Loading...
679`, Enlarge pool deck from 4 ft. t, ApplicationREQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modem or remove any unauthorized or. unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: 1 F Cal,UC 4zl I t p R.44 C.., e/©.4.74 o —akal PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: I C r t4c44.1Zl' 4 in) 3 R# a C.A. et0274- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 124a.Rc L Ai + to "'r1OrAzzgL2.0 OV .(. T' "flu ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 51 . PAGE PARCEL Z 1 1'1.) A45 AGENT'S NAME: o L MP IA P. G1 ice) AGENT'S ADDRESS: 7 PaJ.05 UE.gDFS VIZ . WrrSr )41 I , ?V! E.,C-& 10,174 TELEPHONE NO: �3 tb) *37533 ,10'8 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: 1 t "i1#- :SLOE of TM, L Du-x�1) RFt1 f1TL`� doe-ne ro 101-0" . trf L LzF. ,a. ar.F.JAPED I E 4 IU4uro > 4. 1 81,E-5 two t i%dee r) g! 6 Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage " O • • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. 'Rae. ritalECT 60 ,IUR .P.. S Ill S1Z� f' 7 [itadC4. O-tuEIZ. C4-4,7-641C=490C2I1.l 4t 7U£ES.IT roes 14.I<U L t M ITrt7 'PA c •RRE•e... 14- EXI 5 l tits U P 41/ I I i L 15 E)enzebt E 3-Y Tk 4I C 111 F'tO SC 1 !t IT`t TO "('+E->E.. 1 USE. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. %r reAl Ec'C I 1 uT.r.1 US 144-1G 51TE DES164.1 I'1.1 1%47 IT PPS ES 'T IE 14Az `( o11D)Uc vrra.aTdcTtotll \'I51BL.E 11 t ► PB as. r Iu.stflitetrtA4u5 1 1121M___ 1 EES "[WA- FI„4.1.1.k . "[ttM. 'bioiM-- 5 (1DE. QI= 141r6. riR,ParrYgEWuji. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. Vj T14 E- USE_ n P T:r e 1 t eteP- I,i I 104. _ IT IN 111, I tyl p Dv "ROE. Exismuc C ,14 T Ic4.1 U5114 1T T© t b E.vsL`f D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. UlUP B . I t CAFED VII CASCAZIti= M A -A P'S ..4. SregE v -e- j TC.4N4.1a► 'ME SI 1.1.4:1volt116N, or-.rI Fraeor 41 E tHplIVoszta ,e.I .a. • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. i11-e- 3L9 !j„p iu 44,No --e-Aeeme ft4vie.17t, R1iTda1.1 i k St44.44_ c Cl?1PLY P 1.LDS nave. ' JS.IZ `f¢R ' .r 1FL tiG1l- IIL R 1Z IS V E,M.Y L114T . . F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. PReg7Re3SET, P �lT�I'i'1 �1 I1 Ic44 Plow #-ib.izycifil©U S cu ' y,/ fl4- R U T S. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. Ex 1 sTroc. P P1srp1441 T itix41-1 , .: Sg ARP-1 RE470.41, 4.9 ' Tz- • H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. Pep roa.&L st-re_ PL1A.1-1 c 1.l Rp et5 Int T+1-El t��u lg-..cl�l� f� owl dl_ w1 J r (064r• 144, ►, fin to C` • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: Signature For: ?'R al, 06441 l.lc illt,at 1... Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS W. ft. shall ie 24.2.A a shall have a -A. shall have 'fitments hest the Boil lattons for the be tempered. a. ssemblies and pools, saunas, ly portion of a re the bottom love a standing door where the 24-inch are of t and where the a inches above mel, other than of the following to 9 square feet. ve the floor. ve the floor. t horizontally of waling surface. structural in -fill r for indoor and rf the following 'inches above tit rol or spa water's rithin 5 feet of the a edge of the glass a. depth in front of ►e scuttle, (M.C. 314) above the highest vent clearance. FAU is not required clearances are (MC. 304) ibis or containing other the outside or to an arcs pain other fuel burning rea). (M.C. 504.3) 4 inches in diameter and ions the clothes dryer to lured by 2 feet for every ) which useno more than op of ceiling joists and/or aanent stairs or ladders, of the scuttle hole or attic L G ur►a.. irier • : P44 21 po>'zTlot4 G'>✓ • >' ce t, 41 o f Lori " 1115 • ' 1G440 T'ALO.S G r `r • or 'O!-•1-1 1-1,44 ►1-LS COUNT`( DF 1-05.6.41a-F ! S\ '�,r.� OF C44-4Fo17-141.4-12 RECOM,ED !N 8x2:K 57, P, 35 i�tzr )c� of 1 E • SYM LS or- 2 gun. : 51-1AD,D AF-A5 INDICATE E ADDITION A'RE.A - re) Ba R JmP '/i//////////. : EX1ST IN* BUILDING LIN= AREA ANALYSIS CALCIILATIOILDEISLISMERAGE BUILDING AREAS NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S)9a " 1� ';,1 fit. RESIDENCE 3, C55 sq.ft. GARAGE ' G,25 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA (fic9 5 7G sq.ft. STABLE -'Q-' sq.ft. JO RECREATION COURT' 1 �-o - O - sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. OTHER r.35roII 15v, sq.ft. TRELLIS 4 4:2 ao — o — • NEW:BAS, _AREA - . (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) ' _.__( VE1 flo ,slx, =-0- BXISTING PROPOSED t 924 TOTAL sq.ft. _cert�'sq.ft. sq.ft. 5511 sq.ft. 'sq.ft. 4, 581 sq.ft. — O— sq:ft. 625 sq.ft. SPa.� 64 sq.ft. 64o sq.ft. CS sq.ft: 4-570 sq.ft. 140 sq.l•'f: • -- sq.ft. - D - sq.ft. sq.ft. ? g sq.ft. 5 70 s9 ft• 70 ble.FT. 37g TOTAL STRUCTURES •52.4,5 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 4° ji f ,1 4 -; !o % TOTAL PAD 22- , COVERAGE 2'Z, 7,,. J DRIVEWAY • PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING OTHER EASEMENTS DRTVEWAYS, .1 ‘1&2 sq.ft. 1106 sq.ft. 1 aq4 sq.ft: 0 - sq.ft. -O - sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. -O- sq.ft. 13G efoo —O- '375 Av.FT 7 'Ei? .. sq.ft. sq.ft. cr a+p, sq.ft. sq.ft. -D - sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE sq.ft. ego sq.ft. 2, f %, 1 sq.ft. GJs �r � r TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE —1, ~ - �sq.ft. .% TOTAL COVERAGE _.(554.49L •z '. a sq.ft. 1';x 'rt.sq.ft. _47 _ % 3 Gt asp- /Lt/ G �`v s- DATE_ I OJ 4b ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 16 e.ttlaitiritl� APPLICANT 4 t PMED WA-1-1-ALCM CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) 3,2C.a sq.ft. 4►5si sq.ft. 6,25. sq.ft. *So sq.ft. POOL 640 sq.ft. Pc7I4p 1 s4, Fr. RECREATION COURT ( 1 ""0 sq.ft. .'tI c.a- `14.4r 1°6 , OTHER -' 'TOF f 5 sq.ft. Tl t-1JS - P50 570 SR. FT, TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 71_6 Q sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %" . % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE sq.ft. OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at PA.Lce,\) this AV:4 day of oe.:12:,P„aam. By: , B �J'.. 16 C.4 WCAttzzati Address ' - . 1.4..1 Cc -lit Ll-L,C 4, 'T X1 City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accr. panying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. , California, APPLICANT: tSrl.l i '' REPRESENTATIVEL`C MP IA tzte,Fr...fk COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: 1 I pis vetzpia. E,aTTsicar /027+ COMPANY PHONE NO. ( J0) 375.• VVIS PROJECT ADDRESS: I t GlN p •1 l.L�► , 20 .(;) DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: Date Filed • Ciiy o/ /e0fl ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 Zoning Case No. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) - U.14E.. iiti4 JJ., .. Tel. ( ItO) 54 —2.2 Address _ 16 a tttcAkiza 3 lag71 1t.1.G 441L.L5 2. Legal Owner(s) - Tel. ( ) Vt Address 3. Project Address 1�_G�41C 1 t -t t Assessor's Book No. Ser - 136 35 - 36 Lot No. r +1 p.6.F.C£LS At RTIott OF 20 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: __?:1U l L771l.12 re.-124ottr p ® TI.A 4E.17 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site SttecpLe. Y/11t„`f PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size e3gscoo 8. Net lot ar a _ "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or p I of ro , exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures "i l ems' p 10. Number of floors of construction 11. Basement square footage 1-1 February 2002 Environmental Information Form @Printed on Recycled 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 1 FT. 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? `? ES —S'j"Rzorrtco of HoIC:114 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? _DMI, Rex,tyt5 4 Ki LSf4 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? YE•S 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? NCB 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? 140 (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? .2. Proposed? —0 (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). t c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? _2.1.. Proposed? " 0 (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? `( ES Proposed? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? V O% Proposed? 'r (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? No Explain Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? NO Explain h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? W O Explain g• Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? I 'Zr..Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 2%p . j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? `(GS With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 3 - 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are prop:etd to be added. Square feet / _. Percentage of Net Lot Area 28 2j g. 0 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 1-2 «� G.U.`{,p,Amount fill (e t c41,41>S February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 4/ A, 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 'E'Rdtk1ET (ZL . C..ent 5 V.L.4.71014 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the app` iicalion is required. 1.10.Th- SD (O FT. - TEpP I, F.STaul ut 54,414- V 6 R-14 ( !-T .' F -ro S FT ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. PD•1" AT 1Ik - Q- 1"4-1-11M 'R ES Li'?�-.i�GE . ) PCWP . To W.6 I _ rb„,R To 1.�a1F-L r' LArTI .4.o A t img2 _F s1-LE.. tw4JP E P TiVi &g..12,5_' e- Vr tT ' 0' 1, I a €Ca % __ i4,`? • February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-3 • i 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Singreful4cAt. 12°4,FI. j• 441 1 c-- rownitial ' ►tt3. t"C 14. E &U. +ON- S'rO frf a•VE ze E. E.t 'r ©a. Iv 1„1.. 144-E. r , — D trr i 51t2s 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? / Geology Report Hydrology Report V Soils Report Traffic Study Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-4 Yes No WA ✓ _ Historical Report Archaeological Report _ Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map _ Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or Tess than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. ff there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than. Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-5 • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 Cta°'". b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which 0 0 0 LV would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 d resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ 0 le Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 0 V which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ 0 0 applicable air quality plan? 1-6 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • Potentially Less Than SiLess 7} Significant gnificant WithThanImpact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporation Impact Pact b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 ❑ ❑ 1!7( substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0 'e any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 ❑ 0 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 0 ❑ number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES— Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 0 ❑ p/ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 0 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 0 0 p/ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 pry' resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 1-7 February 2002 Environmental Information Form Less Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact V . CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 0 Of of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 0 lie significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ 0 0 resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ 0 0 1 outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑ 0 0 liti on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 ❑ l iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 0 ❑ 0 tiel liquefaction? iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 i b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? 0 0 0 De c). Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0 or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 1-8 ❑ ❑ ❑ Lf February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or publip use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 1-9 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ fd o ❑ ❑191 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 1 ❑ o ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ t ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ ❑ ❑ I!( requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 ❑ 1 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ 0 1-10 ❑ 0 ❑ v o ❑ ❑ Ii ❑ ❑ ❑ V ❑ ❑ ❑ fill o ❑ ❑ e o ❑ ❑ Ile ❑ ❑ ❑ 67/ February 2002 Environmental Information Form I psc Than • Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ 0 ®% b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 ❑ 0 ISif regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 ❑ 0 q/ natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral ❑ 0 0 I/ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important 0 0 ❑ Ell mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NO IS E — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ II excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 tii groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 0 I31/ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 ❑ 11 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 l where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 ❑ 0 i the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • ss Tha Potentially Significant nWith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 0 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 lirl Police protection? 0 ❑ 0 Er Schools? 0 0 0 pi Parks? 0 ❑ 0 V Other public facilities? 0 0 0 121/ XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 1-12 ❑ ❑ 0 191 ❑ 0 0 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact • XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 ❑ relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 IV service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 ❑ 0 Ifi an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? / d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 I� (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 ❑ 0 BY/ f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ 0 ❑ V g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 ci supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 ❑ L7 applicable Regional Water Control Board? - b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 ❑ ❑ L� wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm 0 0 ❑ water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ 0 ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-13 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS —Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo( work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm? g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? 1-14 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 O ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 No Impact February 2002 Environmental Information Form Potentially Significant Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ 0 ❑ L quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 ❑ 19 will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-15 • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. 'have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date IOI A7/O4? VW - Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date _if)12:40, gnatur Applicant 1-17 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: ' - P'FZiMt GT (5 t•4OT 1-0 Cd:r 3, a A. tt-A-Zieaftraf,VX kklAk t° S. ITS 1. Name of applicant: , tE. 4 riizE.D K.J.1-4Co% 2. Address: 16 e.1c,Amtvt _ 3. Phone Number: (2110) y'"'s}. 2249 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 1 G111CJ4-Rt t 3 R.H 5. Local Agency (city/county): _ ,1,. NgA, 44-1 Ll.6.) 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 14 5 7 3 P am- S B S *, 6 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE 0 F CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date 1 o Pa5/o?, For c--'3i aturr Applicant 1-16 February 2002 Environmental Information Form