Loading...
874, Construct a 338 sq ft aviary, ApplicationREOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure an your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: gtoT evrvA fr4ottieb tiltie 'UM - EMAIL: LOT NO. 193 rooriovi IT lc Ram { Q ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 917 PAGE PARCEL "" 7 tit : -190? OO4— ex) g 6* 4 4 (5-23- i 00000 A?�1 cotopq /lo C014P 64-02- NATURE OF PROPOSED P4O TECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance conditional use is permitted in the zone. the 1,,,„,,rorco tovvinavo- fryt ttitprz-ti �t,•A.14,6) tut `t'tv, gAvt• ro4noo pP2pe41y kva /+verAAT . rePoro4rrio loot 170N P 35e, •il'i/le-% (. "(yi15 P^'' /y1.,? (.o►zbryvL-444A. Pilou0.10 Zoo tb g7 foDer `L • �r wh i I A & ?tteti elA10 J9f\ ttA-0 Trwitv•-t4A 5 co v� -tue, rAllafTy ibri-t.,--111 -0,r .%4- poet/14r itt•vw -114/1)5' ion. fin4,411- 46.5•?5-uprs/2-6 frIff.'t11-5r A,vocnoa q"itfri?oo 1rtit71.y - f,224.���i� Will the proposed use be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? 4troerr rt. t* *AA ftotter-2.11tIsekt ptetie Voi penv19, (7 MPItiC4 /kr ookliti tir 114419$416tva 114 .y� vN�tn 76'%6- • 14 100/1"Pi'p11otJ ¶ -146e,0 roe et,55 D" Th. *6(O r raw pearvatLy toivi*TrAir tP r t s avig W 1140011,69v; 40ipr -ram' 11^4- pevbrogro 1(;11417 tiargirei4i. tot 4*v• eavve fp. - Vitt/AT O► kertov0-0 nip tip, A-f pi$itThpot4414 koper- . r 61 vot popeePry 14 it\yeKilastorati1,1fM "rt-j A•tv 1-t 'c' t vies, p to votti-its- % (4 potrs$60 P C�` ,te vt' 4se (1 I� . tit 6t M Ptex 0 prkoroprom (u Clit. 1lAt, "PyttetiwAPtiet Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? 60/tPkt Itta- ,0914jor rr' vty (*A Feti 016ca&'N g• w414441 of $akf fitt4P a•OtiotAittiA9 ,its aria ,imp Ittikr ,PO/ tovtity n jfi7M Q~ s foti- fi4tierary trci c tisrvAuttip fib , ` •;., 6 -it,1 G ®r its Govt, noiupi v5 6 WAttoli. tMi i•Atieti fUrtir401144.- 1114. keoor , )+144t.141. tat FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS., -13- ecev RI eeer, VFW& INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed Zoning Case No. 99-11 GENERAL INFORMATION,,//11,,�� //����� .� 1. Applicant(s) t4i"n't7 601415 Tel. (3 (C) 1p p ,5102. Address TA,5 /M i / ; f1:T'tuvo tfrrr✓[ 44. gotp 2. Legal Owner(s) dellt4JMIiVl4CMf TeI. F()_. v * ;DPO Address OVT n4,4,0'U 3. Project Address 10+QUtI9 ,4sseet ,' C2e 4o.. __ 190 7 •- op l Lot No. t 0 N °Ivrc 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: t/tr6V4T14,4pt.ttorhetio- N,05.rowytk: 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site PROTECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size ft - * ' tiff? lm"ro k pomp 8. Net lot area . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures i' i/4440: 4 10. Number of floors of construction v" l 11. Basement square footage t./4.. 9• 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 14` 13. Will any exterior wails be removed or relocated? Which wails? • +I o 14.. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? M0 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? i� d 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? i Proposed? 14;46' (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? f O Proposed? flit (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? Proposed? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? Proposed? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? 14. ( A.. Explain Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Explain tl If h. Does uncovered parkin area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? _ Explain i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? Stable and,corral average vehicular access slope (� Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut (include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet . Percentage of Net Lot Area 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 2 . Amount fill • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sates area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. l d. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/a: 23. if institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. /!. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. (t) piu' 4 1V 1 PO ir 1 rwo , '�'� ff U O) rtlev. tvtamee PV Ui `" " GS tiA4.0 nkowir,0 44/0/44744T 4046f . ENVIRONMENTAL. SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. FitoK 4 trif flow/kits tiev-Olsort. twiirfruirotK Vierf tivt;,t Two- ("orV.we- of LL,M.'y ty*Criefp 4114.0rtkit:ime,..em-po-94,z, 0.46144-kttAttivet (.5,y pae9 istwO wL rro,viVvvLR9r- ., .; . i _ ` ►4.- t ► t4 4 • - • 28. Describe, the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. i / 4v0,04tivti OW 40 A i #A4-1-101,' ?ISO rtain Atetelfylows-n, c -tips Flor f ' °" `7 AlA4 pool* 41 Pro v `owl$ 'N'10.040e. Ovr to The, PAei t °"-t / tistvtoolittiPrat froustrOtAT forl-WO #14-ffr Alitvt"1"--+d of. wlotimivwt 41, rthott pim— /kilos -pro wok vv14, 04.1 1 teioreAlis r qw(,�. r 16 Gosiortkti - • 29. is the proposed protect consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the followina studies been submitted? Geology Report __. Hydrology Report _ Soils Report r Traffic Study _ Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 4 Yes Historical Report r Archaeological Report Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis _ Slope Map _ Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A o_ REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mod j5' or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure, which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: JOHN AND JOANNA RICH OWNER'S ADDRESS: 20 OUTRIDER , ROLLING HILLS , CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO: EMAIL: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 20 OUTRIDER , ROLLING HILLS, CA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 78, PORTION OF LOT 95, BOOK 7566 A.P.N. 7567 - 004 - 008 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: GREG GEORGE 318 AVENUE 1, #154 , REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90277 310/ 686.5202 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS TO CONSTRUCT A33DSF AVIARY AND A 358.4 SF KOI POND THAT IS WITHIN THE MAIN OUTDOOR LIVING AREA ON THE PRIMARY BUILDING PAD, NEXT TO THE POOL AREA. 1. THE AVIARY IS LARGER THAN THE ALLOWED 200 SF FOOTPRINT PROVIDED IN THE PLANNING CODE, YET THE PROPERTY IS 3.49 ACRES. AND ALL OTHER CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL CAN READILY BE MET, OTHER THAN THE 5 ACRE REQUIREMENT. 2. THE KOI POND ADDS 356.4 SF TO THE WATER FEATURES AND POOL &SPA OF 705.25 SF TO A TOTAL OF 1,063.65 SF. THIS IS ABOVE THE ALLOWED 800 SF PROVIDED IN THE PLANNING CODE. DD th IM4X , i S crvk ,Q,L(,r,fa,14 A) hmv iS/SP L$ ) 'Yt LAra,b, u p4- ,t rn,)) .�n) .S';tr ikev. &iti r7 Yt.F-t -12- Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage THERE IS NO NEW BASEMENT AREA AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA C9 P iL .- ke titie.e.,/ Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. 1. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 3.49 ACRES. 2. THE EXISTING CONDITION AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROPERTY. FALL WITHIN THE CITYS PLANNING GUIDELINES FOR LOT AND BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PERCENTAGES. THE KOI POND AND POOL ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE ALLOWABLE 800 SF. 3. THE PROPOSED WORK IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT ASPIRATIONS OF MANY OF THE RESIDENTS IN THE COMMUNITY AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SUBROUNDING USES. THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALLOWS FOR UNLIMITED AVIARY SIZE ON FIVE ACRE PARCELS, YET THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS 3-49 ACRFS ANh 1S UNREASONARI Y RFSTRU'TED TO AVIARY DEVELOPMENT THE PLANNING AND ZONING CODE SHOULD BE AMMENDED TO REFLECT A TIER DEVELOPMENT STANDARD. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land THE Pforms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the -project preserves and integrates existing natural features. ROPOSED PROJECT IS ON THE BUILDABLE PAD, AT THE EDGE OF THE CANYON AND NATURAL AREA. THE PROJECT ENHANCES THE APPRECIABLE AND VISIBLE USE OF THE POOL AND PATIO AREA BY ADDING AN AMENITY THAT CAN BE APPPRECIATED BY ALL WHO COME INTO THE POOL AREA. (THERE IS NO OTHER AREA ON THE PROPERTY WHERE THIS FEATURE CAN BE PLACED AND APPRECIATED BY SO MANY). THE NATURAL SYSTEj'd1SOf WATER AND BIRD FEEDING WILL INEVITABLY PRODUCE A POSITIVE EFFECT ON LOCAL BIRD LIFE IN THE CANYON. NATIVE VEGETATION WILL BE POSITIVELY ENHANCED AND MATURF TRPFC W11 I NOT RF NFGATIVFI Y FFFFCTFIT C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. NO GRADING IS REQUIRED. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. THE PROJECT IS A LANDSCAPE AND NATURAL WATER PROJECT THAT PROVIDES WATER TO LOCAL WILDLIFE. THE PROJECT IS BEINGIIICORPORATED INTO THE EXISTING TREE CANOPY. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. THE PROJECT FITS WITHIN THE ALLOWABLE GUIDELINES OF DEVELOPMENT. NO trrPDttto trAmiltY4,619 t4ivept,- Pwrotto Ofin6 u io 172 cgrertreilly,v✓ . tpw N h 6 geutovrro Alt9 u w+, lbw wfrt- . as 0 , t4m.voy l f icsi (9kpocr F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. CAREFUL CONSIDERATION TO SCALE AND MASS WERE OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE IN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE WAS CRITICAL TO "SOFTENING" ANY AND ALL OF THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES SO THAT THERE ARE NO HARD PLANAR ELEMENTS. THE SPECIFIC LOCATION ON THE PROPERTY PROVIDES FOR THE MOST FURTHEST SETBACK FROM ALL OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, THUS ENSURING THE LEAST AMOUNT OF IMPACT TO ANY NEIGHBOR. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. THE PROPOSED AVIARY AND KOI POND ENHANCES THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE AND VEHICULAR CRITERIA IS NOT RELEVANT. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. ALL CRITERIA OF CEQA - ARE MET AND THERE IS NO NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. -14- I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in a ed exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria iu n the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented atrue an orrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: JANUARY 19, 2015 For: GREG GEORGE Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -15- DATE • ZONING CASE NO. 0.7f. ADDRESS ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON TH 14, PLAN CALCULATION Of LOT COVERAGE AREA ANTS STRUCTURES NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT6;4s,j^ GUEST HOUSE Y''xc' CABANA EXISTING I5Z 1Sq.ft. �sq.ft, Oa. .ft. 1°1 --,q.ft. o — sq.ft.` sq.ft. o — sq.ft. PROPQSU --D -- sq.ft. - ©" sq.ft. -- D sq.ft. — sq.ft. - -- sq.ft. o .• sq.ft. o -- sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included f'''iCO in grading quantities �1 routL ) 41- sq.ft. "0 sq.ft. RECREATION COUR — a sq.ft -- eP sq.ft q q ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES • /sq.ft. sq.ft. Q, ... sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: a .i it G 1 (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELI..TSF.c' 9 t sq.ft, 6'06q 11 o *it Pr 212, , /- sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 5 -- --- sq.ft. pia apd over 120 sq. ft. in area, ., WATER FEATURES) ETC. fr ' .ft. SERVICE YARDCPOVt p) 4fe sq.ft. OTHER ?i' sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA /1/4 sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) NA - DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES XCLLI ;DJNCF UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. / 75D. sq.ft. 14(401 4,(‘-e-4d) /0, 5°9' sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE %� Ja/o (.1() .(1°L' 11-f TOTAL 152f1tsq.ft. 6 45- sq. ft. t,04 . sq.ft. .701.1 q.ft. -- sq.ft. sq.ft. --v4— sq.ft. tic-0 sq.ft. d — sq.ft. sq.ft.._,.,. .,_sq.ft. 1 Pi/ .' .'� sq.ft. '-- 0 -- sq.ft. e I sq.ft. ---e��" sq.ft. •---m sq.ft. sq.ft. — d — sq.ft. sq.ft. iv* sq.ft. N� sq.ft. %. sq.ft., -"© sq.ft. �-D sq.ft. cve...(st,tiS sq.ft. x. ' Sc"?‘. sq.ft. 6 (-1,- f- , -- C--sq.ft. 15211:Oft. 4'4t sq.ft sq.ft, 4/4 sq.ft. NA /41/61.41c .ft. 'III ' V — ,trs1h u 11 (P 4 ,t' .ft. (S FEB 2 0 2015 City of Rolling Hills By DATE `.1 Z.C.NIP ADDRESSVO ' CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NQ,1 RXTTTfARLE PAD AREA RXTSTTNG AND STRTTCTTTRRS BUILDING PAD .ft RESIDENCE GARAGE-- ¢GV l�' l(1 d5 6fPPOOtt A itV / rp • 1 `, c;� n 171 POOL EQUIPMEGX/►j D ' Cq.ft. otift-CABANA/REC.Rb y�� " ./4!sq ft, 1oG2�q.ft. (LiM GUEST HOUSE �"` sa•ft• fib' STABLE h 11, SPORTS COURT '" �'�," C'q•ft• ; SERVICE YARD (N ff,9Qdy. sq ft:. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES , j 1 ft Primary, residence C� 17 q• Accessory structures4� �sq•fr• `AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED Jo% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED STRUCTURE S (from is' page) 4-oh it. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1"page�Q,t incl}iding allowed deductions) 0 '—cq.fr. cq 1"®"-C .ft � �-5, 5 ■�q ft q ft. 1'(sq ft. PR 11Pf4E1:1 - 0 q.ft00- . Bq.ft. ®—sq.ft. cq.fr. "® .~" p ..rgft. ST.ft. a -••4q.ft. ..sq.ft. ..-d _. sq.ft. cq,ft. TOTAL c7/ `q.ft. 1®� 119/ 1ft. q.ft. ""-bq. ft. ft. 6111 O .01q: ft. cq. . p"sq.ft.®rr74.ft. * sq.ft.CA V► ti?' "G_gft( 'dr L ® --,q.fr. 10j3og-R5. *. ftIYODy�• �.G. ft I. . � TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. i(, % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % 1 a� bt�•asLioia4/th d-�, TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO 1 )0)5 ° . sq.ft. cq.ft.J' i J Nor inr1 attached trellises, 11414, Nor inf.] allowed deductions, anV1 inrl the area of coveredporches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/arcs. structur . f 1 a 1-q.ft. � a 9.15 �= 8 % %•� °la % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 3 . % E( .t\D U 33 �' � 5 (to D- a-4". DATE Z.C. NOW"'7 ADDRESS CALCULATION OF AUILDING- PAD COVERAGE .. PAD NO. ?Y BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED AND STRUCTURES a,q fr cq,ft. BU1Lll.iNli PAD RESIDENCE D `sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE 0' sq.ft. cc'. ft, POOL/SPA "'4,"' sq,ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT -'0" cq.ft. sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM "—o '^cq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE "". 0-....'"`c,T.ft. sq.ft. STABLE ��f�sq ft ........0 'rq,ft. SPORTS COURT "aGe77-19>" &—`sq.ft. cq,ft. SERVICE YARD C.,--'Aq.ft. cq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence "` et —Tq.ft. sq.ft cq.ft. sq.ft.. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED — O cq.ft sq,ft, Accessory structures PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES TOTAL 5Y67„q.ft, • ® q. ft, ▪ l3'..`cq.fr. ''.. amo.cq. ft. "4:1) cq.ft. cq.ft. ePasq.ft. — D q.ft. •• O sq.ft. cq, ft. • d • Z;q.ft. cq.ft. cq.ft: cq.ft, sq,ft: sq.ft! cq,ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) sq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1"page nor including allowed sq.ft,. sq.ft, sq.ft. deductions) )4A*4-. OTHER P4 �sq ft. — 0 cq.ft. ! sq ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 7J q.ft. sq ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE o:5% % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 '" * o cq.ft. Nor inrl attached trellises, Nor incl allowed deductions, and incl the area of coveredporches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE C. c"--% "' d -9- ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN &-\4,'5/ 416 prde. Imo I-a-4 PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) b'Z4D sq.ft. "'�B sq.ft. eol-ibt, sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS ( r 7r& sq.ft. sq.ft. !Snit. sq.ft. POOL DECKING l,titriVsq.ft. sq.ft. tt(Ct,sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS 2. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. g'ef' sq. ft. ii TOTAL FLATWORK t °1. 14°asq.ft. © sq.ft. to Itsq.ft., % TOTAL FLATWORK,,"- COVERAGE ."''y �,�_ � �0 " {y % �. 2 C r/ :' % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE ') p7yi asjft. - ! �'GSia3� q.. fsq.ft.+' /tcS.. clo TOTAL COVERAGE f'..V % % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft, sq.ft. 2 3 ND �( 'ham TOTAL DISTURBED AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. cubic yards * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. • eerf WA, Vrected oq 11/ Alitit414 ! q /3 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed ///r5 /y At& Zoning Case No. g / / 1' GENERAL INFORMATION INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 a, 1. Applicant(s) bV/�",5b ems+ egib Tel. `oj 6065102 Address A " 5 � J' / "' 164- I Arroxeo 4 gozv Legal Owner(s) rto,4 Tel LI &OO Address /LpQv'T 19 3. Project Address O ,Assesses-B�eek44o. _ 1907 - 1 - ePIS �S 5'$_- ,_-to Lot No. il OQr Rho 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site PROTECT DESCRIPTION 461 i4- 7 . 7. Site size 6rliki___60106•FridAd`r. Vie•P f6littli4-7 "42 Vol rolktP 8. Net lot area . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion joff a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 4 s lee ( 10. Number of floors of construction l 11. Basement square footage • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 14' i 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 1%iv 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? 1" n 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? ( Proposed? '" o A V (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 143 Proposed? 1414 (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). Proposed? Proposed? f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? tv Explain g• Explain Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? V/ . h, Does uncovered parkin area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located?p Explain Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope off225% or less? Stable and corral average vehicular access slope' j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? _ z,,!, With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut . Amount fill (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. 141,, Square feet . Percentage of Net Lot Area . 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 2 • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N' I 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. n. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional useor rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. C l) 1740frr (wcGvoYs l4- tor,i romr t'st-49 A'KecfhA7y VAC- (1107, ,Qvwn Fovw7--frivi "144- 1144 iolk �Ir-tfk-44.bTv ivy/APR/ $eyoa.n 890 ti> (2) Tilv/ pyttrer timAnori AA /14P144- 9-t�.a„�-�rl�.. oa�.�o 2�0 � fo,�' e+.w044 10101f- . ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. ritotff4L-if feerviiis D� t is tµ i,°1q('LTt4Tinvto6 i- 4Pw0r v 4 - ti y prAetb VAN,/ paiwittri.tpulp-944- 6146144-17114%vve. (5'y (76) mitt„ lictro - to tet-Pi 1O t%i ..,, 15 `3(,a`p�r t�rt,�c j lervm9 �`' y,,� y-r 1 u Tthi fs 316+w0 • • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. ti3IP 2 r-ictfr ' few! pvvios410 ckn ovl op- #14,414.7 4ii' E7 p01410 , rth 1y N 0 vt -jrw -1O cx 6 - to 1 I`L, M 1\M# !l' GN t ,A.tw 4' �'y P y61� y 'tr. / + friejtiPPAT nthit-c U 44/10 roe, r'i4.14 la' tµ(fit(MV'w4 d� f K,tc1 2 -rwro „ UU t,a, Qo t;.vvt•9 -tn 4$ t o 1 toorears r r{ vvvoie `{- rAt t 6 l° 1'`'19a ut vt ' 29. Is the proposed protect consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have anv of the followina studies been submitted? _ Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 4 Yes Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis _ Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agencymust describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 5 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. 6 Potentially Significant Impact Less Thal. Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact • Impact Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic 0 ❑ ❑iff vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including ❑ 0 ❑ but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character ❑ 0 0 or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ 0 ❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or 0 ❑ ❑ a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ 0 0 +� which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ 0 applicable air quality plan? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporation b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ❑ ❑ 0 if to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any 0 0 ❑ a criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 it concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number 0 0 0 IP of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ❑ 0 ' through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑ other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected 0 ❑ ❑ wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 ❑ ❑ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 ir biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 ❑ 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact Les�S Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ 0 0 of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 ❑ 0 0 of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ❑ ❑ • outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on ❑ 0 ❑ the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ 0 0 1111 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 ❑ 0 iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 ❑ 4 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- ❑ 0 0 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use 0 0 ❑' of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ 0 0 0' environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 ❑ 0 * environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ 0 ❑ 1 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0' hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ 0 0 • plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere 0 ❑ ❑ 0 with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ 0 0 St loss, injury or death involving wildland.fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY —Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ 0 t discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ 0 ❑ 0' interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ 0 ❑ the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of 0 0 0 44 the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would 0 0 ❑ It exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 4 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area 0 0 ❑ as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ 4' structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 ❑ ❑I' Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ 0 4' IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 0 regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ natural community conservation plan? 0 X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral 0 0 ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents .of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important ❑ 0 0 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ ❑ ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels 0 ❑ ❑ 4, in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ 0 ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 ❑ ' where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 411 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 12 • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 di directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 ❑ 0 necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 ❑ ❑ 41 the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ 0 0 111 Police protection? 0 ❑ ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ 0 ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑' XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ 0 neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ ❑ 0 St the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 13 • • Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 ❑ 0 dir relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of ❑ ❑ 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 ❑ ❑ an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ 0 0 fi (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ 0 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ 0 ❑' g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 ❑ 4 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ ❑ ❑ applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ ❑ ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ❑ ❑ ❑ drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑ ❑411 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • • e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? Potentially Significant Impact El d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair ❑ the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause ❑ significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of ❑ the project site or surrounding areas? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ift ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ in a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Of ❑ ❑ t Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ 0 ❑' quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ 0 0 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which ❑ 0 ❑ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 4 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: t 1 " 604 61 2. Address: „`r f , (14-msodfoo (kiwi 10/i7 3. Phone Number: iAD P "0 ' (i 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): Dure4k9fylc e-ottotot 44(6 GA- aoT4 5. Local Agency (city/county): aft/ or 00(66.44 4 or. 454444. 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 1 (pmet&or. i') q - 6 _ t o 15-G7 _ 004- -- oorb 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST lavailable at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date For -.17- • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of th°e Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date 5 Sign re For ‘144-6 Aostertr- Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date t.6) I lotc For Sit a App icant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -18-