491, Garage addition encroaching in, Application4. -
•
J
!EWES? FOR NEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned George M. Sweeney
Name
3 Malaga Cove Plaza. Palos Verdes Estates, (A 90274 (310)373-4885
Street Address Telephone Number
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of
XX (2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at 84 Eastfield
Lot Tract
22 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Street Address
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
PLoiosaI is for a 1906 sa.,ft. residence addition and an 816 sa.ft. garage. Existiq
541 sq.ft. garage is to be demolished. Therefore net, increase in garage size is
275 sq.ft. Proposed garage and a small portion of residence addition is within
50 feet rear yard setback and therefore require a variance.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
'same vicinity and zone.
Existingiresidence is a nonconforming structure which intrudes substantially into the
rear yard setback. Such residence is substandardfor,the community and cannot be
N ly modified or improved to provide amenities now enZoyed by other propertiesf.in
the same vicinity and zone without the granting of a variance.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
the property or imnrnvements in such vicinity and zone where property.is located because.
Pr000$ vvar yard encroachments largely replrre existing rear yard PQrroachments and
do not. extend as_far into rPa the4P Pxi cf i ng enrrnar hments. Due to the
neighborhood topography and exigitinfUedgerows of trees at the southerly and westerly
property lines, said enchroachments will not be i bl from neighboring properties.
•
FILING FEE
A filing fee . must accompany the application. make r1,ni-Ir -�-�-
w
• •
COMPUTATION OP LOT COVERAGE
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or
an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of
a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that
in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included
within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt
or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the
Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than
thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (101) and that
portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway
purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway
which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of
land, and access strip portion of any flag lot.
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED MAL
NET LOT AREA 49702 sq.ft. 49702 sq.ft. 4A7n7 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 2721 sq.ft. 1906 sq.ft. 4ti97 sq.ft.
GARAGE 941* sq. ft. 275(81E)** sq. ft. R1ti sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL 689* sq. ft. _B1.(f08)**,-sq. ft. 608 sq. ft.
STABLE 2880 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. RRn sq.ft.
TENNIS COURT 0 sq.ft. n sq.ft. n sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 50* sq.ft. 48(9R)** sq.ft. AR sq.ft.
OTHER (covered porch) 0 sq.ft. 230 sq.ft. 73n sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4881 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 9.82 %
2378 sq.ft.
7259 sq.ft.
4.78 % 14.6 %
* Existing to be demolished
**Differential between proposed (in parentesis) and existing to be demolished.
• •
COMPUTATION OP BUILDABLE AREA AND'COVERAGE THEREO$
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING
BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of. the residence, garage, stable (barn), and
other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area". •
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as
stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which
declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that
constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion
of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten
percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall
mean that portion of a lot within. allowable setbacks that has an average
slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA 30247.0 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4627.0 sq.ft.
GARAGE 816.0 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 880.0 sq.ft.
POOL 608.0 sq.ft.
OTHER covered porch & service yard 328.0 sq. ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD 7259 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 24
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREA
POOL DECKING
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
3981 sq. ft. 1339 sq. ft. 5320 sq. ft.
785 sq.ft. "627*** sq.ft. 1412 sq.ft.
1198 sq.ft. 143*** sq.ft. 1341 sq.ft.
5964 sq.ft. 2109 sq.ft. 8073 sq.ft.
13 % 3.24 % 16.24 %
***Differential between existing paving areas'and new.
TOTAL COVERAGE 22.82 % 8.02 % ; 30.84
• •
ORNER'8 DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the
correct.
Executed at 3 Malaga Cove
this
foregoing is true and
Plaza, Palos Verdesy-Estates
✓ day of �"' atez-,a7Wr../ g • AZ
(address)
,California
4
ADA
, 199
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is
signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of
that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge
and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
COMPANY NAME:
COMPANY ADDRESS:
COMPANY PHONE NO.( )
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE FILED
FEE:
RECEIPT NO:
BY:
ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
OWNER' 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hillsis governed by ordinances of
the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions
enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are
completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean
or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City
approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has
been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at
this
3 Malaga Cove Plaza, Palos Verdes Estates , California
day of .ea? , 19�„
By: /------ l�
By:
Address
CITY OF ROLLING RILLS
ZONING CAsg
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I,
ane-vrY'`p M qi.TMGTl4a`7
)
ss
, declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and
addresses of all persons to whoa all property is assessed as they appear
on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area
described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the
exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Lot 84, Eastfield tract, Rolling Hills, California
Executed at Palos Verdes Estates.
this 29th day of January
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
, California,
_ , 1993 .
•
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNERS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
REQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Norm & Mary Lean
q9 Crest Read'Rollina Hills
310 377-7707
72 Fastfteld.., Rolling Hills
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO 84-0
ASSESSORS BOOR NO 58 PAGE6-"PARCEL 4
ceorae M. Sweeney. Architect
3 Malaga Cove Plaza, P.V.E., CA 90274 Suite 201
TELEPHONE NO: (310.1 373-4885
sit***s********s**********************************:******************s*
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review:
jiazi dpnr.P a11— rat-.i on and 2181 sa: ft. addition. Addition
67 % i r ,rPaca in Gi ze of structure.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
represents
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make
an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance
with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the
sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
Suhiect
use and zone. Proiect size (5443 sa.ft.*) is compatible with
neighboring residences. EG: Resich residence 23 Eastfield (5718 sa.ft.*)
Site Plan Review
Application -9-
r°*Residence and garage
oro-iect conforms with existing older residences in the same
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic
features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature
trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and
knolls) ? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing
natural features.
Residence additions are confined to existing pad which is essentially
flat_ Existipa
cut/fill slopes arP_lnaffected except for a .4 footcwidg
x 2 foot high x (0 feet long cut adjacent to the motor court. No maior
native or mature vegitation will be removed. Drainage courses and
landforms are unaf_fectPr
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved.
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage
redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
Rnhicart nroj, ect. c5nes not involve aradina.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding
native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community?
Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between
private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
Native vegitation is unaffected by proposed additions. A mature
_Pfvonorum hedge which provided complete screening between residences
at the southerly property line is to remain. All mature trees are
to remain.,
Site Plan Review
Application -10-
• •
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot
coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual
amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing
buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
Si tP has hPPn prt vi niisl y &PvPI npPc1; hilt prnpnspd rhangPs wi 11 ma i nf.a i n a cpngc' Of
openness on the lot because .residence is set well hark from Eastfield Drive and
total pad coverage by structures is only 14.6% with pad coverage at 24%_ Resich
property 23 Eastfield: approx. structure coverage = 7014 sq.ft.(% net lot coverage
=-20:2%: % =rad coverage = 32.43%) ." Lyons property 21 '` 'a.stfiPld: apprnw Giriri-nrp
coverage = 665 sq.ft.(%:net lot coverage = 16.91%; % pad coverage = 19.53%).
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass With the
site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall
be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
Site development scale and mass respects the character of the
neiahborhood. Setback from Eastfield is generally greater than that
of neiahborina houses. Sidevard setbacks are on the order of 40 feet.
Proposed rear yard setback for additions require a variance but:are
not -less than existing:and:.are._not visible:.:fr:omz:neighboring properties.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
Due to the proposed garage relocation, vehicular circulation and
parking on site are slightly improved by the proposed changes. Site
access is to remain the same as betore. Parking tor tive cars
(3 enclosed) will be provided on the upper pad. The westerly portion
of the lower pad has driveway access and will be available tor
"overflow" parking for larger gatherings, thereby reducing parking
impact on Eastfield Drive. A stairway connecting the upper andlower
pads will improve pedestrian access to parking areas::<Garage,-and
parking areas at the upper pad are behind the house and are completely
screened from view by other properties.
Site Plan Review
Application -11-
• •
H. Does the site development plan conform with .the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
Since proposed project consists of residence addition on a
pre-existing flat pad in a fully developed neiihhorhood, is in
scale with sur_.rou:nc7i.ngv resS.dences . and haz notsi gri.i f i cant view
impact, it conforms with Ca,lifornia FnvironmP.ntal Onality Act.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
facts, statements and other information presented are true, nd correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date:
January 29, 1993
Site Plan Review
Application -12-
Signatute
For: „Norm & Mary Lean
Applicant
C
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed at 3-Malaga ('civa? Playa, Pains VPrdPG P. 1 ataq , California,
this day of ., 1993
e =
e;.‘2.7' AV,
(address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is
signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of
that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge
and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED yi4 3
REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: "I 7.
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: ,.x37--Y
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 44146V
ZONING CASE NO: Of
COMPANY PHONE NO.( ) TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
Site Plan Review
Application -13-
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of
the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions
enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are
completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean
or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City
approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has
been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at 3 Malaaa Cove Plaza, Palos Verdes Estates , California
this day of t"e-, 2 % , 19
By:
By: 12/,
Address
R -eec_ /146Z4)
City /
Site Plan Review
Application -14-
• •
STY OF ROLLING RILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ss
I, , declare
Geor M.'Sweene
under penalty of perjurythatthe attached ist contains the names and
addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear
on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area
described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the
exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Tom. t.R4EF
Executed at 3 Malaga Cove Plaza, Valos Verdes Estates
this
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
29th day of January
Site Plan Review
Application -15-
, California,
1993 •
,
DATE 4/(13
BUILDING AREAS
NET LOT AREA
BUILDING PAD(S)
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
STABLE
RECREATION COURT
( )
SERVICE YARD
CIMER (Covered Porch)
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
% PAD COVERAGE
ZONING CASE NO. 4 l r ADDRESS 'Z &444 t
APPLICANT fri,Y`', A Aft,;/ i /VZ'r.4.t4au
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING
49702 sq.ft.
30247 sq.ft.
2721 sq.ft.
PROPOSED
49702 sq.ft.
30247 sq.ft.
TOTAL
49702
30247
1906 sq.ft. 4627
541*sq.ft. 275(816)*tq.ft. 816
689*sq.ft. -81 (608)*tq.ft. 608
880 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
50* sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
4881 sq.ft.
9.82 %
_ 1 6.1.3 7%
0 sq.ft. 880
0 sq.ft.
48(98)**sq.ft.
230 sq.ft.
2378 sq.ft.
4.78 $
7.862%
DRIVEWAY 3981 sq.ft. 1339 sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS 785 627***
& PATIO AREAS sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL DECKING 1 1 9 8 sq.ft. 14 3 * ft .
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL
& FLATWORK COVERAGE
% TOTAL COVERAGE
5964 sq.ft. 2109 sq.ft.
12% 4.24$
10845 sq.ft.
21.82 %
4487 sq.ft.
9.02 %
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
98 sq.ft.
230 sq.ft.
7259 sq.ft.
14.6 %
24 %
5320 sq.ft.
1412
sq.ft.
1341 sq.ft.
8073 sq.ft.
16.24 %
15332 sq.ft.
30.84 %
-7-
*Existing to be demolished.
**Differential between proposed (in parenthesis) and existing to be demolished.
***Differential between existing paving and new.
•
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERACT
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 22822 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4677 sq.ft.
GARAGE 816 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft.
POOL 608 sq.ft.
RECREATION TION C aJRT
( ) 0 sq.ft.
OT ERCovered Porch & 328 sq.ft.
Service Yard
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 6379 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 27.95
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 7425 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft.
GARAGE 0 sa.ft.
STABLE ( BARN) 880 sq.ft.
POOL 0 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) 0 sq.ft.
OTHER 0 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 880 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 11 .85
-8-
• •
C1iyoyeofena wee
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Date Filed
GENERAL INFORMATION
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
Zoning Case No.
1. Applicant, address and telephone no. mr. & Mrs. Norm Lean,
99 crrgt Rnar1 Fast, Rol l i nr Rills, CA 90274 (310) 377-7707
2. Legal Owner, address and telephone no. (if different from
above) See Above
3. Address of project 22 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills
Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. Bk 58. Pa 6-10
Lot No. R4
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project,including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies: City approvals required:
1. Site review, 2. Variance. Community association approvals required:
1 pl-coiminary, 2. Final. County approvals required: Building & Safety
5. Existing zoning district RAS-1
6. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed):
Single family residence
PROJECT -DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 56.671.56 sq.ft.
8. Net lot area 49,702 sq.ft.
9. Total square footage of structures 7259 sq.ft.
10. Number of floors of construction 1
-1-
11. Basement square footage 0
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 15332
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
Existing garage to be demolished.
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
See attached floor plan.
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? ves
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200
square feet added? no
17. Will cut and fill be balanced? Amount cut NA
Amount fill NA
18. If residential, include the unit size, approximate sale price
and household size expected. 1'.. Size: 4627 sq.ft., 2. Site price
unknown, 3. Household size: 2 persons + guests.
19. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether
neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of
sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading
facilities. NA
20. If this is industrial project indicate the type of project,
estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. NA
21. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project. NA
22. Attach plans.
23. Proposed scheduling. Preliminary Design & Approvals 3 mos. /Working Drawings
& Approvals 3 mos./Plan Check 2 mos./Construction 10 mos.
24. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required. A variance is required because additions to
existing nonconforming structure will extend into rear yard setback.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as,
necessary).
Yes No
x 25. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration
of ground contours.
26. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
- 2-
• i
* x 27. Change in pattern, scale or character of general
!" area of project.
28. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
29. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in
vicinity.
30. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing
draining patterns.
31. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
32. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or
more.
X
.X-
33. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives.
34. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
35. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
36. Relationship to a larger project or series of
projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
37. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
Subiect site contains two existing graded pads. Upoer pad (Pad No.1) area is
22822 sq.ft. and contains a single family residence and a garage. Lower pad
(Pad No. 2) area is 7425 sq.ft. and contains a stable and corral area.
Pad No. 2 is closest to the street. No evidence of geologic or soils instability
has been observed on the site. Views are to the north (partial) and northeast
(dity) for the subject property.
*Residence alterations and addition increases size of house and garage
combined by 67%. See site plan attached.
-3-
• •
38. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential,
commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest
house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of
the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
Surroundina properties consist of single family residences on moderately north/
northeast 1-1 1/2 acres in size. Views are obstructed pastoral or city/harbor
views. Obstruction is caused by numerous non-native mature trees in the neighborhood.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Please explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers on separate
sheets.)
39. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
X
40. Air.
YES MAYBE NO
Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air qaulity? X
b. The creation of objectionable
x
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any change
in climate, either locally or
regionally?
41. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in either marine or fresh
waters?
X
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface water runoff? x
•
c. Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters? X
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? x
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? x
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? x
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct additions
or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water -related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
-5-
•. •
j. Significant changes in the
temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
42. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species of
plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
43. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changein the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish,
benthic organisms, insects or micro -
fauna) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species of
animals?
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in a
barrier to the migration or move-
ment of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat?
44. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
-6-
YES MAYBE NO
x
• •
45. Light and 'glare. Will the proposal
produce new light or glare?
46. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
47. Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of
any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
48. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous sustances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemical or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset
conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an emer-
gency evacuation plan?
49. Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
50. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
51. Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
-7-
YES MAYBE NO
d. Alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail
or air traffic?
Yes Maybe No
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
52. Public Services. Will the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a need for
new or altered governmental services in
any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
53. Enercw. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources
of energy?
54. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
-8-
• i
f. Solid waste and disposal?
55. Human Health. Will the proposal result
in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
56. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic vista or
view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
57. Recreation. Will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing receational opportunities?
58. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of a
prehistoric or historic archeological
site?
b. Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic effects
to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Does the proposal have the poten-
tial to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
YES MAYBE NO
0r
i •
59. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the poten-
tial to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major
periods of California history or
prehistory?
b. Does the project have the poten-
tial to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short term impact on
the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A
project may affect two or more separate
resources where the impact is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total
of those impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effect on human
beings, either directly or
indirectly?
YES MAYBE NO
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as
complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed
statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are
located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall
specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this
application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section
65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant
is required to submit a signed statement which contains the
following information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number:
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP
code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government
Code:
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List:
Date
For
(Signature)
(Applicant)
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives
are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of
the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as
provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section
65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the
development project and any alternatives proposed in this
application are not contained on ,hese lists.
Date I " 'r P1.• ir2 ,1 " ' .�
('Signature) ��
For
(Applicant)
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and
that the facts, statements, and information presented
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date r 27 " `73
For
(/(
(Signature)
(Applicant)
are true and