Loading...
843 MOD, Grading and construction of a , Application• January 7, 2014 VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: Steve & Lori Wheeler OWNER'S ADDRESS: 38 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO.: (3101386-2128 EMAIL: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 38 Portuguese Bend Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 118 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 AGENT'S NAME: Dan Bolton. Bolton Enaineerina Coro. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue #210. Lomita CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-325-5580 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance: A variance is requested for the project due to the average height of the walls being above 2.5' at the pool pad. The walls at the pool pad will have a max height of 5' and run at that height for the majority of the length except at the ends where it returns on itself and have an average height of approximately 4.75'. The linear length of walls is approximately 190 linear feet. The plans have been revised so that only one 5' wall is required: Additionally, the walls have been changed from MSE walls to conventional retaining walls. This also means that no structural select backfill will be required for the walls. The topographic survey was updated to reflect the current conditions, as there have been changes since the construction of the stair feature, which is why it is now possible to construct the site with only one retaining wall and no import. 12IPage • Criteria to be satisfied for Brant of Variance January 7, 2014 Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The pool pad area requires a 5' wall in order to decrease the amount of grading required to bring the elevation of the existing grade, up to the elevation of the current pool. Due to the steep slope in said area, the length of wall required to join the existing grade after the 5' wall is quite short thereby decreasing the amount of wall <5' which would reduce the overall wall average height. The average wall height variance is also the only variance being requested; all other planning guidelines are met. Additionally, after discussion with the Planning Commission it seemed like it would be more desired to just have one wall, as opposed to two tiered walls which would be 2.5' in height each. This one wall can have landscaping planted in front of it to decrease the appearance of a taller wall. r Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located The change would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building and OSHA codes being followed during the construction process. Additionally the walls will not be easily seen from any major roads so the visual impact will not be as noticeable. Landscaping will also be provided to lessen the visual impact to neighbors. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 13IPage i • • VARIANCE REQUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. Steve and Lori Wheeler PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Road TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 386-2128 EMAIL: PROPERTY ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 118 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 Dan Bolton- Bolton Engineering Corporation AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 325-5580 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. The nature of the proposed project is to construct a new 2,290 S.F. barn with a bottom level of 1,145 S.F., 1,145 S.F. storage loft, 520 S.F. covered walk attached to the stable and additional 550 S.F. open corral. The project will also create a driveway to the second story level of the stable, and an access way to the corral area which also has an attached 270 S.F. trellis. A variance is required due to the stable being placed in both the front yard and front yard setback. If all of the requirements were to be met and the barn placed outside of the front setback, multiple retaining walls would be required to create both the driveway and corral area due to the slope in that area being 2:1 or greater. The disturbed area for the proiect would also greatly increase. An additional variance request is for the rear stable wall to be greater than the allowed 3' wall in the setback. The rear stable wall will be 10.0' and run that height along the entire rear wall. It will then diminish along the south wall and terminate after approximately 15 feet. There will be no retaining wall along the north side of the stable however the wall does continue alone the driveway and returns at the stairway, a portion of this wall will be within the easement. The purpose of this wall is to set the stable into the hill and allow for a corral area without cutting into a larger portion "of the lower slope to create it. -12- r • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The exceptional circumstances or conditions that this site has which would qualify it for a variance is that the overall lot is split into two by Portuguese Bend Road. That there by creates two front yards and two front yard setbacks, along with the roadway easements, which greatly diminish the area in which structures can be built. The lot also contains a 2:1 slope or steeper as you go farther back in the lot. The main portion of lot, to the east of Portuguese Bend Road, is also quite steep in the areas which are not yet developed and a barn could not easily be designed for said area without a large amount of grading. The 10' retaining wall will also only be seen when viewing from the west and will not be seen from Portuguese Bend Road. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The change would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building codes being followed for the building of the structures. Additionally. the closest corner of the stable to the roadway is approximately 28' away so it is highly unlikely that any car would come into contact accidentally with the stable nor would it reduce visibility while driving on the road. The 10' retaining wall will also have a guardrail of sorts on the top of it to prevent cars or people from falling into the corral/ trellis area. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under p alt of perjur that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at 6!/i /24 l7 / lL/� f'75 this 2 7- day of 11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. By: v o, 5Q41 OF so r�F KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WILSON COMM, #1991173 2 By: NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA o LOS ANGELES COUNTY s 4twonN` � My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 9IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE' , California, ,20 2 C-5 cadt0{ )4U Address 6tt616 - , City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: -20- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely uncle st000d. r7,64 t Executed at f fS this o2 7L day of d1111111111111111111111111111111111111. KIM ROSHUN NEVELS WILSON NE a... e My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 v 7111111111111111111111111111111/111111" COMM. #1991173 NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA -a-a LOS ANGELES COUNTY it , California ,201 AddressnG �C U // /IU �fll City -21- • • CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ AFFIDAVIT I, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: this Executed at . California, day of , 20 Signature PUBLIC::Planning Forms in PDF format:Variance Application Rev. 2010 -22- WELLS FARGO All-purpose Acknowledgment California only State of California County of o091\ ? personally appeare before me, --*%.- 1 e- 5 ksc5-.0 , . who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Signature Scanner Enabled Stores should scan this form Manual Submission Route to Deposit Operations DSG5350 CA (12-07113424) (here insert name and title of the officer), d1111111111111111111111111111111111116 SEp�•�Fl � PWi ' ��' . H KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WIL 30N F. °& COMM. #1991173 U NOTARY PUBLIC -CALIFORNL, 7p 4<iFORNP LOS ANGELES COUNTY —` 7111111111� 111111111 Expires11111111 1181111, WITNESS my hand and official seal. %•( I FO01-000DS G5350CA-01 Notary Seal • • VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Steve and Lori Wheeler #38 Portuguese Bend Road (310) 386-2128 EMAIL: PROPERTY ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 118 AGENTS NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 Dan Bolton- Bolton Engineering Corporation 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 325-5580 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. A third variance is requested for the project due to the average height of the walls being above 2.5' at both the pool pad and the house pad. The walls at the pool pad will have a max height of 5' and run at that height for the maioritv of the length except at the ends where it returns on itself and have an average height of approximately 3.75'. The linear length of walls is approximately 425 linear feet. The walls on the house pad will have a max height of 4' and have an average height of 3.75' as well. The linear length of walls on the house pad will be approximately 405 linear feet. -12- • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The pool pad area requires 5' walls in order to decrease the amount of grading required to bring the elevation of the existing grade up to the elevation of the current pool. Due to the steep slope in said area the length of wall to join the existing grade after the 5' wall is quite short thereby decreasing the amount of wall <5' which would reduce the overall wall average height. As to the house pad, the same problem exists, in that bringing the wall back to a 0' height occurs quite quickly due to the approx. 2:1 slope in the joining area. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The change would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building and OSHA codes being followed during the construction process. Walls of 5' in height will already be being built on the site so the average height of the wall being - 1.25' above the required average height will not be detrimental. Additionally the walls will not be easily seen from any major roads so the visual impact will not be as noticeable FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- • REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: Steve and Lori Wheeler #38 Portuguese Bend Road (310) 386-2128 #38 Portuguese Bend Road LOT NO. 118 EMAIL: ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 Dan Bolton- Bolton Engineering Corporation AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO: (310) 325-5580 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. The nature of the proposed project is to construct a new 2,290 S.F. barn, 515 S.F. open air corral and 520 S.F. covered walk to be used as a corral. The conditional use is permitted under section 17.18.050 of the zoning ordinance. The stable meets the requirements of being greater than 200 S.F. and also will be designed for agricultural purposes only. The only requirement which is not met is that the stable is located in the front yard setback. The stable will have three stalls, each with an approximate area of 165 S.F. which open to the covered walk and corral area The tack room is approximately 250 S.F. and includes a 65 S.F. bathroom containing a toilet. The remainder of the lower level (401 S.F.) is used as a stairwell to the second level and horse care / walkway area. The second level of-12- 1,145 S.F. will be used as a storage area and is accessible directly from the driveway and also has a stairwell to the first level. • • Will the proposed use be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? The proposed stable will be compatible with the uses in the surrounding areas due to it being of appropriate size and height for a stable in Rolling Hills and also using minimal grading and retaining walls to construct the barn pad. If the stable was designed to meet the setback requirements multiple retaining walls would be required, due to it being placed farther back in the property in an area of 2:1 slope or steeper. The lots surrounding this property also differ from others in Rolling Hills in that they are split by Portuguese Bend Road which decreases the Net Lot Area and also makes it so that there area essentially two front yards, making it quite difficult to build a stable in the secondary lot. Currently it appears that only one lot of the secondary lots surrounding the property have any structures built on it and it appears to be a small barn and corral. Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? The Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with an in furtherance of the public health, safety and general welfare due to all of the appropriate building codes being followed, for the building of the structure, and the horse corral being fully fenced in. FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under, ty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this GP f By: .1111111111111111111111111111111111111L �,.:SE:."' '"F KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WILSON! *' v �,} = COMM. #1991173 n �: ffin �:'r.:,, a fn 9U1 t : ,�., �, ; NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA j ` LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 7111i111111111111111111111111111111111P // J } , California, .20 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( ) PROJECT ADDRESS: -20- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). • The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at »/Zi 1--7&71e}? this c 9 / day of �� / I / ins / . 20 / _ "5 .elllllliulllluuulllululloilliioluuiuld .. 11111 NM KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WILSON COMM. #1991173 9, NOTARY PUBLIC. CAUFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY "` us 't111111iiiliini�iiinuIuII i ouoee By: . California By: i—e--)2744 k-ge--4,,,,,,,.6afdpoc Addreozzi„ ,a/z5 -21- CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CER1'IFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: this Executed at , California, day of . 20 Signature PUBLIC::PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Conditional Use Permit Application rev. 2010.doc -22- • • WELLS FARGO All-purpose Acknowledgment California only State of California County of g 1 ' rr 'JC t 1 U OriC��� V(1)� before me,, \k u- �"� (here insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared vet € '�1�� -e_\-0-Y QM °\ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Signatur Scanner Enabled Stores should scan this form Manual Submission Route to Deposit Operations DSGS350 CA(12-07 113424) .i11111i111111111111111111111111e11rt1 . a 8 KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WILS(IN COMM. #1991173 2 NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA a `FOpNp LOS ANGELES COUNTY -` My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 'h ill 111111111e11111111111111111111111i11p WITNESS hand and official seal. FO01-00 )DSG5350CA-01 Notary Seal • January 7, 2014 REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Steve & Lori Wheeler 38 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (310) 386-2128 EMAIL: 38 Portuguese Bend Road LOT NO. 118 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 Dan Bolton. Bolton Enaineerina Coro. 25834 Narbonne Avenue #210. Lomita CA 90717 310-325-5580 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Piz Review: The proposed project consists of an addition to the existing structures on the lower pad at #38 Portuguese Bend Road. The lower pad is currently improved with a pool and guest house which can be accessed via a newly constructed stair feature or a gravel driveway. The new additions include a proposed 860 S.F. covered patio, a 90 S.F. pool equipment area, 1,208 S.F. of new pool decking and a 90 S.F. spa which is to be located at the northern end of the pool pad. A new 5' maximum height retaining wall is proposed to bring the existing grade up to the elevation of the current pool and deck; it will be used to create a flat grass area and the additional pool decking. An existing 75 Sq.Ft. sauna attached to the guest house will be removed as part of this plan. A Site Plan Review is required due to the grading required for the project and the addition of the covered patio area & pool equipment area. A future stable of 720 S.F. and corral of 1,060 S.F. are also included in the calculations. Said stable will be located at the northern corner of the property and will be accessed through a gravel access way which will take off of the existing gravel driveway connected to the lower pad. 121 Page • • January 7, 2014 Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: None SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The project is compatible with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses in that the spa, covered patio area and grass area meet all of the planning requirements, with the Building Coverage recommendation being met even before the allowed deductions. Additionally all structures and walls are outside of the setbacks for the pool area portion. The future stable is located at the northern most corner of the property and is located 35' from the side property line, which is allowed per the zoning code for RAS-2. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The project preserves and integrates into the existing site design by building in an area which already has been disturbed. The retaining wall is used to reduce the amount of grading required and the existing topography has been used where possible. As the pool area has already been disturbed, there will be no further destruction of trees, vegetation or drainage courses. As for the future stable, it was decided that locating it on this side of Portuguese Bend Road would be less detrimental to the overall site and community. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The project follows the natural contours by utilizing the flat pad previously created to extend the pool deck onto and minimizes the amount of existing slope being destroyed by using a retaining wall to reduce the cut/fill area. An existing dirt flat pad was used as the bottom of the retaining wall along the northern side of the project and the slope within that area will be reconstructed to have a more uniform slope and look. The future stable was located in such a way that the largest amount of natural contours were able to be used as well as balancing the grading. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The project preserves the native vegetation by minimizing the grading as much as possible. There is quite a distance between the proposed project and the neighboring property with an approximately 13IPage • • January 7, 2014 2:1 slope being a buffer zone. A Landscaping Plan will be prepared at a later date showing proposed landscaping for the project area. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Building coverage is minimized by only proposing buildings which will fit well with the newly proposed pad and not be overcrowded. The covered patio on the pad will be open in nature and will not create a pad that is simply filled with closed in structures. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The plan is harmonious in scale and mass with the site as the Structural Coverage, Disturbed Area and Flat -work Coverage are not exceeded and the Building Pad coverage are under the allowed 30% for both existing and proposed conditions. Finally, the proposed pool pad additions are well outside of the setbacks. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The Site Plan is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles as the addition is located on the lower pad and connects to the existing driveway with a gravel road arid stairs. The only vehicles which will be accessing the new addition are that of the owners and possibly pool cleaners. The future stable will take access the same way from Portuguese Bend Road and a new future access road will connect the lower pad to the future stable. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The Site Plan is sensitive conforms with the requirements of C.E.Q.A and will not have any significant impacts to the, environment. 14IPage • January 7, 2014 I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 151Page • • REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: Steve and Lori Wheeler #38 Portuguese Bend Road (310) 386-2128 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 118 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 008 PARCEL 002 EMAIL: AGENT'S NAME: Bolton Engineering Corporation AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO: (310) 325-5580 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: The proposed project consists of (1) an addition to the existing structures on the lower pad at #38 Portuguese Bend Road and (2) a new barn and associated improvements. The lower pad is currently improved with a pool and quest house which can be accessed via a newly constructed stair feature or a gravel driveway. (3) New MSE Retaining wall and grading to raise grade of area surrounding house pad.(1) The new addition will include a proposed 860 S.F. covered patio, a 90 S.F. pool equipment area, 1,208 S.F. of new pool decking and two 90 S.F. spas, one connecting to the existing pool and one at the northern edge of the pool decking. In addition to these structures multiple retaining walls, four foot max. height will be used to create a flat grass area and the additional pool decking. An existing 75 Sq.Ft. spa attached to the guest house will be removed as part of this plan. (2)Additionally, a 2,290 S.F. stable, 550 S.F. open air corral, 520 S.F. covered walk and 270 S.F. trellis area area along with a new driveway, horse access way and stairway area are proposed for the undeveloped portion of the lot to the west of Portuguese Bend Road. A Site Plan Review is required due to the grading required for the project and the -12-addition of the covered patio area, pool equipment area, stable and trellis. (3) The new MSE wall will be 4' max and wrap around the house pad. • Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage N/A SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The project is compatible with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses in that the spas, covered patio area and ;grass area meet all of the planning requirements, with the Building Coverage recommendation being met even before the allowed deductions. The stable does not meet the building pad recommendation, however the pad area was calculated using the area outside of the easement and <10% as no portion of the building is outside of the front setback. Additionally all structures and walls are outside of the setbacks for the pool area portion. The stable is located in the front yard setback and requires a variance. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The project preserves and integrates into the existing site design by building in an area which already has been disturbed. The retaining walls are used to reduce the amount of grading required and the existing topography has been used where possible. As the pool area has already been disturbed, there will be no further destruction of trees, vegetation or drainage courses. The western portion of the lot has not been disturbed but the amount of disturbance was minimized as much as possible due to placement of the stable and corral. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an, existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The protect follows the natural contours by utilizing the flat pad previously created to extend the pool deck onto and minimizes the amount of existing slope being destroyed by using retainina walls to reduce the fill area. An existina dirt flat pad was used as the bottom of the retaining wall along the spa side of the project and the slope within that area will be reconstructed to have a more uniform slope and look. The stable was located in such a way that the largest amount of natural contours were able to be used. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The project preserves the native vegetation by minimizing the grading as much as possible. -13- • • There is quite a distance between the proposed project and the neighboring property with an approximately 2:1 slope being a buffer zone. A Landscaping Plan will be prepared at a later date showing proposed landscaping for the project area. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Building coverage is minimized by only proposing buildings which will fit well with the newly proposed pad and not be overcrowded. The covered patio on the pad will be open in nature and will not create a pad that is simply filled with closed in structures. The stable will be set into the hill and by doing so dramatically reduce the amount of Grading required for the corral and driveway areas F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. Pool Area:The plan is harmonious in scale and mass with the site as the Structural Coverage, Disturbed Area and Flat -work Coverage are not exceeded and the Building Pad coverage is under the allowed 30% for both existing and proposed conditions. Finally, the proposed additions are well outside of the setbacks. Stable Area: The Stable is within the front yard setback and required a variance but by being in the setback the amount of grading is reduced and retaining walls are minimized. The size of the stable is comparable to others in the area. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. Pool Area: The Site Plan is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles as the addition is located on the lower pad and connects to the existing driveway with a aravel road and stairs. The only vehicles which will be accessina the new addition are that of the owners and possibly pool cleaners. Stable: The driveway up to the stable will have a slope of - 5% and the horse access-wav will have a slop e of 20%. The upper driveway will allow for hav delivery and for cars/ trucks to turnaround. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The Site Plan is sensitive conforms with the requirements of C.E.Q.A and will not have any significant impacts to the environment. -14- • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evalu the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are tru correct to he 1pest of my knowledge and belief. Date. o2 / c.2-6/( Signatu� For: Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ti • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) sq. ft Pool Stable —2,250 —3,500 sq. ft 0 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS —5,750 sq. ft. OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: El GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) 0 SITTING WALL / BENCH 0 WALKWAY OR PATIO TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE El -21- • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under sty of perjury,that the foregoing is jrue and correct. aExecuted at /, this c2,2 ay of ) G •1IllIIIIlI umiII1IIIIIJIIIIIIouIIuIa.By: f- � , .� , KIM ROSHUN NEVELS�NILSON i"y: ;a W ��� };.4 COMM. #1991173 co f. ' iy ° NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA III ,, op;,;. LOSANGELESCOUNTY -` A My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 aaaaaaalaaaaaaaaaaaiaauIaaailtalaaaauI . California, ,20 l (19) S LISP ieito:6eAid_Aratk) Addr,,o� thinA. 91).9 City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: -22- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understo, this Executed at 02 /74 h / 6 day of dllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllll. MN MN NI OM KIM ROSHUN NEVELS-WILSON COMM, #1991173 NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA Zi LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Expires 09/15/2016 7iu.lul11Illllllllillllllllllllllllll&' By By: (LTh Addres City -23- . California ,20 / • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: this Executed at , California, day of , 20 Signature PUBLIC:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2010.doc -24- • WELLS FARGO All-purpose Acknowledgment California only State of California County of oPs\-1e —\'\ I I� before me, 1� l oe\ (hereinsert name and title of the officer), personally appeared J\� who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. Scanner Enabled Stores should scan this form Manual Submission Route to Deposit Operations 05G5350 CA (12-07 113424) .11111111111111111/11RDnr"5�9e1g1111116 WITNESS my h nd official seal. —0 ZV-1 FO01-0 )0DS G5350CA-01 KIM Rr ;,I vELS-0/ILS3N 199117:'i :ic • aL,IFORNIA C0UN1Y —` My C • _,cpres 09/15/2016 1111't ag ii111111111111111111111P Notary Seal t/lolly Chang Z DATE: -'37"717" ZONING CASE NO.: 843 ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 192,980 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 192,980 sq.ft RESIDENCE 5,112 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 5,112 sq.ft GARAGE 761 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 761 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 848 sq.ft 15 sq.ft 863 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 90 sq.ft 90 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE : 653 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 653 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE (dirt volume to be 0 sq.ft 720 sq.ft 720 sq.ft included in grading quantities RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft 0, sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 525 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 525 sq.ft ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 87 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 87 sq.ft BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, BARBEQUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN,ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq.ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. SERVICE YARD OTHER: BASEMENT AREA: (Volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURE %STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 860 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 860 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 113 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 113 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 8,099 sq.ft 4.20% sq.ft EXCLUDING UP TO 5 AND UP TO 800 sq.ft. 8,099 sq.ft detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 4.20% sq.ft 1,685 sq.ft 0.87% sq.ft 9,784 sq.ft 5.07% sq.ft 1,685 sq.ft 9,784 sq.ft 0.87% sq.ft 5.07% sq.ft 16 ' Y • DATE: 1/7/2014 ZONING uASE NO.: 843 ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend ti ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK %TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE %TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up Ito 5- 800 sq.ft. structures from previous liage. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral, and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL 8,621 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 8,621 sq.ft 5,153 sq.ft 360 sq.ft 5,513 sq.ft 1,712 sq.ft 1,208 sq.ft 2,920 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 15,486 sq.ft 1,568 sq.ft 17,054 sq.ft 8.02% 0.81% 8.84% 23,585 sq.ft 3,253 sq.ft 26,838 sq.ft 12.22% 1.69% 23,585 sq.ft 3,253 sq.ft 12.22% 1.69% 58,463 sq.ft 30.29% 13.91% 26,838 sq.ft 13.91% 9,500 sq.ft 67,963 sq.ft 4.92% 35.22% Including Over-ex/Re-compaction/Select Backfill: 1,790 C.Y. Only Cut / Fill: 970 X All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. E *Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fireplace, etc. are not counted towards coverage and disturbed area unless their combined area exceeds 80 sq.ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. 17 DATE: 1/7/2014 ZONING *SE NO.: 843 ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1- MAIN RESIDENCE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 34,363 RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE SPORTS COURT SERVICE YARD sq.ft 5,112 sq.ft 761 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 113 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 34,363 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 5,112 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 761 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 113 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED1PORCHES Primary Residence 525 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 525 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 13.8 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 13.8 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE 87 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 87 sq.ft COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0' sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 6,598 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 6,598 sq.ft %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 19.20% sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft 19.20% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, 6,087 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 6,087 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 17.71% sq.ft 0.00% sq.ft 17.71% sq.ft 18 DATE: 1/7/2014 ZONING 110,E NO.: 843 ADDRE : #38 Portuguese Bend CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2- Pool Area Pad BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD ii 7,185 sq.ft 2,133 sq.ft 9,318 sq.ft RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 90-75 848 sq.ft 15 sq.ft 863 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft 90 sq.ft 90 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE " 653 sq.ft sq.ft 653 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED, PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 0 sq.ft 860 sq.ft 860 sq.ft (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 1,501 sq.ft 965 sq.ft 2,466 sq.ft %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 20.89% sq.ft 10.36% sq.ft 26.47% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises", Not incl. allowed deductions, 1,501 sq.ft 965 sq.ft 2,466 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 20.89% sq.ft 10.36% sq.ft 26.47% sq.ft 19 DATE: 1/7/2014 ZQNING kSE NO.: 843 ADDRE ': #38 Portuguese Bend CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 3- STABLE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 0 sq.ft 2,685 sq.ft 2,685 sq.ft RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA' sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft - sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE 0 sq.ft 720 sq.ft 720 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE , 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 0 sq.ft 720 sq.ft 720 sq.ft %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0.00% sq.ft 26.82% sq.ft 26.82% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises; Not incl. allowed deductions, 0 sq.ft 720 sq.ft 720 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0.00% sq.ft 26.82% sq.ft 26.82% sq.ft 20 • DATE: 1/7/2014 ZONING AT NO.: 843 ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Pad 2: Pool Pad Grading Ouantities: CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List Pool Eqpt. Covered Patio For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation !� For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT TOTAL IMPORT Balanced FILL For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List Pool Eqpt. Covered Patio For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location 0 N/A 20 4' West Wall 30 .75' N/A 0 N/A 250 6' At Top of Wall 0 N/A 4.5' South Spa 5 100 0 0 0 N/A 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 300 7.5' East and North Walls 0 - N/A 5 3.5' N/A 100 TOTAL FILL 405 TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing Dad elevations Finished Floor Finished Grade ProDosed Dad elevations Finished floor Finished grade AL GRADING 810 (No Over -ex/ Recompaction/Select Backfill): Guest House 472.00 471.50 Other Pad: Covered Patio 471.00 470.50 610 21 DATE: 1/7/2014 ZONING AE NO.: 843 ADDRESS: #38 Portuguese Bend Pad 3: Future Stable Grading Ouantities: CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition (Stable) For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT TOTAL IMPORT Balanced FILL For house/addition (Stable) For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction TOTAL FILL TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing pad elevations Finished Floor Finished Grade Proposed pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Cubic Yds. 120 60 310 490 0 120 60 310 490 Max Depth 3.5' 2.0' 4.0' 2.0' Max Depth Location N/A N/A N/A N/A Cut Slope N/A N/A 0 N/A Corral N/A N/A Fill Slope N/A TOTAL GRADING 980 (No Over -ex/ Recompaction/Select Backfill): Stable 427.50 Other Pad: Corral 427.00 427.00 427.00 360 22