Loading...
734, Retaining wall within the rear, Application• TITLE(S) : This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD JAN 1 0 2007 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By 20072.232072 '1111'11111111111111111,111, i1111111111111111111 H . RecoidecliFiled it Rec rtt Fes: $36.00 1--;ecorde 's Office, Los Angels CoLinf)( California $0.00 A II Pages: 0011 Ofh,.?r. $3,3.00 ' 09/27/07 AT 1 0:32AM i6'6:66 Pala. 001219069 200709270620029 Couiiter LEAD SHEET Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. Number of AIN's Shown E4384137 THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX \\t\11fi'Iii:11J11 NIII T RECORDER'S USE ONLY The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 734 SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 0 CHESTNUT LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 241A-1-MS), CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 734 SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT certify (•; . •cl re un f'r the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. •Mljeiid0 Signature Nisi() Sig re An�`�d,I Name tyr6r pr t tad 1 Name pedtr ntedi Addresses _ tP n 11 k at) I „ / /.7�� Ad 4(h f (5 CA I00 1314 City/State Ufi�J'I l I�hs t/� I �G City/State j Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On )-26-O7 beforeme,DouccV, Mom( -In_ ( 00 IAJ Po ( -- Personally appeared Ni r . !`r1 f`'t i-.. d 0 L.. K/-1 ter. i M G. t D personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the .tit,L upw behalf of.wto on(s) acted, executed the instrument. � DOUGLAS K. MCHATflE Witness b( Ind and official) seal. / . �, Commission it California3 t� , ��s��G-�i/ t LP i Notary Public - adltoPet _ L. Los Angeles County [ Signature of Notary °acts"my:t „cn .h,m.,-)401%4-ciarreliHERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • Ccatitelr RESOLUTION NO. 2007-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SWIMMING POOL IN THE FRONT YARD ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING CASE NO. 734, AT 0 CHESTNUT LANE, (LOT 241-A-1 MS), (MEIDL). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Norm Meidl with respect to real property located at 0 Chestnut Lane (Lot 241-A-1-MS), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review and Variance to permit grading and construction of a new 4,320 square foot single family residence, 885 square foot garage, 96 square foot service yard, 837 square feet covered porches, future stable and 436 square foot swimming pool in the front yard area. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on October 17, 2006, November 21, 2006, December 19, 2006 and at a field trip visit on November 21, 2006. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. In 1992 a Site Plan Review application for a new 1,674 square foot pre -fabricated residence, 350 square foot garage with a Variance to encroach into the front and side setbacks with a 5-foot retaining wall was approved. A 12,000 square foot building pad with grading in the amount of 4,000 cubic yards of cut and 4,000 cubic yards of fill and a 15-foot wide driveway were also approved. The project expired and the owner re -filed in 1994 for the same request. After reviewing the 1994 plan, the Fire Department required a 20-foot wide driveway and a wider turn area into the garage. The applicant filed an application in 1996 for a Lot Line Adjustment between subject property and the adjacent lot, which were under the same ownership. With the approval of the lot line adjustment, the size of the subject lot was enlarged from 2.0 acres gross to 2.35 acres gross. Once the Lot Line Adjustment was processed in 1996, the applicant completed grading of the site and constructed the driveway, but not the residence. Therefore, the site is ready for construction and will require minimal grading. Section 4. Fifty five (55%) percent of the lot was disturbed for the previous approval. At the time the property was graded there was no provision in the Zoning Code for maximum disturbance. Therefore, the previous disturbance of 55% of the lot is legal nonconforTing and Variance is not required. Reso. 2007-02 1 Mairil • • Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the new house, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 89,940 square feet, (2.05 acres). The proposed residence (4,320 sq.ft.), garage (885 sq.ft.), covered porches/entryway (837 sq.ft.), trellis (252 sq.ft.) service yard (96 sq.ft.), swimming pool (436 sq.ft.), and future stable, which constitutes 8.2% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including all structures, paved areas and driveway will be 18,738 square feet, which constitutes 21.0% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot is 55.0%, which exceeds the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the stable. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The existing shrubs and trees on the southern portion on the parcel will remain and will screen the house from the rear. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the new house will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structures will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximums set forth in the Zoning Reso. 2007-02 2 Code will not be exceeded. The proposed residence is compatible in scale and mass with adjacent properties. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and is screened from other properties and the road by existing mature vegetation, which will be preserved. The applicants have partially landscaped the front (north) of the property and continuously add plants in that area. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 587 cubic yards of cut and fill and will be balanced on site. The grading will be generated from the construction of the pool and the excavation for footings and the wall. The disturbance or grading will take place within the existing building pad area, which was previously disturbed. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the applicants will utilize an existing driveway, which was previously approved by the Traffic Commission and the Fire Department. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 7. Section 17.16.200I prohibits the construction of a swimming pool in the front yard area of a lot, except where a Variance is approved. The applicants are requesting to construct a 436 square foot swimming pool in the front yard with the pool equipment area located underneath the pool. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The lot was graded in a manner that the construction of a pool lends itself to the front location. The topography of the lot together with the fact that the pad has been already created, cause difficulty in constructing the new residence elsewhere on the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the new construction elsewhere on the property. The lot is unique in that it is on a knoll and any different configuration of structures on the lot would require additional grading. The pool would be located in an area least obtrusive to adjacent properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed construction will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to Reso. 2007-02 MPi rl l 3 • surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed construction will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed pool will not encroach into the existing or potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable area for a future stable and corral has been set aside. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 6 and 7, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application and Variance in Zoning Case No. 734 for grading and for construction of a new residence and locate the swimming pool in the front yard as shown on the Development Plan dated January 16, 2007 and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated January 16, 2007, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. Reso. 2007-02 Meirdl 4 • • E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed a total of 587 cubic yards of cut and fill and shall be balanced on site. Any additional disturbance, grading or grading quantities, including from the excavation of footings, swimming pool, drainage and sewer line devices and any other activity on site, either required by the Los Angeles County Building Department or due to conditions in the field shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,306 square feet or 8.2%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 18,738 square feet or 21.0% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 55.0% of the net lot area as previously approved. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 19,440 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 6,856 square feet or 31.5% (not including 432 sq.ft. of covered porches and 252 sq.ft. attached trellis). The 1,800 square foot stable pad will have coverage of 25.0%. K. Prior to stamping any plans for plan check review, the applicants shall submit a plan showing the location of the proposed sewer line and where it would connect to the sewer line in the street, and showing the location and cross section of the pool equipment area. L. Any modification to the drainage design shown on the development plan marked January 16, 2006, required by the Los Angeles County Drainage Division or due to conditions in the field, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. M. The project shall be landscaped and screened from adjacent properties. Landscaping shall be designed using trees and shrubs so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to screen the project, including the pool equipment area. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray. N. The proposed wall, located to the rear of the residence shall not encroach into the rear and side setbacks and shall not exceed 5 feet in height at any one point. O. Prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit two copies of a preliminary landscape plan shall be submitted for review by the Planning Reso. 2007-02 5 Marl • • Department. Native trees and other native plants shall be utilized, and which are consistent with the rural character of the community. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed the height of the structures. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the structures on the site, including the proposed wall. P. All utility lines to the structure shall be placed underground and the roof material shall meet the City and RHCA requirements. Q. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards. R. The property on which the project is located shall contain a set aside area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access thereto. S. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. T. During and after construction perimeter easements and trails shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, fences -including construction fences, grading (both cut and fill), landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment, except that the Rolling Hills Community Association may approve certain encroachments.. U. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to contribute to erosion or in any way affect an easement or trail. V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, County and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. W. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Reso. 2007-02 6 Mpi rl l Y. The property owners shall be required to construct a sewer line and shall conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of a sewer line. Z. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. AA. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMPs) related to solid waste. AB. Prior to the submittal of a final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. AC. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. AD. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, disturbance or grading, including exceedance of the approved 587 cubic yards of cut and fill quantities in condition "F" above and any modification to the drainage design inn condition "L" above, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AE. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including Parks and Recreation Fees for a new residence and school fees for new construction. AF. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variance approvals, as required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective. AG. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variance approvals, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit from the County of Los Angeles. Reso. 2007-02 Meirll 7 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16th DAY OF JANUARY 2007. A`R L WITTE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2007-02 Maid 8 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2007-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A SWIMMING POOL IN THE FRONT YARD ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING CASE NO. 734, AT 0 CHESTNUT LANE, (LOT 241-A-1 MS), (MEIDL). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 16, 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Henke, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Reso. 2007-02 MairdI DEPUTY CITY CLERK 9 •opeoilin9 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 VARIANCE (310) 377-1521 REQUEST FOR HEARING FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore. you may be required to modem or remove any .unauthorized or unlanful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. in addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process. and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: L. Pro. S3 o4 ' 74 .Ro 1.-1 I L_ (.3I' <-? - 0 C- I.-(C ts,) L) i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. U- ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7 56 9 PAGE 0 2 .7-7 PARCEL 9 AGENT'S NAME: 0 (-- -co ci lei L G R ! /\) AGENTS ADDRESS: l U '"7 ' 1 c.—'-i c_ R 3 P , k=. ci O z 7 44- TELEPHONE NO.: (? (0) � 4-v- - 6 0 1 U Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. t r\.� t r'i U ( i 1-t t`} R. C A i?. J/-T (..� t) t ' C R 3 r_.{ I N) I 17) ce) r ` i /) I I (\( i ARi Pin %led on Poo ':l' d i': es op 4111 Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Vlence Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. L t•-t G. f C t 4 t-\ C-, 1 a AN, r t�n..)!`7 J,) r7 s i U r' IL= i G t-tit' (l ` !-i r R. Q c: l-1 tv -re P R o i C c r (`/ t P,_ S .L ) F F (-7P //uvJ Pic_ 0, L._ L.- f to L t C C. ©n) ia- /I C I— V-) 1 i i a /A O t NW-1 Gr C 5 i L L Ga U l3 7 F2, N Te'D lh1 TO it-AS T G C4 ! 1-) e l (.) P (_ A (✓ (= ( LI 42. [ [ -) L (� l"i (% L, t era /A) ((-1 l= I- Q r: n.) Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because ! "0 l t_ t_ S 1--1 L / L A -St T L: 1-7 c%' G L. L c l C> l \A) I L ( r -f 4 (if-7 /1) 6= /= F'l' "i FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. Masters/Forias/Variance- Rev.2006 REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: ;Accordiig°to'Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be niadc"coi foiiningcar shall be removed Therefore, i•ou inca be required to modifi• or remove any unauthorized or unlmtf rl use or clruciw e.`on }oue property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900:of the;Citv;Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition: of:.caid permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionag permit process, and is .subject to higher app lication he: .PROPERTY OWNER: Ni (7_ D L. OWN ER'S•ADDRESS: P, Q v 7 G(- c) R ©Lc-t �� C1 1—� t Lt✓� TELEPHONE NO: (3 t 0) 9 4- e 0 2 (� PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 0 C t-lc_ i N i) T. . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2- 4 1 - 11 l ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7 6 9 PAGE 0 2 3 PARCEL & 2.9 AGENT'S NAME: a rC L C- 1 t<1 tr R t t Cc AGENT'S ADDRESS: 70 7 S t LA/c CAD. R. C4,C, Ca_ 90 2 -74 TELEPHONE NO: (-3(01 44-(c, ©tom NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: vL) CZ �hli7c� NGL Describe and delineateon plans any new basement area square footage SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it ;'compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. l v G 6 !` 4 i 13 E f -( t= S t z c= i \,c) L t< \/: ( T ! -( 1 N.> i (71 -I ©r, 'T) . B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms • (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. -ref l O i l As, `-d c-, r2 A t7 L T) C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. o D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation; integrates landscaping and;creates buffers. A L « 1 c A c� c� �r'tZC�PA2c`7. E. • • How. does rhe;site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall he regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. T=00—lPR(\--1Ac, ( .S lC-ti`�t-D , tc V t l t_tZ(-.TO i.-1E-, S i Lx (mi) PoSS (t,f_e ) i �c >4"(6-1 p R �7 F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. Ll—t G(—o0G P6f Tt ((" ( t= —CH C (D ( t G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. /<1 cti T)CZ (V L kA) ,r-8 1= N i (a A- y.) GCE. C S t N7) !� PcOcis (Cr) t=O ( /'\) r-t ? c,t-1 'jv34.)c.�r�l 'To t? P. or o s c= ram 47 ,Al2 A 6 ZE H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. t C v.) c L t_ t--4 A c= (= r- ,. DATE 9-23 06 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 0 C 1.1E57/&4JT ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AREA AND <` ` STRUCTURES NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE `:GARAGE:;'.' SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT : GUEST HOUSE CABANA'".. CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE EXISTING $ 9,4-40 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED_ COVERED PORCHES.:_. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, sq.ft. BARBECUE; OUTDOOR KITCHEN, sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft, OTHER sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT .TOTAL: STRUCTURES %STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL" STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 600. sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 10 ft. STRUCTURAL COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. PROPOSED TOTAL sq.ft. e) 9. 44O sq.ft. . 4 3 2 0 sq.ft. 8 85 sq.ft. 43 Co sq.ft. 3 U sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 45 CU sq.ft. sq.ft. 837.sq.ft. sq.ft. Z 5 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. — sq.ft. --- sq.ft. sq.ft. ct Co sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 73010 sq.ft. % 8.2 % sq.ft. sq.ft. • ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY`DRiVEWAY(S) PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS •'POOL 'DECKING . OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK % . TOTAL.FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL. STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 600 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas: to be 'graded). sq_ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % % sq.ft. sq.ft. Z 4.'52 sq.ft. sq.ft. All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. 10,085 sq.ft. G 7 9 sq.ft. b 66 sq.ft. sq. ft. 11,43 Z sq.ft. Z.6 % 18 %M B sq.ft. Z.1.O % sq.ft. 29, 525 sq.ft. SC/ 3O * Free: standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, outdoor fireplace, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless exceeds 600 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. cubic yards fountains, barbecue, their combined area tVIY1 • ADDRESS 0 LA CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE .. GARAGE. POOL/SPA• POOL EQUIPMENT CABANA/REC.RM GUEST HOUSE STABLE SPORTS COURT SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence Accessory structures AREA. OF ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES THAT EXCEED to% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED S i1(UCTURES (from 1" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1%` page not including allowed deductions) OTHER. sq.ft. sq.ft. 19)440 sq.ft. sq.ft. - sq.ft. 43 20 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 8 8 G sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. '436 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ' 30 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. —' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. "" sq.ft. 1.ft. sq.ft. G sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. , 'B 37 sq.ft. c�j.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. si.ft. sq.ft. 1.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sl.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft. �1.ft. 2. 5 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 8 56sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE To % 5.3 % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. s7_ft. 6 17 2- sq,ft, Not.incl. attached trellises: Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed .10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING;PAD COVERAGE % % 3'1. • 7 %n DATE 9-Z3-O(o:'Z.C: NO. ADDRESS 0 ct^I esT OU i LAO CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE `BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND STRUCTURES 'BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE: GARAGE;: EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL ZOO sq.ft. sq.ft. 2-60sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Sl.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL/SPA . sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CABANAIREC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. 4O sq.ft. 4 t.)sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. s,q.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE! BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.fr. Gl.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sl.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1 A page) . sq.ft. `l. ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from .1"page not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sl.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft. 4S Osq.£t. 4S 0 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % %n a 1 % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Not incl. attached trellises. Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/aces. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE • • I hereby , certify ,that: the . statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: FILING FEE �,-,C!�% Signature" For: A% /�% E /L7 Applicant A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare: under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at • this b.Y day of By: By: Address City NOTE The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. fze, • , California, ,2d9 APPLICANT:. l`1 G a L DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE _PO vCy /1t/47 ' FEE: COMPANY NAME: ,G ocTOA) Sirl6/AJEE-,Q/No RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 70 7:.S iG i/L ,¢ S.o�J� ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: Ca, 9o274 COMPANY PHONE NO. f 3' O 1 S ¢¢ - 6 0 o PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 C..6 r'At"v i LA% OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval byeither the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), .the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. / y� Executed at /�1�e /( / ( ,California this - 7 day of - , 20 . 1 By: By: PC-7 7-B6 OFFER OF DFnICATION JUN 2 1991 Honorable City Council City of /'� 11 I' )-J California L' We herby declare that the sanitary sewers and appurtenant struc- tures constructed under Private Contract No. 90-1 in accordance with the plans filed in the Office of the City Engineer are built for public use and that upon their acceptance by the City of Rolling Hills all right, title and interest of the undersigned in and to said sewers shall vast in said City. (corporate seal) WO h0G (print name under each signature) Sudscribed and'a,cknowledged to before me th7.s f 774 ' dayf ,197( pg- Notary Public in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California • Note: If the above instrument is executed by a corporation or partnership, appropriate notary acknowledgments are to be attached: OFFiClAI SEAL - - - JOYCE F. UU Notary Fu k-Collforn'o ' LOS G_ E3 COUNT/ ►UYorurnrNss1on Epee : 16, 1995 • OFFER OF DEDICATION Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles California We hereby declare that the sanitary sewers and appurtenant structures constructed under Private Contract No. 08-1 R.HLL in accordance with the plans filed in the Office of the Department of Public Works are built for public use and that upon their acceptance by the County of Los Angeles, all right, title, and interest of the undersigned in and to said sewers shall vest in said County. Property Owners: 0 Chestnut Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Norman N. Meidl Karen Heidi Note: All signatures must be acknowledged before a notary public. (Attach appropriate acknowledgements.) P:ILDPUBISUBCHECKISEW ERSWORMIACKOPFERDEDICATION 04/2612005 Date Date Date Director of Public Works 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803 Dear Sir: LETTER OF PARTICIPATION Private Contract No. 08-1 RHLL Name/Tract/Parcel Map No. Chestnut Ln. & John's Canyon Rd.. The following Is a full and complete i(t of all legal descriptions for abutting properties which have contributed to the cost of construction of the sewer system constructed under Private Contract No. Q8-1 RHLL Note: 1 0 Chestnut Lane, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 A.?.N.: 7569-023-033 Norman N. Meidl Karen Meidl Developer or Property Owner(s) (Print or Type) Developers or Property Owners' Signature(s) Properties connecting td public sewers constructed at no cost to the abutting property may be made subject to charges as prescribed by Sections 20.32.130, 20.32.140, and 20.32.150 of the Los Angeles County Code as amended. Notarization of signatures not required. REV, l unaroo PALCIPUBISUBDIVSNIPIANCHMFCRMSI CIP MAR-04-2009 15:57 ADPW WSM 6263003365 PLEASE REl DRN ORIGINAL FORM TO MAY HONG - SEWER MAINTENANCE DIVISION P.01/01 Unincorporated/City of Applicant Address Name of Project Location Application for Sewer Maintenance COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES O DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS / SEWER MAINTENANCE DIVISION Date Private Contract No. RC O' -CV AKLL Telephone /iNo. g City o ill," 9 J 1/c N . �75 i59 —02-3 —d3?Thomas Brothers Map Sl Sewer Maintenance Operations Map g a 3 /5 T The above listed applicant hereby applies for the following services provided by the County of Los Angels in accordance with the Los Angeles County Code. ❑ Flow Measurement (Section 20.32.250C) PCA No. Y050722, OCA No. 494340, Rev. Source Code 9524, Fund GA9 Appr. Org. No. 53000 MH ❑ Sewer Certification/Second Unit Connection (Sections 20.32.250A and 22.52.1760A), PCA No. Y050721, OCA No. 494340, Rec. Source Code 9583, Fund GA9, Appr. Org. No. 53000 1� Special Sewer Maintenance District Annexation Fee (Se 20.32.280) PCA No. Y050723, OCA No. 494350, Rev. source Code 951 I and A� 't��9 Appr. Org. No. 53000 Isak Original Copy Copy Copy SB Tap and Saddle Installation (Section 20.32.200) PCA No. Y051524, OCA No. 494340, Rev. Source Code 9532, F Appr. Org. No. 53000 Sewer Maintenance Division Applicant Fiscal Division Land Development Division nnGr etiM. inr !Cower AA a7nlenenre 00 H1ERS51 nd 9, TOTAL FEE $ L. VALIDATION TOTAL P.01 540390 DEPARTMENT:`UBLIC WORKS RECEIPT Date: 0 Received From: $ ail by M ic/L If paying by check: Check#: , V / 7 For: J, c Additional Information: Received By: ,j� Date: Z/ Z /0 / (Address/Account #/ Description) DOLLARS Check here for cash payments FILL IN THE FOLLOWING IF AVAILABLE For Water Payments: Batch Number P Development Deposits: Parcel Number: Survey Payments: Record of Survey Number: Tract Number: PCA Number: "fOG q,-3 OCA Number Revenue Source Amount Sales Tax (TK9-7315) Bal Sheet Acct 22-0066 DPW 12/06 540390 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. �C - 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.. Applicant(s) 1 CZ) 'L Tel. (? 10) 9 4 - GO 2- Address C�; C� ,i?� o x 4-7 4 R o ( rk-1 \ k-C-5 Ca , c? c-2 2 74_ 2. Legal Owner(s) A V? I ! E Tel. ( ) Address 3. Project AddressC ti) ti -i Assessor's Book No. 156 6 - 2Z 3 - ©2- q Lot No. 2_ 41 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: R.1,.►.C,,A. LA, Gtdv . Sa-(e4� 5. Existing zoning district . - Z 6. Proposed project/use of site 1\\Cv,i R E C PROJECT DESCRIPTION / \ 7. Site size Ze 3 6 A Ira c-s l Q (1- EDI S5. 05) Net lot area 8 9. 4-4-0 5: ; "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 730 Total square footage of structures Number of floors of construction Basement square footage I-1 February 2002 Environmental Information Form Printed on Recycled Pipet • 12. . Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removedor relocated? Which walls? 14: :'.:..; Will any interiorwalls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. ; Will the entirebuilding structure require a new roof? 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 0 0 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. . Is a new driveway accessway proposed? 1-1 0 (Requires Traffic Commission Review b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? U l) E Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). Width of driveway(s) Existing? 2- 0 Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). . Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? _6 Proposed? f. h. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 1 c,% °lc Proposed? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet: current driveway access requirements? ILA 0 Explain. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? N 0 Explain Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? !'Q 0 Explain Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? '/' 5 Stable and corral average vehicular access slope Z., £ln. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity . o 2 cars? , YE6 With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut Amount fill, (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19 - Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet Z-q, G 2 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 3 3 ,.0 if residential, include the unit size. Square feet February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-2 21. t commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, . square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. • If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. A Elk P 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. ve_.) 1,4D t L ) c G i ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING I_ Q_ YA2D 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 1-3 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30: Have any of the following studies been submitted? ✓Geology Report Hydrology Report ✓ Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study Biological Study _ Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report Public. Services/. Infrastructure Report 1-4 Historical Report _ Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits _ Visual Analysis Slope Map _ Fiscal Impact Analysis Air. Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste February 2002 Environmental Information Form Potentially Significant Impact I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a<state 'scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation ❑ ❑ II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 C resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique` Farmland, or 0 ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the:maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ 0 Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 1-6 Less Than Significant No Impact Impact El February 2002 Environmental Information Form • ss Than Potentially Significant With • Significant . Mitigation • impact . Incorporation Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality, standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California. Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on, any riparian habitat 0 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and. Wildlife. Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 1-7 Less Than Significant No Impact Impact El February 2002 Environmental Information Form,. Potentially Significant Impact V . CULTURAL :'> RESOURCES — would the project: a) : Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) . Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death : involving: i) ;:Rupture ofa known earthquake fault, as delineated onthe most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known. fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) : Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be; located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 or that wouldbecome unstable as a result of the project, and potentiallyresult in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? `. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1S of the Uniform. Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 1-8 Less Than Significant Impact No .. Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation February 2002 Environmental Information Form VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c). Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? . Fora project located within an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ Fora project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? i) ` Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 1-9 Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 Less Than . Significant With LesSignificantS Mitigation Impact February 2002 Environmental Information Form ... Potentially Signdis Thann t psa Than Significant Significant Impact gaonmP ncorporatonImpact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the • •site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ❑ the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? •f) Otherwise substantiallydegrade water quality'? 0 g)'', Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood • Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ❑ which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structuresto a significant risk of loss, ❑ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam'? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, ormudflow? ❑ 1-10 0 0 ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form Potentially Significant Impact IX. LAND USE `AND. PLANNING —Would the project: ) . Physically divide an established community? ❑ b) . Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specificplan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating in environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ ❑ natural community conservation plan? Less Than Significant With Less Than mit• igation Incorporation • Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) : Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) . Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI." N O IS E Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan :or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ... d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ) : For a` project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted,: within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ the' project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? CI No Impact February 2002 Environmental Information Form Potentially Significant Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: Less Than Significant With """ Mitigation Si,gnificant No Incorporation ImPact Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 EV directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through -- eXtension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) . Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 0 1117 '.. neCessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 0 QV the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant 'environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 12t O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 1117 O 0 0 Police protection? Schools? Parks'? Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 0 •0 EEI neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0 17K require the, construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the. environment? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-12 XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the project: ) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street, system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in . . either the numberof vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b)" Exceed' either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or, highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Potentiallyllnt Significant a With Lession Significant • impact Incorporation • Impact ❑ ❑ 0 No Impact d)`:Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 D� (e.g, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) • Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ 0 ❑ l V 0 0 ❑ Irk f) :Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 ❑ 0 I supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c)`:.Require .or result in the construction of new storm 0 0 water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) : Have sufficient watersupplies available to serve the projectfrom existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?. 1-13 El February 2002 Environmental Information Form Potentially Significant Impact e) Resultin a determination by the wastewater treatment . 0 provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ❑ to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g)Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. 'STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project a) During construction result in potential impact on storm 0 water runoff? . b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm 0 water runoff? c) Resultin potential for discharge of storm water from areas ❑ from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo( work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair ❑ the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow 0 velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm? g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? 1-14 Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation 0 ❑ Less Than Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 No Impact February 2002 Environmental Information Form Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant . Mitigation Significant impact Incorporation impact XVIII.. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ::.. Does the project: have the potential to degrade the C quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?: b) ::Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project: are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of, probable future projects.) ) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,, either directly or indirectly? 1-15 0 February 2002 Environmental Information Form NOTE In the event, site that the project sitand any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. have consulted The lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the develeprnent project and, any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Applicant CERTIEfCATiON•' .thereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits res t' d µa °and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fasts, state' .e ts, and information presented are true and correct to the. best of my knowledge and belief. Signature Applicant 1-17 February 2002 Environmental Information Form