Loading...
838, Addition & remodel existing SF, ApplicationThis page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD i i i fl 20131238449 Recorded/Fi ed in Offic a Records Recorders Office, Los Angeles County, California 000082057 m i mi I 11 005725543 SEQ: 01 08/22/13 AT 02:20PM iu i DAR - Counter (Upfront Scan) lII IIl I 1111 IIl 11111111111111 l 111111 IIllIl 111 11 IIIIl 111111 llI IIIHllhIID 11 I 1111 lIII IM 111 IllI 11 UI 11 HID 11 11111111 HI 0! 111 THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED Pagges: 0008 FEES: 36.00 TAXES: 0.00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 36.00 E535500 RECEIVED SEP 0 9 2013 City of Rolling Hills By • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX •IN RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 838 (SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED) XX SITE PLAN REVIEW I (We) the undersigned state I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 3 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 40-EF) This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 838 XX SITE PLAN REVIEW I (We) certify (or decla nder thetpenalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ignature 4_, ( �c Name typed or printed Signature Name typed or printed Address Gam'=c g`‘11,166Address pCLi1/G , % -% .9D2%4 City/State ' ' City/State • See Exhibit A, attached Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On CZ ( vz4 2 '1 before me, 'CRAsrn \) FI l-1F(), ,6it PALA CJ (Insert Name of Notary Public and Title) Personally appeared S1 E P/+EO CJ . 1_1( ) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person frs) whose name(,s1 is/ 0 subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ sJ'/jMy executed the same in his/I r/t11eir authorized capacity(*) and that by his/ Jxtsr /th'eir signature() on the instrument the person(), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( 'acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary G ( Seal) CRISTIAN FISCHER Commission # 1950261 Notary Public - California t "fir' Los Angeles County r My Comm. Expires Sep 18, 2015 REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition ofsaidpermit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: STEVEJJ wa I?4C'HEC. 4 l tl 4# 3 clklcK.WAGartf Alt VE, 'Po G/1"./4 AeIGG 5, en 4oZ7g 6/07/2-/?73 EMAIL: racheierccsChb • Coin 4 3coacicW4CxoJ DiVVe, % GL/46 CA; 90Z7`f LOT NO. i ' ASSESSORS BOOK NO. SS PAGIOragbl PARCEL l'44) Roa/Al A s s a c /41.-5 AGENT'S NAME: Je ea y C. ROUi/4/I A./LCNIt CT, 4./4 AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: Z goat s . WEs7-42/Y •4ii., se//re 462 reeciV.i C4 9e275 (3/4) 832.3/35' Co (3'0) 200-4 333 cc) NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: 4tpP/776,4t ANO /2.10+'oP e- r EKJST/I!5. / S? I y 5/f 1-+' 4eit.t(i2e5 'xice.. galioArd.. ro EXXSr/.JcS /G/7 s 4/SST' /4 mivz4e •c,,1,1,AD/T,dt! I-o 4MIST/A/4 iNt4-C792.q-nr rir iJ ,f•t!O 59 2 Vi4e , 't .,#ree4-r A i 6-?/T8z2w2 al= / i ice•. Est'-rAVG woov . ecie • Tb,sa .e 0/4-rt - Pee ?Zy_W.fe3uCiff. e*/ A4a.G 40g7 /.Z / .4•121zr ro f-E e'VE - .PEX.0 AFT Ex'sr'ceq 4 iZ.4.5-s .¢A. LetAAti zr -r-./ . . C7C'5 sto% APer/C, f 4-7 4MI41i Are:444 /WTC441/4/i//N4%zi4.1 #4,440 /14,71544=0.ecioete A1i204-S `/It'OR.7 K SYPE-' Doe dee tpe/Cezr) . Weld , 4r K/zc/%7V Awe / p 4-C E (fj r/mac T%2e-C1-4$ • AiGic( ,(1-1 cy le-04.efrilwAgy 7'0 , PI-4c c t/Sr" '4 7-E (-/ • 444 . .45 22 4.1(4Ce . 'Pox e' caccecrr.er / /•Q- dc?re-R S e Ltowcj 9115e?S 4.149 -1 ie-Avt! 4S te4roar 13'Y cave • -12- Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage (NA) SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. A`es'G eA•q iee : $4(et& AVEa Seele,c.o,/t. /ti' S/2E/ / 'YL CSes fef > m/4 views 4 r AYdtr4' P4c, *14 , ',f4VE "be C 4-V!O /.oar/ C. G®V€ft1-O DEcirs• rAtestsseabaecr atswese /A/ C 'rt-J'eS erWST4444. P4132t 144e4 4r$e /t•�E fizr S4' •Pr. 7;44US i.IP4CT es .ytgi qd. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. t7 eedthe 0 Des Al ser-4,47-eO fir- 77YE I 'Xtsr 4 , 47v"oAl oic.& lS7VA14 Maws, /y/,div/zi,..Yy AV6W ear tolrl AWs&-1 n ice -Mu- A/977VE VE6E777'td. X''77•t/4 4eneriev.vp,41 O/L44,..ges. em e l teS$ ees, 4N0 L 4.4'O Aon+irs• fZEAt4,/at i/A/p/s7r/RiASe. 7 S7.eacre/e4C s'rs nRct .4iaiot, S /At/4%4.7 j AD B"Y/S774/4 s eo/t!S. 7N1 Aleta !fin veAe3G .4•z.e r 4 .4 7f� E►K/tT/ 14 ja2.@if/oe4tLy Avvs ii•Z Sates. rbst4rr #U'E/7.E Ce2. 4'r'e • C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. Vree.,ez,41 s p/t- 3 AID a-441 ' Semat$ ,,#/N/11/zE•Stweirailesive Gcrr1F« - T# P" Aerr&P`e ae.bi24st7EL-S ,t4/4erotite ' rio4G7 r es7' i St-efe-s - 41, I bi0-rS Seve ArzeStedgE /L,DE eo,Nso e-c a/A,4 j t-12, te,wierS 76 3 t-oP" Su4,r ,4. (o .4;e-r At/ Pe i -.t .ref ee P.e4/fle 4. c/K/ 7-0 ea/es/�c..a/ e �'eric. /6ef-I,t 1444-Te# /!t-.eVOC.TC .0,0PeeN i' P erG•w47'.41.ri D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. ,7Z= i(l&'4 .4_1/0 /TCdL / 7 44 41-7 , xic r-ei--+G /'eEYtegettf /�A'Ge& 4,444.0s/}t+zef 71ste + e1.5✓/?e Y '747,4e e/f /s-fto.ccrer) t...ree. s'� erg' c. 6,95 -13- , 44' V AdQdee-C41 , edow 44 rz, lifteer4rntoe, Semen 5 c idcc,-( t /•v'fr4424 p 4-1 144144f40e5..40,442 .ytie r -re-✓/Zc M Z- t• vea rrt, cX Asix"t % wt w /3 8 Lots ? Avoid +1/ '/8 r'tP4 r- E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Try Aw. 5/2_6- /$ #,N4(/4 44,_. /.5 4(Zs_ 3 7S s. es.ie4, G ;d'r • t E- J4Z8Z-L, 5 /Ze'ts 7 5t7 �= .L'$+� S7: jig(E weir • tAwirrcad derc-Rec.A. ,¢at.P /s //.5' &K/S/7•0.r'csv fiuer7 $'Oe-) /r "Lee(1 .0 Afealo pee •,/s .."-carp XMlier Pd i'-J•4GGtti. 7 eee tov rt AGE /d/+4' /S O•t✓e, 3 .3b7. To141.. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. TN= o x/s TJLI it�� S/Ai�kGE !S S'reD !4/7w4 -/s,, ,EGG fiatotioteo, $ erlre4G4 f via m/ST/.G G A-AIQ Ncresgi p car, /ode- 1d ✓, czaze ¢lG �sCe tT . • de .r/da /srp447) /—/Tie/A, , «ece t 'e A /NJ . t eel /er=da.a,,p 41 78 cbee/t a sFr#94-cts. iwee: / 6 N67 /At Q4 ' C.0F41 Aews-c •ems ,may A- Ata►r''et 'ew A-•�-d G 4"61" f- /G-r-7 ,-e S''( s-ef=rzl• r F Iee - 4,,► 7 It � eW �✓�-.vr 44"*SS G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. 74 AEc c S. / G, 72446az.r• e✓'� .e7 e. /•4,09h►Acw pc' 4et 1 /U11D*e7 +4-4ey WS-70'Je G11Z e., 47••64J /044/02.eeedus 'TUC, Afteitgen. elv- /G4arcbv4f Y 4C/f ei r s ,St444 74/ Awe, Ow-(14-datkc`J wig u,.c• ►t- . .ejess- i+Ie4 ikr v 4 c r P ec,e j- ,4<.—•e,e4te , y A- 8UG4,474 v0 ,rlo. -44 NI g4i e..4-st. A-«-fj 4.,O .4- (ID o,',v fp'QC H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. 1' Oter.C'SJ AC." .,4N4=1"/ ,TWO leeloglecoPee74 0,7 014 le &Sr 1.0419 •ti 7%. Ze,/e' c,sc, Za/c, 4.1Zez=41 Cope, cAvAto 73te )1-114.4J4Gevat +J P crl ct.S / 14d G4Cp7Vi G/Z.4- /.�C 4+R/O igeeecoi +G -- pe 4 7 Mg-xJ7 /dc I/E11.J Ae., 1.t.0/.�+L /RZ, AC" 7-4.1- /T• 4. pe.4„(Aumie isl.A..O !e/pi"&Awry 4ss'ot mac/ edriz-Er"id .trr s .t?Maif re14.0G CWV7;�.c>Ge./mot 44/ 44 W 4 " 4,ece pAre. evv1/ 01 re-eC+T I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: O Z - Z , -1 Signature For: Sretj, AdvD , 9CFF6C e. JlI Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application.. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -15- • • DATE o}A/o9f /3 . ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 3 G/'Qg fit/ ? ' ,2 '4O ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURE PYNET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/(PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS 0, te. e.45 . -5+ i5l,Way— ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. ' SERVICE YARD ,06 OTHER 2C 5 =nee +I% BASEMENT AREA (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT 0 EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL 514/z sq.ft. 4. jf, 1//2-sq.ft. los, w2- sq.ft. 5.062 sq.ft. 11+ /see_ 22,sq.ft. 5",-2. J 1 sq.ft. Ggi sq.ft. P 4 b sq.ft. dog*/ sq.ft. C sq.ft. 4/6 t iSt 4:472. sq.ft. 4 71 sq.ft. O sq.ft. ' 3to sq.ft. '50. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. c, sq.ft. C sq.ft. G? . sq.ft. b . sq.ft. 6 . sq.ft. O sq.ft. © sq.ft. . 4' sq.ft. (_P,A-r. O sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. P' sq.ft. . O sq.ft. to 4 0 sq.ft. C) sq.ft. 1476 O sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES. 7, 81� �s�wz % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft, detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft, STRUCTURAL COVERAGE o sq.ft. a sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. /SO sq.ft. A 04 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 3:/1 sq.ft. t5 sq.ft. eca 0 en sq.ft sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. /4 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. C. sq.ft. sq.ft. t sq.ft. sq.ft. 27 S3 sq.ft. sq.ft. 7 S / / sq.ft.?tiir 0464 sq.ft. �`, /0,711 sq.ft. -�- % I 4,14 % gs11 ti j 1. s"% 7811 sq.ft. t� -5- ?g34'sq,ft. /6.717 sq.ft. . /:z...50% ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) wvnv PeeteS PAVED WALKS, FA t LU AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS. ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS ( 7*.4-r%Z-S/ Vrt.1. 7°S) TOTAL FLATWORK zo«i % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE.. 743" TOTAL STRUCTURAL &.* j �( FLATWORK COVERAGE }+''` % TOTAL COVERAGE sq.ft. c' tifor 7- sq.ft. sq.ft. Pere Sr STh 3e4,0 s3fiBz 3.116.5" sq.ft. sq.ft. 9 sq.ft. f/Ns sq.ft. APsOt.S z 4S sq.ft. 3✓' sq.ft. l/,vies sq.ft. A'S44(E) (3 a -f 6.3)- owl-) sq.ft. 32-7-3: sq.ft. All/ sq.ft. L370 sq.ft. 414'3 sq.ft. "7• S".*% 43y51f1 % % ¢fit'- 1-13 if i 3'Q 392.2-sq.ff'r'ri-L i # o. % SP`ti TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE / 3.71 sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 - 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED/6 G i$ ' (N44" AREA na0(4- 14t1)6 6Cf« % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) Row 34' 990 2'11424 sq.ft. 4, 6g lo ostt, £ 3/ sq.ft 737 5•0S' t3/1" sq.ft. Io00 poe.0%. tea* r v% eo42 sq.ft. Tz JA 7 37 sq.ft. G 1 .lam % tks sq.ft. 2e�G2.G sq.ft. bl % 74 2* cubic yards All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there aremore than 5 such structures on the property. -6- • • DATE t) 1401I13 Z.C. NO. PAD NO. 1 ADDRESS 3 GWtdt.t-Wha► % ' CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAT) COVERAGE BUTT .D..A3L.E.TAa ARE A. ANI SIR L TT ri3 ES BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE GARAGE POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT CABANA(R.EC.RMi GUEST HOUSE STABLE SPORTS COURT SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence Accessory structures AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES THAT EXCEED xo% OF SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE EXISTING cq.ft. sq ft sq ft. t sq.ft. a sq ft to sq.ft. d sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. / sq.ft. • G] sq ft sq.ft. THE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHEREi BREEZEWAY C sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES cq.ft.(from P page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES <n,.ft. (from Ptpage not including allowed deductions) OTHERG f. •5) tip t r7 ` ���sq ft P3:OPfS.EU /4,D/.3 sq.ft. ,923 '71t'$ :2-Zc) sq.ft. pp Orb+ 5'G= ern, sq ft sq.ft. «}.ft. © <q.ft. G cq.ft. cq.ft. Me" sq.ft. 400 <q.ft. sq.ft. <q.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. i 71483'q ft 1$3SY „0 p�eerr % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE11 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 i,35° sq.ft. Nnr inr1 attached trellises, Nnr inrl allowed deductions, and inrl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/aces. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE -7- 314 sq.ft. sq.ft. '!" sq.ft. 4 sq.ft. sq ft. ��-d�-'�-= 4 sq ft L ~�% ate•►%34 cq.ft. TOTAL i1/0/.3 sq.ft. Si Z`T 1 sq.ft. 659 sq.ft. 4 ?2q.ft. 3+a et" sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft.. fJ sq.ft. /610 sq.ft. Z1 '7 / sq.ft. cq.ft. G"y sq.ft. 314- sq.ft. J <q.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ".� sq.ft. 633S-- 6476 q7240 sq.ft. L 13 40 60.83% • "4°4,01 ��'sq ft. • • DATE c'409%3 Z.C. NO. ADDRESS AZ cditiewiciAlMwav CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE. PAD NO.2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTX1 G PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILD1NG PAD WOO sq.ft. r 0 Qq.ft. 4e40 cq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. ._sq ft GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft: sq.ft. POOL;SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq it. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CABANA/REC.Rh1 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. c 1.ft. STABLE _...._sq ft © rq.ft. 4IG?7 sq ft SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sift. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED 1`ORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft, sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTR' WAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1"page not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 G sq.ft. 4'5a sq ft '9.-9 sq ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE D To t 5,-tv % .a' 670 • TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 Co 'q.ft. sq.ft. 4-57" sq.ft. Nor ;rid attached trellises, Nnr inc. allowed deductions, and inc1 the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/acts. structures. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % -8- to ,Ov %v VS: a° % • DATE aWG, /13 Z.C. NO. ADDRESS 71i 5 CKcIGK-1,40,4L?,0 00047, GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Gradine Ouantities: Cubic Yds. CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (Le. walls) List Pi For driveway(s) For yard areas • For basement excavation For pool / spa excavation Overexcavation • TOTAL CUT TOTAL EXPORT FILL For house / addition For other structures (i.e.walls) List P41C4ra. For drive' v(s) For yard areas For basements For basement wells For pool/spa z� Max. Depth Max. Depth Location 153 -,'-O" . A't.e.s t 2.84C' L 2. es CIWrnto 2-r ` ( <) 9 erOt{) a 74 zo rdy Recompaction Z72 4.y TOTAL FILL 272 Cy TOTAL GRADINNG (Sum of total cut and total fill) Existine pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Proposed pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Basement -finished floor Basement -finished well wall 74 D 574 ey PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Residential zd 245, z40, exs� 2.440, 00 1404 Other pad 2- et nia-0S) 3''7 'Co Y c1 STARD Ge.) Public:PL.ANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills calculating Lot Coverage Rev. 2009.doc -9- • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS 4;eit w ' OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 660 sq. ft sq. ft sq. ft. 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT Si h PLAN: WATER FEATURE: ❑ GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) ❑ SITTING WALL / BENCH ❑ WALKWAY OR PATIO Pig TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE -21- • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare unde r penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tr//ue��and corrre�ct., Executed at / Dad A6P11),ci�l ,Ff/L S , California, this c V7* day of f? { a� / , 20 ‘41e,e. d,eke,),"„,t Address (/ //N /i9 /1-C.S By: By: City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. XioPxv .asso APPLICANT: •/GL2Y 4-•'Cc41)eu/ m rr;a e► REPRESENTATIVE: e. 4y C • I"Pi , 444 COMPANY NAME: Re' i m/ .4-s so cry S COMPANY ADDRESS: 2 9 'o S • tn/Es 'VM-�E.� Sa'rE tree /'&M/cNo P44e5" 1/eP€5, c4 4o u,S. 43 32.• 3/ 3 5��) COMPANY PHONE NO. ('S/b 1 240 • lV333 Cc) PROJECT ADDRESS: 0 3 e-sfae-g K/4c 4 f `t'D 2o%G/A(c ,r" - -Sr G.4 }o Z7 DATE FILED o 2 "ZS FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: -22- 4 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approvalgiven byboth the Cityand the RHCA to developproperty in P PPr P Pe Y Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at 'JGP G() ii ) £'d 1 j #4g,California this day of .rsa, 20 ( . By: By: Addres City 1//f; ,t) 49c.vx -23- 00 RaeeePt9 qieed INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed Fe75/Z(l4/2V 2$, 20/3 GENERAL INFORMATION Pichcv4e .4SScc/areS 1. Applicant(s) J/EiqR y c . RbD . n 7e7: 44 TeL (3/0) 5 'Z-3/ 3.5' Zoning Case No. Address Z9aac• 5. 1. /ESr EN AYE. , St//rE 44' . )2/?V. , C/4 9e75 2. Legal Owner(s) STsvreivRQc/fe'G < /e/ Tel. (310) 7/Z-/47,5 Address iQoG/_/.vc /,//'4.S, 44 9o274 3. Project Address # 3 chedcKWA e 4 ia,z4/A( Azezz.S. 90 Z If. Assessor's Book No. 756 7 - c74v3 - 42-3 Lot No. 4 4 4. Other related permits and other,public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: S1TE 101.4/q[ AEWEW 16Prn 4) , So/es /6Ebe..c:" y / 1l1L 14/, 4e. Cb ®lam/ /CGMV( k/• 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of sitie) 5//I4/-E F4HU.V "..ES/ [Ca , Mm,/2 ie/Yci44 .9 5. .N.q-.$7 P4,774rece,q , ':tet • Z tf-qe PROTECT DESCRIPTION "4/de. •a407vo.<I K/ Ai .0Nt i / v/i"Se PQoL. 2 4 o ..741.edzze 7. Site size en. «21 S .F. S5 ) 8. Net lot area 7O, %7 5 =. "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 10. Number of floors of construction (1) oN 11. Basement square footage 4>" 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage /7/ 412 5F le I. Z¢% 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? YeS/ i '4tr �7 $T ,14sv 1"45"" 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? YES, ,G/reflEW�I v2 t (T 414E4- 444-j r ez. 45.00-74 Zer1, 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? (#VD) C414,/,dt(v/4 izegve € , 74 4,ea-1 c 00.44.IG• g -R ci: turestoc, cr. 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? y/ES ,ri/CL 'i4' tw T /e/re:IIU,d.�e: goo 50 4r 17. Driveway Access and Parking: C4 °Sy,'t esies� • Ehr7ity . _ ..?.s sf a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? No (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 1 Proposed? No C l44 r16E (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). Width of driveway(s) Existing? /S'o eeF' /6 "15 Proposed? Ale' C t+Art C C (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). c. d. e. f. g. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? YES Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? / (o lm (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). Proposed? oteid'E Proposed? Na C E#4N4 Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? Aseeat014 Explain /Mt p/Z 4fl$etc set/3tats4201 Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? A1' Explain ex,sre'tcy .,MIld ca.4N6E h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Me, Explain 8)057.044 44 N. d,4l4 E" i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or Tess? YES Stable and,corral average vehicular access slope - Z'Y,• . j. Does property have an above ground garage with 2 cars? yes With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? C3 C. .R.5 ,4vMu cE) 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). A a minimum capacity of N..4,• mount fill / 15 tY Flu. 40•49e•c. w017" Ow db. Peek... 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet d . Percentage of Net Lot Area 0 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet Aid." 2 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 4//4411A,rWa,41.- /G0-001 /24eefr'♦°MAW/4(4 4` £. AP", " caa/Sr-Ra.e.rt..v r._4 .ts/'p/161ce At-re..-ece (4 rc 9'r041 TN-,S) 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. SITE /2G.4,/V REV / EW - i2C^7•/ZaF-/rr/'/4 E 1L/ 5 TmeG L2 X 5 .4N O M "di . 4PP ri ) Tv PC" S . AI W /At/, 1'I /ry Ro o z- r' cr zz./. 414Af /01(� T/Z.'Yus c q-N6P' A-7- EN772Y A-4VD /G/TG+,1 ! 541-G 4V -r ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. EXI Sr/KG Dowdy l-tez. s 4>P/KG $/T* . ( ) O.r-Awgy Ase- Cvi1t' PxIs r7" ' Sla/4G� l4,11-1/ ) S7a2V, ,LE5 /8 ?(/ P40. VI Wbrziewrrzo re, Ai6x.r'f 4/49E die LoT To Lbw<M num L.A.. G/r,/ Gir s . T/ . G iW 5i# - '8 "A"a" <Vy tov b SGo,GEs.ce) 2 lip 11C. Sr48# ,zt' se.e:i AeTS/Dr?tkii — To ASS Ra.hD A3b1/S/tE 'urea Aeo p S?iZuy-u!Z p4e,"e:Itir. g Gop@ ? o ,t6, -T6( D/-12.'A Ps' (U4fu .v ?. J .: f « To •3: /) . IYz.d I7' yAi.'4S ? cea ,e 4'z p .tS es) 4r �i0-srs�y /7.4.4.1 t�0, /c /7c4t t'/`/ f!!q 4r`r LGppta2-,pe.`GrE FN'r 7 $ .aAto Atasrw- /3er/2"Leo M AEc./c4.55 A-c-F4 �X'Sr$ ,mac-ls•i(Et jeUcs. le. • it .D/Z tve; x✓z.tcl u4 A dnt O AEA/74y ..4.c-femq .ga t-4& /'4" S.v th4.c y- .. f..►/o ca.l eez.-t-r s c„//=. A2-4 c.cs. 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. $X/51lNGl. Sviz Q 1.pI" 4 /7-6,5474isocs iDe.4. t 2 Za2'(, 5/104GE'4'/''`tt'Y S Z t1-t.'.Z .4' S, 431.54es. S otz-k-1 S 47C4,t 24:12_c t..) 4( ? O lentil s 4..0? 1 •-3 4 . Uurtr 5 t t2e ' 3t0 s c.Atoi VA 0114 P aami (2.4.0-) g'vl7t) t/JD1 Gene vS pL `.'t M WSR•l4<4 C it#s Cr ltJy, 005 ct f flu$.& Tom , 1 , , p #t,. mac) , Meurer 4z.ft-Voits74-zcfit. s ,i twit. Met• VlesUi t..p?►s r r vts tA-s zx► Matz ar- 7)a .TT,wsJ L 4 ecer'e) 104M eOc 4'i& SC -GIP, N C fo0 •-/ A-040 i-zrz-A.Aucrs £o,2 M 4 - vearwolgt CAti"et..o • OW- A ° -O P 6-t, .rt geSPooPf.r 7° Qu t l '-ne 5* (69E A+ -ID iterAft- lc c-J: &re- c S LCSS r61,40 r A-Lc�v 20 % • L4 z e c t(t 3 -t 6 terr . tS' 4tT �l zC'6 Ca fej,e Lees►~- s ty) EL+cv er'c'.cr 5 t © - j 40 NIL) c(t 2 1. 29. Is the or000sed oroiect consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the followina studies been submitted? Geology Report (" 1 Ze 4445°S) Hydrology Report Soils Report e/N f rA o t"V S) • _ Traffic Study — Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report Yes No se Historical Report _ Archaeological Report _ Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A 4 . • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agencymust describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). 'In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 5 • • 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. 6 ' Less Than::: Potentially_ Significant ,. Significant With Impact ::, Mitiigation;. ` incorporation Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic ❑ 0 vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including ❑ ❑ but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character ❑ 0 or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare 0 0 which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ 0' 0 IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 ❑ ❑ resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ 0 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existingzoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ al/ III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Less Than: Potentially`. `. Significantr: Significant Impact : •`Mitigation ;' Incorporation • mpact ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ GY . ❑ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number 0 ❑ ❑ of people? W. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ 0 ❑ Is� through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any .riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑ other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected 0 ❑ ❑ wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh; vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ❑ 0 ❑ C resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Ct� 8 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? • Less Than Potentially :. ;'Significant With` t ess_Than Significant Mitigation Significant •" Impact Incorporation Impact , ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 EV* c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ 0 0 DEr resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 ❑ I3" outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on 0 ❑ 0 the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 CAS' ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ 0 is e 0 iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 UV 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 Lie 0 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or 0 0 In 0 that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 ID, 0 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? g-4 c/--i E pew'S /4�+ar, 13e-40,5) 710 #rase e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use 0 ❑ ❑ of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? €_o1 ' •P m/ 9 Less Than :.... .::.:.::::... potentially.. >.:SignificantWith, Less;Ttian Siignrfgnificant Mitigation Sican .impact Incorporation' Impact Impac VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 Er. 0 environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ 0 C9* 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use 0 0 0 G7ra plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ 0 0 would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ F2 ' with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ 0 ❑ Gd' loss, injury or death involving wildland.fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Less Than! Potentially Significant Less.Than,,` Significant ;.':With Mitigation Significant . Impact Incorporation '.i; Impact , VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 ❑ 0 IY interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ ❑ ❑. the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of 0 ❑ 0 GY the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ ❑ 0 exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 LB" g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area 0 0 0 9" as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ 0 CY structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? 0 0 0 i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ . loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ f 11 IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING —Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Les'S;Than Potentially Significant Less Than :'8ignificant : With Mitigation ;Significant. Impact ' .; Incorporation Impact. Impact ❑ ❑ 0 l� b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ 0 ❑ g regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ 131/ natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral 0 0 0 t9� resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important A 0 ❑ Csi/ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 ❑ Ee ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ 0 ❑ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ 0 9" ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 III/ ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ 0 ❑ LAY where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ 0 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 12 XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new. or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Less" Than', `PotentiallySignificant, ;:,'.;,Less Than Significant With Mitigation ;Significant Impact Incorporation Impact :Impact ❑ ❑ 0 ISe ❑ ❑ 0 Ilr ❑ 0 0 EV Fire protection? 0 0 p/' 0 Police protection? 0 0 ❑ Er Schools? 0 ❑ ❑ E' Parks? 0 ❑ ❑ SK Other public facilities? 0 ❑ 0 pi' XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ 0 ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ❑ 131r 13 XV. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? Less Than Potentially Significant' `,;' Less.Than Significant ,With Mitigation .,:Significant Impac( ' ,Incorporation' : Impact:,: Impact ❑ ❑ ice' ❑ b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ 0 Iie. 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 I an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ 0 ice' 0 (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 ❑ M" f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? - 0 0 ❑ Ur g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 ❑ EZV supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 ❑ i9'' applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 05/* wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ❑ 0 0 Lill' drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 LL9� project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 14 • e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS.— Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow Cl velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can causE environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? LeasThan Potentially. Significant<;;'; LessThan" Significant With Mitigation`; Significai►t.. Impact :'.: Incorporation: _ .Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ CI ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ G✓ 0 ❑ ❑ l" ❑ lid ❑ ❑ ❑ LAY ❑ 0 0 ❑ XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially. Significant Impact ess Than ;, Significant With" Less Than Mitigation; Significant • Incorporation' : c lmpa ❑ ❑ ❑ t1/' b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 ❑ C9r limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 ❑ D . will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 16 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 5-reve 4,4'V AEG I ! ti 2. Address: 44.3 C/IJCsf bt,/Ac , ,goLG/4,V eveuSE Z 7 t 3. Phone Number: C3/4)) 7/Z - / 4 73 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): # 3 CNacre �t/,4 cx V , llo /V' Ilr,. 5, CO4 C?e Z.7 y 5. Local Agency (city/county): GG4'A/TV o/c' ze> 54494 e5 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: ? S6 7 - 46 3 "d 23 7.Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of,the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE. AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date 0 2- 245— / 3 For ignature STe:: Ve.4I , {,vv /4 C!{e - 1. /U Applicant - 17 - • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date 02 * 222-/3 For Signature STC IaA/ 4.1/ 7 -t_. Z. lei Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date G' 2-2$-13 l%i4__ Signature c-e-e. ✓erme2Y C .,poo„..v, 4a,e_ !' ', For STEfraf/ 41.4f0 .eilc6' fU Applicant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -18-