Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
508, Modification Pavng of a portio, Application
J A N 0 5 1994 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ewoorem N00000000000.Vti t REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN IZEN=PENNT-r'0 OtFICP (O a PROPERTY OWNER: Jo �l �� . 1? t c ‘-1 OWNER'S ADDRESS: Z O Dora i n .ti Ro A ra R. TELEPHONE NO: rj 41 - 3 3 2, Co PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: Q 443 0 Er LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 7 8 4 e) 5 , 5 , h $ / ASSESSORS BOOK NO.7 5.6, 7 PAGE 4 PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: 8 Sr,O is C3cA4) CI. ACft EE.RltA(-1 304 TcJot) PL. M.C.-.Ca. 90271 Cato) 37c5 Z A NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan aerie= M o \D \ «n , k o a P A\l t►�1C, of fa tPC %for 05. 7R IcQS L() a PPrr6J6rD AaF,A FOR GO n fl-1E_ (\DP2nVA1J/aS Fna C____S ()Rr-Are... SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. P (<-LNCr, czU cnvcQt=r caI Pt;aret, re. ira MN) rZn--r 17)c4QQ. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. ll-1c (4 r•pc To PJG Ile-,asn Fnn►n.. 1t (ri CAlgTS v.) c 1 N -T C(i R A T C, D "Nita 77-I t-" D t= 51 t_',1a C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. t-1 S 1 i E. ► .S L ©P -r L A N n S c A PC- D E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. )N e lr,LGOt-A-rt 0N) 41= L0 T Gdve Rf4G-t 1=tG-tt/dQ..l5 ert4) T1-1 Al A t R r' Lt. P 1 /2 C tY to TA Gr G d l= T t-I (. t_. O T 1 5 D e L () P tt.", F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. Ti- Cr; Cr, i s -r" P ("' t ) Ca rb C Lok.) 1Rorot t? Pgot) t= n-r•) Li NIt 3 t i t' tlQ r UC.1:0( I i 1 RCe, =►yT N(7 P2t)F LEMC G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. IT C ►RCLLA-i0P, A-5 t r ELIM,NATt 5 r OtJ Tf - eta-R[,1C, . H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. �ider2A Date: ci : 0, 41 11 q 4- �C i S'ignatu For: J Applicant . . P.. c l-I OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. this Executed at 4th San Pedro , California day of Januarn � 1 , 19 94. By• By: John W. Rich ?n nritrider Road Address Rolling Hills. CA 90274 City OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Pedro ,California, this 4th day of January , 1994. John W. Rich 20 Outride,r Pond, Pn11;ng Hilts, CA 90274 (address) NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: I)owIL«5 t V(4-I/► T1� FEE: COMPANY NAME : 600 , FAO p i\V- /N c- 6-0 06, RECEIPT ' NO: COMPANYADDRESS: 3 D -F361) PL , BY: (] , J , I- , ZONING CASE NO: COMPANY PHONE NO. (3101-375—=2 S""_s7 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: ZO OO-r.Rirni^ tz • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 23,925 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 6,195 sq.ft. GARAGE 1,062 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft. POOL 720 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) 0 sq.ft. OTHER Aviary 335 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 8,312 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 34.7 % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 4,830 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft. GARAGE 0 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 450 future sq.ft. POOL 0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 450 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 9.3 % • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 152,378 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 28,755 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. RESIDENCE 6,195 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE 1,062 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 720 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE 450 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( Sports Court ) 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 94 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. OTHER Aviary 335 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 8,856 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL 5.81 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 30.8 % DRIVEWAY 6,280 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Guest Parking 2,415 PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 1,586 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL DECKING in above sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 10,281 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 6.75 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 19,137 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 12.56 % % %