Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
550, Grading for a lower level flat, Application
• City o/ R0M • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER: D OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 2/ +BUT l D 1 okP `;\ TELEPHONE NO: C2jIO) 55(4 —gllI PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: IZ ou p-1 f?-40/14) /z 1 N LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 74 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: 6ffln) AGENT'S ADDRESS: 4044i VI A L°/ N zo APV 1o175 TELEPHONE NO: (3/0> g, 33 • S S 05 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. rPeVI&G0191 (i LEpP f-tA; t 1 A6 Pc Sao TCov r -1-04ii Gave- "%011(5 ehopi5 pro pow limp 1 PJ Orli 0 R414 • ®P•,.+ted on Recycled Pao , Will,the proposed use be collatible with the uses in the surrourrg area, and if so, why? I2z9N pkiel01W- l oss ecupr VPJ Y is Po 9T I D Wrs I PJ 14. a HSi'o eoup - I�j 6 G1i- W ,Wit ! 13 S?ksite 114P J N tS e9o2- Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at _ pLi i•t -11-NL(( , California this I d'i^ day of .l R�� , 19 By: • �- Z tz' - Address City CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNLA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I,-1.014i t -4044 , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at day of Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change r4 6 4lI Luc , California, this ,19 . COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 171 Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twentypercent (20%) of the net lot., area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude a) any and all perimeter easements measured to a minimum lineal distance of 10 feet perpendicular tq file property lines; b) any portion of he toLused_for.Joadway,purposes.; c) any private drive or driveway which provi es access to any other lot or parcel; and d) the access strip portion of any flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA." Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing 'buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion •of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. •ECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMIT* The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone no. of architect and civil engineer. 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title •17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). Z 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. /14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 15. Show a graded Oa of not less than 450 square feet •he construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade fof vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17). 16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate land contours with existing ground. 17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. 18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. 19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. • DATE BUILDING AREA NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE lI f t ZONING CASE NO. 51(P ADDRESS (Z ©u l''`tOEe. ,Wy APPLICANT L).LJitlla 4.OMJI Q 7/4.14414- OF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED TOTAL CALCULATION EXISTING 8 5377 sq.ft. 1 S-o5D OD sq.ft. 3'�zi 1 3¢3esq.ft. GARAGE Cacio sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA r, ov sq.ft. STABLE 2) sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( S Pn covhr ) sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. OTHER l o(j sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 5 L75 sq.ft. '4 % sq.ft. A 5377 sq.ft. sq.ft. t 1 sq.ft. 3 ��357 sq.ft. i3 ; sq.ft. sq.ft. (yet° sq.ft. sq.ft. UZ' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. .94 so sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 2- q Sz sq.ft. sq.ft. f UZ) sq.ft. 2-+-f so sq.ft. sq.ft. q2 % % (e0 % 7240 �5 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1,7T5 sq.ft. 01) sq.ft. '7 DO sq.ft. 14 av sq.ft. /'1,67) sq.ft. sq.ft. ) —7 o7j sq.ft. (, 7,5 sq.ft. Z as sq.ft. -58/6 sq.ft. % % /9 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE / I col) sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE / ?,, 5 % ?,1'Sd sq.ft. _14(p 0 sq.ft. 11.0 % % DATE it i 1 NO ZONIN CASE NO. ((a ADDRESS jiejor-R D r<R R� APPLICANT DA1I!-rrl CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA > O5p sq.ft. RESIDENCE SeS sq.ft. GARAGE caq O sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 5-7 5 sq.ft. 5616 % PAD BUILDABLE PAD AREA 33�✓'7 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) — sq.ft. POOL --- sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( S PoPT C®uRr) Z460 sq.ft. OTHER — sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE sq.ft. % • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at .WOLL t,.c G.-Aril 1,c-4 , California, this tP-`fek'N day of v , 19 By: By: OVU-1 bit Address P-oLL 6- t 6.44' oL NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California, If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: LA p o & REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: PArt)i D 154-P7 14 COMPANY PHONE NO. ( ) PROJECT ADDRESS: IZ OuTFinD &). DATE FILED ih-S q 7 FEE: 074 4--ro RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: • C14 o/ RO/A PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 .-vAvia 2f-I.ttnn TeLiatiA ouyi�,e►- `., , (271o) 5l4-11tt I Iae r 1M . 1. 14. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 14 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. '150e1 PAGE 3 AGENTS NAME: ePvobfn. Je1V1 cm. AGENTS ADDRESS: (P54I >e'I Lepr 417o `P P V TELEPHONE NO.: 3 ' GOO f) NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 PARCEL 33 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. 0 rk- Court \,06 yoirek V\t?QAr p r�'11__ I 1 n e , i (,0e,t/ ► ,, `1 `� e `i . Cam'' �', 6i-c ,,,(1- e oor r h� eev� ►rd` cw l livice, *..eep Lo e r'` /wJ iw `%e-n tulotk. s - vies mutt -k 50, F ripo reA t Ald4 Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. iki`s ? or' rs 5e ic7 wQe, KiTAA. a�� le, iS %(%L��P,QQ iyt0� d 1-Ae VPim/��Y1eV'��tN�Q- • Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because weve,oh4e. fin, o poferti a 512� /,li ma`s AA- ilAe 5,vatov 1 ttue►i pet 12ve2 tiiS Nre*sect id' awr;-. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPERTY OWNER: LtiA)1U 4P4Vrti 1 D-1-A-0A-4 OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 Z OU i R 11) 1 1 l-1 TELEPHONE NO: 019 D) c,14 -.111 1 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1 Z Our P- I D RV , "' ,14 . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 14 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: /k qUer /AI- A • • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. k(vv% A.-r V9Cri D 14,2 / - 1—L7L1/Jt5 -®vrPT JM r To ii ? ? Af 1 Z ovT 06 B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. i !XIS ICJ ik 6ri lye? £4iffri, #Aim cr1/ /e-OV /i 76i -S PrAtO �i-1-OPii - , rn 5,0/2-r tO'0n1 D $1Utr J04-er 2' ri(16170-0 iyuitvp4 i6,65 Pplim65 /f i,u,I& AILIV Mole 6,1Z,1,I 0 IMMO 13 xU' Wiu- 7-'( w l,u 074711 LV ?it< C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. Pal / uA e wi 1 / rf1uad - 9wre Ct1 - l>UTD 670597v6 li1ro k piomm PP P 6 y )A' op wAt,6 ,Ateiv6 ipm &MU ?A/0 i1 J I,J P1PI0 7U PP0101rn pj5PM5 bi'6/005 oN 51,P0 D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates' landscaping and creates buffers. AiVirloArk, iN vc Nli / i film f/04/W1J iuma4 l A Ilia VC-66111170i MI, 136- e' 11 J, 411 III E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimising building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. for emi s ON' 77,117.5 9/ Lg tae6i2 77 A'4e 1 F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. i144/2 r Vim) aiW/77f/fJ , -etas V Gf'7ojL) &'P '-S ,1 1,/e61419 G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. �a is itomeumit A-6603 15 a/0 S/1V. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. AJ/A- r • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: ilippl 1 l For: Applicant • •ECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMIT. The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical,,or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. 14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 15. Show a grade area of not less than 450 square feet or the construction of a stable, , 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17). 16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate land contours with existing ground. 17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. 18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. 19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 171 Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) any and all perimeter easements measured to a minimum lineal distance of 10 feet perpendicular to the property lines; b) any portion of the lot used for roadway purposes; c) any private drive or driveway which provides access to any other lot or parcel; and d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA." Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing 'buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. DATE Mite (\ 11 BUILDING AREAS. NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE RECREATION COURT ( 5 Port coon- ) SERVICE YARD OTHER • • ZONING CASE NO. 51(Q ADDRESS 12 ©OTl''' 1 ne/- ,W " APPLICANT /41/AIf OM t 7ip. l- OF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED sq.ft. CALCULATION EXISTING, g 5377 sq.ft. t S-o5D 11a) 3P;q; sq.ft. (ela sq.ft. co-'o sq.ft. 9>aV sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. /01j sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 5 475 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE G 4 % % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 4Z % DRIVEWAY 774sz7,5 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 1 sq.ft. POOL DECKING / ^},6V sq.ft. (p 026 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE / 11 cov sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE / % sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 2.-tf So sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL f 5377 sq.ft. t -t o Z sq.ft. 3 "?..15i sq.ft. loci° sq.ft. 5 ub sq.ft. 07 sq.ft. 9-KS? sq.ft. sq.ft. t 01) sq.ft. 2-1-iSO sq.ft. sq.ft. /•3 % Ce4 % sq.ft. 2"775 sq.ft. '700 sq.ft. 14 U-j sq.ft. sq.ft. ) 7 rfl sq.ft. .Z a 0 sq.ft. .6875-. ,q.ft. % 101 % 15O sq.ft. _/ (pt O sq.ft. 11. 0 % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 • Z U ZONING CASE NO. 90 ADDRESS 1 d T ) PCt lW R /4 APPLICANT 7_Y//N 6 p f7 ii1V AI4 CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA .6D50 sq.ft. 2yZ1 RESIDENCE 4 5' sq.ft. 1 do GARAGE —(fit sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. 3,687 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % PAD NO.2',3 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 3357 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT (S Pf gx Cwt i X) (W sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE sq.ft. OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this (AA (r .L (9- 44/u S day of &.\ &` y t‘,(k./A-A\_ By: , California , 19�_. oiferY 06.. b. Address O 1.-- 4=i t L t( Ua- CI OP- City CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, 1 -U -;tea 04-14 declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at day of Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change , California, this ,19 7 . FEE-25-97 TUE 1:06 PM BENEZRA STUDIO FAX NO, 310 548 1961 P. 2 DATE i 4 l \ 1P ZCSNG CASE NO. to ADDRES* l Z OuT'R it»', 1,D, APPLICANT t-`'t.s N a 4 2IV (1 BUILDING AREAS NET LOT AREA CALCULATION EXISTING 8377sq.ft. f3OOa BUILDING PADS) 11 D p sq.ft. RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE RECREATION COURT SERVICE YARD OTHER 'fool. 000 St 61 sq.ft. �7 sq.ft. �oO sq.ft. f�O sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 100 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 504 te, sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE .3%S % % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE it, a % DRIVEWAY f4oZG sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 100 sq.ft. POOL DECKING 1100 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK (p D?rCj sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE fl11 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE le, In % OF LOT COVERAGE PRQPOSED TOTAL sq.ft. 66 o7 7 sq.ft. 8000 sq.ft. t Z o o sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 760 sq.ft. sq.ft. SOD sq.ft. sq.ft. 'aoO sq.ft, Z450 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Z160 sq.ft. Z4S0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 00 sq.ft. / D 1 sq.ft. Tic) % % 15 % 153 % sq.ft. 2.11G sq.ft. -100 sq.ft. 9e3 ) sq.ft. 100 sq.ft. 61-eva sq.ft. t�► % '.� 115Q sq.ft. I t' OS sq.ft. S(19 % tort, % sq.ft. '76c sq.ft. 1 % r Ciiy • ol /eOf/tfl ._J4//d INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Date Filed January 15. 1997 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s): Mr. and Mrs. David Tabah Address: 12 Outrider Road. Rolling Hills. CA 90274 2. Legal Owner(s): David and Lynn Tabah 3. Project Address: 12 Outrider Road. Rolling Hills. CA 90274 Assessor's Book No. 7567 - 003 - 033 Lot No. 74-EF NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Zoning Case No. 547 Tel. (310) 514-9111 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Approvals are required by the Planning Commission, concurrence by the City Council, and the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. 5. Existing zoning district: Residential Agricultural -Suburban - 1 acre Zone (RA-S-11 6. Proposed project/use of site: Develop a sports court at a lot where a one-story single family residence with an attached garage is being constructed to replace an existing single family residence. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size: 1.96 acres 8. Net lot area 85.377 square feet 9. Total square footage of structures: Existing and proposed structures on the lot are a one-story single family residence. attached garage, swimming pool. pool house. stable and the proposed sports court. These structures will total 7.037 square feet. 10. Number of floors of construction: : N/A 11. Basement square footage: N/A INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage: 12.505 square feet 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?: N/A 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?: N/A 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?: N/A 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added?: N/A 17. Will cut and fill be balanced? Amount cut 20 cubic yards Amount fill 20 cubic yards 18. Area of disturbance. Square feet 13.107 square feet. Percentage of lot 15.4%. 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet: The residence is 2.927 sauare feet. 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N/A 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. As soon as possible. 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. The proiect requires a request for a Variance to encroach into the rear yard setback for a proposed sports court and a request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Recreational Game Court in conformance with the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO X 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. X 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. X 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 2 • • YES NO X 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. X 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. X 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. X 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. X 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. X 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. X 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). X 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). X _ 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. The sports court is proposed to be situated on a hillside at a third level below a new single family residence that is being constructed to replace an existing single family residence. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. The project site is a large 1.96 acre parcel consisting of an undulating hillside covered by mature shrubs and trees. with some areas being heavily wooded. Currently. a one-story single family residence with an attached garage is being constructed to replace an existing single family residence. The new residence encroaches into the front yard setback. There is an existing stable at the site. At a second level down from the residence there is an existing pool and pool house. The applicants propose to construct a sports court at a third level beneath the pool and pool house. Landscaped lawns. shrubs and trees surround the existing residence. with native plants. grasses. shrubs. and trees beyond the residential area. Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows. raccoons, possum. skunks, gophers and an occasional fox. 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE3 • • (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. The site is located within a one unit per 1-acre zone designation and is surrounded by similar development of the one-story ranch style residences with agricultural outbuildings. As described in Paragraph 38. native birds and animals frequent the area. A detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" . or "Maybe" is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Please explain all "yes" and "maybe" answers on separate sheets) YES MAYBE NO 40. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _ X a-d. Although approval of the snorts court will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures. it should be noted that portions of the City exhibit unstable earth conditions. including active landslides and soil creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading. excessive irrigation. and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active Southern California. additional development will be exposed to potential groundshaking in the event of an earthauake. The Palos Verdes fault, considered potentially active. is located approximately one mile northeast of the City. Approval of the sports court will result in disruptions. displacement. compaction. or overcrowding of the soil at the eastern portion of the lot. During construction these will occur in order to prepare a 3.357 square foot pad site for the 2.450 square foot sports court. Two building pads currently exist. The displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced cut and fill on each individual lot and should not cause a significant environmental impact. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 4 YES MAYBE NO e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? g• X X e-g. During future construction. there will be removal of some natural vegetative cover to create a building pad. potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and the increased runoff associated with development may cause a slight increase in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As additional development is limited to a 2.450 square foot sports court. related erosion impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures A. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the City 15 copies .of a preliminary grading plan showing proposed drainage direction and facilities. driveways, easements, setbacks, existing structures. building pad(s). the sports court. stable. corral. and blue line streams for the lot at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the Variance and Conditional Use Permit applications. 41. Air. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X b. The creation of objectionable odors? _ X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ X a-c. The proposed proiect provides for a total net increase in development of a sports court. Although this development will generate slight increases in vehicle trips during and after INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 5 • • construction and obiectionable odors during construction. the resultant impact on air auality will be less than significant. YES MAYBE NO 42. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X The development of a sports court will not alter fresh or marine water currents. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X The proposed sports court may alter drainage patterns. increase surface runoff and reduce water absorption by the placement of a concrete sports court and the introduction of impervious surface materials and irrigation systems. The impacts are not expected to be substantial. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X No maior floodplains exist in the City. Flood waters generally flow through the canyon areas. The proposed sports court is proposed for a flat area above the bottom of the canyon that exists on this hillside lot. Changes in the course or flow of floodwaters is not anticipated. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X No water bodies are located in the proiect area. Future development of a sports court is not expected to result in change in the amount of surface water of anv water bodies located in the vicinity. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ X g., Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? _ _ X INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 6 • • No maior floodplains exist in the City and development is not permitted in the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of water occur within the City. thus no such hazard exists. The sports court is located high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do not exist. YES MAYBE NO j Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? _ X 43. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? _ X b . Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? _ _ X c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ X d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ X a-d. Anv additional development within the City will reduce the amount of native vegetation which will be replaced in some instances by non-native species. But. due to the limited growth proposed. the development of a sports court. this impact will be less than significant. In addition. the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the City. 44. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X As further development occurs in Rolling Hills. the natural habitat of the area will be slightly reduced. But. the impact of the current proposal is expected to be less than significant. b . Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? _ _ X The development of a sports court for this project provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. In 1994. the Palos Verdes Blue butterfly. formerly listed as endangered. was seen at the nearby San Pedro Fuel Depot Station where its habitat is being restored. Several other animals do INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 7 • • occur. however. that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal Government or the State Government. Recently. the California gnatcatcher was removed from the list of endangered species and. in a recent census. pairs were located in the adjacent City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Other target species for the Rancho Palos Verdes Peninsula Area that are being studied by the State of California Department of Fish and Game are the Cactus Wren and the Coast Horned Lizard. The impact of the proposed future development of a sports court will be less than significant. YES MAYBE NO c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? X d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ _ X 45. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X Noise levels from the use of the proposed sports court may increase. These noise levels are expected to be intermittent in nature. A full size tennis court currently exists at the residence at the north side of this property at the same elevation. Development of the sports court is consistent with similar recreational uses in the community and the court will be located in an area of the property where such use will not be intrusive to surrounding properties. Therefore. the impacts of the noise levels from the use of a sports court at the subiect site is not expected to be substantial. b . Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 46. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 47. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 48. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural 'resource? 49. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ X b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 8 X YES MAYBE NO 50. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X 51. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 52. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X X X X X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? 53.. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: X a. Fire protection? _ _ X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ _ X f. Other governmental services? X 54. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ X b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X 55. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? _ X INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 9 b. Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO X c. Water? X d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 56. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard excluding mental health? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 58. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 59. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? X X X X X b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? X d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X Mitigation Measures B. In the event that subsurface material of an archaeological. paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during proiect grading or development. all grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area. and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist. whichever is appropriate. is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition. mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 10 • • with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition. mitigation or salvage of such material. 60. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or more separate resources where the impact is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 11 YES MAYBE NO X X X X • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county: 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: DECEMBER 1994 Date: LOLA M. UNGAR (Signature) For the City of Rolling Hills Public Agency INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 12 • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date: FEBRUARY 13, 1997 LOLA M. UNGAR (Siture) For the City of Rolling Hills Public Agency CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: FEBRUARY 13, 1997 LOLA M. UNGAR (Si(gziature) For the City of Rolling Hills Public Agency • On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared. I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date February 13, 1997 INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 13 By: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPI PLANNER For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency) • • ZONING CASE NO. 550 Mr. and Mrs. David Tabah 12 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mitigation Measures A. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the City 15 conies of a preliminary grading plan showing proposed drainage direction and facilities, driveways, easements. setbacks. existing structures, building pad(s), the sports court, stable, corral, and blue line streams for the lot at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the Variance and Conditional Use Permit applications. B. In the event that subsurface material of an archaeological, paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during proiect grading or development. all grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area. and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist. whichever is appropriate. is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition. mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition, mitigation or salvage of such material. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 550 PAGE 14