or negative impact on the neighborhood. The trail along the front yard rises gradually up to seven feet above the floor level of the house which helps screen the house from the roadway. In addition, the trees along the trail and property line helps buffer the view from the street. If the request is approved, my house will be a minimum of (62) sixty-two feet away from the roadway at its closest point. Approval of the request will allow me to build a house that is more desirable to live in for myself and my family, and also for future potential owners. The project will not alter the essential character of a neighborhood. Approval of the request would not conflict with any other aspect of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance to my knowledge. DATE I 12 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS �'�'�=�csC 64^ND , CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS, THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED \K12,0o sq. ft 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) `ooOO sq. ft 3. ' TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS . 2-00 sq. ft. OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: ❑ GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) ❑ SITTING WALL / BENCH ❑ WALKWAY OR PATIO ❑ TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE ❑ -19- OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Vak*I b 06\\S California, this day of `=C �� , 20 12 By: 3 1/f /. C� iA, ,i44.4 Co ? t-t- SE \?7E:NO i.o. By: ��� v Address V-OWING3 \\\s 1 CANt 6[k2.-*14-1 City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: MIN-01�1,1 Mnt,1 k,- DA'1B FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: KW. be C c S . RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: LA121 chafeq _ ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: k os Pt . CP. ' OO(o3 COMPANY PHONE NO. (321 ) Z53.-O5 OCR PROJECT ADDRESS: (p Pc cSE Bc ►O P O . (4?‘\ ij A 5 C{\ '102'7`-A . -20- OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RI-ICA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this 1S1day of ' ok\i+33 kM, California 20 12 . B y. C ` By: %1 lid--- 'Qv/ RD2\\)5uesE. qil'.NO 9-o . Address lZ�i\�Nc k\&sC \ 9O2 i' % City -21- As•4 • CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ AFFIDAVIT Ik1lprNN•1 Mom_ , , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at this k6% day of cJ u , ci t-g e-s PA © J 4J e..e p7 1-a `e fi'o/1- 6 „4, , California, 20 12. '4.:)\--C4: Signature PUBLIC:Planning Forms in PDF format:Variance Application Rev. 2010 HIC... BRUNO SARTINI COMM. #1889753 ..I NOTARY PUBLIC a CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY Commission Expires MAY 17, 2014 -22- 4 • • EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 1: LOT 22 OF ROLLING HILLS, IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 201 PAGES 29 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 2: EASEMENTS FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROADS NO. 1 AND NO..2 AND PARCELS A, B, C, D, AND E IN SECTIONS 6 (A) ARTICLE V OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN BOOK 14065 PAGE 345, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND AS AMENDED IN DESCRIPTION BY THE MODIFICATION OF DECLARATION RECORDED IN BOOK 14311 PAGE 58, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; AND OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROAD NO.3, IN DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN BOOK 14710 PAGE 166, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE LINES OF PARCEL NO.1, ABOVE DESCRIBED. ***END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION*** • • ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE (D) = DEMOLISHED AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTS PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 41704 sq.ft. 41704 sq.ft. 41704 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 1873 & 51(D) sq.ft. 2654 sq.ft. 4527 sq.ft. GARAGE 385 (D) sq.ft. 1077 sq.ft. 1077 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. CABANA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) 0 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES & PATIOS 0 sq.ft. 479 sq.ft. 479 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, 46 (D) sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 102 (D) sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. OTHER 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT 0 0 0 TOTAL STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 2457 sq.ft. 5.9 % 2309 sq.ft. 5.5 % 4765 sq.ft. 11.4 % 4765 sq.ft. 11.4 % 6631 sq.ft. 15.9 % 6631 sq.ft. 15.9 % • • ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN (D) = DEMOLISHED PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) 1769 (D) sq ft 2702 sq.ft. 2702 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) 2125 (D) sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 3894 (D) sq.ft. 9.3 % 6351 sq.ft. 15.2 % 6203 sq.ft. 14.9 % 8886 sq.ft. 21.3 % All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. 2534 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 5236 sq.ft. 12.6 10001 sq.ft. 24.0 % 10001 sq.ft. 24.0 % 7762 sq.ft. 18.6 % 2534 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq. ft. 5236 sq.ft. 12.6 % 11867 sq.ft. 28.5 % 11867 sq.ft. 28.5 % 16648 sq.ft. 39.9 % 340 cubic yards * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. • • pAn NO. I. CALCULATION OF BIJILDMNG PAD COVERAGE (D) = DEMOLISHED BUILDABLE PAT) AREA EXISTING AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE GARAGE POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT CABANA/REC.RM GUEST HOUSE STABLE SPORTS COURT SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary. residence Accessory structures AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 PORCHES THAT EXCEED io% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE sq.ft. si9.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 102 (D)sq.ft. 3293 sq.ft. 1924 sq.fr. 385 (D)sq.ft. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 46 (D) tq.ft. 0 (from 1'`page not including allowed deductions) OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Nnt incl attached trellises, Not incl allowed deductions, and incl the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 74.6 % 2457 sq.ft. structures. 74.6 %p 2457 PROPOSFI) 4936 2654 1077 0 0 0 0 450 0 98 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 27 cq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 4306 sq.ft. 87.3 % 4306 sq.ft. TOT T, 8229 sq.ft. 4527 cq.ft. 1077 ti.ft. 0 0 0 0 450 0 98 27 0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.& sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 6179 sq.ft. 75.1 %v 6179 sq.ft. 87.3 % 75.1 % • GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Grading Quantities: Cubic Yds. Max. Depth Max. Depth Location CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List 100 S. BUILDING CORNER For driveway(s) 40 For yard areas 30 For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation 700 TOTAL CUT 170 TOTAL EXPORT FILL For house/addition For other structures (i.e.walls) List SOUTH-EAST YARD 10 E. GARAGE CORNER For driveway(s) 100 E. SIDE DRIVEWAY For yard areas 60 AROUND DRIVEWAY For basements For basement wells For pool/spa Recompaction 700 TOTAL FILL 170 TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill) 340 PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing pad elevations Residential pad Finished floor 519.88 Finished grade 519.38 Proposed pad elevations Finished floor 517.00 Finished grade 516.50 Basement -finished floor 0 Basement -finished well wall 0 Other pad GARAGE 512.50 • • CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REOUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 2506 1600 4106 sq. ft sq. ft sq. ft. 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT Sl'1'E PLAN: WATER FEATURE: ❑ GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) 0 SITTING WALL / BENCH ❑ WALKWAY OR PATIO 0 TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE 0 V I4 • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this 1 S' day of By: By: QO\\Itt l\\s SP.OkGM teat.. Address , California, ,20 12. dein. �. �o2' UeSe ?-e 9-0 . 16\',4b \\\\s i C°c cjQ-tom► City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: NNWMotile s 1 DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME:_ `A Cies,.btJ &noop RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: y121 VOILAr-.l.% O . ZONING CASE NO (,p5 p..ottkes, CA ciovo 3 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (32%) 2c3 -coS(c PROJECT ADDRESS: l0 aA e veSe, 2eNA RHO. \201s t'I \\s 1 Uk gO219 -22- A • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at V-14,\\\-s . California this iS`l'` day of Sisrpkceng. ,20 k2 . By: - �--- .�--' By: cd1- Q '11` 1 (o ? . 5vese., € e*O 9.0. Address, "26" \ \\; C4St *)2 19 City -23- CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) 1, .N, S , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: (SEE c\eO) this Executed at \9 eo,sY d,� 3 , 14 Suasc-i- i3e A..6) 6f 444 ZI:7 34 - i73 / br, Se? ec p-a) • ft6 day of Q c�l1;► we t \\s Signatbre" , California, 20 12- IS Public/ Planning Masters / City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2009.doc -24- tiwxti `\. BRUNO SARTINI COMM. #1889753 -4 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA to LOS ANGELES COUNTY Commission Expires MAY 17, Z014 • • EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 1: LOT 22 OF ROLLING HILLS, IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 201 PAGES 29 TO 35 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 2: EASEMENTS FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROADS NO. 1 AND NO. 2 AND PARCELS A, B, C, D, AND E IN SECTIONS 6 (A) ARTICLE V OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN BOOK 14065 PAGE 345, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND AS AMENDED IN DESCRIPTION BY THE MODIFICATION OF DECLARATION RECORDED IN BOOK 14311 PAGE 58, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; AND OVER THE LAND DESCRIBED IN ROAD NO.3, IN DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN BOOK 14710 PAGE 166, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE LINES OF PARCEL NO.1, ABOVE DESCRIBED. ***END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION*** • s Date Filed etre, v _oaf, eitie(1 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) MktJNU Tel. (323) 2 53 -0 CY> G' Address Gt�21 ?%)Qxe,ki UDs k O 'ts C 4OO(0� 2. Legal Owner(s) Wake 01 e' C, f\-4•N Tel. (3 _) CfGi - '51 �S Address ro Qon.X.) ,�,-�PaJt� �'� . 1:26%w5b %\`s CA tOV114 3. Project Address 2p , Fon\V1 \WS C 'b219 Assessor's Book No. 1.5 VV- Ob% - COG, Lot No. 22. 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district gA 5 - I 6. Proposed project/use of site S1N5\e \1Pew i\v Qe ct r PROTECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 52.. 210 SCi,F.�-, 8. Net lot area 1-11)1OM . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 5 f (O\ 3 SF 10. Number of floors of construction ONE.. -5ka11i 11. Basement square footage ¶O SINSvonC-1 -. 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 3O 8 8 Sq ). 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? G'N. VVo•,t, w`A1.— 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 601"' 5A � ,_ -DM 4 QA0UM W1Ams 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? Yes, EKAtJ3 eat OPvg tAP$. f ‘et \t s . 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? NO 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? t'O (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 1 Proposed? ____CL_____ (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? LOVA. Proposed? ZO Fk• (Maximum of 20 toot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? 1 e:S Proposed? YCS e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 5,o Proposed? ago (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? YGS Explain 'DQ:Atet,J� lakh1- _. INC(Q Q.. -0 2OfA-. Vol- TAIL itwck-.sS g• Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? at) Explain 1t4 00:tiCaJ CbkseR.7 e90 1W(2,'4 1.0 . h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Ne Explain _�] fLe' ►S 140 1/43tJC0 (LG O yptax-, A . Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or Tess? ND Stable and corral average vehicular access slope t•1/IN . Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? YES With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 1.\0 (o03k 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut . Amount fill Z ga . (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet 19,410 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 4U .43 . / 1 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet ` '431 Sc t#. 2 • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. WIN 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. S � , 911 i..\ Qeait - e..;1d„� wow, '11•Vot,NS WOO set. - ` tP.?- vAC,\1N3 ufi VN\.1 fQoc?t SekQ cX_ _ 2,P,n1 C2 - D,i S )Pc-ANic '' c 1-10% kiPresers Le, IAA co:•ELk OR= \-Aar220 of, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. See, 0111 kt\ 3 • • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. • 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studieseen submitted? Geology Report Hydrology Report X Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 4 Yes N/A X2 Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis _ Slope Map _ Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste • . EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 5 • . 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. 6 • • Potentially Significant Impact Issues: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact - Impact ! AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ ❑ 0 JEC vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including 0 0 0 g but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character ❑ 0 0 or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare 0 0 0 which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? L AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑ resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 ❑ ,� Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or ❑ ❑ ❑ a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ 0 0 .11 which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? !ll. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ❑ ❑ ❑)31 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporation b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially 0 0 0 lig[ to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any 0 ❑ 0 Si criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 )11 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ❑ 0 ❑ of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or 0 0 ❑ ,L'�9► other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ 0 ❑ wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ❑ ❑ ❑ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting ❑ ❑ 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 ❑ ❑ 3gC Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 8 • Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact Y. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ❑ ❑ of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ 0 0 g of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 ❑ 0 18( outside of formal cemeteries? VI . GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on ❑ 0 ❑ P4 the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ❑ 0 ❑ that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? R egi tg- ❑ ❑ ❑ at ❑ ❑ ❑ l 9 • • Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ill. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ 0 0 111 environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 g environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 ❑ 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use 0 ❑ ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ 0 X would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere 0 0 0 K with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 ❑ 0 X loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ 0 discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 ❑ 1 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ ❑ ❑ the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ 0 ❑ 18( the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ ❑ 0 1" 4 exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ 0 ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ 0 as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ 0 structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 ❑ ❑ loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 ❑ 0 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING, — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? 0 ❑ 0 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ Vg ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project SLE IPoi oe- (including but not limited to the general plan, specific Cc-,) �cce Appi0A#i, plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 ❑ ❑ natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral 0 ❑ ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important ❑ ❑ ❑ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X!. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ ❑ ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ 0 ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ❑ ❑35( where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 12 • • Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ ❑ 0 X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ 0 X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 0 A the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑Xirt Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ 0 ❑ Other public facilities? 0 ❑ 0 XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑C 13 • • Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIK — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ 0 ❑ 4 relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ 0 ❑ service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 ❑ ❑ an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ g f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 ❑ ❑ supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 ❑ lit wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 0 0 0 k drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 X project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact CI ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ XVII. STORM WATER DUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from ❑ areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair ❑ the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause ❑ significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 kg A4 • • XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑)sc ti • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7.Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE, AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: ,!ILLY 1992 Date For Signature Applicant -17- • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are nol contained on these lists. Date For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date 14,'1V . 8 I 2.o1z For 1A1l$ti\l M�tJ vE Applicant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -18- • a Environmental Setting 6 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills, CA A. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of structures. Attach photographs of the site. The property is an irregular -shaped lot with approximately 52,270 square feet. The site has a rear slightly descending slope with a pad elevation created by grading operation. The relatively flat site is occupied by a one-story single family dwelling with attached two -car garage. The structure is in good condition, however, The roof is aged and will need replacing. A concrete driveway provides access from the street to the garage and dwelling respectively and concrete walkway provides access to the rear yard. The property is filled with many trees located throughout the site which provides a sense of privacy from adjacent neighbors. Other vegetation consists of grass, fruit trees, oak trees, and ornamental plants. The soil on the site is stable and suitable for proposed additions and improvements. B. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. The surrounding developments are all residential one-story ranch style single —family homes with the exception of the Planning Department and Community Association offices. Many homes around the area range between 4000 — 5000 sq.ft. A few of the surrounding properties also have horse stables. The surrounding properties are filled with many tall mature trees, hedges, ornamental plants, and other native vegetation. There are a few other irregular shaped properties that have their houses within the front and side setback requirements. See attached photos.