Loading...
733, 664 sq ft for an addition of a, Staff Reports• e14 0/ ie0ii4 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4A Mtg. Date: 1/8/07 DATE: JANUARY 8, 2007 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR THROUGH: ANTON DAHLERBRUCH, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 733, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69-A-EF), (RICH). REQUEST Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an addition on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved previously at an existing single family residence at 18 Eastfield Drive. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2006-15, which is attached, on December 19, 2006 at the regular meeting granting approval in Zoning Case No. 733 for a 664 square foot addition. The vote was 4-0-1. Commissioner Sommer abstained, because he was absent during the field trip and the subsequent meeting. 2. The applicants request to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed, the residence will be 5,852 square feet with accessory structures, which include 1,192 square foot garage, 624 square foot swimming pool, 220 square foot cabana, 320 square foot recreation room, 72 square foot aviary, 96 - square foot service yard, 500 square feet of covered @ Pn lied on livcyf;lrv;i • • porches attached to the residence, 537 square foot attached trellis, 1,614 square foot basement and 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and corral. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1. The gross lot area is 1.74 acres. The net lot area for development purposes is 62,471 square feet, (1.43 acres). 4. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing driveway approach to the property. Access to the stable is proposed from the existing driveway; and then continuing along the southern easement of the property, as previously approved. 5. No grading is required for this project. No additional disturbance is proposed for the addition, as the addition will be located on a previously disturbed pad. 6. The structural lot coverage on the 62,471 square foot net lot area is proposed to be 10,223 square feet or 16.4%, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted); the total lot coverage proposed including the structures and paved areas is proposed at 21,447 square feet or 34.3%, (35% permitted). 7. The existing residential building pad is 26,786 square feet. The stable building pad was approved at 3,168 square feet. Building pad coverage on the 26,786 square foot residential building pad is proposed to be 8,490 square feet or 31.7%. Building pad coverage on the 3,168 square foot stable pad will be 24.1% including 315 square feet of the 360 square foot covered area. 8. Utilities to the residence have been placed underground. 9. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the proposed addition for architectural design at a later date. 10. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also approved. 11. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. The 1996, 1998 and 2005 Resolutions of Approval contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). . 0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report or provide other direction to staff. ZONING CASE NO. 733 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) i BARN PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth or covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) Must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, REC. RM., STABLE, CABANA & POOL Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 14.85% of 62,471 5188 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 1092 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 9,791 sq.ft. sq.ft. net lot area PROPOSED ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 16.4% of 62,471 sq. 5852 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 860 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537 sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 10,223 sq.ft. ft. net lot area 32.6% 34.3% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 33.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, including covered porches; 28.8% not including porches: 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad including the covered area 14.2% not including the covered area 328 cubic yards cut 328 cubic yards fill including excavation of basement 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area, (Variance approved) 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive N/A N/A 31.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, (exc. attached trellis and porch) 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad (excl. 45 s.f. covered area) NONE 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive Planning Commission review. Planning Commission review. NEARBY PROPERTIES For information only ADDRESS 23 Eastfield 22 Eastfield 21 Eastfield 20 Eastfield 17 Eastfield 19 Eastfield 16 Eastfield AVERAGE 18 Eastfield NAME Cobb Yoshimura Lyons Dyer Raleigh Cannon Gregorio Rich SQ.FT. RESIDENCE 4,452 4,543 4,055* 4,458* 4,060 3,530 5,264* 4,338 Existing 5,188 Proposed: 5,852 NET LOT AREA (ACRES) 59,590 56,640 55,756 56,040 61,320 57,480 78,280 60,872 75,820 SOURCE: Assessors' records. * City records Garages and other accessory uses are not included. Roadway easements are not included. f RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 733, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69-A- EF), (RICH). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Rich, with respect to real property located at 18 Eastfield Drive, (Lot 69-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed the residence would be 5,852 square feet with a 1,192 square foot garage, basement and accessory structures. Section 2. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence on subject property. In 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. Section 3. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square feet covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also granted. All previous approvals contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the request in Zoning Case No. 733 on October 17, 2006, November 21, 2006 and at a field trip on November 21, 2006. The applicants were notified of the hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in said proposal. The Planning Commission heard a report from the City staff and reviewed, analyzed and studied the proposal. The applicants and the applicants' representative were in attendance at the hearings. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the 664 square foot addition and the restriction placed in 1996, 1998 and 2005 on any future development on subject property the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, and surrounding uses because the proposed addition complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and equestrian uses. The project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks and no grading is proposed. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. The proposed addition will be constructed on an existing building pad. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the addition will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. Although the disturbed net lot area exceeds the maximum permitted, the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the addition will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Site Plan Review for 664 square foot addition and the total proposed development due to the restriction placed on the previously approved applications for subject property, in accordance with the development plan dated October 11, 2006 and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 733 subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance and others. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated October 11, 2006, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 10,223 square feet or 16.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 21,447 square feet or 34.3% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 30,236 square feet or 48.4% in conformance with the Variance approval granted in 2005. H. Building pad coverage on the residential building pad shall not exceed 31.7% not including the attached trellis and not including 585 square foot of covered porch. I. There shall be no grading for this project. J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. K. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by 0 construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. L. During construction, conformance with the Air Quality Management District requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices shall be required so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. M. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. N. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. O. During construction perimeter easements shall remain clear and free of debris, parked vehicles, building material, building equipment and all other construction items. P. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. Q. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. R. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any permits. S. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional structural development or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. T. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan pursuant to Section 17.46.065 of the Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. U. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, which apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF DECEMBER 2006. ARVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN L.'ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2006-15 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 733, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69- A-EF), (RICH). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 19, 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Henke, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. • DEIUTY CITY CLERK 8 DATE: TO: FROM: • C14 0/ ie0m Jh116 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityolrh@aol.com DECEMBER 19, 2006 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 733 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 69-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.74 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH RICH BLAIR ASSOCIATES OCTOBER 7, 2006 Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an addition on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved previously at an existing single family residence at 18 Eastfield Drive. BACKGROUND 1. At the November 21, 2006 Planning Commission meeting the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution approving the proposed project. The vote was 4-1, with Commissioner Sommer being absent. 2. The attached Resolution No. 2006-15 contains standard findings of facts and conditions, including acondition that any further development or grading is subject to Planning Commission approval RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2006-15 approving this development. • • RESOLUTION NO. 2006-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 733, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69-A- EF), (RICH). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Rich, with respect to real property located at 18 Eastfield Drive, (Lot 69-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed the residence would be 5,852 square feet with a 1,192 square foot garage, basement and accessory structures. Section 2. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence on subject property. In 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. Section 3. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square feet covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also granted. All previous approvals contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the request in Zoning Case No. 733 on October 17, 2006, November 21, 2006 and at a field trip on November 21, 2006. The applicants were notified of the hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in said proposal. The Planning Commission heard a report from the City staff and reviewed, analyzed and studied the proposal. The applicants and the applicants' representative were in attendance at the hearings. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the 664 square foot addition and the restriction placed in 1996, 1998 and 2005 on any future development on subject property the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, and surrounding uses because the proposed addition complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and equestrian uses. The project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks and no grading is proposed. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. The proposed addition will be constructed on an existing building pad. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the addition will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. Although the disturbed net lot area exceeds the maximum permitted, the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the addition will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Site Plan Review for 664 square foot addition and the total proposed development due to the restriction placed on the previously approved applications for subject property, in accordance with the development plan dated October 11, 2006 and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 733 subject to the following conditions: J A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance and others. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated October 11, 2006, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 10,223 square feet or 16.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 21,447 square feet or 34.3% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 30,236 square feet or 48.4% in conformance with the Variance approval granted in 2005. H. Building pad coverage on the residential building pad shall not exceed 31.7% not including the attached trellis and not including 585 square foot of covered porch. I. There shall be no grading for this project. J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. K. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. L. During construction, conformance with the Air Quality Management District requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices shall be required so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. M. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. N. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. O. During construction perimeter easements shall remain clear and free of debris, parked vehicles, building material, building equipment and all other construction items. P. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. Q. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. R. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any permits. S. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional structural development or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. T. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan pursuant to Section 17.46.065 of the Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. U. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, which apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF DECEMBER 2006. ARVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN L. KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2006-15 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR AN ADDITION ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION IN ZONING CASE NO. 733, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69- A-EF), (RICH). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 19, 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK DATE: TO: FROM: • City (I l7 PQ..p �tQ� • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOVEMBER 21, 2006 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 733 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 69-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.74 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH RICH BLAIR ASSOCIATES OCTOBER 7, 2006 Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an addition on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved previously at an existing single family residence at 18 Eastfield Drive. BACKGROUND 1. At the October 17, 2006 Planning Commission meeting a field trip was scheduled to view the subject site on November 21, 2006. 2. The applicants request to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed the residence would be 5,852 square feet with a 1,192 square foot garage and accessory structures. 3. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square feet covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also approved. 4. The property is zoned RAS-1, and the gross lot area is 1.74 acres. The net lot area for development purposes is 62,471 square feet, (1.43 acres). With the ZC NO. 733 R irh ®Printed Ori Hec', :lw1 f',i:wr • • previous approvals and current request the lot will be developed with 5,852 square foot residence, 1,192 square foot garage, 624 square foot swimming pool, 220 square foot cabana, 320 square foot recreation room, 72 square foot aviary, 96 square foot service yard, 500 square feet of covered porches, 537 square foot attached trellis, 1,614 square foot basement and 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and corral. 5. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. The 1996, 1998 and 2005 Resolutions of Approval contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing driveway approach to the property. Access to the stable is proposed from the existing driveway, then continuing along the southern easement of the property, as previously approved. 7. A Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the net lot was approved in 2005, (48.4%). No additional disturbance will be required for the addition, as the addition is proposed to be located on a previously disturbed pad. 8. No grading is required for this project. 9. The structural lot coverage on the 62,471 square foot net lot area is proposed to be 10,223 square feet or 16.4%, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted); the total lot coverage proposed including the structures and paved areas is proposed at 21,447 square feet or 34.3%, (35% permitted). 10. The existing residential building pad is 26,786 square feet. The stable building pad was approved at 3,168 square feet. Building pad coverage on the 26,786 square foot residential building pad is proposed to be 8,490 square feet or 31.7%. Building pad coverage on the 3,168 square foot stable pad will be 24.1% including 315 square feet of the 360 square foot covered area. 11. Utilities to the residence have been placed underground. 12. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the proposed addition for architectural design at a later date. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission view the project, open the public hearing and take public input. ZC NO. 733 Rirh ZONING CASE NO. 733 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) BARN PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth or covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) Must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL). STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS ZC NO. 733 Rirh II PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 11 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, REC. RM., STABLE, CABANA & POOL Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 14.85% of 62,471 5188 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 1092 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 9,791 sq.ft. sq.ft. net lot area PROPOSED ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 5852 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 860 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537 sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 10,223 sq.ft. 16.4% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 32.6% 34.3% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 33.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, includina covered porches; 28.8% not includina porches: 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad including the covered area 14.2% not includina the covered area 328 cubic yards cut 328 cubic yards fill including excavation of basement 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area, (Variance approved) 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive I N/A N/A 31.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, (exc. attached trellis and porch) 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad (excl. 45 s.f. covered area) NONE 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive Planning Commission review. Planning Commission review. NEARBY PROPERTIES For information only ADDRESS 23 Eastfield 1 22 Eastfield 21 Eastfield 20 Eastfield 17 Eastfield 19 Eastfield 16 Eastfield AVERAGE 1 18 Eastfield NAME Cobb Yoshimura Lyons Dyer Raleigh Cannon Gregorio Rich SQ.FT. RESIDENCE 4,452 4,543 4,055 4,458 4,060 3,530 5,264 4,338 Approved: 5,188 Proposed: 5,852 NET LOT AREA (ACRES) 59,590 56,640 55,756 56,040 61,320 57,480 78,280 60,872 75,820 SOURCE: Assessors' and City records. Garages and other accessory uses are not included. Roadway easements are not included. ZC NO. 733 Rirh a DATE: TO: FROM: • Ciiy opeoeenS �eP • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOVEMBER 21, 2006 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 733 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 69-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.74 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH RICH BLAIR ASSOCIATES OCTOBER 7, 2006 Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an addition on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved previously at an existing single family residence at 18 Eastfield Drive. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission visited the site earlier today. 2. The applicants request to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed the residence would be 5,852 square feet with a 1,192 square foot garage and accessory structures. 3. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square feet covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also approved. 4. The property is zoned RAS-1, and the gross lot area is 1.74 acres. The net lot area for development purposes is 62,471 square feet, (1.43 acres). With the previous approvals and current request the lot will be developed with 5,852 ZCNO. 733 R irh ®Print et on IigCyr r:d Pdp.21 square foot residence, 1,192 square foot garage, 624 square foot swimming pool, 220 square foot cabana, 320 square foot recreation room, 72 square foot aviary, 96 square foot service yard, 500 square feet of covered porches, 537 square foot attached trellis, 1,614 square foot basement and 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and corral. 5. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. The 1996, 1998 and 2005 Resolutions of Approval contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing driveway approach to the property. Access to the stable is proposed from the existing driveway, then continuing along the southern easement of the property, as previously approved. 7. A Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the net lot was approved in 2005, (48.4%). No additional disturbance will be required for the addition, as the addition is proposed to be located on a previously disturbed pad. 8. No grading is required for this project. 9. The structural lot coverage on the 62,471 square foot net lot area is proposed to be 10,223 square feet or 16.4%, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted); the total lot coverage proposed including the structures and paved areas is proposed at 21,447 square feet or 34.3%, (35% permitted). 10. The existing residential building pad is 26,786 square feet. The stable building pad was approved at 3,168 square feet. Building pad coverage on the 26,786 square foot residential building pad is proposed to be 8,490 square feet or 31.7%. Building pad coverage on the 3,168 square foot stable pad will be 24.1% including 315 square feet of the 360 square foot covered area. 11. Utilities to the residence have been placed underground. 12. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the proposed addition for architectural design at a later date. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission open the continued public hearing, take public input and provide direction to staff. ZC NO. 733 Rirh ZONING CASE NO. 733 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) BARN PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth or covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) Must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS II PREVIOUSLY APPROVED II SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, REC. RM., STABLE, CABANA & POOL Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 5188 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 1092 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 9,791 sq.ft. 14.85% of 62,471 sq.ft. net lot area PROPOSED ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 16.4% of 62,471 sq. 5852 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 860 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537 sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 10,223 sq.ft. ft. net lot area 32.6% 34.3% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 33.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, including covered porches; 28.8% not including porches: 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad including the covered area 14.2% not including the covered area 328 cubic yards cut 328 cubic yards fill including excavation of basement 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area, (Variance approved) 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive N/A N/A 31.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, (exc. attached trellis and porch) 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad (excl. 45 s.f. covered area) NONE 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive Planning Commission review. Planning Commission review. ZC NO. 733 Rirh NEARBY PROPERTIES For information only ADDRESS 23 Eastfield 22 Eastfield 21 Eastfield 20 Eastfield 17 Eastfield 19 Eastfield 16 Eastfield AVERAGE 18 Eastfield NAME Cobb Yoshimura Lyons Dyer Raleigh Cannon Gregorio Rich SQ.FT. RESIDENCE 4,452 4,543 4,055 4,458 4,060 3,530 5,264 4,338 Approved: 5,188 Proposed: 5,852 NET LOT AREA (ACRES) 59,590 56,640 55,756 56,040 61,320 57,480 78,280 60,872 75,820 SOURCE: Assessors' and City records. Garages and other accessory uses are not included. Roadway easements are not included. ZC NO. 733 Pirh DATE: TO: FROM: • City opeofenS Jhfl • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com OCTOBER 17, 2006 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 733 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 69-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.74 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH RICH BLAIR ASSOCIATES OCTOBER 7, 2006 Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an addition on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved previously at an existing single family residence at 18 Eastfield Drive. BACKGROUND 1. The applicants request to construct a 664 square foot addition to the existing 5,188 square foot residence and reduce the covered porches by 232 square feet. When completed the residence would be 5,852 square feet with a 1,192 square foot garage and accessory structures. 2. In June 2005 the Planning Commission approved a request to convert a 320 square foot stable to a recreation room, to grade for and construct a new 450 square foot stable with 360 square feet covered porch and approximately 2,200 square foot corral area in the rear of the property, to add 109 square feet to the existing residence, reduce the existing entryway by 84 square feet and to construct a 446 square foot addition to the basement. A Variance to exceed the maximum allowed disturbed area (48.4%) was also approved. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1, and the gross lot area is 1.74 square feet. The net lot area for development purposes is 62,471 square feet, (1.43 acres). With the previous approvals and current request the lot will be developed with 5,852 square foot residence, 1,192 square foot garage, 624 square foot swimming pool, ZC NO. 733 Rirh ,G 4' Printed on Recycled Paper. • • 220 square foot cabana, 320 square foot recreation room, 72 square foot aviary, 96 square foot service yard, 500 square feet of covered porches, 537 square foot attached trellis, 1,614 square foot basement and 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and corral. 4. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. The 1996, 1998 and 2005 Resolutions of Approval contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 5. The applicant is proposing to utilize the existing driveway approach to the property. Access to the stable is proposed from the existing driveway, then continuing along the southern easement of the property. 6. A Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the net lot was approved in 2005, (48.4%). No additional disturbance will be required for the addition, as the addition is proposed to be located on a previously disturbed pad. 7. No grading is required for this project. 8. The structural lot coverage on the 62,471 square foot net lot area is proposed to be 10,223 square feet or 16.4%, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted); the total lot coverage proposed including the structures and paved areas will be 21,447 square feet or 34.3%, (35% permitted). 9. The existing residential building pad is 26,786 square feet. The stable building pad was approved at 3,168 square feet. Building pad coverage on the 26,786 square foot residential building pad is proposed to be 8,490 square feet or 31.7%. Building pad coverage on the 3,168 square foot stable pad will be 24.1% including 315 square feet of the 360 square foot covered area. 10. Utilities to the residence have been placed underground. 11. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the proposed addition for architectural design at a later date. 12. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, open the public hearing and take public input. ZC NO. 733 1?irk ZONING CASE NO. 733 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36- month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% maximum -guideline) BARN PAD COVERAGE GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth or covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) Must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, REC. RM., STABLE, CABANA & POOL Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 14.85% of 62,471 32.6% 5188 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 1092 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 9,791 sq.ft. sq.ft. net lot area 33.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, including covered porches; 28.8% not including porches: 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad including the covered area 14.2% not including the covered area 328 cubic yards cut 328 cubic yards fill including excavation of basement 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area, (Variance approved) 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive N/A I N/A PROPOSED ADDITION TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. Residence Garage Swim Pool Stable Cabana Rec. Rm. Covered porches Service yard Aviary Trellis Basement TOTAL 5852 sq.ft. 1192 sq.ft. 624 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 220 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft 860 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 72 sq.ft. 537 sq.ft. 1614 sq.ft 10,223 sq.ft. 16.4% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 34.3% of 62,471 sq. ft. net lot area 31.7% of 26,786 sq.ft. building pad, (exc. attached trellis and porch) 25.6% of 3,168 sq.ft. stable pad (excl. 45 s.f. covered area) NONE 48.8% of 62,471 sq.ft of net lot area 450 sq.ft. with 360 sq.ft. covered area and 2,200 sq. ft. corral Existing along southern side yard and easement Existing driveway approach from Eastfield Drive I Planning Commission review. Planning Commission review. ZC NO.733 Rinh NEARBY PROPERTIES For information only ADDRESS 123 Eastfield 122 Eastfield 121 Eastfield 120 Eastfield 117 Eastfield 19 Eastfield 16 Eastfield AVERAGE 18 Eastfield NAME Cobb Yoshimura Lyons Dyer Raleigh Cannon Gregorio Rich SQ.FT. RESIDENCE 4,452 4,543 4,055 4,458 4,060 3,530 5,264 4,338 Approved: 5,188 Proposed: 5,852 NET LOT AREA (ACRES) 59,590 56,640 55,756 56,040 61,320 57,480 78,280 60,872 75,820 SOURCE: Assessors' and City records. Garages and other accessory uses are not included. Roadway easements are not included. ZC NO. 733 Rirh