Loading...
888, Construct a pool, walls, light, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 05?i2f' *2016060671 i• T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 888 (SEE EXHIBIT A - ATTACHED) XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES I (We) the undersigned state I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 5-MR) This property is the subject of the above numbered cases and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 888 XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES I (We) certiiffy(. r . flare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Signature J� 14ni I_ ?r Name type or printed Name typed or printed Address Address 17 M t04t.8 -tDc( LN ca.ta.s.. CA- qal City/State City/State See Exhibit A, attached Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CLl;t '{''','''`'"v COUNTY OF } } On l 0, j /lam , before me, +ti , a Notary Public, personally appeared Clakr, !- who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(t is/arty subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheLthey- executed the same in his/he#thei•r-authorized capacity(ies`), and that by his/her/their signature(4on the instrument the person(sj, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s''acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: Name of Notary: ��l t La.t,f f - a - Date Commission Expires aCc1w+ a"'1 �, 70 1 ' Commission No. ''0 9?>0 MAMA u'ttfr'-1:Po CGs tt'a3ic t 0 20')2017 t ctly Put% - Cw.`"Vr li s LC3 Anr.t.1 Cr7,—.ty Lim Cora. Ert'rez Jr.1 7 20111 w?C1-1E4if A RESOLUTION NO. 2016-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION, GRADING, SWIMMING POOL, PORCH, TRELLIS, AND WALLS AND VARIANCES FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH PORTIONS OF THE ADDITIONS, WALLS AND A LIGHTWELL INTO SETBACKS, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED 2.5' AVERAGE HEIGHT OF WALLS IN ZONING CASE NO. 888 AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5-MR), IN THE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT-OZD-1, (POST). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. John Post for a Site Plan Review for a 1,055 square foot addition with 1,260 square foot basement, varying heights, but not to exceed 5' high retaining walls, 492 square foot swimming pool with a spa,100. square foot covered porch, 180 square foot trellis; 1,510 cubic yards of grading (incl. 150 c.y. for future stable and excavation from the pool and basement); and Variances to encroach with the front addition (395 sq.ft.) into the front 30' setback, with 120 sq.ft. of the 660 sq. foot side addition into the side yard setback, including with the basement below, with 125 sq.ft. basement proposed under a portion of the existing residence; to encroach with the walls and basement light well into the side setbacks; to exceed the 2.5'required average height of retaining walls and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot. Additionally, stairs and not to exceed 3' high wall along the stairs will be constructed in the south side yard setback to gain access into the rear of the pool area, construction of which is compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. The property received a condition with past approvals that any additional construction or grading on the lot be reviewed and approved by the Planning Conunission. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on September 15, 2015, and at a field trip and at their regular meeting on October 20, 2015, and on January 19, 2016. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff. The Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the meetings of the Planning Commission. Several neighbors testified in support of the project. Section 3. The property is located in the RAS-1 Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) of the City. The OZD-1 was established within the RAS-1 Zoning District to ZC No. 888 1 allow modernization, reconstruction, or enlargement of homes located on unique lots generally characterized by steep terrain, smaller than typical lots in the City, smaller than typical homes in the City, lots that are divided by a road and lots where redevelopment of the existing home is difficult due to setback requirements. Properties in the OZD-1 are allowed a reduced front yard setback for locating primary structures including attached garages to 30' from the roadway easement line. In addition, an existing encroachment of not more than 10' into the side setback may be reconstructed; however, any new construction must comply with the 20' side yard setback requirement. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Section 17.46.030 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any structure, (with exceptions), may be constructed. Section 17.46.020.A of the Municipal Code requires a Site Plan Review for an addition exceeding 999 square feet, for grading, and walls higher than 3 feet. With respect to the Site Plan Review applications for the improvements subject to the requirements of the above listed Section, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan and surrounding uses because the proposed project complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The construction of the additions will occur in an area previously graded and disturbed and new earthwork will be confined to creating a larger pad for the construction of the pool and related retaining walls to accommodate the building pad and access thereto. The lot size is adequate to accommodate the new addition and related walls and the pool and not look overdeveloped. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot because minimal grading is required for the pad to construct the swimming pool and related terraced areas and the additions will utilize the existing level area of the lot. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed improvements will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with shrubs and trees and is of sufficient distance from nearby ZC No. 888 2 residences so that the proposed project will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of homes in the surrounding RA-S-1, OZD-1 similarly zoned neighborhood. The proposed project entails additions to the living area with a basement, a trellis, swimming pool, pool equipment area, and terraced walls, all of which are common improvements throughout the City. The project site, with the development, will be within the allowed structural coverage (17% proposed, max. permitted 20%) and total coverage of the lot (32% proposed/35% maximum permitted). D. The development plan generally follows natural contours of the site to the maximum extend practicable to accomplish groomed and usable areas of the lot. Natural drainage courses will not be affected by the project. Minimal grading is proposed and therefore existing drainage channels are not anticipated to be impacted. The project construction will not be located in a canyon or on existing slopes that exceed 25%. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed development will utilize the existing driveway approach. F. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is exempt pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. G. The project preserves much of the existing vegetation including trees and will supplement these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping. A landscaping plan will be filed with the City. Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance is required from RHMC Sections 17.16.190F and 17.16.060(B) because the project exceeds the allowed maximum average of wall height of 2.5-feet and the walls and basement light well would be Located in side yard setback. Additionally, a Variance to Section 17.17.030 is required because it states that every lot in the RAS-1, OZD-1 zone shall have a front setback of not less than 30 feet from the roadway easement and for new construction, 20 feet from the side property line. The applicants request a Variance to construct an 395 square foot addition that would encroach into the front 30' setback; 120 square feet of the 660 square foot addition to ZC No. 888 3 encroach into the side setback, including the basement, and in addition, 125 square feet of the basement proposed under a portion of the existing residence would encroach into the side setback. A Variance to Section 17.060.070B is also required because the maximum disturbed area is not to exceed 40% and this project is proposed to exceed maximum disturbance with 50.41%. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to this property that do not apply generally to the other properties in the same zone. The lots along Middleridge are narrow and are divided by the road, leaving very small building pads for construction. For development purposes the road easement plus additional 10' parallel to the road is deducted from the size of the lot; and for Middleridge Lane properties that condition exists on both sides of the road, leaving a smaller net lot area than lots where the road does not intersect the properties. Therefore the disturbed area of the lot is measured against a smaller portion of the lot. The exceedance of disturbance of the lot will result from future construction of the stable and corral and is not related to the current project. The property is exceptional in that the existing rear slope of the property is very steep, up to 1.5:1 slope, and in order to gain flat area in the rear, retaining walls must be used, as typical grading methods would not work in this condition. Additionally, in order to gain some back yard and to "catch" the steep slope, the terraced walks with planters and retaining walls are necessary. Otherwise a very tall wall would be required. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties with similar lot configurations. The side encroachment will be along the line of the current encroachment of the residence. The property is located in the Overlay District of the City, where it has been determined the lots are difficult to develop due to their configuration, size or steepness, and therefore the front setbacks were reduced and side setback encroachment with existing structures could remain and/or be reconstructed. The new addition along the line of the existing encroachment will not be more intrusive or make the side look overdeveloped than exists. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the front setback is in line with some of the other properties along Middleridge Lane North and is in line with the existing ZC No. 888 4 side setback encroachment. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. The area of additions or pool would not impair views. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed additions, pool and walls to create a patio area will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed project will not encroach into potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable stable and corral area exists on the site. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review and Variance application in Zoning Case No. 888 for a 1,055 square foot addition with a 1,260 square foot basement, varying heights, but not to exceed 5' high retaining walls, 492 square foot swimming pool with spa, 100 square foot covered porch, and trellis; all of which require 1,510 cubic yards of grading; and Variances to encroach with the front addition (395 square feet), into the front 30' setback, with 120 square feet of the 660 square foot new addition and new basement, and 125 square foot basement addition, under the existing residence; to encroach with the walls and basement light well into the side setback; to exceed the 2.5' required average height of the retaining walls and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot. Additionally, stairs and not to exceed 3' wall along the stairs will be constructed in the south side yard setback to gain access into the rear of the pool area, construction of which is compliant with the Zoning Ordinance. A. The conditions of approval specified herein shall be printed on all construction plans and shall be available at the construction site at all times. B. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. ZC No. 888 5 C. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. D. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the Zoning Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with, including the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, unless otherwise set forth in this approval, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. All existing overhead utility lines serving the subject property shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030. E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated February 2nd, 2016. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to the Building and Safety Department for issuance of grading and/or building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. The licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/ or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). H. Grading for the project shall not exceed a total of 1,510 cubic yards of cut and fill, which includes future grading for a stable. No grading at this time shall be conducted in the area set aside for a future stable. 585 cubic yards of dirt may be exported from the excavation of the pool and basement. The resulting slopes shall not exceed 2:1 gradient. I. The proposed basement shall not exceed 1,260 square feet and shall meet all requirements of the Los Angeles County Building Code for basements, including exit doors and provision for light and ventilation. ZC No. 888 6 A minimum of four -foot path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the structure, including the basement. The basement light well wall shall not be exposed more than 5' above grade. J. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 6,388 square feet or 17.3% of the net lot area, in conformance with the zoning ordinance limit of 20%. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 11,850 square feet, or 32.1 %, which is in conformance with the zoning ordinance limit of 35%. K. The new infinity pool and spa shall not exceed 492 square feet in total area. The pool equipment shall be screened; if by a solid wall, the wall shall not exceed 4 feet in height at any point from finished grade. Sound attenuating equipment shall be installed to dampen the sound. The swimming pool and the spillway shall utilize the most quiet and technologically advanced equipment to dampen the sound. L. The disturbance of the net lot area shall not exceed 18,623 square feet of surface area or 50.4%. M. Residential building pad coverage on the new 7,920 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 5,758 square feet or 72.7%, which includes the encroachment into the reduced front yard setback. N. Should 5,000 square feet or more of existing landscaping be altered or new landscaping introduced, the applicant shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 13.18 of the Municipal Code. O. The applicant shall submit to the City two copies of a landscaping and irrigation plan prior to obtaining grading permit. All backfilled and graded areas as well as the slope between the walls shall be vegetated utilizing to the greatest extent feasible medium to large size native and drought resistant plants. Plants shall be utilized, which are consistent with the rural character of the community and meet the fire department requirements for fire resistant plants. Any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that will not result in a hedge like screening and as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the project site. P. Pursuant to Section 17.17.030, 60% of the remaining front yard area shall be landscaped, as defined in Section 17.12.250 of the Zoning Ordinance and such area shall be shown on the plans as landscaped area. Q. Minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation to the City. ZC No. 888 7 R. There shall be no dumping of any debris, trash, soil spoils, construction materials or any other matter anywhere on the property. Further, perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, driveways, fences -including construction fences, grading, stairs, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment, except if permitted by the Rolling Hills Community Association. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. During construction, trucks shall not park, queue and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining right-of-way before or after the permitted hours of operations. To the maximum extent possible, staging of equipment and parking of vehicles during construction shall be on site. U. If required by the City's drainage engineer, the applicant shall submit a detailed drainage plan. This project may be subject to the requirements of the City's Low Impact Development portion of the Storm Water Management and Pollution Control ordinance triggered where 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface is reconstructed or added and/or the project is deemed hillside development. V. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to contribute to erosion or in any way affect an easement, trail or adjacent properties. The energy dissipaters, if required, shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails or easements. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and shall be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department requirements for the installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities, and their Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water management, including erosion control measures. X. The property owners shall comply with the LA County Public Health Department requirements pertaining to septic sewer systems. ZC No. 888 8 Y. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements shall be complied with, so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors. Z. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no -smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. AA. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: htM://www.wrh.noaa.eov/!ox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazardTdefinitions#FIR E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AB. The property on which the project is located shall contain a stable and corral or a set aside area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access thereto. AC. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property or this project, which would constitute additional grading, height or structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AD. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variances approvals, as required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective. AE. All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permit. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16 D ATIFST:. �w HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK RY 7BRU RI - a LF, CHHAI 16. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 ZC No. 888 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION, GRADING, SWIMMING POOL, PORCH, TRELLIS, AND WALLS AND VARIANCES FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH PORTIONS OF THE ADDITIONS, WALLS AND A LIGHTWELL INTO SETBACKS, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED 2.5' AVERAGE HEIGHT OF WALLS IN ZONING CASE NO. 888 AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5-MR), IN THE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT-OZD-1, (POST). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 16, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf. NOES: Commissioners Gray and Smith. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. 0118fi,66, HEIDI LUCE CITY CLERK ZC No. 888 10