183, Construct a pool, Resolutions & Approval Conditionsr
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. Barry Becker
Lot 52-RH
ZONING CASE NO. 183
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Barry Becker, Lot 52-RH, Rolling Hills
Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c)
of Ordinance No. 112.for construction of a swimming pool came on for
hearing on the 15th day of March, 1977 in the Council Chambers of the
Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of
the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its
Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Barry Becker, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 52-RH, which
was originally known as 1 Eucalyptus Lane, and which has been designated
by the City Council as 10 Portuguese Bend Road, at the request of the
Beckers, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with
said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of
Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The
Commission finds, further, that no communication, written or verbal,
was received in opposition to the request for a swimming pool, but
the City'Clerk reported that a neighbor had come to the office and
discussed with her and the Chairman of the Planning Commission the
general condition of the property, since the change of address resulted
in location of the stable in the front yard, also storage of a recrea-
tional vehicle in the area which is now the front yard, and landscaping
along Portuguese Bend Road, which had provided screening, had been
removed.
• •
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant requests the conditional
use permit for construction of aswinming poolin a legal location in
the rear yard of the property. The Commission finds that a conditional
use permit should be granted in order to preserve substantial property
rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
that the granting of such conditional use permit would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same
vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use permit
should be granted under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c) of Ordinance
No. 112 for construction of a swimmingpool on Lot 52-RH to Mr. Barry
Becker, 10 Portuguese Bend Road, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
WW.Ge
etary, Planning ission