340, Construct pool & spa in side y, Resolutions & Approval Conditionsr vl
8'7-1051.3'75.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS; CA 90274
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
4 PAST. 8IN.
A.M. JUL 2 1987
Pleaserecord this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office
before recordation.)
•
Office and
I FEE $7'
requires that the form be notarized
• Acceptance Form
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ') ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO:
VARIANCE CASE NO. 340
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s). of•the real property
described as follows:
LOT H OF RANCHO LOS PALOS VERDES IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS - PARCEL
NQ. 37 RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK 58 PAGES 6 TO 10.
This property is the subject of the above numbered
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated
Conditional Use Permit•Case No.
Variance .Case No. 340 •
cases.
conditions in said
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true'and correct
(Where the owner 'and applicant. are
Applicant Name
Address
City, State
Signature
Owner Name
Address
not the same, both must sign..)
Type or print
JAMES F. HANSEN
41 EASTFIELD DRIVE
City, State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
ING HILLS, CALIF
SAME
40 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
) ss.
rS.. COUNTY OF CeM...
On this acD day of )
and for said State, personally appeared
87-1051375
,19s? , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in
F
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactor evidence) to be the person whose name
,subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Official Notarial Seal:
4
OFFICIAL SEAL
ARLETTE LA FONTAINE
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My comm. expires DEC 9, ins
FORM 5104-C
VEUSAX116WA:A4RM%.17.,-11
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. and Mrs. James Hansen
ZONING CASE NO. 340
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. and Mrs. James Hansen. Lot 37 B-EF,
Rolling Hills Tract, for a Variance under Section 17.32.010 of the
City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code, came for hearing on the 21st
day of April, 1987 in the Council Chambers of the Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. The
Planning Commission, after being appropriately advised by Staff and
hearing public testimony, now makes its Findings and Report as
required by the Municipal Code of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicants, Mr.and Mrs. James
Hansen, are the owners of that certain real property described as Lot
37 B-EF, located at 41 Eastfield Drive in the City of Rolling Hills,
and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said
application was given as required by Section 17.32.080 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further, at no
comment, written or verbal, was received in opposition to the
request.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicants have requested a
Variance from Section 17.08.260 and 17.08.270 yard and front yard
requirements. The applicants have requested a 26-foot encroachment
into the established front yard setback, which is currently 94 feet
from the roadway easement, which would leave a 68-foot front yard
• •
setback. The applicants indicate that the addition of a swimming
pool and spa can only be accomplished by building into the front
yard. To do otherwise would be detrimental to the environment.
Therefore, the applicants request the granting of the Variance so
that they may have the same property rights as others in the same
vicinity and zone, which would otherwise be denied if they were not
able to fully utilize the existing building area. The Commission
finds that there are significant topographical and physical
conditions which exist on the property which impinge upon the
applicants' ability to fully utilize their property without damaging
the environment. The Commission finds that a Variance should be
granted in order to preserve substantial property rights in the same
vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such Variance would not
be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to
property in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a Variance should be
granted to Mr. and Mrs. James Hansen, Lot 37 B-F, 41 Eastfield Drive,
under Section 17.32.010 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code
for a Variance from Section 17.32.010 of the City of Rolling Hills
Municipal Code for a Variance from Section 17.08.260 and 17.08.270,,
yard and front yard requirements, subject to the following
conditions:
1) The front yard encroachment shall not exceed 26
feet;
2) The landscaping plan be approved by the Planning
Commission, and a bond in the amount of estimate for the cost of
landscaping, plus 15%, be posted after landscape installation, for
not less than two years.
3) The property shall be developed and maintained in
• •
substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A.
4) It is declared to be the intent of the Planning
Commission that if any provision of the Variance is held or declared
to be invalid, the Variance shall be void and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse.
5) The improvements, as set forth in Exhibit A shall
respect, preserve and reinstate if necessary, the existing
topography, natural features, landscaping and RHCA easements.
/s/Allan Roberts
Chairman, Planning Commission