90, "SFR ""as built"" to meet curr, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.OF THE.CITY:OF ROLLING HILLS,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. William St. Sure
Lot 37B-EF
ZONING CASE NO. 90
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Mr. William St. Sure, Lot 37B-EF, Eastfield
Tract, for a variance of side yard requirements under Article III,
Section 3.07 and Article V, Section 5.01 and a variance of rear
yard requirements under Article III, Section 3.08 of Ordinance No. 33
came on for hearing on the 19th day of August, 1969 at the hour of
8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building of the City'of Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of
his application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its
Findings and Formal Report as required by the Ordinances of the City
of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. William St. Sure, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 37B-EF, East -
field Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and
that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application
was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of
the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II .
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and that
no evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III.
The Commission further finds that the building pad on the lot, is
pre -graded, and in order to locate the house satisfactorily within the
limitations, variances of 10 feet in the rear yard, which would then
be 40 feet, rather than 50 feet as required by ordinance, and 22 inches.
for an eave which would project into the side yard would be necessary.
The Commission further finds that the foundation of the house will not
be in the side yard, but the eave at the southerly corner projects 72
inches beyond the foundation, and of this, 22 inches project into the
sideyard, and further finds that the variances of side yard and rear
yard requirements should be granted to applicant in order to preserve
substantial property rights possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such variances will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property
in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that variances of rear yard
and side yard requirements should be granted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rolling Hills to Mr. William Ste Sure, Lot 37B-EF, East -
field Tract, in accordance with the plot plan marked Exhibit I on file
in these proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
October 20, 1969.
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Comm sion
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Dr. Victor Meyer
Lot 9CH
ZONING CASE NO. 89
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Dr. Victor M:eyex, Lot 9 C1R, Crest Hills
Tract, for a variance of front yard requirements under Article III,
Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 came on. for hearing on. the 17th of
July, 1969 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building
of the City of Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having
submitted. evidence in support of his application, the Planning Com-
mission., being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as
required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California,
I.
The Commission. finds that the applicant, Dr. Victor Meyer, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 9CH, Crest
Hills Tract, located_in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and
that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application.
was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance'Noo 33
of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II. o
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and
that no evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III
The Commission further finds that because of the unusual shape
of the lot and the curve of the road, placement of the house on the
lot is limited, and because of the extensive grading required, the
residence would be 20' from the road easement line of Cinchring Road
instead of 30' as required, but would be below road level and not
visible from adjacent properties, and further finds that a variance
of 10of front yard requirements should be granted to applicant in
order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of
such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
Iv.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be
granted by the Planning Commisloo of thE. City of RnIlirlg Hills to
Dr. Victor Meyer, 9CH Ur;t Trnct, Lit 44,(1,rdancer with
the plot plan markod E.Oibik 3 oo file in 1.hest-, pr,cet,dllipg, and
it is therefore, so ordered.
August 6, 1969.
4f7u-C/
cretary, Planning Cajnissoir
-2-
Chairman:, Planning Commission