601, Addition to front entry of exi, Resolutions & Approval Conditionsass 2182949
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.601
11)
ifi;itE\ EF s$ 21 6 Z I
C20 4 J
T Recorder's Use Only
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
,I• W4the undersigned state:
I-asa4We arel'the owned s) of the real property described as follows:
21 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH (LOT 3-MR), ROLLING HILLS, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
f r t-(We arel aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO.601
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PKWelycertify (or declare) under the natty of perjury that the fo going is ru
L
Signature / .nature
GIVE KAMALI ( NAHID KHADIVI AMALI
Name typed or printed
21 N. MIDDLERIDGE LANE
Name typed or printed
21 N. MIDDLERIDGE LANE
Address Address
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On 't RE,e 8 I�ia_before me, . C —r_r -)--
appeared "7 Rta30 � 1 C
personally _ ��/�/ fj/*,_8- ft L ., i< 4 / 15,0L I .-.LLB AL 1
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
name(s) ' subscribed to the within instrument and acknow edged to me thatilatslugtheyxecuted the same
in ?`e authorized capacity(ies) and that by141sPatir ri signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
th n(s) acted, executed the instrument.
o'r"+r. R. COWAN
r Vllitness byhand and official seal.
*'c COMM. #1197846
J ^5 NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
� +' ,,i,y LOS ANGELES COUNTY 'i _ ( '
`,tR.1 ; My Comm. Expires Nov. 3, 2002 i
Signature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
(»r' °DAV1'/ P1-45 TIR,,t PI46J— Rk50Lij,'eiti AM• 14 -17)
•
RESOLUTION NO. 99-17
•
99 2182949
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO EXPAND A FRONT ENTRY
AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE
NO. 601.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Give Karnali with
respect to real property located at 21 Middleridge Lane North (Lot 3-MR),
Rolling Hills requesting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to permit
the expansion of a front entry at an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on September 21, 1999 and October 19, 1999, and
at a field trip visit on October 12, 1999.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard of fifty feet (50') from the front easement line.
The applicant is requesting to add 28 square feet for the expansion of a front entry
which will encroach a maximum of forty-three feet, (43') into the fifty foot (50') front
yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission
finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the residence is located close
to the street and adjacent residences. The existing development pattern on the lot
and the sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the residence on the
lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
RESOLUTION NO. 99-17
PAGE 1
•
49 2132949
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because by
allowing incursion into the front yard there will not be any greater incursion into
the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5 . Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 601 to permit the encroachment
of 28 square feet of additional residential space into the front yard setback with a
maximum encroachment of forty-three feet (43') into the fifty foot (50') front yard
setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 6 of this Resolution.
Section 6. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 5 is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approvalshall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written
notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated August 31, 1999 and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
F. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of these Variance approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective.
G. All conditions of this Variance approval must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-17
PAGE 2
i
409 2132949
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON T'HF 9T I EFAY,O OCTOBER, 1999.
ATTEST:
ry3,„„i„.<?. kitft")
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO EXPAND A FRONT ENTRY
AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE
NO. 601.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
October 19, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta and Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Sommer and Witte.
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
b:
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 99-17
PAGE 3