699, Construct a stable in the fron, Application12/04/2004 16:55
760771413E
•
C4'
MAGAUGD PAGE 02
0/ t2 fl..s �fl,
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be
made conforming or shalt be removed Therefore, you may be required to moth or remove any unauthorized or unlawful
use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No,
900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without
the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher
application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: A C `5 T I c3 5 v
OWNERS ADDRESS: 4 S AA (l U Rs"+ (2 n . 2 t-1 cr Ca_ c) 0 .7 4-
TELEPHONE NO.: (3 (o) 4 G- - i3 -, GJ
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4-0 P c.)2 r u [--, v E C=. = r.Z D i2 .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7 t5 PAGE 00 3 PARCEL O 0 3
AGENT'S NAME: 1.) Cz I 1 (,) C�1
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 70 7 I (av [z 5 i'u tZ D , P.. t-1, l; , Ca - -7 4-
TELEPHONE NO.: (3 10) 4 4- c,, v k Q
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO, 2 PORTUGUESE REND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(MI 0) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377.7208
E mail; cityafrti®aol.com
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance.
r3 LS . ( LA r 1= c ca n)
®Pnrsled Orb Beau. JAC; 1'.,u n:r
12/04/2004 16:55 7607714138 MAGAUGD PAGE 03
Criteria to be satijsficd for,grani qiipriance
Such change is based upon th.. following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
(=oC-1oo TG✓C. rr TE-cG Rr7r-\1 r' YAt2i�
t-it-I&. L l PLACt;;�
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or
improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
t—i AJ . iN)ra E17 c / G.r
FILING FED
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.
12/04/2004 16:55 7607714138 MAGAUGD
•
PAGE 04
REQUEST ,Qg HEARiNG
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
NOTE: According to Section'17.24,020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. illegal uses or. structures ore required to be
mode conforming or shall be rcmored. herefi7re. you m wY he required to modi y or remora any unauthorized or unla»fu1
use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No.
900 of the City Council. any ,usc or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without
the acquisition of said permit' .shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, .and is subject to higher
application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: 11 c.) S ; ► c v
OWNER'S ADDRESS: EA t-.► 2 D t 12- 0 Z 7¢
TELEPHONE NO: (31 n 1 c - 8 ;3 <
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 4 0 P o l'L T U Cz U G. L: 13 L r n Q O.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 l 9
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 717 (a 9 PAGE 0 08 PARCEL 0 3
AGENT'S NAME: o l_ U Gt ► iJ C CC ca t C—t
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 707 k•ZO, R..l-l.l= . Ca,.6)v274
TELEPHONE NO: i3 t ) 4- 4- - ( 0 1 U
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site
Plan Review:
1\1 c v.) 1-1 0 nilc_. `►-► a i j2(r Q [) ► t2 �. p-- m n 0.1)
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage ' ( 0 U . C
12/04/2004 16:55 7607714138 MAGAUGD PAGE 05
• •
SHE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding_ Describe
in detail the projects conformance with the criteria below:
A. is the project compatible with the General Pectin. the Zoning Ordincm a and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes. setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses_
/-I M e / S i) e 4 c - /A2t 7-/-/ 1A / _/A / C/,�//) i=/ / � c e5 /
�.,`/ / S /2� s! (n/'e/) -� n �' l� rr�� �2 s1 f A/� /(,' s / -cG
B. How does the project presene and integrate into the site design, to the cnarimuun extent feasible. existing manual
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, ntature trees. drainage courses, and land fonns
(such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features-
{4G btiG c)tT'? G-2(T>.INI) C1 M4T/afrl5 r! C_
>N�:Rn(� �r-IAP 0J-7 r xr , a,1.)cLi �a�Gi�TFJ
I )/ T "/o r) r /N 7 ,? ,c '/Afe Leis rz-/ /7.49,4 ^/A lam/-` n02
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to tninitnie grading? Extensive grading and
recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and
contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow
unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on Lots.
iNE 6Q74>>./Ni;- / k t7 T ei r e) ... /� Ca:/1 ri�.4 L
,e/A /9 't .Q / i 7 [�s!
D. To what extent does the site development plats presenv surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should proms
a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
4) L. i f? G /5 /--/At/' ' G
/ ��A/ -- / -/1
12/04/2004 16:55
760771413E
MAGAUGD PAGE 06
•
E. How does the site development plan present Me natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot covtrage permitted
should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
A5 /'"ieC' t// n 0 7/4/ 5 /VQ
C/-/% Af-7 L % D r _//r �` X/ 7-/ /4l/a /49 /Q. i
F,
Is the sire development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain ad surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary
to assure proportionality and openness.Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
i / 1 /5 (S' ,�-A 47 / r 1-763 e (Vi�L.eif" G/t(T
/S 'ECG i T / r v�f / //+/
G. Is the sire developtnent plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians mei
vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and
other on -site parking or storage areas.
A/4 C/-/ A. h/ l-A J < % r/`/ice`/-1 71,7F %7J �iE ,Y/ s %/it <(*
e GZ 4( s- 1/1 g GCr
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment. a.g. significant impact. proposed mitigation measures-
/V 1) T
12/04/2004 16:55
760771413E
•
MAGAUGD
•
PAGE 07
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts,
statements and other information presented are true and correct to the/best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: , / / — 2 C� cO ¢ 4
Signature
For: 4 s
Applicant
FILINCE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
• f.16.te 4r"--cj±1,,
DATE, - t -09 ZONING CASE NO.
ADDRESS
0 <l3R.
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES
NET LOT AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
POOL EQUIPMENT
GUEST HOUSE
CABANA
STABLE (dirt volume to be included
in grading quantities)
RECREATION COURT
ATTACHED COVERED
PORCHES
ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE,
BREEZEWAYS
EXISTING
ATTACHED TRELLISES
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO,
BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN,
ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft.
high and over 120 sq. ft. in area,
WATER FEATURES, ETC.
SERVICE YARD
OTHER
BASEMENT AREA
(volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO
600 sq. ft. detached structures that
are not higher than 10 ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
Ille(V)°\
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
I e 5, ZOB sq.ft.
v sq.ft.
t 776, sq.ft.
t I DO sq.ft.
G 0 sq:ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
5"7S
Z402
t0(b
6
6 6 1-0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft. 16_S t4.5 sq.ft.
rlo ` %
sq.ft.
c10
TOTAL
242.0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft. (' (,Z)
sq.ft.(-- 7,2,0)
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft. (/
sq.ft.
sq.ft. (_H s
sq.ft.
675 sq.ft. ( 3cf'()
sq.ft.
7 3 sq.ft.(.f-T
sq.ft.
sq.ft. (ZS)
f 2.7 sq.ft. (k 51)
sq.ft.
.-15'6 sq.ft.
16,031 sq.ft.
8.7 '7o
2q
sq.ft. r/
a'2124 %
03
t.-% ljt-tcuTek AL46,1 jolAcv\
q ub
(/
sq.ft.
• •
ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON T3-Ir. PLA
PRIMARY DRIVEWAYS) sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS, PATIO
AREAS, COURTYARDS sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft.
OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS,
ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING
PADS
TOTAL FLATWORK
c/o TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
9a TOTAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 600 sq. ft.
structures from previous page.
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
wieeztv-d pe—
,.prGc,,l rib
12, l GO sq.ft. i 3, 43 23 U sq.ft.
29.75 sq.ft.
3ZO0 sq.ft.
6-r-720)
2,594 sq.ft. (— 3 $1
32-t 6 sq.ft. e I6
sq.ft. sq. ft.
IS 335 sq.ft. 19 , (,c U sq.ft.
sq.ft. 3 4, 5 0 sq.ft. 3h.7Z 7 sq.ft.
n%n 1 a. Ya % i c, 3 %n
�.rna�
sq.ft. sq.ft. 35, 654 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE % % { ci .3 %
TOTAL DISTURBED
AREA
% DISTURBED AREA
GRADING QUANTITY
(include future stable, corral and
access way; basement and all other
areas to be graded)
sq.ft. 6(,Dav sq.ft. (7)17, Isq.ft.
nln 35.7 % 3b.13 %
-3 9 a fD cubic yards
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.
Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue,
outdoor -re place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area
exceeds r 00 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property.
DATR,5~t(3 -Qc? Z.C. NO. ADDRESS 4-0 P.a2.
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
AND STRUCTURES
BUILDING PAD sq.ft. t Z,OEOsq.fr. h g,qGOsq ft
RESIDENCE sq.ft. 94Q0 ty.ft. 94c10 sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. l `l Z ( sq.ft. VI 1 �- sq.ft.
POOL/SPA sq.ft. t 10 0 sq.ft. 9 34 sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. 60 sq.ft. 72. sq.ft.
—
CABANA/REC.RIII sq.ft. sq.ft, sq.ft.
—
GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. r' sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq. ft. 5 7 ' sq ft 57sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 12? sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence sq.ft. 24-02 sq.ft. 2420 sq.ft.
Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. t A ci 3 sq ft 1 47 t sq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED to°r'o OF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAYIPORTE COCI-IERE/
BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. t _D L 6 sq.ft. G 7 5 sq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
(from I" page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
(from I' page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. 1 h, 1 sq.ft. 16t W1 sq ft
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4o 3 t -7 ok V •2- %
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. (o sq ft (5060 _sq.ft.
Not incl. attached trellises,
Not incl. allowed deductions,
and incl. the arca of covered porches that
exceed IQ% of the size of the residence/aces. structures.
ck BUILDING PAD COVERAGE u/o 2.9. q °0 2'c*
11,
LLy ofi21otn� ✓ V _ 3 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Date Filed Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) A L 5 '7 / /./ 5 U TeL ( 3 t 0) r-5 4 4- S 3
Address 4 3 E/- 7-1 5- 7- /2D ,Q ,/, C, er7 C) 2 2 7 4-
2. Legal Owner(s) / G) Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address ci a ,P) i IJL1 LJ€ 3 C /3 G/c//7 'l7
Assessor's Book No. 7 573 n - d C) 3 - v a 3 Lot No. / 1
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing zoning district Q A 5 - 2.
6. Proposed project/use of site Vic- 5 ID i /J f A L.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 6-
, i' 7 0 AGi2E5
8. Net lot area 18 5. 20 Y, s. "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 2 0, 3 ec.
10. Number of floors of construction 0 A/L-
11. Basement square footage 3 6 0 0 • -�
I-1
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
@Printed on Recycled 1':ip;r
• •
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 3 ?, `5 9 5,
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? A L L
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? /-) L L.
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? /'✓U
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? /'/c7 (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? Chit/G Proposed?
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? L / / Proposed? 2 0
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? `/L 5 Proposed? —"
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 5 e/v Proposed? 6-
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? A./0
Explain
9•
Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is
located? N'
Explain
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? NO
Explain
i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or
less? r/e 5 Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 3 o/v .
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? With guest house a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 5 (4 O . Amount fill 5/4-C) .
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet 7 2; 4 4 0 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 3 g, 2 5 .
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet / /, f3 4 0
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-2
' 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
/V, .
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N.A
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling. n 5 n fP
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
A/6 loci i) G/a .)
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-3
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
Geology Report
Hydrology Report
Soils Report
Traffic Study
Noise Study
Biological Study
Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
Solid Waste Generation Report
Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
1-4
Yes
X
No WA
Historical Report
Archaeological Report
_ Paleontological Study
Line of Sight Exhibits
Visual Analysis
Slope Map
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Air Quality Report
Hazardous Materials/
Waste
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant With
Impact Incorporation
noorpora
Issues:
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS— Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 (�
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 li
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 ❑ 0 14
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which 0 0 0 ti
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ 0 ❑
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ 0 0
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ D ❑
.44
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
❑ ❑ ❑
III. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 ❑ 0
applicable air quality plan?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-6
ss Than
Potentially Signficannt With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ❑ ❑ ❑
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0 131
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
❑ ❑
❑• ❑ ❑
❑ 1s
IV, 'BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 ❑ 0
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat ❑ ❑ 0
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 0 0 !�
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 ❑
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting ❑ 0 ❑
biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-7
ss Than •
Potentially Sign ficantt With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
V . CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ 0 ❑ k1
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 0 fill'
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 ❑ 0
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 0 X
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 ❑
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 0 0 0 D
liquefaction? �t
iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 l
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0
c). Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 ❑ 1i
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- ❑ 0 0
1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life and property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
-.8
❑ ❑ ❑ l5i
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
• •
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ 0 ❑
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ 0 0 g
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0 RI
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ 0 14
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0 Ygr
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 0 0 lir
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 ❑ Id
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ 0 0 14
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-9
Less Than
Than
Potentially Significant With Less Significant
No
Significant mitigation
Slc p
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ 0 0 lid
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0 le
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able
level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 ti
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 ❑ ❑ (�
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 0
the capacity of existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 ❑ 0 13(
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 tif
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 ❑
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, 0 0 0 kf
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ 0
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-10
• •
Potentially Less Than Less Than
Significant Significant With significant No
Mitigation 9
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
IX. LAND USE AND .PLANNING— Would the
project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ 0
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ° 0 ❑
natural community conservation plan?
0
X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important 0 ❑ ❑
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
(21
XI. NOISE— Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ 131
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
•
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 p 0
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 0 lEr
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 14
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 Id
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
.51
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
Less •
Potentially Sig ican Thant With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
XI1. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the
project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
❑ ❑ ❑
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 ❑ 0
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? 0 ❑ 0 0
Police protection? 0 0 0 rEf
Schools? 0 0 0 te
Parks? 0 0 0 tEr
Other public facilities? 0 0 0 te
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 0 ❑
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be.
accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
I-12
• •
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less -Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ 0 0
• relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections?
b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 �(
service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 ❑ V
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ 0 0 jgj
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ 0 0 Iiid
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 *I/
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 [gf
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 0
applicable Regional Water Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 jgj
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ❑ ❑ II
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 ❑ 11
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-13
•
Potentially
Significant
Impact
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS —Would
the project:
a) During construction result in potential impact on storm ❑
water runoff?
b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm 0
water runoff?
c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas ❑
from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling,
vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing),
waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo(
work areas?
d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that
provide water quality benefit?
e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause ❑
significant harm on the biological integrity of the
waterways and water?
f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑
velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause
environmental harm?
g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of ❑
the project site or surrounding areas?
1-14
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
•
Less Than
Significant
Impact
0
❑ 0
❑ ❑
❑ 0
❑ 0
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ 0
❑ 0
No
Impact
Isf
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
• •
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
XVII1. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE ,1
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ❑ 0 Id
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 Igi
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 0 til
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-15
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant
to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
these lists.
Date / 2 -a 7- 04
For
Signature
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: thereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 12 - 7 -
For
L 7/( "V-Z
Signature
svi
Applicant
1-17
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
•
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I, JANE KOBZEFF declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains
the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the
County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a
1000
distance of feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as
follows:
Property address: 40 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills
APN #: 7569-008-003
Legal description: Lot 119, Rolling Hills Tract
Date: November 24, 2004
Signed: /\-/ A.A.?.
Subscribe ji d sworn to before me this
/f 0, vte-e-,o
Notary Public
,0
24th day of November, 2004
FRANCENE D. URALMAN
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
COMMISSION # 1324574
My Comm. Exp, October 9, 2005
LOS ANGELES COUNTY E
C:\DATA\WORD\MAPPING\MASTERS\CertOwnersList.doc