7, Allow existing SFR to encroach, Resolutions & Approval Conditions14
BEFORE THE PLANNING " COi4MISSION OF THE .CITY OF. ROLLING HILLS,
COUNTY, OF L S ANGELES, STATE •F CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of, the Application
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Robert K.-,',Lot 94, Eastfield,
for a ide..yard variance, came ' on forhearing. on
May, 19661, AZ the hour of 8:00 P.M., at the City. Hall of the City
of Rolling Mills
California
evidence in support of his
15 . being advi
16
by the
17
18
19
20
21.
22
23
24
25
26
28
ed,, noW mal e
and the applicant having submitted
pplication,.: and the Planning Commission
Findings and Formal'Report
eport
Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills
The Commission finds
is the owner. of
Eastfield,
I.
required
California..
that the. applicant, . Robert K.:Pox,.
that certain real property described as Lot 94
located in the: City of Rolli
Hills Ls, `California, and
chat notice of the public hearing in connection with said
application was' given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.0.7 of
Ordinance "No-. 33,;. of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
That no'person appeared at said public hearing in
opposition co the application . for a variance and that no evidence
29 was received by the Commission in opposition .thereto.
30
31
.13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
'21
The. CommisE.don. further fin& that the proposed residence
of applicant is
to be fift
r_
locaiced. �:�..�t
en (15) feet from the . ;side line
o1 saki, Lot 1nstcad, rnf „twenty, five (25) feet'a,, required by said'
Z ni i 9 r ur LhF' o n� , C? n�xs� . � -'y ' � :� .the terrain
rd � e arn.� :� r finds that o ' ge«son.
variance:'should be granted to eppli ant In
order` -to preserve substantial property ..rights pOss.e sed by other
property' in the `. same vl.0 pity and:zone-, one, and.:.tha;t: the granting .03:
such variance vYi11 not be ateriaily detrimental to, the public
Welfare or.' in_3urious to property or improvement. in such -
and zone in which applicant's . property is located
.and that there.
are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by
reason of physical location and .terrain or said Lot 94, which do
not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and
zone.
From the foregoing it is concluded . nat.. a .variance
should be granted by the Planning Commissionof the City of
Rolling Hills to Robert K . Fox . of Lot 94 of Eastfield in accordance
with the plot. Plan marked Exhibit 1 on file in these proceedings,
24 and it is, 'therefore, so ordered.
'rij Lottl e roars
secretary, Planning. ComMission