691, Convert existing barn into a c, Application•
City 0/ leollin
REOUEST FOR HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be
made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use
or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of
the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary pennit but which is conducted without the
acquisition of said pennit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: Fram & Julie V i r i ee
OWNER'S ADDRESS: #2 Cinchrina Road, Rollina Hills. California
TELEPHONE NO: (310) 377-0709
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: #2 Cinchrina Road, Rollina Hills. California
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:: LOT NO. Parcel 5. RS 57-55/36
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7567 PAGE 017 PARCEL 025
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
Wynn Engineering, Inc.
27525 Valley Center Road, Ste B, Valley Center, CA
(760) 749-8722 or (310) 306-9728 Gary Wynn
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the
conditional use is permitted in the zone.
Existing horse barn (35'x 20.5') to be converted into a pool
cabana to accompany proposed pool and spa, for existina s—f—r.
Proposed future 450sf stable and 550sf corral to he rilnrat.pr1
at S.E. property corner.
A pool rahana i p a1 1 nwpd with a rondi ticnal 11Ge nPrmi t pt1r,g11ant.
to Section 17.16.040 a) 2 of the Rolling N;1'1m Municipal Cnr7P_
6)Pr interi on Recvtat.-1 r':mnr
IPWill the proposed use be c mpatible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why?
Yes, existina uses in the surrounding area nnnsist of s.--F-r'
with various detached structures such as pools, barns, r-abanas,
stables, etc. These uses are typical for +-Ibis residential estates
community.
Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety
and general welfare?
Yes, granting this conditional use permit will be consistent with
and in furtherance of Fhp publics health safety Ana general
fare. On the typical larger or terraced lots in Rolling Hills,
pool cabanas are a desirable amenity to make p.on1 areas mnre
comfortable.
FILING FEE
A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.
• /•
DATE
ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS #2 Cinchring Road
APPLICANT Fram V i. r i e e
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 49,297 sq.ft. sq.ft. 49,297 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 3,251 sq.ft. sq.ft. 3,251 sq.ft.
GARAGE 490 sq.ft. sq.ft. 490 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. 850 sq.ft.
STABLE 1 , 000 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1,0-0�sq.ft. '1 '
RECREATION COURT
( 1 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 295 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. 345 sq.ft.
OTHER Cabana sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft.
NEW BASEMENT AREA
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.)
N/A sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES 5036 sq.ft. 1620 sq.ft. 6656 sq.ft. , 6 l®6
% STRUCTURAL 10.2 % 3.3 % 13.5 % /Z •• q
COVERAGE
TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE % % %
DRIVEWAY 2134 sq.ft. sq.ft. 2134 sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS 3492 sq.ft. 1033 sq.ft. 4525 sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft. 1008 sq.ft. 1008 sq.ft.
OTHER PAVED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft.
DRIVEWAYS, EASEMENTS
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
5626 sq.ft.
11.4 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE 10,662 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 21.6 %
2041 sq.ft.
7667 sq.ft.
4.1 % 15.5 %
3661 sq.ft.
7.4 %
14,323 sq.ft.
29.1
/3773
27�22
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by
the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at , California
this day of
n , 20
By:
By:
2- NM-h1,; Road
Address
Ro Ik 1 H Uk, CA 6'o2.74-
City
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at (-I it/&- /-4 c S
this 10 day of / )447
i
By:
By:
Address
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the
State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment
here.
, California,
,20 C}'
Z 7 s2 S' `IAUGS1 C6vr - (2-0 .
(,k t cC COe CC 206 a
APPLICANT: era. I V I rl -
REPRESENTATIVE: ark/ w J s1 V)
COMPANY NAME: W Li ny) 613 Iv) e"1 {(-"
COMPANY ADDRESS: J
'2-7 52,5 Ua.l!oj Cmf r 120 ad , 51-e,
Uo.11-,i 0,e-01-er% e gzOg2
COMPANY PHONE NO. (3 I0 ) 306- 172E
PROJECT ADDRESS:
#"2 Civ,chr i f2d) ROIfr1j)-iiI/5
DATE FILED
FEE:
RECEIPT NO:
BY:
ZONING CASE NO
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
DATE
1
ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 42 C1a 1Nci-1 tt11J6- Ro.4 D
APPLICANT V t R S>i; E
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREAg= sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 325/ sq.ft.
GARAGE 49D sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
l ) sq.ft.
OTHER .5,101/CE Y412.D
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. I
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
2 RS sq.ft. 3 ,s
4036 sq.ft., t 9 `,L-
g-4 . I % � c,alo
PAD NO. 2-
II.
BUDABLE PAD .AREA 14, 400 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) `FUTuti�> 450 sq.ft.
POOL 8 S o sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT �.-
1 Pe c ()Eak:, :.l sq.ft.
OTHER Pond CA-a4nf,} (Cu•KIE(25mt) 720 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
2 t.c)
2c' o
23�'1a sq.ft.
fl
•
Ci4o/ lee&q wee
Date Filed
GENERAL INFORMATION
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM.
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
Zoning Case No.
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
1. Applicant(s) Fram & Julie Viriee Tel. (310 ) 377-0709
Address 2 Cinchrina Road, Rolling Hills, California
2. Legal Owner(s) SamP aS above Tel. ( )
:Address
3. . Project Address 2 Cinchrina Road, Rolling Hills, California
Assessor's Book No. 7567 - 017 025 Lot No. 5
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
Conditional Use Permit - City of Rolling Hills, CA
5. Existing zoning district RAS-1
6. Proposed project/use of site s-f-r W/Pool Cabana, Pool & Spa
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 78,949.5 sf
8. Net lot area 49,297s f . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot.
9. Total square footage of structures Pool Cabana 720 SF
10. Number of floors of construction 1
11. Basement square footage N/A
I-1
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
@ Printed on Recycled 1'%u c t
• •
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 2 9. 1% (14 , 3 2 3 s f )
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? No
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? No
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? yes
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? No (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 1 Proposed?
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 13 .5 ' Proposed? N/A
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? No ( 13%) Proposed? N/A
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 16% Proposed? N/A
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? No
Explain _ C:onvertina an existing structure
Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is
located? Nn
Explain
g.
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? No
Explain
i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or
less? Yes Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 5% from
Portuguese Bend Road
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? Yes With guest house a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 0 . Amount fill 0
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet 4766 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 10% , 4316 Deck & Pool
450 Barn
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet N/A
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-2
21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
N/A
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
N/A
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling.
As soon as approved
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
Proposed project requires a conditional use permit to
allow an existing barn to be converted into a pool cabana
to accompany the proposed pool and spa.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
Proiect site consists of an existing residence (3251sf)
with attached garage (490sf), with an existing detached
barn & corral. Topoaraphv slopes approx. 22% from the
highest elevation C` N.W. property corner easterly to
Portuguese Bend Road. Soil stability, plants & animals
are typically for this area. There are no cultural, historical
February 2002
or scenic aspects involved in this projecteniironmental Information Form
1-3
• •
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
Surrounding properties consist of single—familyre.sidential
uses consistent
structures such
are situated on
with the RAS-1 zoning. Various accessory
as pools, barns, cabanas, stables, etc.
these estate lots. Plants and animals are
typical of residential areas. There are not any notable
cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
Geology Report
_ Hydrology Report
X Soils Report
_ Traffic Study
_ Noise Study
Biological Study
_ Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
_ Solid Waste Generation Report
— Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
1-4
Yes No
X
X
X
X
X
Historical Report
Archaeological Report
Paleontological Study
_ Line of Sight Exhibits
_ Visual Analysis
_ Slope Map
_ Fiscal Impact Analysis
_ Air Quality Report
Hazardous Materials/
Waste
NIA
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources
show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls
outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on
project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to
a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from
Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative. declaration. See
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify
the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared
or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where
the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-5
Less Than
Potentially
Significant Significant With
mitigation
Impact Incorporation
rpora
Issues:
Less Than
Significant , No
Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS— Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 ❑
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which 0 0 0 ril
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ 0 ❑ Cil
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 12)
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the niaps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 0 0 121
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 0 al
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 ❑ 0
applicable air quality plan?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-6
Potentially Signiifiiccant With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 ❑ 0 g�
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑ 0 ❑
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ 0 0 ❑
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ 0 0 ❑
number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ 0 0 El
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 0 Ea
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 0 0 ❑
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 El
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 El
biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 ❑ ❑I
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-7
• i
V . CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑
outside of formal cemeteries?
Potentially -
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
❑ 0 0 to
o ❑ ❑ al
o ❑ 13
❑ 0 rti
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 0 El
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 III
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ 0 ❑ 01
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 El
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 El
c). Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 ❑ 0 13
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 M
1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life and property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ❑ ❑ 0 El
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-8
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS —
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 El
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 ❑ 0
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ 0 0
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 ❑ 0 El
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ 0 0 El
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 El
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 121
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-9
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 0 ea
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ 0 0 Dil
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able
level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 IN
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 ❑El
the capacity of existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 ❑
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 ❑ ❑ El
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 0 El
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 0 ISI
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ 0 0 El
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
I-10
I egg Than
Potentially significant With
Significant Mitigation
Impact Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING —Would the
project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 ❑ E]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 ❑ 0 ❑
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 0 0 EI
natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral 0 0 0 ID
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important 0 0 ❑ El
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
XI. NO I S E — Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 ❑ ❑
El
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0
El
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 0
El
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 0 El
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 (21
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 ❑ 0 Eil
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
Potentially Signifisant With • Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
XI1. POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the
project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 11
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 0 ID
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 0 El
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? ❑ 0 0 El
Police protection? ❑ ❑ 0 El
Schools? 0 0 0 El
Parks? ❑ 0 0 131
Other public facilities? Cl 0 0 El
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ 0 0 ❑
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0 El
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-12
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 0
relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the
street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections?
b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 Et
service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ 0 0 El
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 El
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ 0 El
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ 0 0
applicable Regional Water Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ❑ ❑
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm 0 ❑ ❑ El
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑ 0
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-13
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. STORM WATER DUALITY IMPACTS —Would
the project:
a) During construction result in potential impact on storm
water runoff?
b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm
water runoff?
c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas
from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling,
vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing),
waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo(
work areas?
d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that
provide water quality benefit?
e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause
significant harm on the biological integrity of the
waterways and water?
f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow
velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause
environmental harm?
g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of
the project site or surrounding areas?
1-14
Potentially
Significant
Impact
El
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
No
Impact
o ❑ ❑
o o ❑ 1�1
o ❑ ❑
o 0 0 ID
❑ 0 0 El
❑ 0 0 ❑
❑ 0 0 El
❑ 0 0 Ea
❑ 0 0
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
Potentially
Significant
Impact
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 0 ❑
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ 0 ❑ISI
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which ❑ ❑ ❑
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
1-15
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the
lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement
indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list,
and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT,
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is
required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant: Fram & Julie Virjee
2. Address: #2 Cinchring Road
Rollinct Hills, California 90274
3. Phone Number: (310) 377-0709
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
#2 Cinchrinq Road
Rollina Hills, California 90274
5. Local Agency (city/county): Rolling Hills
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7567-017-025
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF
CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at
Citv Hall). No Hazards
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List: JULY 1992
DateSl 10 /e'�/
I Signaturk
For
Applicant
1-16
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant
to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
these lists.
Date
ci 0
For Fram Viriee
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date
For Fram Viriee
Applicant
1-17
February 2002
Environmental Information Form