Loading...
605, Construct a new SFR, grading r, CorrespondenceDear Mr. Bolton, OCT 1 22001 uv CITY OF. -ROLL'',' HILLS Fay Re: 14 Outrider Road. 12th October 2001 12 Outrider Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 Further to our conversation on Tuesday 9th October, I am writing to confirm that our discussion of the matter of the drainage pipe and rip rap will be moved an additional 50' approximately, so that the run off from this pipe will stay entirely on the property of 14 Outrider Road. The additional 50' of pipe will negate the problem of water draining on to our property at 12 Outrider Road, as much as possible. We really appreciate your cooperation on this matter. Yours Truly Lynne & David Tabah cc. Tony Inferrera. cc. Yolanta Schwartz Principal Planner Rolling Hills. 40. • APR 0 Uti CITY OF ROLL "? ` tr.. LS tv Dear Mr. Inferrera, Lynne and David Tabah 12 Outrider Road] Rolling Hills CA 90274 Re: Property At 12 Outrider Road, Rolling Hills.]. Thank you for speaking with me regarding the drainage issues affecting my property. As you know, I am extremely concerned to make sure that the drainage from the proposed home above me at 14 Outrider, does not flow onto my property, since that could cause significant landslide and related problems. In response to my concerns, you assured me that the drainpipe you currently are installing to take water from the property at 14 Outrider, will be connected directly to the culvert at the bottom of my property, and will not spill water onto any portion of my property. This is the only way to effectively deal with the drainage issue, since I simply cannot allow drainage onto my property. If my understanding that you will take the drainpipe all the way to the culvert is incorrect, please let me know as soon as possible. Otherwise, I appreciate you having discussed the issue with me and provided your assurances. Very truly yours, Lyn? ]3avid Tabah. cc: Dr. Richard Sugiyama. City of Rolling Hills. Mark Shipow, Esq., Holland 86 Knight LLP City ofiarunq �ee INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com February 23, 2001 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 14 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 605 Dear Dr. Sugiyama: This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year time extension was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on February 20, 2001 for the subject case. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2001-03, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Note that this approval will expire on FEBRUARY 15, 2002 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must re -file based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. cerely, olanta Schwartz, Principal Planner Cc: Mr. Anthony Inferrera, Architect Co Pririted on Recycled Pape!. • RESOLUTION NO. 2001-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02, APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 605. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. Anthony Infererra, Architect, on behalf of his client, Dr. Richard Sugiyama with respect to real property located at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting a one year time extension for a previously approved Site Plan Review. to permit the construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 605 that was approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 2000-02 on February 15, 2000. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on February 20, 2001, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time is necessary because the Los Angeles County Soils and Engineering Division did not complete their review of the applicant's soils and engineering report. Section 3. Based on information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 7 of Resolution No. 2000- 02, dated February 15, 2000, to read as follows: "This Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval, if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Code." Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 2000-02 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ?�'H DAYiC�F FF RUARY 2001. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: 1 4J MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02, APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 605. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 20, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte, and Chairman Roberts NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK A F. INFEIRRERA A.I.A. January 23, 2001 Mr. Craig R. Nealis City Manager ARCHITECT SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 605 14 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 75-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 Dear Mr. Nealis, On behalf of my client Dr. Sugiyama, I am requesting a one year extension for ZONING CASE NO. 605. thony F4!' ererra 1967 Upland Street, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 (310) 541-9925 • OFFICIAL RECEIPT 7320 City of c?oL'L'i z9 CALIFORNIA RECEIVED FROtAr ,v^�1' '_ i�/7'Yr.(�/ ^F-l^f_/ e%% O" ��� �/j j / jyty THE SUM OF / )11 , �/.Glilr4(�l FOR cc g�O- kt 99.P /6-02y DATE 023 (.2.orei ANTHONY F. INFERRERA, A.I.A. ARCHITECT PH. 310-548-0388 1967 UPLAND ST.' RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275 Pa Ordto the er of Order of 1, WELLS FARGO Wells Fargo Bank www.wellsfargo.com i Memo 5'06 /11C/Ap'%7 it-- 1: 1 2 2000 2471:074 2 27085311 099 T1OLLARS F r o©o (2 Q FUND AMOUNT 47C Q©c U� CITY CLERK 1616-24 1220 742 998 Date =40 //Z3/1 I$LDo Dollars 8 o.ai.o-mu. • NP • cry � � Pen9 Jutto December 20, 2000 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 2822 Colt Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 605 14 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 75-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 Dear Dr. Sugiyama: This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since the approval of Zoning Case No. 605. Approvals will expire on February 15, 2001. You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola Ungar 2("1-ffri--- Planning Director cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie Printeci on Recycled Paper • Cay 0/ Rollin9 _WA CERTIFIED MAIL February 17, 2000 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 2822 Colt Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 605 14 OUTRIDER ROAD (LOT 75-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 ' E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Dear Dr. Sugiyama: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on February 15, 2000, granting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 605. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on February 28, 2000. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in ,the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, �.t Lola Ungar Planning Director Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corp. Printed on Recycled Pape;'. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. Recorder's Use AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE NO. 605 ) §§ SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. , I<am. (We are),aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in. said....:, ZONING CASE NO. 605 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (We) certify (or.declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. L Signature Signature Name typed or printed Name typed or printed Address Address City/State City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof x%,'6/'7 :4 u RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.605. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. Richard Sugiyama with respect to real property located at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF) requesting Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on December 21, 1999 and January 18, 2000, and at a field trip visit on January 15, 2000. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, from allpersons protesting the same, and from. members of the. City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said Proposal. The applicant's representative was in. attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission • finds that the project qualifies as a Class 2 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15302] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 125,017 square feet. The residence (4,350 sq.ft.), attached garage (610 sq.ft.), stable (450 sq.ft.), service yard (96 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 1 OF 6 • • sq.ft.) will have 5,506 square feet which constitutes 4.4% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 11,168 square feet which equals 8.9% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed structures located below the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The building pad coverage proposed for the 17,160 square foot residential building pad is 29.5%, building pad coverage proposed for the 3,330 square foot stable pad will be 13.4%, and the total building pad coverage will be 26.9%. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of a single family residence that requires grading would not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed new structures would be constructed close to the hillside and are a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the structures would not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass .with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding ,residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will; not. be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. ;Grading shall, be permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. D. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because the amount of grading proposed will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the residence, new structures, and existing neighboring residences. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. The structures proposed will not be visible from Outrider Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across portions of the property. Further, the proposed project will have a total buildable pad of 20,490 square feet with 26.9% of pad coverage. F. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the north side (rear) of this lot. G. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 2 OF 6 H. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the same driveway to Outrider Road for access. I. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 605 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not . commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080. B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval . shall . be . suspendedand the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; :.provided that the applicant has .been .,• given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. . C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated November 29, 1999, and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Any retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 5 feet in height, averaging no more than 2-1/2 feet. G. The proposed project shall not include a basement. H. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 29.5%, the stable pad coverage shall not exceed 13.4%. The total building pad coverage shall not exceed 26.9%. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 3 OF 6 I. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. J. Grading for the project shall not exceed 2,675 cubic yards of cut soil and 2,675 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted. K. The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 30.0% of the net lot area. L. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the residence and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. M. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the residential building pad. N. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design. using . , "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and .utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting. from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. O. The property owners shall be required to conform .with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. P. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Q• project site. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 4 OF 6 • • S. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. T. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. U. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. V. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. W. The project must, be reviewed and approved by . the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review -Committee: prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. X. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the . Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would, constitute additional structural development shall require the,, filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. Y. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective. Z. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED D1y OF FEBRUARY, 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: i< MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 5 OF 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 605. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 15, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts.' NOES: None. •"ABSENT: None . ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at' the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2000-02 PAGE 6 OF 6 • • 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk, B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City. Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed .until .the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with .the provisions of this Chapter. • 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the. Planning Commission to the City Council, in .accordance with: the terms of this Chapter.. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard- at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed; 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24,1993 • 17.54.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of aproceeding in which by law a hearing.' is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within • the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.E 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 d v N g. d 0 c 0 a SENDER: ■Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this card to you. ■ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. ■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article N ive the (for an 0 1. 0 Addressee's Address o i' 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery Consult postmaster for fee: - umber I also wish to re following servic extra fee): ��p t° 8-5a 8-6s a c.c c lDr. 1 l tOt l %ne,-J 4b. Service Type d 0) P g P a. /� �j ❑Registered Certified °C Lz; w Gam- w 0 Express Mail 0 Insured y Power 2-tea t-J Z 9©a? 7J CC 5. Reeved By: (Print Name) 6. Signature:/(Ad re s or Agent) ° X N PS Form 3811, December 1994 ❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ /* COD 7. Date of Delivery I� pEP.flPf�i'a, ' 8. Addressee's Ad' s Q1i/ if regaested and fee is pale '�'` t��g (f) i s 1 Domestic; R, OReceipt 0 c 2 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE' - ,Postage -&fees Paid USPS I 5 : rfij 11P G-10, • Print your name -address, a )ZIP Code in this box MAR 1 6 2000 CITY OF ROLLINGWF POLLING-1441S #2 PORTUGUESE IRNO .9.1-.1 ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 t FirstClass Mail,. r P`852 865 H2O RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) trt- Street and No. a 8:2 Pkipiejand ZIP Code Postage S £ % a ? / Certified Fee // /0 Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered lA Return Receipt showingco to, whom, Date, and Address,ot pelivdty d TOTAL P6stg' Hate s' �'f Postrr?drk r Date�f;`" O LL co a_' 3��50 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier. (no extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 38f 1, and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space per- mits. Otherwise, affix io back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the' number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. If return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. U.S.G.P.O. 1987-197-722 sCity 0/ leolling January 19, 2000 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 2822 Colt Road• Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING BILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 605, Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr. Sugiyama: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on January 18, 2000 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 605 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider: the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that subsequent .meeting. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(6) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, February 15, 2000. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Monday, February 28, 2000. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. - Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie tiJ Printed on Recycled Pape! eitioe u. Tit 10 70co December 29, 1999 • Ci1y ofieolli..y Mr. and Mrs. David Tabah 12 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. and Mrs. William Gardner 16 Outrider Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 605, Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA.. °. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tabah and Mr. and Mrs. Gardner: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of the subject property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, January 15, 2000. The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 8:00 AM at the subject property. The owner and/or representative will be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director • Wd Pririted on Recycled Paper. •City 0/ Allinf JUL FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION December 29, 1999 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 2822 Colt Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 605, Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr. Sugiyama: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, January 15, 2000. The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 8:00 AM at your property. The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements: • A full-size silhouettemust be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls; • Stake the limits of the building pad; and • Delineate areas to be graded showing finished floor or grade elevations. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Lola M. Ungar Planning Director Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines cc: Mr. Douglas K. McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corporation Printed on Recycled Paper. Cu• • y opeo ee.�nS NO, 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1821 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. Bracing should be provided where possible. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid i n the visualization of the proposed construction. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521. SECTION PLAN ®Panted on Recycled Paper • Cuy 0/eo efin $ire • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETII"I:' cityofrh@aol.com December 7, 1999 Dr. Richard Sugiyama 2822 Colt Road Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 605, Request for Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage that requires grading to replace an existing single family residence at 14 Outrider Road (Lot 75-EF), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Dr. Sugiyama: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 605 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. December 21.1999. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, December 17,1999. We will forward a copy to you. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola M. Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corporation Printed on Recycled Paper.