Loading...
679`, Enlarge pool deck from 4 ft. t, Staff Reports• 0/ Yt�•/i'jcilifid INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4B Mtg. Date: 2/23/04 DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2004 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-04. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH), (WALLACE). BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-04, which is attached, on February 17, 2004 at their regular meeting granting a request for a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a retaining wall, patio and detached trellises. The vote was 3-0-2. Commissioner Hankins abstained due to the proximity of her property to subject site and Commissioner Sommer abstained due to his relationship with the property owner. 2. The applicants request a Site Plan Review to grade an approximate 1,000 square foot area located behind the existing residence to enlarge a patio, construct a retaining wall that varies in height from 4 feet to 8 feet, and construct 570 square feet of detached trellises, which includes a gazebo and a 64 square foot spa. According to the RHCA Manager, the RHCA Architectural Committee does not review requests for walls alone, as the proposed wall is what is considered an "internal wall" and is incorporated as part of the overall deck and pool construction. The Architectural Committee will, however, review an overall landscaping design for the pool area, which includes the landscaping, spa, gazebo trellises and the wall. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and is 2.05 acres (gross) in size. The net lot area for development purposes is 69,000 square feet, (1.58 acres). The residence was recently ZC No. 679 CC 2/23/04 ®Printed on Hr;c:ycled Prim, • • • damaged by fire. The applicants received an administrative approval to rebuild the house within the footprint of the damaged residence and to add 926 square feet to the residence. A Site Plan Review is not required for rebuilding a home, which was damaged or destroyed by fire or for addition of less than 1,000 square feet or not exceeding 25% of the size of the structure. The reconstruction is currently in progress. Pursuant to Section 17.46.020(3) of the Zoning Code a Site Plan Review is required for "the expansion, modification, alteration or repair of any existing building or structure, which either requires a grading permit or increases the size of the building or structure by at least one thousand square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than 25% in any thirty-six month period" 4. The existing north side of the pool deck is currently 4 feet wide. The applicants propose to widen it to ten feet, and to move the existing retaining wall ten feet further away from the pool deck. The wall will only be visible from the applicant's property. A stone veneer matching the residence will be applied and trellises will be constructed. To control erosion, a concrete swale will be constructed along the top of the retaining wall. 5. The property, once rebuild, will contain a 4,581 square foot residence (prior to the fire damage, the residence was 3,655 square feet), 64 square foot spa, 570 square feet of new trellises and 375 square feet of covered porches. The property is also developed with 625 square foot detached garage, 576 square foot pool, 140 square foot pond, 96 square feet service yard and 153 square feet storage area, which will remain. There will be a total of 7,180 square feet of structures on the lot, not including the future stable. 6. An area for a future 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral has been set aside in the rear of the garage. There exists a level pad above the garage area. 7. Grading for the project will require 169 cubic yards of cut soil and 169 cubic yards of fill, which will be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4% or 26,500 square feet of the net lot area, (maximum permitted 40%). 37.2% of the net lot has already been disturbed. 8. The net lot area of the lot is 69,000 square feet. By enlarging the patio area, the size of the building pad increases slightly. The existing building pad is 23,500 square feet. The proposed building pad will be 24,551 square feet. Building pad coverage on this pad is proposed to be 7,630 square feet or 31.07%, which includes the future stable. 9. The structural net lot coverage proposed is 7,630 square feet or 11.05%, which includes the residence, garage, pool, service yard, trellises, gazebo, porches, pond, storage area and future stable, (20% permitted). Currently, with the proposed 926 square foot addition the structural coverage is 8.9%. 10. The total lot coverage proposed including all of the structures and paved areas is 13,786 square feet or 20.0%, (35% permitted). Currently, with the proposed addition to the residence the total net lot coverage is 15.2%. 11. Records show that the house and detached garage were built in 1947. An addition was built in 1952 and the swimming pool was built in 1954. ZC No. 679 CC 2/23/04 2 • • 12. As part of the administrative approval for the addition it is required that the utilities to the residence are placed underground. 13 The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the staff report or provide direction to staff. ZC No. 679 CC 2/23/04 Zoning Case No. 679 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) STABLE PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS ZC No. 679 CC 2/23/04 EXISTING + APPROVED ADDITION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (with administratively approved addition, not yet constructed) Residence 4581 sq.ft. Garage 625 sq.ft. Pool Stable Service yard Storage Pond 576 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 153 sq.ft. 140 sq.ft. TOTAL 6,171 sq.ft. 8.9% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 15.2% PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Residence Garage Pool Stable future Service yard Storage Pond Trellises /gazebo Porches TOTAL 11.05% of 69,000 20.0% 4581 sq.ft. 625 sq.ft. 576 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 153 sq.ft 140 sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. 375 sq.ft 7,630 sq.ft. sq.ft. net lot area 26.2% of 23,500 sq.ft. building pad 31.07% of 24,551 sq.ft. building pad N/A 37.2% N/A N/A Existing from Cinchring N/A N/A 169 cubic yards cut 169 cubic yards fill 38.4% Future 450 sq.ft. Future 550 sq. ft Proposed from Cinchring Existing from Cinchring Planning Commission conditions. Planning Commission conditions. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH), (WALLACE). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Wallace with respect to real property located at 16 Cinchring Road, (Lot 21-CH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading to enlarge a patio area, to construct a retaining wall not to exceed 8 feet in height and to construct detached trellises. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on December 16, 2003 and January 20, 2004. The field trip public hearing was cancelled due to lack of quorum. However, each Commissioner visited the subject project with the Planning Director separately. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 4 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting grading and a new wall, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed grading, trellises and wall will not alter the General Plan requirement of low profile, low - density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage i Reso. 2004-04 Wallace • • requirements. The graded area will not exceed 1,000 square feet of cut and 1,000 square feet of fill. The proposed wall will be located along the rear yard setback, but will not encroach into the setback. The proposed project is not visible from the road. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the future stable. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new wall and trellises will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The, existing vegetation on the parcel will remain and will screen the enlarged patio and wall from the neighbors. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the grading and construction of the wall and trellises will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed development will be located on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed construction will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The enlargement of the patio and the construction of the wall and trellises will not deter from the rural character of the community. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 169 cubic yards of cut and 169 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed development does not later the existing circulation. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 679 for grading to enlarge a patio and to construct a retaining wall and detached trellises as shown on the Development Plan dated December 9, 2003, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 2 Reso. 2004-04 Wallace A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated December 9, 2003, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed 169 cubic yards of cut and 169 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,630 square feet or 11.05%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 13,786 square feet or 20.0% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 26,500 square feet or 38.4% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 24,551 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 7,630 square feet or 31.07%. K. The disturbed areas shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 3 Reso. 2004-04 Wallace • • L. A landscaping plan for the disturbed areas must be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to issuing grading or building permits. To the maximum extend practicable, native trees and other native plants shall be utilized. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed 20 feet in height; shrubs shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the wall. M. The walls required for this project shall not exceed 8 feet in height and to the maximim extend practicable shall be screened with landscaping. N. The proposed trellises and gazebo shall not exceed 570 square feet. O. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. P. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. Q. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, (Ordinance No. 287). V. A drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and County District Engineer, to include any water from patio irrigation systems and that all drainage from the patio shall be conveyed in an approved manner. Reso. 2004-04 Wallace 4 g • • W. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. X. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval the approvals shall not be effective. Y. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. /1/& ARV L 'fT , CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERM, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2004-04 Wallace STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-04 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH), (WALLACE). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 17, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Margeta, and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners Hankins, Sommer. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. r{;\4 A . ` ,�, k U DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2004-04 Wallace MEMORANDUM FEBRUARY 17, 2004 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6B ZONING CASE NO. 679, 16 CINCHRING ROAD (WALLACE). DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF COMMISSIONER HANKINS' PROPERTY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY, (WITHIN 500 FEET), COMMISSIONER HANKINS SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING IN THIS CASE. DUE TO PERSONAL FRIENDSHIP WITH THE APPLICANT, COMMISSIONER SOMMER EXCUSED HIMSELF FROM DELIBERATION IN THIS CASE, AND SHOULD ABSTAIN FROM VOTING. DATE: TO: FROM: • Cry .1)f2 PP,,.g INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com FEBRUARY 17, 2004 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 679 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH) RA-S-1, 2.05 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. FRED WALLACE GREER AND ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 6, 2003 RESOLUTION NO. 2004-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH),.(WALLACE). BACKGROUND 1. At the January 20, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of approval in Zoning Case No. 679. The vote was 3-2-0. Commissioners Hankins and Sommer abstained. Resolution No. 2004-04 is attached for Commission's consideration. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2004-04 approving this development. ®Printed on Recycled F'apnr 1 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2004-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH), (WALLACE). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Wallace with respect to real property located at 16 Cinchring Road, (Lot 21-CH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading to enlarge a patio area, to construct a retaining wall not to exceed 8 feet in height and to construct detached trellises. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on December 16, 2003 and January 20, 2004. The field trip public hearing was cancelled due to lack of quorum. However, each Commissioner visited the subject project with the Planning Director separately. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 4 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan, Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting grading and a new wall, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed grading, trellises and wall will not alter the General Plan requirement of low profile, low - density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage Reso. 2004-04 Wallace i • • requirements. The graded area will not exceed 1,000 square feet of cut and 1,000 square feet of fill. The proposed wall will be located along the rear yard setback, but will not encroach into the setback. The proposed project is not visible from the road. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the future stable. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new wall and trellises will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The existing vegetation on the parcel will remain and will screen the enlarged patio and wall from the neighbors. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the grading and construction of the wall and trellises will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed development will be located on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed construction will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors,, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The enlargement of the patio and the construction of the wall and trellises will not deter from the rural character of the community. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain, the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve 169 cubic yards of cut and 169 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed development does not later the existing circulation. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 679 for grading to enlarge a patio and to construct a retaining wall and detached trellises as shown on the Development Plan dated December 9, 2003, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 2 Reso. 2004-04 Wallace • • A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated December. 9, 2003, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed 169 cubic yards of cut and 169 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 7,630 square feet or 11.05%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 13,786 square feet or 20.0% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 26,500 square feet or 38.4% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. J. Residential building pad coverage on the 24,551 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 7,630 square feet or 31.07%. K. The disturbed areas shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 3 Reso. 2004-04 Wallace • L. A landscaping plan for the disturbed areas must be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to issuing grading or building permits. To the maximum extend practicable, native trees and other native plants shall be utilized. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed 20 feet in height; shrubs shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the wall. M. The walls required for this project shall not exceed 8 feet in height and to the maximim extend practicable shall be screened with landscaping. N. The proposed trellises and gazebo shall not exceed 570 square feet. O. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. P. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. Q. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, (Ordinance No. 287). V. A drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and County District Engineer, to include any water from patio irrigation systems and that all drainage from the patio shall be conveyed in an approved manner. 4 Reso. 2004-04 Wallace S W. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. X. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval the approvals shall not be effective. Y. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. ARVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2004-04 Wallace 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-04 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR GRADING IN ORDER TO ENLARGE A PATIO AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AND DETACHED TRELLISES IN ZONING CASE NO. 679 AT 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH), (WALLACE). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 17, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2004-04 Wallace A DATE: TO: FROM: • • (34 o/ ie0ti4 Jd,'P7 JANUARY 20, 2004 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 679 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH) RA-S-1, 2.05 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. FRED WALLACE GREER AND ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 6, 2003 Request for a Site Plan Review for grading to enlarge a patio and to construct a retaining wall and detached trellises at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission visited the subject property on January 17, 2004. 2. The applicants request a Site Plan Review to grade approximately 1,000 square feet of area located behind an existing residence to enlarge a patio area, to construct a retaining wall that varies in height form 4 feet to 8 feet, to construct 570 square feet of detached trellises, which includes a gazebo and a 64 square foot spa. According to the RHCA Manager, the RHCA Architectural Committee will not review this project, as the proposed wall is what is considered an "internal wall" and is incorporated as part of the overall deck and pool construction. The Architectural Committee will review an overall landscape design for the pool area. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and is 2.05 acres (gross) in size. The net lot area for development purposes is 69,000 square feet, (1.58 acres). The residence was recently damaged by fire. The applicants received an administrative approval to rebuild the house within the footprint of the damaged residence and to add 926 square feet to the residence. A Site Plan Review is not required for rebuilding a home, which was damaged or destroyed by fire or for addition of less than 1,000 square feet. In addition the spa, and the gazebo would also be approved administratively. The reconstruction and addition is currently in progress. Pursuant to Section 17.46.020(3) of the Zoning Code a Site Plan Review is required for "the expansion, modification, alteration or repair of any existing building or structure, ZC No. 679 P1ng.Comm.1 /20/04 @Prurturl on Hr'cyrind • which either requires a grading permit or increases the size of the building or structure by at least one thousand square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than 25% in any thirty-six month period" 4. The existing north side of the pool deck is currently 4 feet wide. The applicants propose to widen it to ten feet, and to move the existing retaining wall ten feet further away from the pool deck. The portion behind the retaining wall will be landscaped. A stone veneer matching the residence'will be applied and trellises will be constructed. To control erosion, a concrete swale will be constructed along the top portion of the retaining wall. 5. The property, once rebuild, will contain a 4,581 square foot residence (prior to the fire damage, the residence was 3,655 square feet), 64 square foot spa, 570 square feet of new trellises and 375 square feet of covered porches. The property is also developed with 625, square foot detached garage, 576 square foot pool, 140 square foot pond, 96 square feet service yard and 153 square feet storage area, which will remain. There will be a total of 7,180 square feet of structures on the lot, not including the future stable. 6. An area for a future 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral is proposed in the rear of the garage. There exists a large, 510 square foot, service/patio area behind the detached garage. The applicants propose to located the future stable on portion of this area and retain a minimum of 96 square feet (as required by the RHCA) for service yard. The corral would be located a minimum of 25 feet from the rear property line, and would be adjacent to the stable. 7. Grading for the project will require 169 cubic yards of cut soil and 169 cubic yards of fill, which will be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4% or 26,500 square feet of the net lot area, (maximum permitted 40%). 37.2% of the net lot has already been disturbed. 8. The net lot area of the lot is 69,000 square feet. By enlarging the patio area, the size of the building pad increases slightly. The existing building pad is 23,500 square feet. The proposed building pad will be 24,551 square feet. Building pad coverage on this pad is proposed to be 7,630 square feet or 31.07%, which includes the future stable. When calculating all of the structures on the lot prior to the fire damage and without the additions to the residence, the building pad coverage was 22.3%. With the administratively approved addition, the building pad coverage would be 26.2%. 9. The structural net lot coverage proposed is 7,630 square feet or 11.05%, which includes the residence, garage, pool, service yard, trellises, gazebo, porches, pond, storage area and future stable, (20% permitted); Currently, without the administrative approval of the addition, the structural coverage is 7.6%, and with the proposed 926 sq.ft. addition the structural coverage would be 8.9%. 10. The total lot coverage proposed including all of the structures and paved areas is 13,786 square feet or 20.0%, (35% permitted). Currently, without the administrative approval of 926 sq.ft. addition the total net lot coverage is 13.86%. With the proposed addition to the residence the total net lot coverage would be 15.2%. ZC No. 679 2 P1ng.Comm.1 /20/04 • 11. Records show that the house and detached garage were built in 1947. An addition was built in 1952 and the swimming pool was built in 1954. 12. As part of the administrative approval for the addition it is required that the utilities to the residence are placed underground. 13 The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the report, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. ZC No. 679 3 P1ng.Comm.1/20/04 4 Zoning Case No. 679 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) STABLE PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING + APPROVED ADDITION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (with administratively approved addition, not yet constructed) Residence 4581 sq.ft. Garage 625 sq.ft. Pool 576 sq.ft. Stable 0 sq.ft. Service yard 96 sq.ft. Storage 153 sq.ft. Pond 140 sq.ft. TOTAL 6,171 sq.ft. 8.9% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 15.2% 26.2% of 23,500 sq.ft. building pad N/A 37.2% N/A N/A Existing from Cinchring I N/A N/A ZC No. 679 4 P1ng.Comm.1 /20/04 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Residence 4581 sq.ft. Garage 625 sq.ft. Pool 576 sq.ft. Stable future 450 sq.ft. Service yard 96 sq.ft. Storage 153 sq.ft Pond 140 sq.ft. Trellises /gazebo 570 sq.ft. Porches 375 sq.ft TOTAL 7,630 sq.ft. 11.05% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 20.0% 31.07% of 24,551 sq.ft. building pad 169 cubic yards cut 169 cubic yards fill 38.4% Future 450 sq.ft. Future 550 sq. ft IProposed from Cinchring I Existing from Cinchring Planning Commission conditions. Planning Commission conditions. DATE: TO: FROM: • City o/ Robing JI•fe INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com JANUARY 17, 2004 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 679 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH) RA-S-1, 2.05 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. FRED WALLACE GREER AND ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 6, 2003 3E Request for a Site Plan Review for grading to enlarge a patio and to construct a retaining wall and detached trellises at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission at the December 16, 2003 meeting scheduled a field visit to subject property on January 17, 2004. 2. The applicants request a Site Plan Review to grade approximately 1,000 square feet of area located behind an existing residence to enlarge a patio area, to construct a retaining wall that varies in height form 4 feet to 8 feet, to construct 570 square feet of detached trellises, which includes a gazebo and a 64 square foot spa. According to the RHCA Manager, the RHCA Architectural Committee will not review this project, as the proposed wall is what is considered an "internal wall" and is incorporated as part of the overall deck and pool construction. The Architectural Committee will review an overall landscape design for the pool area. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and is 2.05 acres (gross) in size. The net lot area for development purposes is 69,000 square feet, (1.58 acres). The residence was recently damaged by fire. The applicants received an administrative approval to rebuilt the house within the footprint of the damaged residence and to add 926 square feet to the residence. A Site Plan Review application is not required for rebuilding a home or for addition of less than 1,000 square feet. In addition the spa, and the gazebo would also be approved administratively. ZC No. 679 1 P1ng.Comm.1/17/04FT @F'nnied on ilccynlrxf 1',1n n Pursuant to Section 17.46.020(3) of the Zoning Code a Site Plan Review is required for "the expansion, modification, alteration or repair of any existing building or structure, which either requires a grading permit or increases the size of the building or structure by at least one thousand square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than 25% in any thirty-six month period" 4. The existing north side of the pool deck is currently 4 feet wide. The applicants propose to widen it to ten feet, and to move the existing retaining wall ten feet further away from the pool deck. The portion behind the retaining wall will be landscaped. A stone veneer matching the residence will be applied and trellises will be constructed. To control erosion, a concrete swale will be constructed along the top portion of the retaining wall. 5. The property, once rebuild, will contain a 4,581 square foot residence (prior to the fire damage, the residence was 3,655 square feet), 64 square foot spa, 570 square feet of new trellises and 375 square feet of covered porches. The property is also developed with 625 square foot detached garage, 576 square foot pool, 140 square foot pond, 96 square feet service yard and 153 square feet storage area, which will remain. There will be a total of 7,180 square feet of structures on the lot, not including the future stable. 6. An area for a future 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral is proposed in the rear of the garage. There exists a large, 510 square foot, service/patio area behind the detached garage. The applicants propose to located the future stable on portion of this area and retain a minimum of 96 square feet (as required by the RHCA) for service yard. The corral would be located a minimum of 25 feet from the rear property line, and would be adjacent to the stable. 7. Grading for the project will require 169 cubic yards of cut soil and 169 cubic yards of fill, which will be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4% or 26,500 square feet of the net lot area, (maximum permitted 40%). 37.2% of the net lot has already been disturbed. 8. The net lot area of the lot is 69,000 square feet. By enlarging the patio area, the size of the building pad increases slightly. The existing building pad is 23,500 square feet. The proposed building pad will be 24,551 square feet. Building pad coverage on this pad is proposed to be 7,630 square feet or 31.07%, which includes the future stable. When calculating all of the structures on the lot prior to the fire damage and without the additions to the residence, the building pad coverage was 22.3%. With the administratively approved addition, the building pad coverage would be 26.2%. 9. The structural net lot coverage proposed is 7,630 square feet or 11.05%, which includes the residence, garage, pool, service yard, trellises, gazebo, porches, pond, storage area and future stable, (20% permitted); Currently, without the administrative approval of the addition, the structural coverage is 7.6%, and with the proposed 926 sq.ft. addition the structural coverage would be 8.9%. 10. The total lot coverage proposed including all of the structures and paved areas is 13,786 square feet or 20.0%, (35% permitted). Currently, without the administrative ZC No. 679 2 P1ng.Comm.1 /17/04FT approval of 926 sq.ft. addition the total net lot coverage is 13.86%. With the proposed addition to the residence the total net lot coverage would be 15.2%. 11. Records show that the house and detached garage were built in 1947. An addition was built in 1952 and the swimming pool was built in 1954. 12. As part of the administrative approval for the addition it is required that the utilities to the residence are placed underground. 13 The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission view the project and take public testimony. ZC No. 679 3 Ping.Comm. l / l7/04FT Zoning Case No. 679 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum-ouidelinel STABLE PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is. more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SO.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS hEXISTINGADDITION + APPROVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (with administratively approved addition, not yet constructed) Residence 4581 sq Garage 625 sq Pool 576 sq Stable 0 sq. Service yard 96 sq. Storage 153 sq. Pond 140 sq. .ft. .ft. .ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Residence Garage Pool Stable future Service yard Storage Pond Trellises /gazebo Porches TOTAL 6,171 sq.ft. TOTAL 4581 sq.ft. 625 sq.ft. 576 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 153 sq.ft 140 sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. 375 sq.ft 7,630 sq.ft. 8.9% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 11.05% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 15.2% 20.0% 26.2% of 23,500 sq.ft. building pad 31.07% of 24,551 sq.ft. building pad N/A 37.2% N/A N/A Existing from Cinchring N/A N/A ZC No. 679 4 P1ng.Comm.1/17/04FT 169 cubic yards cut 169 cubic yards fill 38.4% Future 450 sq.ft. Future 550 sq. ft Proposed from Cinchring Existing from Cinchring Planning Commission will review. Planning Commission will review. DATE: TO: FROM: • City °Mo ili,.S Jh/t • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com DECEMBER 16, 2003 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 679 16 CINCHRING ROAD (LOT 21-CH) RA-S-1, 2.05 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. FRED WALLACE GREER AND ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 6, 2003 Request for a Site Plan Review for grading to enlarge a patio and to construct a retaining wall and detached trellises at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The applicants request a Site Plan Review to grade approximately 1,000 square feet of area located behind an existing residence to enlarge a patio area, to construct a retaining wall that varies in height form 4 feet to 8 feet, to construct 570 square feet of detached trellises, which includes a gazebo, to add 375 square feet of covered porches and to construct a 64 square foot spa. 2. The property is zoned RAS-1 and is 2.05 acres (gross) in size. The net lot area for development purposes is 69,000 square feet, (1.58 acres). The residence was recently damaged by fire. The applicants received an administrative approval to rebuilt the house within the footprint of the damaged residence and to add 926 square feet to the residence. A Site Plan Review application is not required for rebuilding a home or for addition of less than 1,000 square feet. In addition the spa, and the gazebo would also be approved administratively. Pursuant to Section 17.46.020(3) of the Zoning Code a Site Plan Review is required for "the expansion, modification, alteration or repair of any existing building or structure, which either requires a grading permit or increases the size of the building or structure by at least one thousand square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than 25% in any thirty-six month period" Prince, I nn f y,;ir I'ah•dr • • 3. The existing north side of the pool deck is currently 4 feet. The applicants propose to widen it to ten feet, and to move an existing retaining wall ten feet. The portion behind the retaining wall will be landscaped. A stone veneer matching the residence will be applied and trellises will be constructed. To control erosion, a concrete swale will be constructed along the top portion of the retaining wall. 4. The property, once rebuilt, will contain a 4,581 square foot residence (prior to the fire damage, the residence was 3,655 square feet), 64 square foot spa, 570 square feet of new trellises and 375 square feet of covered porches. The property is also developed with 625 square foot detached garage, 576 square foot pool, 140 square foot pond, 96 square feet service yard and 153 square feet storage area, which will remain. There will be a total of 7,180 square feet of structures on the lot, not including the future stable. 5. An area for a future 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral is proposed in the rear of the garage. There exists a large, 510 square foot, service/patio area behind the detached garage. The applicants propose to located the future stable on portion of this area and retain a minimum of 96 square feet (as required by the RHCA) for service yard. The corral would be located a minimum of 25 feet from the rear property line, and would be adjacent to the stable. 6. Grading for the project will require 169 cubic yards of cut soil and 169 cubic yards of fill, which will be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot will be 38.4% or 26,500 square feet of the net lot area, (maximum permitted 40%). 37.2% of the net lot has already been disturbed. 7. The net lot area of the lot is 69,000 square feet. By enlarging the patio area, the size of the building pad increases slightly. The existing building pad is 23,500 square feet. The proposed building pad will be 24,551 square feet. Building pad coverage on this pad is proposed to be 7,630 square feet or 31.07%, which includes the future stable. When calculating all of the structures on the lot prior to the fire damage and without the additions to the residence, the building pad coverage was 22.3%. With the administratively approved addition, the building pad coverage would be 26.2%. 8. The structural net lot coverage proposed is 7,630 square feet or 11.05%, which includes the residence, garage, pool, service yard, trellises, gazebo, porches, pond, storage area and future stable, (20% permitted); Currently, without the administrative approval of the addition, the structural coverage is 7.6%, and with the proposed 926 sq.ft. addition the structural coverage would be 8.9%. 9. The total lot coverage proposed including all of the structures and paved areas is 13,786 square feet or 20.0%, (35% permitted). Currently, without the administrative approval of 926 sq.ft. addition the total net lot coverage is.13.86%. With the proposed addition to the residence the total net lot coverage would be 15.2%. 10. Records show that the house and detached garage were built in 1947. An addition was built in 1952 and the swimming pool was built in 1954. 11. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the proposed wall and grading for the wall at a later date. The Association approved the addition. [21 r 12. As part of the administrative approval for the addition it is required that the utilities to the residence are placed underground. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission reviews the staff report and take public testimony. Zoning Case No. 679 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) STABLE PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING + APPROVED ADDITION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (with administratively approved addition, not yet constructed) Residence 4581 sq.ft. Garage 625 sq.ft. Pool 576 sq.ft. Stable 0 sq.ft. Service yard 96 sq.ft. Storage 153 sq.ft. Pond 140 sq.ft. TOTAL PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Residence Garage Pool Stable future Service yard Storage Pond Trellises /gazebo Porches 6,171 sq.ft. TOTAL 4581 sq.ft. 625 sq.ft. 576 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 153 sq.ft 140 sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. 375 sq.ft 7,630 sq.ft. 8.9% of 69,000 sq.fr. net lot area 11.05% of 69,000 sq.ft. net lot area 15.2% 26.2% of 23,500 sq.ft. building pad N/A 37.2% N/A N/A Existing from Cinchring N/A N/A 20.0% 31.07% of 24,551 sq.ft. building pad 169 cubic yards cut 169 cubic yards fill 38.4% Future 450 sq.ft. 550 sq. ft Proposed from Cinchring Existing from Cinchring Planning Commission will review. Planning Commission will review. - • ---• ' "'ft rAni: 'AWE:tali all 11.11