Loading...
658, Addition to existing SFR with , Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT O F ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) 04 i729449 ZONING CASE NO. 658. 658A and 658B SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 4 Recorders Use Only I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE N., ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 5-MR) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered cases and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 658, 658A & 658B SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) certify or ecllare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. v 1, Signature ,(� Signature Jo,44 1�- c)rf' Name typed or printed Name typed or printed 11 i"l t A.5w 4. A 6•C Address Address t t.a s CA 1021' City/State City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles) 1 h On El12.) t 09 before me, 0-LA lfl-Y�(1 1 �t l� 1"\ A te, personally appeared h rr1 t' personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. i CYNTH1AA. MA%1GEL w Commission # 1343023 a Notary Public - California Loa Angora County My Carom. Expkns Feb 10, 2008 ess by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" AND EXHIBIT "B" ATTAG`FIED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • g)(1-!)!31T- a RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS THAT WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5-MR) IN ZONING CASE NO. 658, (POST). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Post with respect to real property located at 17 Middleridge Lane North, Rolling Hills (Lot 5-MR) requesting a 999 square foot addition to an existing 2,007 square foot residence, of which 340 square feet would encroach into the required side yard setbacks. With the additions the house will be 3,006 square feet. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the applications on December 17, 2002, January 21, 2003, February 18, 2003, March 18, 2003 and at a field trip visit on February 8, 2003. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.120 is required because it states that every lot in the RAS-1 zone shall have a side yard of not less than 20 feet from the side property line. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach 8 feet for a total of 252 square feet into the north side yard setback, and 8 feet for a total of 88 square feet into the south side yard setback to for a total encroachment of 340 square feet at an existing single-family residential development. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is divided by a roadway and the area of the lot where the additions are proposed is small in size in comparison to the average lots in the City. The lot size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates a difficulty in meeting this Code requirement. 04 1729449 • i The existing legal nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 10 feet into the side yard setbacks and 20 feet into the front yard setback. The existing residence and proposed additions are modest in size. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same vicinity and zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the side yard will allow the remaining portion of the lot to remain undeveloped, and would minimize grading. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. The residential building pad coverage exceeds the City's guidelines of 30%. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 658 to encroach into the side yard setbacks, (north and south), to construct a 999 square foot addition at an existing single family residential development, of which 340 square feet will encroach into the side yards setbacks, as indicated on the development plan dated March 31, 2003, submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, and subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A), unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conforrnance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated March 31, 2003, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07 04 1729449 • • E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of minimum of 1,000 square feet to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable (450 square feet) and corral (550 square feet) with vehicular access thereto. F. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills, (ORDINANCE NO. 287) pertaining to lighting on said property. G. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.16.190 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to roof covering. H. Utility lines serving subject property shall be placed underground. I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4,079 square feet or 11.3% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 6,613 square feet or 18.3% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations. K. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 8,800 square feet or 24.4% in conformance with disturbed area limitations. L. Residential building pad coverage on the 4,940 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 3,629 square feet or 73.5%; coverage on the 1,144 square foot future stable pad shall not exceed 450 square feet or 39.3%. M. There shall be no grading of the site, except for the future stable. N. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent feasible. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During consti actioa., n fnrr ince with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. R. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07 3 04 1'729449 • • followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within_nearby_roadway ----------easements.-- -- — U. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. V. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. W. The drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and the L.A. County Building Division, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner. X. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of a building permit. Y. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. Z. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance approval, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective. AA. All conditions of this Variance approval, that apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. AB. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property which would constitute additional structural development or additional lot disturbance shall require the filing of a new application for discretionary review and approval by the Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07 04 1729449 �n 4 i • PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL 2003. //t)12 EVIE HANKINS, CHAIRWOMAN ATTEST: �p . 1 .1 I. MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2003-07 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS THAT WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5-MR) IN ZONING CASE NO. 658, (POST). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 15, 2003 by the following roll call vote: Commissioners DeRoy, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairwoman Hankins. AYES: NOES: None. ABSENT: None . ABSTAIN: None . and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. RESOLUTION NO. 2003-07 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 04 1729449 5 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2004-07 (il eit og A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION THAT WOULD FURTHER ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 658A-MODIFICATION AND 658B SITE PLAN REVIEW, AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5- MR), (POST). • THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Post with respect to real property located at 17 Middleridge Lane North, Rolling Hills (Lot 5-MR) requesting a 154 square foot addition, of which 42 square feet would encroach further than previously approved into the side yard setback. In April 2003, the Planning Commission approved a 999 square foot addition to an existing 2,007 square foot residence, of which 340 square feet would encroach into the required side yard setbacks. With the additions the house will have 3,160 square feet. Section 2. Section 17.46.030 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25)/0) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the addition, between the April 2003 approval and the current approval, the applicant proposes to construct 1,153 square foot addition in a 36-month period. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the applications on December 16, 2003, January 20, 2004, and at a field trip visit on January 17, 2004. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant and his representative were in attendance at the hearings. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. The proposed addition would encroach into the required 10-foot easement. The Rolling Hills Community Association granted the applicants 04 1729449 i encroachment permit along the south side of the property to encroach into the easement with the proposed construction. Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.120 is required because it states that every lot in the RAS-1 zone shall have a side yard of not less than 20 feet from the side property line. The applicant is requesting a modification of a previously approved Variance -to -encroach -I -ES -feet -into -the required-20=foot south side yard setback, for a total of 42 square feet encroachment. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is divided by a roadway and the area of the lot where the addition is proposed is small in size in comparison to the average lots in the City. The lot size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates a difficulty in meeting the setback Code requirement. The existing legal nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 10 feet into the side yard setbacks and 20 feet into the front yard setback. The existing residence and proposed additions are modest in size. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same vicinity and zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the side yard will allow the remaining portion of the lot to remain undeveloped, and would minimize grading. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. The residential building pad coverage exceeds the City's guidelines of 30%. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 658 Modification to encroach into the south side yard setbacks, to construct a 154 square foot addition at an existing single family residential development, of which 42 square feet will encroach into the side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan dated December 3, 2003, submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post 2 04 1729449 • • Section 6. Section 17.46.030 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the addition, between the April 2003 approval and the current approval, the applicant proposes to construct 1,153 square foot addition in a 36-month period. With respect to this application the Planning Commission makes the -following -fin -dings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements and disturbed area, except for the encroachment into the setbacks, with the front yard encroachment being pre-existing. The net lot area of the lot is 36,013 square feet, (4.2 acres). The proposed residence (3,160 sq.ft.), existing garage (527 sq.ft:), service yard (96 sq.ft.), and future stable (450 sq.ft.) will have 4,233 square feet of structures, which constitutes 11.8% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including all structures, paved areas and driveway will be 6,767 square feet, which constitutes 18.8% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot will be 24.4%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted, and includes the stable. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the addition will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed addition will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the new construction. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development will not reduce the amount of existing trees and native vegetation. The development plan preserves the rural character of the community. Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post 3 04 1729449 E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. There will be no grading for this project, as the addition will be constructed on an existing building pad. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the project will utilize the existing accessway. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, and as approved in Section 5 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 658 Modification for construction of a 154 square foot addition at an existing single family residential development, of which 42 square feet will encroach into the side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan dated December 3, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance and Site Plan approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.38.070 and 17.42.080, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and Site Plan Review, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated December 3, 2003, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of minimum of 1,000 square feet to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable (450 square feet) and corral (550 square feet) with vehicular access thereto. F. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills, (ORDINANCE NO. 287) pertaining to lighting on said property. Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post 04 1729449 4 • G. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.16.190 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to roof covering. H. Utility lines serving subject property shall be placed underground. I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4,233 square feet or 11.8% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 6,767 square feet or 18.8% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations. K. TIC d �tulbed area of the lot shall not exceed 8,800 square feet or 24.4% in conformance with disturbed area limitations. L. Residential building pad coverage on the 4,940 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 3,783 square feet or 76.5%; coverage on the 1,144 square foot future stable pad shall not exceed 450 square feet or 39.3%0. M. There shall be no grading of the site, except for the future stable. N. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent feasible. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. R. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post 04. 1729449 5 T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. U. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. V. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. W. The drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and the L.A. County Building Division, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner. X. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of a building permit. Y. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. Z. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective. AA. All conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review approvals, that apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. AB. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property which would constitute additional structural development or additional lot disturbance shall require the filing of a new application for discretionary review and approval by the Planning Commission. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO THIS 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. A ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post HAIRMAN 04 1729449 6 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-07 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION THAT WC)i teLD FURTHER ENCROACITINTO THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 658A-MODIFICATION AND 658B SITE PLAN REVIEW, AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5-MR), (POST). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 17, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Reso. 2004-07Mod. Post DEPUTY CITY)CLERK 44 1729449 7