132, Construct a tennis court in th, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Richard Colyear
Lot 241A-MS
ZONING CASE NO. 132
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Richard Colyear, Lot 241A-MS, Miscel-
laneous Tract, for a conditional use permit under Article III,
Section 3.06, Front Yard Requirements and Section 3.07, Side Yard
Requirements, Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 21st day
of May, 1974 in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building,
2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant,
having submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning
Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as re-
quired by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Richard Colyear,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 241-A-MS,
Miscellaneous Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California,
and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said appli-
cation was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance
No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission finds, further, that no communication, written
or oral, had been received in opposition to the request, and that a
letter had been received from Mr. and Mrs. R. I. Mahan, 33 Crest
Road West, stating that they have no objection to the construction
under specific conditions, specifically that their view is not blocked.
Further, the Commission finds that in approving the tennis court plan
in the front yard, the Board of Directors on April 4, 1974 had imposed
conditions regarding trimming of trees and preservation of view
III.
The Commission further finds that the property on which the
tennis court is planned is a flag lot resulting from subdivision, and
the tennis court will not be on Crest Road, although access is from
Crest Road. Further, the applicant advised the Commission that when
the property was subdivided he had included a condition in the modi-
fication of Deed Restrictions that the property could never be sub-
divided further in order to prevent overdevelopment of the site, and
the conditional use permit is required because the tennis court will
be located in the front yard between the residence and the front
property line. The Commission finds that a conditional use permit
for construction of a tennis court in the front yard should be granted
in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance of Front
Yard Requirements and a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a
tennis court in the front yard under Article III, Section 3.06,
Ordinance No.33 should be granted to Mr. Richard Colyear, Lot 241A-MS,
Miscellaneous Tract, subject to the following conditions:
1) That the conditions imposed by the Board of Directors of the
Rolling Hills Community Association be complied with.
2) That the deed for quitclaim of easement on the southerly
boundary of the property in the area of the tennis court
construction, granted by the Board of Directors, be
presented to the Manager.
3) That three copies of the tennis court plan, incorporating
conditions of approval by the Board of Directors and the
Planning Commission be submitted to the Architectural
Committee,
and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Godfrey Pernell
CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION
ui
TARY, PLANNING) OMISSION