898, Construction of a raised deck,, Correspondencei A
C'ty o/Ro mn9 J7i/t€i
May 10, 2016
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898- 46 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller;
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
This letter is to notify you that the City Council at their regular meeting on May 9,
2016 received and filed Zoning Case No. 898, approving your project to construct the
addition and keep the shed in the side yard setback.
Before this case takes effect you are required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance
Form together with the Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder.
Please read the conditions of approval, as some may have to be met prior to issuance
of a permit.
I am enclosing a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2016-09 together with the affidavit of
acceptance form specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning
Commission. Please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM,
have the signature notarized, and forward, (or hand deliver), the completed form and
Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
(562) 462-2125
OR
LAX Courthouse 310-727-6142
11701 S. La Cienega Blvd. 6th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90045
Confirm the hours of operation and the cost of recordation with the County Clerks
Office, as they change frequently.
The preparer of the construction plans for plan check and later construction and for
obtaining building permits will be required to sign an affidavit stating that the plans
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
,
submitted to the Building Department for review are the same as those approved by
the City; and further, prior to obtaining a grading/building permit you and/or your
agent will be required to sign an affidavit stating that the project will be constructed
according to the approved plans. I will provide you the certification forms prior to
your submittal of the plans to the Building Department.
Please make a copy of the Resolutions for your records and keep a copy of the plans
with the conditions printed on the plans at the construction site at all times and
assure that the contractor adheres to the conditions in the Resolutions during the
entire construction process. Any deviation from the approved plans and conditions
of approval, either prior to construction or during must be brought to City's attention
for review prior to it being implemented by the contractor.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sinc : ely,
Yi'- nta wart
nning Director
Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 2016— 09
cc: Anthony Inferrera, Architect, (cover letter only)
• •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 898 (SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED)
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE
I (We) the undersigned state
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
46 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 97-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 898
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARAINCE
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
• •
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
}
}
On . before me, , a Notary
Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they
executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
Name of Notary:
Date Commission Expires
Commission No.
• • E-c. H (0 cr A
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE
PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GRADING;
AND A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK WITH A PORTION OF THE ADDITION AND TO
RETAIN A SHED IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING
CASE NO. 898 AT 46 EASTFIELD, (LOT 97-EF) (MILLER).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Robert Milleivith
respect to real property located at 46 Eastfield, (Lot 97-EF), Rolling Hills, CA
requesting a Site Plan Review for the construction of a 1,757 square foot addition
to their existing residence for a total of 4,000 square feet, and grading of total of
700 cubic yards of dirt, of which 500 c.y. is for excavation and recompaction (250
c.y. each). The variances are requested for an 85 square foot portion of the
proposed addition that encroaches between 8-10 feet into the front yard setback
and to retain an existing wood shed in a side yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on January 19, 2016, February 16, 2016, and March 15,
2016 and in the field on February 16, 2016. The applicants were notified of the
public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented
from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the
City staff and Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed, and studied
said proposal. The property owner and his representative were in attendance at
the public hearings. No neighbors reviewed the plans before the meetings or
attended the meetings.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the lot area excluding the
roadway easement is 1.8 acres. For development purposes the net lot area of the
lot is 65,880 square feet or 1.51 acres. The property is developed with a 2,243
square foot residence, 420 square foot garage, 465 square foot swimming pool,
680 square foot pool house, several trellises, sheds, and other amenities. One
shed and the service yard are located in side setbacks and require a variance or
must be removed. The pool equipment area is located in the side setback as well
and it is considered legal -nonconforming.
Section 4. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1
exemption in that the project is an addition.
Reso. 2016-09 1
46 Eastfield Drive
• •
Section 5. Section 17.46.020(3) requires a development plan to be submitted
for Site Plan Review for an addition over 999 square feet, and for grading. With
respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting approval of a 1,757 square
foot addition, and associated grading the Planning Commission makes the
following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure
complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density
residential development. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage
requirements. The lot currently is nonconforming for disturbed area (maximum
40% of net lot area permitted). There is a total existing disturbed area of 26,600
square feet (40.4% of the net lot area), which is not proposed to change. The
proposed project is located below Eastfield Drive and will be screened from the
road by the drop in elevation and landscaping which minimizes the visual
impact of the development.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the
addition is located in a previously graded area and will not cause the lot to look
overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to
maintain open space on the property. The nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been
considered, and the construction and maintenance of the proposed addition will
not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings,
or structures because the proposed addition will be constructed on a portion of
the lot which is already graded, will be below street view, is a sufficient distance
from nearby residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view
or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The
proposed project is consistent with the scale of homes in the surrounding RA-S-1
similarly zoned neighborhood. The proposed project entails construction of an
addition and will create a residence that is 4,000 square feet. The average
residence size of the adjacent homes is 4,413 square feet, which is larger than the
proposed project.
D. The development plan generally follows natural contours of the site
to the maximum extent practicable to accomplish groomed and usable areas of
the lot, subject to concurrent approval of Variance pursuant to Section 6 of this
resolution. Natural drainage courses will not be affected by the project. Minimal
grading is proposed on previously graded areas and therefore existing drainage
channels are not anticipated to be impacted.
Reso. 2016-09 2
46 Eastfield Drive
E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because no
change is proposed to the existing driveway, which is in compliance with
applicable requirements.
F. The project conforms to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is exempt.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable
to the property and not applicable to other similar properties prevent the owner
from making use of a parcel or property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties in the same vicinity. Sections 17.16.110 requires that every lot in the
RAS-1 zone shall have a front setback of not less than 50 feet from the road
easement line. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach with an 85
square foot portion of the addition into the front yard setback by 10-feet, leaving
a 40-foot setback. Section 17.16.120A requires that every lot in the RAS-1 zone
shall have a side setback not less than 20 feet from the side property line. A
Variance is requested to retain an existing wood shed in the side setback. With
respect to this request for Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions because the
property was previously developed with a retaining wall in the front yard
setback and the residence was pushed close to the front yard setback with a steep
slope on the other side of the front of the lot. The addition will bring the
residence more in line and more compatible with other residences in the vicinity
with the additional square footage. While the lot is larger, the majority of it is
sloped and unbuildable. By utilizing a portion of the lot for the addition that is
already graded and flat, it allows for less overall disturbance of the lot. The front
encroachment is very minor and is not visible from the street or other residence.
The 100 square foot existing shed that encroaches in the side setback is small and
unobtrusive.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the
Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the rights and benefits
enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same zone, including the ability to
enjoy a similar sized home due to physical constraints of the lot. The
encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties
in the vicinity. The front and side encroachments are very minor.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the front
Reso. 2016-09 3
46 Eastfield Drive
• •
setbacks is minimal. The area of addition would not impair views. The
disturbance is not proposed to increase but is already above the maximum
allowance. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are
within the requirements of the City.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed addition will be orderly,
attractive, attached to the residence, and will not affect the rural character of the
community. The proposed addition will not encroach into potentially future
equestrian uses on the property. A suitable stable and corral area exists on the
site.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. While the total disturbed maximum
is exceeded by a minor amount, it is legal non -conforming, and the structural lot
coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of
the City.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 5 and 6, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review, and Variance in Zoning Case
No. 898 to construct a 1,757 square foot addition to the existing residence for a
total of 4,000 square feet residence, grading of total of 700 cubic yards of dirt, to
encroach with 85 square feet of the new addition into the front yard setback and
to retain the 100 square foot shed in the side setback subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Site Plan and Variance approval shall expire within two years
from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has
not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080 and
17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is
otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the
applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing
has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant
fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of
the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on
an approved plan.
Reso. 2016-09 4
46 Eastfield Drive
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file dated March 9, 2016, except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application. A copy of the conditions of this Resolution shall
be printed on plans approved when a building permit is issued and a copy of
such approved plans, including conditions of approval, shall be available on the
building site at all times.
F. The licensed professional preparing construction plans for this
project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that
the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and
including conformance with all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's
Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building permit for this project shall execute a
Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according
to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
G. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property or this project, which
would constitute additional grading, height or any structural development
shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning
Commission.
H. Grading for this project will entail 100 cubic yards cut, 100 cubic
yards fill, plus over -excavation of 250 cubic yards and recompaction of 250 cubic
yards, for a total of 700 cubic yards of dirt. The 100 c.y. of cut will be spread on
the existing stable pad area, and shall not be exported.
I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,401 square feet or 11.2%
of the total net lot area of the lot, excluding the allowed deductions. The total lot
coverage will be 13,418 square feet or 20.4% of the net lot area. The residential
building pad (outside of setbacks) will not be increased and will remain at 9,950
square feet. The coverage on this pad is proposed at 60.4%, which includes all of
the structures on this pad. With the allowed deductions the building pad
coverage will be 5,206 square feet or 52.3%. This is an increase from 34.7% from
the existing condition
J. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed a total existing
disturbed area of 26,600 square feet (40.4% of the net lot area), which is not
proposed to change.
Reso. 2016-09 5
46 Eastfield Drive
• •
K. The future set -aside area for the stable and corral area of 1,000
square feet, shall be retained on the property at all times.
L. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does
not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the
residence.
M. In conjunction with an application for a building permit for this
project, the applicant shall submit an application for a roof permit for the non -
permitted roof on the pool house. A final inspection for the pool house roof by
the Building Inspector must be granted prior to or in concurrence with a final
inspection of this project.
N. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be
prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit.
Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements.
O. The setback lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project
shall remain staked throughout the construction.
P. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be
required.
Q. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby
unimproved roadway easements, but not to obstruct neighboring driveways.
During construction, to maximum extend feasible, employees of the contractor
shall car-pool into the City.
R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
S. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department
Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste,
drainage and storm water management and comply with the City's Low Impact
development Ordinance (LID), if applicable. Further the property owners shall
be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a
septic system, should changes to the existing system be required.
Reso. 2016-09 6
46 Eastfield Drive
T. A minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be
recycled and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation
to the City.
U. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association (RHCA). Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall
remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to
fences -including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping,
irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the RHCA.
V. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark,
including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions.
Weather conditions can be found at:
http:/ /www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitio
ns#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her
contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning
be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall
have readily available fire distinguisher.
W. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the
Zoning Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with, including the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. All utility lines to the
residence shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030.
X. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as built"
plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the
Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance
with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project
during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan.
Y. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this approval, the approvals shall not be effective. Such affidavit
shall be recorded together with the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19t AY G w L 2016.01
/PATCCHELF, I TRM
ATTEST:
CiAi&,i
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Reso. 2016-09 7
46 Eastfield Drive
• •
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the
public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in
section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-09 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE
PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AND GRADING;
AND VARIANCES TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK WITH A SMALL PORTION OF THE ADDITION, TO
EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF
THE LOT, AND TO RETAIN A SHED IN THE SIDE SETBACK IN
ZONING CASE NO. 898 AT 46 EASTFIELD, (LOT 97-EF) (MILLER).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
April 19, 2016 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Kirkpatrick, Smith and Chairman Chelf.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Gray.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
/WO: (.14
HEIDI LUCE
CITY CLERK
Reso. 2016-09 8
46 Eastfield Drive
•
C1t ol /Qo//in9 JJi//6
April 20, 2016
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898- 46 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller,
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
The Planning Commission adopted a resolution at their regular meeting on April 19, 2016,
granting approval of your request. That action accompanied by the record of the proceedings
before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on Monday, May 9, 2016, at their
regular meeting beginning at 7:00 PM. You or your representative should be present to answer
any questions the Council may have. Please submit 6 sets of plans for the City Council meeting
by Monday, May 2, 2016.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the
adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed within that thirty
(30) day appeal period, or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case (Section 17.54.010(B) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will
be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the
Municipal Code.
Please review the conditions in the resolution that was provided to you previously. Should you
have any objections to any of the conditions, you may appeal them to the City Council.
If no appeals are filed and if the City Council does not take the case under jurisdiction within
the appeal period after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution, the Planning
Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an
Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County
Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. Instructions for recordation will be
forwarded to you after the Council's proceedings.
The staff report to the City Council with a copy of the signed Resolution will be forwarded to
you prior to the Council's meeting.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely
Wendy Stay, Associate Planner
cc: An ny Inferrera, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
City 0/ Rolling_ IL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
March 16, 2016
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898- 46 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller,
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted 4-0 at
their regular meeting on March 15, 2016 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to
approve your request in Zoning Case No. 898 and shall be confirmed in the draft
resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and
consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an
upcoming meeting on April 19, 2016 beginning at 6:30 PM and make its final
decision on your application at that meeting.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded
to you and your representative before the Planning Commission meeting.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council
takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty. (30) day appeal period. (Section
17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). You or any other interested
party may appeal the Commission's action to the City Council. Should there be
an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes
its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
The Planning Commission's action, accompanied by the record of the
proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a
report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on
Monday, May 9th, 2016.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
Vuv
V1e1
Associate Planner
cc: Anthony Inferrera, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
•
City
0/ olling�Lng INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
February 22, 2016
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898- 46 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller,
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
This is to notify you that the Planning Commission at their February 16th, 2016
meeting continued deliberation of your project to their March 15th, 2016 meeting.
Specifically, the Planning Commission requires that the deck be removed from
the plans, and that you address the ridgeline and massing of the addition, that a
4' walkway around both additions, and the service yard be provided and shown
on the plans.
Please submit a revised plan and calculations for staff's review immediately, but
no later than March 7th, 2016.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
e dy Sta!s
Associate anner
cc: Anthony Inferrera, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
City O leot n INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
January 21, 2016
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898- 46 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller
The Planning Commission scheduled to conduct a field inspection of your property to
view the proposed project on Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at approximately 8:00 AM.
The owner and/or representative must be present to answer any questions regarding
the proposal the Commission may have. Your neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius will
be notified of the field trip.
The site must be prepared a minimum of a week prior to the field trip according to the
enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements:
• A full-size silhouette must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project
showing the footprints, roof ridges, walls and any projections;
• Stake the property lines, easement lines and the setback lines in the vicinity of
the proposed project
• Delineate limit of grading
• Stake the proposed raised deck
After the field trip, the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will take place
on Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 6:30 PM at City Hall, at which time the Commission
will further discuss your proposed project.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Y,• /d(Gtiet-
endy Star
Associate P nner
cc: Anthony Inferrera, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
>rai&if qee.6
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
A silhouette of proposed construction must be erected the week preceding the designated
Planning Commission or City Council meeting / field trip.
Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable.
Bracing should be provided.
Lumber, wire or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves.
Flags in close proximity to each other must be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the
visualization of the proposed construction.
Property lines, setback lines and easement lines must be staked along the areas of
construction. 2 1/z - 3' high wooden stakes must be used to delineate the lines. Such stakes
must be flagged and marked on their sides:
• Property line ( red or pink flag)
• Setback line (green flag)
• Easement line (yellow flag)
and remain in the ground throughout the entire review and approval process as well as
during the entire construction process, when required by the Commission.
The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed.
If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521.
-141
SECTION PLAN
Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Silhouette Guidelines.doc
-1-
•
C1t /// J/d/
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
STATUS OF APPLICATION
& PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION
January 7, 2016
Mr. and Mrs. Miller
46 Eastfield
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 898 -Request for Site Plan Review and
Variances
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller,
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the
application noted above and finds that the information submitted is sufficiently
complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify,
amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application.
Your application has been set for public hearing by the Planning Commission on
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills
City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You
or your designated representative must attend the meeting to present the project
and to respond to questions.
Your neighbors will be notified of this project. The staff report for this project
will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, January 15, 2016. We
will mail the report to you and your representative.
Please do not hesitate to call or email me at (310) 377-1521 ext 225 /
wstarkscityofrh.net if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Wendy Starks, Associate Planner
cc: Anthony Inferrera, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper