Loading...
678, Addition of 210 sq ft to exist, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• RESOLUTION NO. 2005-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-03 AND APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 678 AT 14 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD (LOT 56-A-RH), (ST DENIS). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Michael St Denis, property owner, with respect to real property located at 14 Portuguese Bend Road, (Lot 56-A- RH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a two-year time extension for a previously approved Site Plan Review to construct 1,642 square feet of additions to an existing residence. This approval was granted to the previous owners, Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on February 15, 2005 at which time information was presented indicating that additional time is needed to process the development application. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 5 of Resolution No. 2004-03, dated February 17, 2004, to read as follows: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within three years from the effective date of approval, unless work commences within that time period, as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance." Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of Resolution No. 2004-03 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2005. IXX ATTEST: ROGER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN }-( ,-' MARILYN KERN``_, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • i STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-09 entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-03 AND APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 678 AT 14 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD (LOT 56-A-RH), (ST DENIS). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 15, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Witte and Chairman Sommer. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY CLERK RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ' _�_ •tl (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 678 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT XX I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 14 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 56-A-RH) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 678 I (We) ce ify 5A-v-kKL__ SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT clare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. rya\ ;LC Name type or printed -Po \v`� Address (-Lk CA' CI 0 D- City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles) /� On 49 7/2'2 before me ///,_ /��e�° >/� rr� )p,7 Signature Name typed or printed Address City/State personally appeared / //C7-71,4iv i .�J% • , A-e/vic personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on t•: instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. 05 22210'10 T Recorder's Use Only and and offi o �E•w,;,,4,. VALERIE BREWER - Comm. No. 1364230 2 rJ • : NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY q► -I IA.. Pnmm Cvn nilf1110A 9nnii r 6‘,( Signature of Notary tEENE>XHIBliv -A 7%11 AL.HCu*rIERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • • Ettit$i'�A " RESOLUTION NO. 2004-03 05 2221070 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 678 AT 14 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 56-A-RH), (MACLEOD). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application -was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. John Macleod with respect to real property located at 14 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 56-A-RH), Rolling Hills, requesting a Site Plan Review to construct additions to an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on December 16, 2003, January 20, 2004, and at a field trip visit on January 17, 2004. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality. Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting 1,161 square foot addition to the residence, 210 square foot addition to the garage, and 271 square foot covered porches at an existing single-family residence, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks, except for the existing guest house, and a small portion of the garage, lot coverage requirements, disturbed area Resolution 2004-03 1 • • 05 2221.070 requirements and all other development standards. The majority of the proposed project would square off existing notches of the residence. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. The proposed additions will be constructed on an existing building pad and will utilize for most.part already existing impervious surfaces. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the additions will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. The site was previously disturbed and no additional disturbance will result from the proposed project. D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the new additions will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings of this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review in Zoning Case No. 678 to permit additions subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. Resolution 2004-03 2 • • 05 2221070 C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance and others. D. The lot shall be developed and . maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated December 2, 2003, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The property on which the project is located contains a stable and corral area .of sufficient size that meets all standards for vehicular -access thereto in conformance with site plan review limitations. F. All utility lines serving the residence and garage shall be placed underground. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 8,778 square feet or 16.9% in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the Zoning Ordinance. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 14,452 square feet or 27.9% in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the Zoning Ordinance. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 16,690 square feet or 32.2% in conformance with 40% maximum lot disturbance limitations. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 16,936 square foot building pad shall not exceed 6,307 square feet or 37.4%. The coverage on the sports court building pad shall remain at 60.7%, and the coverage on the guest house pad shall remain at 32.1%. K. There shall be no grading for the project. L. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to obscure the residence. M. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. N. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. Resolution 2004-03 3 05► 2221070 O. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. P. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers --shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water to the rear of the lot at the west. R. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. S. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. U. The drainage plan system shall be approved by the Planning Department and the County Drainage Engineer and shall assure that any water from any site irrigation systems and all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner. V. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. X. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. Resolution 2004-03 4 ti • • 05 2221070 Y. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any permit. Z. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. AA. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan approval, or the approval shall not be effective. AB. All' conditions of this Site Plan approval, which apply, must be. complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. ARVEL WIITE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN K RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution 2004-03 5 • 05 2221070 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITYOF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 678 AT 14 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 56-A-RH), (MACLEOD). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 17, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. t DEPUTY CITY CLERK tst. Resolution 2004-03 6