660, Construct a pool & spa, Applicationi 1
City O49 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
APPLICATION FILE NO. Zoning Case No. 660
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
OWNER:
Resolution NO. 2003-10
10 Portuguese Bend Road
(Lot 52-RH)
Mr. and Mrs. Hwung-Hsiang`Hwung
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com
I hereby request appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission on the above referenced
application(s) for the following reasons:
The Planning Commission acted unreasonably in denying the applicants'
proposed pool/spa combinat:inn_ is consistent with the
intent of the 30% lot coverage guideline and is well within other
building envelope requirements for the site. The proposed pool/spa
combination does not add 'to the massing nn fhP ci fP anti i c rmm�ati hl a�
with surrounding properties. The Planning Commission failed to properly
account for the?sp anr9 oft, r fari-nrcr whirr J„sti fy approving the
application.
SIGNED: thOzik Pr
DATED: un 17, 2(63
FEE: 3 f (BOO,, 00
(Two-thirds of original application fee.)
Printed on Recycled Paper.
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be
made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modem or remove any unauthorized or unlawful
use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No.
900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without
the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher
application fee.
,
PROPERTY OWNER: M. HA14C,
OWNER'S ADDRESS: l C t4ilk
TELEPHONE NO: 1 ef ' 49
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL
AGENT'S NAME: oV
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 2.,0'Z.4' /(A p%:. � 'o 'p I) 4.
TELEPHONE NO: 313 - `b41
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site
Plan Review:
Ali M I•>II14�- # t...
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.. Describe
in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
C i ev -rlaS I `1'�tts c .140 a- r' LS
cS�'r lM ► LAY-- 5.12-E
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms
(such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
retS 1s St- P- VIOtis
fl 4 ,• D Cs IN
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and
recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and
contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow
unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
kl Cs fti& _ .
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide
a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
116 44tvinlC- }WIuiPAN, .
• i
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted
should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot
coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
0111-tIcert I ILL- k 1v rL cev 1 .c
Law 4-/X tsLAtetwis
WLL
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary
to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
�f .0-' 1L I ,519..-.. �c-s
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and
vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
Ho 11.11 P>cer.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, nd in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria eval tion t . • estmy ability; and, that the facts,
statements and other information presented are true and rre to t i be of my knowledge and belief.
Date: ,''l '3
Signature
For:
Applicant
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by
the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City'approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at , California
this
day of
By:
By:
Address
City
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at , California,
this -c day of rz-e 4- , 20 0 )
By: •
By:
Address
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the
State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment
here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
ZONING CASE NO
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (
PROJECT ADDRESS:
FEB 20 03 14: 22
CRISS GUNDERSON:ARCH
040 P02
•I'i BUILDING AREAS
• .‘;
:,,•
NET LOT AREA 6
,„.
:BULDING:PAD(S).
, • .in • ;•
:RESIDENCE
• . • xf .• .
• .,• . • ''•
• ''.. ' ' •'`fij •:GAIZAGE
.2,,,•
. ...:: SWIMMING POOPSPA
: . •:,
• • i : , ,
:.:'..'' :'il• .' ' STABLE (iF1.47,0•Y, 49)
:,'• .,,,i .
• :,:t .. ., . .
. i
• .• RECREATION COURT
(
•
SERVICE YARD
• OTHER
0 NEW BASEMENT AREA
(Volume to:be included in grading quantities.)
411/
ADDRESS t0 it)/24116Utti5M.
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
sq.ft.
2:2- sq.ft.
C2.4 sq.ft.
74o sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES 611 0 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL l2 12. %
COVERAGE
•'
TaTOTAL PAD
COVERAGE
30. %
DRIVEWAY _aalfrsq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AisiD
PATIO AREAS 1.1175 sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft.
OTHER PAVED
DRIVEWAYS, EASEMENTS
sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK 11 sq.ft.
% TOTAL PLATWORK
COVERAGE 10.3t) %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & ,
FLATWORK COVERAGE 11- VD,G=1 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE
506
1/1M1
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
67$ sq.ft.
0.81%
110e° sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
671007 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
5_fra*. sq.R.
740 sq.h.
508
4°
sq.ft
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
400 sq,ft.
sq.ft.
B sq.ft.
13.01%.
sq.ft. sq.ft.
31115 sq.ft.
'99T sq.ft.
sq. ft.
I 1952- sq.ft. sq.ft.
3.41 %
1400 sq.ft.
%
15..st, sq.ft.
10.14. %
i
DATE (' ?-9'3 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 16 i= e.51A .
l
APPLICANT -T U1.16'
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
STABLE (BARN) kt(Tt,4p.,
POOL
RECREATION COURT
( 1
OTHER 1-N 5M
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
—' sq.ft.
4* sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 -711H sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( 1 sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I, JANE KOBZEFF • declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains
the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the
County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a
distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as
follows:
Pronertv address: 10 Portuguese Bend Rd. , Rolling Hills
APN #: 7569-004-005
Legal description: Lot 52, Tract Rolling Hills
Date: O 3
Signed:
Subscrib d . r d sworn to before me this 25th day of February. 2003
Adiri te, tC
Notary Public
(A.& /pi
4a,ar.^..,E;4.wL.:at0a6'^n.6n3 C1..��sr2Y,Lti..r9.l�,.d,3vy'a.d..r�•,;
FRANCENIE D. UR I_MAN
Commission # 1324574 7
Notar.0 Public - California
Les Angeles County
My Comm. Expires Oct 9, 2005
0!6"r2.-
C:\DATA\WORD\MAPPING\MASTERS\CertOwnersList.doc