370, Addition & remodel of existing, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 9;%-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
IN ZONING CASE NO. 370
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and
Mrs. Alfred Visco for a minimum front yard setback variance for
property located at 15 Cinchring Road (Lot 22-6-CH), Rolling Hills,
California. The application seeks a variance to allow a portion of a
proposed garage addition to be constructed in the front setback of
the property. The proposed encroachment is 12' where a
non -conforming encroachment of 17'.0" exists.
Section 2. The Planning Commission opened the public
hearing on September 20, 1988 and continued it to October 18, 1988.
A duly noticed field trip was conducted on October 4, 1988, to which
the applicant and all members of the public was invited. The
Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral,
presented to it in connection with this application.
Section 3. In accordance with Sections 17.32.010
through 17.32.030 of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as
follows:
1. The subject property is unique in that it has an
existing garage on which the applicant intends to construct
additional square footage (388 sq. ft.). This is an existing
nonconforming garage which extends into the front setback. The
variance involves construction of a structure in an area already
occupied by a legal nonconforming building. Thus, the new
construction will enhance the appearance of an existing structure in
the same location.
2. Approval of the variance does not give to the
applicant a special privilege because it merely allows him to
construct a garage addition to an existing building where the
proposed encroachment is less than an existing non -conforming
encroachment.
3. The variance is necessary to the applicant's ability
to enjoy his property to the same extent as other similar properties
in the same zone. It will permit applicant to construct in
.accordance with a design plan that makes sensible use of existing
unique conditions.
Section 4. In accordance with the foregoing findings,
the variance sought in Zoning Case No. 370 is hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of October,
1988.
/s/ Allan Roberts
Chairman
ATTEST:
For Recorder'; Use
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with t e
return to:
89 934 '56
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUN1Y
CALIFORNIA
r MIN.0 DEC 1989
1 pAST.oc i'1
-negistraL- .eeuL(Let. b office and
JFEEsn.
1
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized
before recordation.)
' STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
• Acceptance Form
ss
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO:
VARIANCE CASE NO. 370
I (We) the undersigned state: •
I am (We are) the owner(s). of'the real property described
15 Cinchring Road, Lqt 22-6-CH
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
as follows:
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, ?11 the stated conditions
Conditional Use Permit Case No.
Variance Case No. 370
in said
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true'and correct
(Where the owner -And
applicant. are not the same, both must sign.)
Type or print
Applicant Name /Y/42 , V21cd ./%40 Alcor4240 f/!sh
Address 266r z J.r,c,z
City, State , ' 'i- r rr Am, 9t 275E
Signature C coN,L.. .•
U
Owner Name MIMM4,U V'l scv ,&vo AQ.Ficao P/sco
Address 1(6CZ 'si 44c.4
City, State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public.. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
U 0.4:1 /'���v< , ; 9v2 7 54
1
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
•
NO: 201
OFFICIAL SEAL '
GEORGIA LEE FROBERG '
Notary Public -California
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ,
My Comm. Exp. June 19,1992 ,
On this t ay of � 191I ,before me,
the underrsi/�g d Notary Public; personally appeared
.4 ersonally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the
within instrument nd acknowledged that } executed it.
WITNESS my hand official seal.
Notary's Signature
t
1
k
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Wood
and Hills, CA 91365-4625
STATE OF California.
COUNTY OF
S0294 (R02/0486)
T nc
4nvolnc
9
A A.A A A A /4./C1 A A A A
OFFICIAL SEAL. -
`MARIA L: ROBERTSON ; < .
NOTARY PUBLIC - CAUFORNIA ,-
LOS,ANGELES COUNTY .
Ay Comn. Expire;1uy 30;1993
I SS.
756
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
On this the 2 a day of N nveTnh c r 19 R o , before me,
Maria L. Psb=tc-on
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Al fresl Vi crn _
❑ personally known to me
16 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose
name(s) i S' subscribed to the within instrument,
and acknowledged that h a executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
Jr
• •
•
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
IN ZONING CASE NO. 370
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section ). An application was duly filed by Mr. and
Mrs. Alfred Visco for a minimum front yard setback variance for
property located at 15 Cinchring Road (Lot 22-6-CH), Rolling Hills,
California. The application seeks a variance to allow a portion of a
proposed garage addition to be constructed in the front setback of
the property. The proposed encroachment is 12' where a
non -conforming encroachment of 17'.0" exists.
Section 2. The Planning Commission opened the public
hearing on September 20, 1988 and continued it to October 18, 1988.
A duly noticed field trip was conducted on October 4, 1988., to which
the applicant and all members of the public was invited. The
Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral,
presented to it in connection with this application.
Section 3. In accordance with Sections 17.32.010
through 17.32.030 of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as
follows:
1. The subject property is unique in that it has an
existing garage on which the applicant intends to construct
additional square footage (388 sq. ft.). This is an existing
nonconforming garage which extends into the front setback. The
variance involves construction of a structure in an area already
occupied by a legal nonconforming building. Thus, the new
construction will enhance the appearance of an existing structure in
the same location.
2. Approval of the variance does not give to the
applicant a special privilege because it merely allows him to
construct a garage addition to an existing building where the
proposed encroachment is less than an existing non -conforming
encroachment.
3. The variance is necessary to the applicant's ability
to enjoy his property to the same extent as other similar properties
in the same zone. It will permit applicant to construct in
.accordance with a design plan that makes sensible use of existing
unique conditions.
Section 4. In
the variance sought in Zoning
PASSED, APPROVED
1988.
ATTEST:
accordance with the foregoing findings,
Case No. 370 is hereby approved.
and ADOPTED this 18th day of October,
/s/ Allan Roberts
Chairman
85 19 756