542, Addition to existing SFR, grad, Resolutions & Approval Conditions'ICp/43/? "
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1 biE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 542.
RESOLUTION NO. 805
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application has been filed by Dr. and Mrs. Richard Oas with respect
to real property located at 40 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 119-RH), requesting
Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to an existing single family
residence.
Section 2. On January 21, 1997, the Planning Commission approved Resolution
No. 97-1 approving a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial additions to an
existing single family residence. During the hearing process, the Planning Commission
discussed, among other issues, the size of the residence and landscape screening of the
residence from the road.
Section 3. On January 27, 1997, the City Council took the case under jurisdiction.
The Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal on February
10, 1997 and February 24, 1997, and at a field trip visit on February 20, 1997. During the
hearing process, the Council discussed concerns related to required passageway from the
existing residence to the proposed additions and limiting the number of kitchens for the
project to one kitchen. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in
affecting said proposal, from all persons protesting the same, and from members of the
City staff and the City Council having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal.
Section 4. The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption
(State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a
development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval for any grading
requiring a grading permit and before any building or structure may be constructed or any
expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve
changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000
square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more
than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. The applicants request Site
Plan Review for substantial residential and garage additions to an existing residence. With
respect to the Site Plan Review application, the City Council makes the following findings
of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the
General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning
Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 197,119
square feet. The proposed residence (7,748 sq.ft.), attached garage (1,560 sq.ft.), swimming
pool spa (882 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.) and existing stable (667 sq.ft.) will have 10,953
square feet which constitutes 5.9% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural
lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will
be 29,825 square feet which equals 15.9%, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot
coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the
proposed structures located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the
development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to
the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including
surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as
hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be
done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed residence and
existing neighboring residences.
Resolution No. 805 -1-
The development plan follows natu• ontours of the site to minimize
grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the northeast
side (rear) of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation
to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several
mature trees and shrubs, and augments them with a landscape plan that will screen the
project's visibility from the street.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped
state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause
the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The percentage of pad coverage will
not exceed the Planning Commission's established guideline. Further, the proposed
project is designed to minimize grading. Significant portions of the lot will be left
undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the northerly portions of the property.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A,
the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded. The proposed project is consistent with
the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood when compared to the large size
of the lot. Only a moderate amount of grading is permitted.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed
project will utilize a new driveway from Portuguese Bend Road for access.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council hereby approves
the Site Plan Review application for construction of substantial additions to an existing
single family residence as indicated on the Development Plan marked, Exhibit A in
Zoning Case No. 542, subject to the conditions specified in Section 7.
Section 7. The Site Plan Review application approved in Section 6 of this
Resolution is subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approvals, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice
to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with
the site plan on file marked, Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 542 dated January 15, 1997,
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. New building and floor plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning
Department that include an interior passageway from the existing residence to the
proposed additions that will not disrupt procession from room to room prior to the
issuance of any building or grading permit.
F. The residence shall be limited to only one kitchen containing facilities
designed or used for the preparation of food, including any of but not limited to the
following: a sink and stove, oven, sink and microwave oven, range and/or sink and hot
plate.
Resolution No. 805 -2-
Grading shall not exceed 3,190 cubic ya41 of cut soil and 3,190 cubic yards of
fill so.
H. All retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not be greater than 5
feet in height at any one point.
I. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 28.6%.
J. Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 30.3% of the net lot area.
K. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible,
the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the
proposed building pad.
L. Landscaping shall incorporate. to the maximum extent feasible, trees and
shrubs to screen the residence from the street.
M. Two copies of a preliminary landscape plan for bond purposes shall be
submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building or
grading permit. The plan shall include native drought -resistant vegetation that shall not
disrupt or impact the views of neighboring properties. The landscaping plan submitted
shall comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall
incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum
extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character
of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the preliminary
landscape plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and
building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after
landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City
Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan
as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition.
N. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los
Angeles for plan check, an Agreement between the applicants and the Community
Association to reduce the southern 25 foot easement to 10 feet to allow a 35 foot side yard
setback shall be recorded, or the approval shall not be effective.
O. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los
Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and
hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the City Council
must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and
fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
P. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or
grading permit.
Q. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any
modifications to the project which would constitute additional development shall require
the filing of a new application for Site Plan Review approval by the Planning
Commission.
R. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to Section 17.42.060, or the
approval shall not be effective.
S. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approvals must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 1997.
JODY RDO , MAYOR
Resolution No. 805 -3-
ATTESo
•
. Ll
MARILYN RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
)§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No..805 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 542.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 10, 1997 by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Hill, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Lay
and Mayor Murdock.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Heinsheimer.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CI' CLERK
Resolution No. 805 -4-
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL. TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
Recorder's Use
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to:
City of Rolling 'Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation).
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGFL .RS ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. 542
SITE PLAN REVIEW 0
VARIANCE 0
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
40 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD (LOT 119-RH)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 542 SITE PLAN REVIEW •
VARIANCE 0
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Print Print
Owner Owner
Name Name
Signature Signature
Address
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
Address
City/State
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On before me,
personally appeared
[ ] Personally known to me -OR- [ ] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose
name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity
upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
• •
City ol Rolling
CERTIFIED MAIL
March 17, 1997
Dr. and Mrs. Richard Oas
40 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
ZONING CASE NO. 542, 40 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD (LOT 119-RH)
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 805
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Oas:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the City Council adopted a resolution on
March 10, 1997 to approve your request for Site Plan Review for the construction of
substantial additions to an existing single family residence at 40 Portuguese Bend
Road, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 119-RH in Zoning Case No. 805.
The City Council's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the
adoption of the resolution by the Council.
Once the resolution becomes final, you are required to cause to be recorded an
Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of
the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 805, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the City Council. Once you have reviewed the Resolution,
please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the
signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a COPY of the
Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for eachadditional
page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions
of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENC: RESOLUTION NO. 805
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
•
N
rn Return Receipt showing to whom,
Date, and Address of Delivery
7 I TOTA st
07/5
Street and
P 852 865 215
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
t to
P.j, State and ZIP ode
Postage
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
IRestricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
0
o Po
co
E
0
tL
rn
a
Ibr / g
I I, to
/, / 0
SENDER:
• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
• Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this
card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
permit.
• Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
• The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. 0 Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
Q 4b. Service Type
(to" 90 fl 6 1` �G� % raj / ,� /� ❑ Registered
to
cc
z Zc r
F,55.. Received B : (Print Name)
f/%/Is, C-19 9e22711
. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number
✓ P F 8846- I
fir,Mrs• alvd a'S
❑ Express Mail
❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD
7. Date of Dyer � e
q
8. Addre`ssoe's Addrdss (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
Certified
0 Insured
PS Form 3811, decerrdir 1994 Domestic Return Receipt
�
0.
0.
0
cc
CC
c
N
a'
m
H
•
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE. PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS
TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE
NO. 542.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application has been filed by Dr. and Mrs. Richard Oas with
respect to real property located at 40 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 119-
RH), requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to an
existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a public hearing on
July 16, 1996, August 20, 1996, September 17, 1996, October 15, 1996, November 19,
1996 and December 17, 1996, and at field trip visits on August 3, 1996 and December
7, 1996. During the hearing process, the Planning Commission discussed, among
other issues, the size of the residence and landscape screening of the residence from
the road.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a
development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval for any grading
requiring a grading permit and before any building or structure may be constructed
or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six
month period. The applicants request Site Plan Review for substantial residential
and garage additions to an existing residence. With respect to the Site Plan Review
application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies
with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The
project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has
a net square foot area of 197,119 square feet. The proposed residence (7,748 sq.ft.),
attached garage (1,560 sq.ft.), swimming pool spa (882 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.)
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
PAGE 1 OF 5
• •
and existing stable (667 sq.ft.) will have 10,953 square feet which constitutes 5.9% of
the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The
total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 29,825 square feet
which equals 15.9%, which is . within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the
proposed structures located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of
the development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the
lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and
land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is
proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away
from the proposed residence and existing neighboring residences.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at
the northeast side (rear) of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan
preserves several mature trees and shrubs, and augments them with a landscape
plan that will screen the project's visibility from the street.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The
percentage of pad coverage will not exceed the Planning Commission's established
guideline. Further, the proposed project is designed to minimize grading.
Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic
vistas across the northerly portions of the property.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated
in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded. The proposed
project is consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood
when compared to the large size of the lot. Only a moderate amount of grading is
permitted.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
proposed project will utilize a new driveway from Portuguese Bend Road for access.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
PAGE 2 OF 5
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for construction of substantial
additions to an existing single family residence as indicated on the Development
Plan marked, Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 542, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 6.
Section 6. The Site Plan Review application approved in Section 5 of this
Resolution is subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approvals,
that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked, Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 542 dated January
15, 1997, except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. Grading shall not exceed 3,190 cubic yards of cut soil and 3,190 cubic
yards of fill soil.
F. All retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not be greater
than 5 feet in height at any one point.
G. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 28.6%.
H. Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 30.3% of the net lot area.
I. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the proposed building pad.
J. Landscaping shall incorporate. to the maximum extent feasible, trees
and shrubs to screen the residence from the street.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
PAGE 3 OF 5
• •
K. Two copies of a landscape plan must be submitted for review by the
Planning Department and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not
disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with
the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing
mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character
of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping
plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and
building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after
landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after
the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the
landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and
in good condition.
L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, an Agreement between the applicants and the
Community Association to reduce the southern 25 foot easement to 10 feet to allow
a 35 foot side yard setback shall be recorded, or the approval shall not be effective.
M. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
N. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
O. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code,
any modifications to the project which would constitute additional development
shall require the filing of a new application for Site Plan Review approval by the
Planning Commission.
P. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to
Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective.
Q. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approvals must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
PAGE 4 OF 5
• •
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 21ST DAY ARY,.._1997.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
Mr\ ILY�RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96-21 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 546.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
December 17, 1996 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners
Commissioners
Hankins, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
Margeta and Sommer.
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
iry../0„QA/3„-,g.k_ovv•-7
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 97-1
PAGE 5 OF 5