210, Construct a tennis court, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. William Lennartz
Lot 70B-2-MS
ZONING CASE NO. 210.
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. William Lennartz, Lot 70-B-2-MS,
Miscellaneous Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section
3.01 (D), Paragraph 3 (a) of Ordinance No. 150 came on for hearing
on the 16th day of May, 1978 in the Council Chambers of the Adminis-
tration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California,
and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the
application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its
Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. William
Lennartz, is the owner of that certain real property described as
Lot 70-B-2-MS, located at 63 Crest Road East in the City of Rolling
Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said
application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of
Ordinance No. 33 of theCity of Rolling Hills, California. The
Commission finds further that no communications, written or verbal,
were received in favor of or in opposition to the request. Mr.
A. E. Esser, 71 Crest Road East, attended the meeting and spoke in
favor of a permit for the tennis court.
II.
The Commission finds that Mr. Lennartz has requested a
conditional use permit for construction of a tennis court on his
property, which consists of more than six acres, and stated that
there is an existing hedge which would screen the proposed court
from a neighbor, and that recent storm damage to the hedge would
be repaired and the necessary re -planting would be done to provide
additional density. The Commission finds that a conditional use
• •
permit should be granted in order to preserve substantial property
rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and that the granting of such a conditional use permit would not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to pro-
perty in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit should be granted to Mr. William Lennartz, Lot 70-B-2-MS, for
construction of a tennis court, subject to the following conditions:
1) that landscaping be replanted and maintained to provide proper
screening along the easterly boundary of the property as shown on
Exhibit A in the file, and 2) that a ten foot high fence be approved
because of the location, since a tennis court as shown on the plan,
with proper landscaping would not detract from surrounding proper-
ties, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
rwvwv�
retary, Planning Co fission.