645, Construction of a new SFR with, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
City/State
Signatures must be adwo+Msdged by a ntktlt.Aal
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGU,ESE BEND RO
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT 0 F ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFOANIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. �
03 2858254
4 Rowdies Use Onh
SITE PLAN REVIEW XX
VARIANCES �.X
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT
1 (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owners) of the real property described as follows:
20 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS. CA (LOT IP3•EF) -
This property Is the aubjeo t of the above numbered case.
t am (We are) aware el, and scoops, an the stated conditions In said
ZONING CASE P10. ,
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) ce (o • „ -; under the ponatty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
A Si
Sign re 1 Signature
Name typed or printed
Name typed or printed
Address Address
RLA, qr.% rt‘.:t\a C.A "Wen 4 t 4sVA\i
City/State
State of California , )
County of Loa Angeles )
On Ci '• helots me; \
S\-4
personalty appeared eti rC`Orl S .\ - .tgr-%-rvw i
Pe IY Pp
toet 901 14
personalty known to rns (or proved to me on the • of satisfactory evidence) to bo the person(*) whose name(s) Is/are
subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged' to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(iss) and that by Ma/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(a), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
it - ` ` ware-
eao- -
CbllAtlA• 1*SIG
Aarmil
alvrRibCr •i ikwillf 'UsAMPWCWIN
Weftess by ha
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
inrintinnr rna AnrtA7Aa.rA nnn,ymrant-Vaar.nnnTn 70111_2R5R754 Parma 2 of R
RESOLUTION NO. 923
03 2858254
ftweir eA
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCETO REPLACE AN.
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A FUTURE STABLE, AND
GRANTING VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED
DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT OF A
RETAINING WALL INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK iN ZONING CASE NO.
645, AT 20 EASTFIELD DRIVE. ;LOT 83•EF) (DYER).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND.
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
$e'ctioin 1 Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Aaron Dyer with respect to
real property located at 20 Eastf,eld Pnve, Rolling Hills. (Lot B3•EF), requesting a Site Plan
Review to perthit grading and construction of a new 4,43E square foot residence with a 693
square foot garage and a facture stable, a Variance to permit a retaining wall to encroach into
the rear yard setback and a Vanance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the
lot. A I,a40 square foot basement is also proposed.
Section 2, The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to
consider the application on February 26.2OCZ, March •19, 2002, and July 16, 2002 meetings and
at a field trip on March )1, 2002. The applicants were noticed of the public hearings by a first
class mail, Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in aftecang said
proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal The applicants' representative was in attendance at the
hearings.
During the course of the public hearings, the Commission requested that the applicant
reduce the size of the proposed residence. and conform to the 30V. midential building pad
coverage guideline established by the Planning Commission. The applicants revised the
proposal and reduced the residential building pad coverage to 32.9%. The applicants reduced
the originally proposed house by 902 square feet and the garage by 55 square fret.
At the July 16, 2002 meeting several neighbors spoke in favor of the protect. Prior to the
meeting, eight letters from neighbors were received in favor of the project.
$ectiun 3. On August 20. 2J02, the Planning Commission approved the application
by Resolution No. 2002.13.
$ectiot;+ 4. On August 26, 2022, the City Council took jurisdietion of Zoning Case No
t45.,The Council members were concerned about the proposed etceedance of the disturbed
area of the lot and the tack of conditions for landscaping.
$tin 5. The City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
case on September 9, 2002. The applicants were notified of the public hearing in writing by
first class mail and were in attendance. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons
interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff and the City Council
having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. At the September 9, 2032 public hearing
the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's approval, but requested that conditions
for landscaping be added.
Section ti The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption
(The State of CA CuidetineS, Section 1S}03) and is therefore categorically exempt frum
environmental review under the Calttornia Environmental Quality Acr
Section 7 Section 1: 46,03J of Ott Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a
development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading
requiring a grading permit . r any bus:ding Or structure may be constructed or any expansion,
addition, alteration or repa:r to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to
grading La, an increase to the size of rhr building or structure by at ieaat 1,000 square feet and
has the effect of increasing; the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (257.) in
any thirty-six (36) month period With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting
construction of the new house and garage to replace the euisting residence and a future stable.
the City Council makes the fallowing findings of fact:
A. The prt.ire" ed development +a compatible with the Crnerai Nan, the 'Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General
Plan requirement of low profile• low•density residential development with sufficient open
rrrin}-inn. Tina Antralsaa.rA nnriimnnf•-Iroar_nnrTn 281,1.2RSR254 Patrrse 1 of R
}
•
• 03 2
858254
space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot
coverage requirements. The at his a net square loot area of 46,040 square feet. The proposed
residence (4.458 sq.ft ), garage (693 sq.ft.). service yard and future stable (450sq.ft.) will have
5.697 square feet which censtttutes 12.4% of the lot coverage, which is within the maximum
20% structural lot coverage requirement A 1.440 square foot basement is also proposed. The
total lot coverage including paved areas and a new driveway will be 8,971 square feet, which
equals 19.5% of the lot which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requerement.
The proposed project is located away from the roads so AS to reduce the visual impact of the
development. The building pad coverage is proposed at 32.9Y., which exceeds the 30
guideline coverage established by the Planning Commission. The disturbed area of the lot is
proposed at 46.6%, which exceeds the 40% maximum permitted and requires a variance.
8. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state
of the lot by minimizing budding coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to
look overdeveloped, Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain
open space on the property The nature. condition, and devtlopinent of adjacent uses.
buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the
construction of the new house and future stable wit! not adversely affect or be materially
detrimental to the adjacent uses. butldin s, or structures because the proposed sttuctureS will
be constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties.
will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs which at maturity will not exceed 25
feet in height. is a sufficient distance from nearby residences and the street so that proposed
structures will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. and will permit the
owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding
property owners.
C. The proposed development. as conditioned, is harmonious in soak. and
mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.•As indicated in Paragraph
A. the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the
proposed project is consistent with the state of the neighborhood.
D. The development plan incorporates existing building pad and preserves a large
undeveloped Landscaped area of the lot that is compatible with and enhances the rural
character of the community The applicants will remove the existing driveway and tandsrape
it to match the existing contaurS of the property, therefore. further reducing the tmperviuua
surfaces on the lot. •
E. The deve;operent plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading
and the natural drainage courses wilt ,Continue to the northeast (towards the streets) of the lot.
Grading for this project will involve 1.610 cubic yards of cut and 1.640 cubic yards of fill and
Will be balanced on site.
F. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees
and supplements their elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or
transition area between pnvate and public areas.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience
and safety of circulation for pedestnars and vehicles because the proposed driveway of off
E.iotfield Drive follows natural contours ur. and will require minimal grading.
H. The pro)ect conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act and is exempt
Section 8. Based upor, the foregoing findings and the: evidence in the retard, the City
Ccrunci! hereby approves the Site Tian Review application fur Zoning Case No, 645 for
proposed structures as shown on the Development Plan dated JLINE 15, 2002, and marked
Exhibit A. subject to the ror,d.tions contained in Section 13 of this resolution.
5ecfiolt9. Seenon )7 16.120 of the Rolling Hitis Municipal Coder requires the side
yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-1 Zone to be twenty (20) feet. Section
17.16.110 requires that (runt yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement fine,
and Section 17.16.110 requires that the rear yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the rear
property line. Except for the required rear yard setback under certain conditions, all other
required setbacks must remain unobstructed by structures. Sections 17.38.010 through
17 :la 050 permit approval of a Varmnce from the standards and requirements ail the Zoning
Code when exceptional or CNtrdurdtnary circumstances applicable to the property and nut
applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of
Resolution No 923 -2-
rnrintinne nose AnnA1AA.rA flnnirmrant_Vgar.flnnTfl 7An3.2R5R754 Pane 4 of R
08 2858254
a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. The
applicant is requesting permission to allow one, not to 'exceed 3-foot high and 60 feet long,
retaining wall to be located in the rear yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance,
the City Council finds as follows:
A. There arc exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable
to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same
zone because the :at is irregular in shapeand it fronts on two streets. Eastfield Drive and
fr
ontage. Road. Due to the double street ntage. much'of the stew of the lot is in the roadway
easements. The remainder of the lot slopes upward from the streets with an existing building
pad located at the westerly portion of the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone. but which is denied
ro the property in question because due to the existing grade. irregular shape of'the property
and double street frontage of the property, the placement of the house and driveway requite a
small cut into the rear, yard slope. which requires a retaining wall in the rear yard aetbsck.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements.in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located because the wall will be incorporated into the landscaping and will contain
planters. in addition, the wall will not be visible from the public right-of•way and will be
screened by existing mature trees in the rear. Construction of said wall would eliminate the
necessity for any' add itionat grading on the hillside.
Section 10. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the City
Council hereby approves the Variance to permit the construction of a retaining wall that will
be located in the rear yard setback. in accordance with the development plan dated JUNE 15.
Z002, and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 645. Subject to the conditions contained. in
Section 13 of this resolution. •
Bastion i1, Sections 17.33.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable
to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to
Section 17.16.070 (81 is required because it states that the lotdisturbance shall be limited to
4Crlt. of the net tot area. With respect to this request for a Variance for lot disturbance of 46.6%.
the City Council finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable
to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class
of use in the sante zone. The Variance for the total disturbance is necessary because the
configuration, double street frontage and topography of the lot create a difficulty in meeting
this Code requirement.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied
to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of the existing conditions of the
,lot. Currently only a 5mait portion of the lot has a slope that is suitable for construction.
'Additional grading and enlargement of this pad is needed to allow construction of a new
e idence.
C. The granting of the Variance would nor be materially cletrimentel to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located. All development witt occur within required setbacks, :anti will be
adequately screened to prevent.,tverse visual impact to surrounding properties.
Section 12. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record. the City
Council hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 645 to pewits .a disturbed area of
21,440 square feet or.6.6'y,%, subject to the conditions specified in Section 13 of this Resolution.
• Secttonil The Sire Clan review request to construct a new house. garage and a future
stable approved in Section 8, the Variance request to construct a wall within the rear yard
setback approved in Section W. and the Variance request to exceed the 40% maximum
permitted disturbance of the lot approved in Section 12 of this resolution are :iublect to the
fi ittowing CunJition+.
Resolution No. 923 -3
rnrintinne r,na Annm7mm.r'A nnnnmgni--VAar_nneTf 71,173.7R5R754 Panne 5 of R
2858254
A. The Site Plan review and the variances approvals shall expire within one year
from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not
commenced within that timer period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approvals granted art otherwise extended pursuant
to the requirements of these sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variances and Site Plan Review
approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written
notice to cease Such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, end if
requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a
period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in
which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the
Permit, or shown otherwise an an approved plan.
D. This approval shall be subject to the approval of the soils. geology
and geotechnicat reports and studies by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works.
E. The lot shall be developed and maintained•in substantial conformance with the
site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated JUNE 15.2002, except as otherwise provided in
these conditions.
F. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and
Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this
application.
G. The basement Shall not exceed 1,440 square feet and all requirements for the
basements shall be met subject to Section 17.20.020 of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code.
H. The future barn shad conform to all of the requirements of Sections 17.16.170 and
17.16,200 of the Zoning Code and be in substantial conformance with the site plan on file
marked Exhibit A and dared JUNE 15.2002.
1. Grading shall nut exceed 1,640 cubic yards of cut and 1,640 cubic yards of fill and
shall be balanced on ;ate.
1. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5,697 square feet or 12.4% of the net lot
area of the tot.
K. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 8,971 square
feet or 19.S in conformance with lot coverage limitations.
L. The disturbed area of the let shall not exceed 21.440 square Near 46.6% of the net
lot area in conformance with the variance approval.
M. Residential building pad coverage on the 15.940 square toot residential building
pad shall not exceed 5.247 square)eet or 32.9 coverage on the itl00 square feet future barn
pad shall not exceed .450 square feet tir-►5.0%.
N. The applicant shall remove all asphalt and cement from the existing driveway
and return the entire existing driveway to landscaped state ro match the adjacent terrain aria
vegetation.
O. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation. to the maximum extent
feasible, that incorporates a luv. gallunage irrigatton system, utilizes .automatic controllers.
incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate
conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and
overspray in acoirdance with Section 17_7.0:C (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
P. All graded areas shalt be landscaped. Landscaping for the entire project shall be
designed using dative shrubs and mature trees. which at full maturity shall not exceed the
ridge height of the residence, and which will not.obstruct views of neighbonng properties.
t'wn copies of landscaping plan for tar graded? repaired :area and a cost estimate fur material.
labor and ►rrigation to implement the landscaping plan shalt be submitted for review by the
!'fanning Department prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Resolution No. 923 •4.
rnrintinn. r.na AnrralAn.(7A nnnnmgnt—Vpar_nnnTf 7n11.1.2R5R7.S4 ParrAe F of R
•03 2858254
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping
plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading permit and shall be
retained with the City for not leis than two years after landscape installation. After the two-
year period, upon the request of the applicant, the retained bond will be released by the City
Manager after the City Manager or his designee determines that the landscaping was installed
pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
Q. The proposed wall in the rear yard setback shall nut exceed three feet in height,
in runfnrmance with the Variance approval.
R. During Corr: truct►orr, any suit disturbance shall preserve the existing topography.
flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible.
S. During conrltratction. conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise.
dust, and objectionable odors shall be required.
T. Daring conirrurtiorr. the Erosion Control Plan containing the 'elements set forth in
Section 7010 of the 19% County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as
required by the County of Los Angeles.
U. Dtirir►g and Orr cori;t•uctiotr. all parking shalt take place an the project site and, if
necessary, any overflow parking ,hall take place within nearby roadway easements.
v, During corrilructton. the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM
and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment
noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of
Rolling Hilts.
W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Cuntrul Board and C.runty Health Department requirements for the installation and
maintenance u1 septic tank,,.
K. The property ownerS shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and
maintenance of stormwater drainage and runoff facilities.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices
(BMP's) related to solid waste.
Z. A drainage plan system shalt be approved by the Planning Department and
County District Engineer. Any Waicr from any site irrigation Systems and all drainage from
the site shall be cunveyed in an approved manner.
AA. All utility fine; shall be placed underground. The roof material Fur the new
residence and future stable shall comply with the City of Rolling Hills Building Code
requirements. The development shall comply with the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting
requ irtments.
AB. The applicants shalt pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building and
Safety and Public Works Department fees. including Parks and rtvcrkativn Fees for new
residency.
AC. A detailed drainage plan and grading plan that conforms to the development
plan as approved by the Planning C.imrnt ion shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning
Department staff for their review and approval.
AD. The %narking drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and
Safety fur plan check review stall conform to the development plan described in Condition
Resnluhon No.921 •5-
inrintinne rn,a Anaalp,a.r!A fnrnmpni--Yaar_nnr.Tf 2An1.2RRR2S4 Parse 7 of R
03.858254
AE. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rotting )-Eros Community
Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any grading cr building
permit
AF. The driveway access to the property shall be from Eastfield Drive. The
construction of the driveway shall comply with the requirements of the Traffic Commission,
r,
AG. Until the applicant executes an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the
Variances and Site Plan Review approvals. as required by Section 17.42.070 of the Municipal
Ccde, the approvals ,hail not be effective.
AN. All conditions of the Variances and Site Plan approvals that apply shall be.
complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
AL Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Ratting Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project or any future construction, which would
constitute additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application
for approval by the Planning Commission.
PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS : +rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER. 2002.
74::ZM
FIL4 E. HIL , MAYOR PRO•PEM
ATTEST:
S, I\ tip4 --'
MARILYN ERN. DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CA LIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 1 a§
CITY or ROLL!NC HILLS
1 certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 923 entitled;
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE AND A FUTURE STABLE AND GRANTING VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND 70 PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT OF A RETAINING WALL INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK IN
ZONING CASE NO 645. AT :^. EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT B3•EF) (DYER).
has approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on September 23. 2002, by
the following roll call vote.
AYES:
NOES:
COunca Lmembers He ir.shwxmer, Ferneil and Mayor Pro
None.
ABSENT: mayor Lay.
ABSTAIN; Counclimcrr.ber rrur;;cck.
and in compliance with the law,, of Califert„a war po+.ted at the following:
Administrative Offices
rrAci R. k-t
DEPUTY CrrYCLFRK
Resolution No. 923 -6-
Ter Hsl1.
rrrinf-inn- T. Anrria7pm.rA nnnr7mmnt_Ygar.T)nr.TT) 7ff1_2A R254 Parro R of R
• •
This page is part of your document • DO NOT DISCARD
03 2858254
RECORDER'S OFFIcE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CAUFORNIA
2:01 PM SEP 26 2003
1111•11111.-
TITLE(S) :
111111111
FFs
FEE$4hbi 1
DAF G20 �� �
CODE
20 .
CODE
19
;CODE
i9
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) •
To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company In black ink.
THIS FOAM NOTTOBE DUPLICATED
D.T.T
Number of Parcels Shown
uirinf-innf T.na AnnA7Aa.(7A T)nnirmanf--Vaar_nnr.Tf 217113.2R5R254 Aafnq• 7 of R
• RESOLUTION NO. 944 •
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 923 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND
VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED
AREA OF THE LOT AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL
WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK IN
ZONING CASE NO. 645 AT 20 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 83-EF) DYER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Aaron Dyer with
respect to real property located at 20 Eastifeld Drive (Lot 83-EF), Rolling Hills,
requesting an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review and Variances
for the construction of a new single family residence.
Section 2. The Council considered this item at a meeting September 8,
2003, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of
time is necessary in order to complete the County of Los Angeles plan check
process.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the City
Council does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 13 of Resolution No. 923, dated
September 23, 2002 to read as follows:
"A. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within two
years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these
approvals has not commenced within that time period."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 923
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2003.
FRANK HILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
rY�f�l vM nv
MARILYN RN
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
2(0
Resolution No. 944 -1-
STATE OF CALIF./IA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 944 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 923
AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AND VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO CONSTRUCT A
RETAINING WALL WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD
SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 645 AT 20 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 83-EF)
DYER.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on September 8, 2003
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Black, Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem
Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill.
NOES:
None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
%^/1rih n.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 944 - 2 -
• RESOLUTION NO. 944 •
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 923 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND
VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED
AREA OF THE LOT AND TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL
WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK IN
ZONING CASE NO. 645 AT 20 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 83-EF) DYER.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Aaron Dyer with
respect to real property located at 20 Eastifeld Drive (Lot 83-EF), Rolling Hills,
requesting an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review and Variances
for the construction of a new single family residence.
Section 2. The Council considered this item at a meeting September 8,
2003, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of
time is necessary in order to complete the County of Los Angeles plan check
process.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the City
Council does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 13 of Resolution No. 923, dated
September 23, 2002 to read as follows:
"A. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within two
years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these
approvals has not commenced within that time period."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 923
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2003.
FRANK HILL
MAYOR
ATTEST:
r�1 fi 2.�k 1 F'? . y l-uNv
MARILYN KERN
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 944 -1-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
) §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 944 entitled:
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 923
AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AND VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO CONSTRUCT A
RETAINING WALL WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD
SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 645 AT 20 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 83-EF)
DYER.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on September 8, 2003
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Black, Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem
Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
1"1�.;n, ,
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 944 - 2 -