Loading...
898, Construction of a raised deck,, Application• • January 6, 2016 VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: samommismairc 21(Z rCVst 46 Eastfield Drive EMAIL: 46 Eastfield Drive LOT NO. 97 of Record of Survey Book 58 nage 6-10 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7567 PAGE 004 PARCEL 013 Tony Inferrera 1967 Upland St Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 310-544-6040 Co 17- 2 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance: Wall Height: The proposed raised deck is proposed to be a maximum of 5' out of grade on the downhill side. This deck and associated walls will however not meet the requirement of 2.5' wall average and so require a variance. The wall average will be close to 5'. Disturbed Area: The proposed disturbance for the site is 42.20% meaning that a variance is required. The existing coverage is 40.38% which make it an existing non -conforming lot. The only new disturbance is for the above grade deck which projects out onto the slope. The building addition is located on a pad which was previously created. Addition in Front Yard: The proposed residential addition is located partially in the front setback and therefore requires a variance. We have kept all but 150 s.f. of the addition out of the front yard setback and it is a minimum of 40' from the roadway easement at the worst location. Due to the location of the existing house on the building pad, the only options for the location of the propsed addition were partially into the front yard setback or doing a large amount of grading to allow for the building pad to be expanded out onto the slope. '—:\L :71 k'-?," '.;1 11 V JAN 0 8 2016 City of Rolling Hills By 121Page January 6, 2016 Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The extraordinary condition which does not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone is that the property was previously developed with a retaining wall in the front yard setback and the residence pushed close to the front yard setback and a steep slope on the other side. The existing residence is significantly smaller than those in the adjacent vicinity and the proposed addition will bring the size up to be closer in area. Another extraordinary circumstance is that while the lot is larger, the majority of it is sloped and unbuildable. By utilizing a portion of the existing flat space, be it in the front setback, it allows for less grading and less overall disturbance of the lot. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located The change would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building and OSHA codes being followed during the construction process. The residence addition is proposed to be a minimum of 40' from the front roadway easement and within the existing retaining wall on the site. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 13IPage • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at I (S this v day of By: By: . California, .20 \ Address reo l . -- cp qc t( City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: -20- • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this TR3-71--- day of By: California , 20 / 6 . Addres6k4- OS_ k . \\\S` CA' c\)2W City -21- • January 6, 2016 REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: R1 R OWNER'S ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Drive TELEPHONE NO.: EMAIL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 97 of Record of Survey Book 58 page 6-10 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7567 PAGE 004 PARCEL 013 AGENT'S NAME: Tonv Inferrera AGENT'S ADDRESS: 1967 Upland St Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO.: 310 0+Q Co V1- 214-' NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: The proposed project includes a 1,835 s.f. addition to an existing 2,243 s.f. single family residence for a total of 4,078 s.f. There is also a proposed 375 s.f. raised deck which has stairs leading down to it from the house pad. A Site Plan Review is required for the following reasons: The new residential addition requires a Site Plan Review under Zoning Code 17.46.020A-3 since it is a new addition. The 375 sf. raised requires a Site Plan Review due to being greater than 12" out of grade per zoning code Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: None a ; JAN 0 8 2016 City of Rolling Hills By 121Page • January 6, 2016 SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The proposed additions meet all of the zoning code requirements other than a portion of the addition encroaches into the front setback and an exceedance of disturbed area. It was decided that instead of pushing the acicifi on towards the south, which would require additional grading, the addition would be located on a previously disturbed area where a retaining wall currently is. There will be no further encroachment past this retaining wall and a 4' pathway around the house would be met. The project's disturbed area is currently 40.38% which is above the allowed 40%. There is a proposed increase of 1.82% for the new out of grade deck bringing the total disturbance to 42.20% The existing roadway easement on the residential parcel is 30' and the same as other neighbors on Eastfield Drive. The proposed additions to the residence will bring the size of the house up to be comparable to surrounding residences. The neighbor to the north has a 5,820 S.F. residence, to the west is 2,990 s.f., and east is 5,550 s.f. so we are proposing to be compatible to surrounding residence sizes. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The project preserves and integrates into the site design existing topographic features by placing the new addition on a previously disturbed area where little to no grading will be required. The raised deck will be located on a slope which was previously disturbed and will only require re- grading of the existing slope, no additional disturbance. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and re -contouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The site development plan follows the natural contours of the site to minimize grading by utilizing a current pad for the residential improvements, and an existing pad for the future stable. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. 13IPage • • January 6, 2016 The project preserves the native vegetation by proposing the structures in an area that has already been disturbed. The side setbacks will allow for buffer between the neighbors, and the front yard setback is only being encroached into by 10' at the worst location. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The site development plan preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by utilizing an area previously partially disturbed to construct the residential pad improvements as opposed to disturbing more land. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The plan is harmonious in scale and mass as surrounding residences. We are asking for a variance to build a portion of the residential addition in the front setback, but the main reason for this is to reduce the grading and walls which would be required if we moved it completely out of the front setback. All other structures are outside of all setbacks. The raised deck also needs a variance due to the average wall height being above 2.5'. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The Site Plan is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles as the stable is being proposed where there is already an existing garage. There is also tree planting all along Saddleback so the addition of the stable will not cause any line of sight issues for drivers. There will be no changes to the driveway off of Saddleback and therefore will not impact any pedestrians or vehicles. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The Site Plan is sensitive conforms to the requirements of C.E.Q.A and will not have any significant impacts to the environment. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are truce correct to best of my knowledge and belief. �� l� Date: 67 r--1) nature For: I 7f II —Z o '-A- 1 `I 1 I Applicant 14IPage January 6, 2016 FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 151Page • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at 1P— O this day of ate: By: By: , California, ,20 4. -CR_`K I ICUcvst Address CR 96DA-L( City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( ) PROJECT ADDRESS: -22- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at a \ r R , California this ( day of , 20 cc--errc_ \z-YR \r3s - By: 46 Esc P R. Address City -23- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills Site Data • • Date Zoning Case Address 18-Mar-161 46 Eastfield Dr Calculation of Lot Coverage Existing Gross Lot Area 81200 1.8640955 Net Lot Area 65880 Residence 2243 Pad No. 1 Garage 420 Pad No. 1 Swimming Pool / Spa 465 Pad No. 2 Pool Equiptment 35 Pad No. 2 Guest House 680 Pad No. 2 Cabana Pad No. 1 Stable Pad No. 3 Recreation Court Pad No. 1 Attached Covered Porches Primary 300 Pad No. 1 Attached Covered Porches Accessory Pad No. 1 Entrayway Porte Cochere 465 Pad No. 1 Attached Trelliss 325 Pad No. 1 Detached Structures: Shed 185 Pad No. 3 Detached Structures: Fire 25 Pad No. 2 Detached Structures: trellis + BBQ 300 Pad No. 1 Detached Structures: SHED 100 Pad No. 1 Service Yard 96 Pad No. 1 Other Pad No. 4 Basement Area Pad No. 1 Depth of Basement Pad No. 1 Primary Driveways 3150 Paved Walks, Patio Areas, Courtyards 1992 Pool Decking 1000 Other paved driveways Disturbed Area 26600 Building Pad 1 9950 Pad No. 1 Building Pad 2 2840 Pad No. 2 Building Pad 3 3375 Pad No. 3 Building Pad 4 0 Pad No. 4 1 Pad No. 1 1au/U0 - Troy � J G 2 Pad No. 2 Sh��I/1110I 5F 1'4 rater Al� (Art-ntta pIran) CC rtvicwl �f( lirAVllLGP/v �-U S shdatc, is /1 LI L- Cti / u,L u G 4.p pruvk 5R 1 30 a OI6 -0 rt Flt�d �S I r�cv►stirA .,, t r'tviw chty rj + r dh�s rtLUI Cc�rc shc03 fri Rrt r 7 fr it PC L//1/4 Proposed zoning 1757 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 450 Pad No. 3 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 3 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 0 Pad No. 4 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 1 -125 0 0 Pad No. 1 Pad No. 2 Pad No. 3 0 Pad No. 4 F.)) 3 7.„ 7 D MAR t 8 2016 City of Rolling Hills f3y • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Dr ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 65,880 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 65,880 sq.ft RESIDENCE 2,243 sq.ft 1,757 sq.ft 4,000 sq.ft GARAGE 420 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 420 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 465 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 465 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 35 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 35 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 680 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 680 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE (dirt volume to be 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft included in grading quantities RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, BREE7RWAYS 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 300 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 300 sq.ft 465 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 465 sq.ft ATTACHED TRELLISES AT GARAGE 325 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 325 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, 185 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 185 sq.ft BARBEQUE, OUTDOOR 25 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 25 sq.ft KITCHEN,ROOFED PLAY EQUP.-over 15 ft. 300 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 300 sq.ft high and over 120 sq.ft. in area, WATER 100 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 100 sq.ft FEATURES, ETC. SHEDS SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 96 sq.ft OTHER: RAISED DECK 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft BASEMENT AREA: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (Volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT 0 sq.ft 0 ft 0 ft TOTAL STRUCTURE 5,639 sq.ft 2,207 sq.ft 7,846 sq.ft %STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 8.56% sq.ft 3.35% sq.ft 11.91% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 AND UP TO 800 sq.ft. 5,194 sq.ft 2,207 sq.ft 7,401 sq.ft detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. "-120(por of shed)-25(fire)-75(bbq)-225(trellis)"=445 deduction for detached % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 7.88% sq.ft 3.35% sq.ft 11.23% sq.ft 16 • • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Dr ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK %TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL 3,150 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 3,150 sq.ft 1,992 sq.ft -125 sq.ft 1,867 sq.ft 1,000 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 1,000 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 6,142 sq.ft -125 sq.ft 6,017 sq.ft 9.32% -0.19% 9.13% 11,781 sq.ft 2,082 sq.ft 13,863 sq.ft %TOTAL COVERAGE 17.88% 3.16% 21.04% TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 11,336 sq.ft 2,082 sq.ft 13,418 sq.ft Excl. the allowance of up to 5- 800 sq.ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE 17.21% 3.16% 20.37% TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 26,600 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 26,600 sq.ft % DISTURBED AREA 40.38% 0.00% 40.38% GRADING QUANTITY NO PROPOSED DISTURBANCE 700 C.Y. (include future stable, corral, and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. *Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fireplace, etc. are not counted towards coverage and disturbed area unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq.ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. 17 • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Dr CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1- MAIN RESIDENCE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 9,950 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 9,950 sq.ft RESIDENCE 2,243 sq.ft 1,757 sq.ft 4,000 sq.ft GARAGE 420 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 420 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE - sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 96 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 300 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 300 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SUF. OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 465 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 465 sq.ft BREE7EWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 325 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 325 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 400 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 400 sq.ft (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 100 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 100 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4,249 sq.ft 42.70% sq.ft 1,757 sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises, (300+325+100)>800 SO USE 800 Not incl. allowed deductions, 3,449 sq.ft 1,757 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures 6,006 sq.ft 60.36% sq.ft 5,206 sq.ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 34.66% sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft 52.32% sq.ft 18 • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Dr CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2- POOL & GUEST HOUSE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 2,840 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 2,840 sq.ft RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 465 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 465 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 35 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 35 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 680 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 680 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZF OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft BREE7J WAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 25 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 25 sq.ft (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 1,205 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 1,205 sq.ft %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 42.43% sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft 42.43% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, 1,180 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 1,180 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 41.55% sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft 41.55% sq.ft 19 • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Dr CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 3- STABLE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 3,375 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 3,375 sq.ft RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 185 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page) ABOVE 120 SO: 185-120 ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 65 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 65 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 185 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 185 sq.ft 6.51% sq.ft 450 sq.ft 13.33% sq.ft 635 sq.ft 18.81% sq.ft 65 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 515 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 2.29% sq.ft 13.33% sq.ft 15.26% sq.ft 19 • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 46 Eastfield Di GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION PAD 1: HOUSE Grading Ouantities: Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation 100 1.5 OVERALL 250 5' OVERALL TOTAL CUT 350 TOTAL Balanced Export 0 Max Allowed Export: 0 FILL For house/addition n/a For other structures (i.e. walls) List STABLE Pad 100 1' Overall For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction 250 5' TOTAL FILL 350 TOTAL GRADING (Sum 700 of total cut and total fill): PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing pad elevations House Other Pad: Stable- future Finished Floor 1000.00 Finished Grade 999.00 Proposed pad elevations Finished floor 1000.00 Finished grade 999.00 955.00 954.00 21 • • DATE: 3/18/2016 ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION PAD 3: STABLE Grading Ouantities: Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition (All in Basement) For other structures (i.e. walls) List Stable For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT 0 46 Eastfield Dr TOTAL Balanced Export 0 Max Allowed Export: 0 FILL For house/addition - n/a For other structures (i.e. walls) List Stable For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction TOTAL FILL TOTAL GRADING of total cut and total fill): 0 (Sum 0 PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing pad elevations House Other Pad: Stable Finished Floor 495.10 Finished Grade 494.10 Proposed pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Basement -finished floor Basemend finished well wall 495.10 494.10 483.33 482.33 475.00 474.00 21