Loading...
612, Addition to existing SFR and e, ApplicationAGENT'S NAME: AGENTS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: • • City opeoffin9 PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING 1-{oVJARD ti • I-f4t -L- 7 PC -TU (v E ' gF ►Jf2 IZ P . - Rou.l'JIP HILLS �77 - 9808 7 MRTUCeEs f✓- tJ t MP . INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 4-1 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7256 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL hJR.ICC fJ ZUoL.1 _A- c+ tTECT I7042 (z-'f l *J 13L- - 413 q- -WST1 KS , CA 121$0 71.4- 'no -S4c--a Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. A PO R'Ron1 a F THE PRo PasE2 12-�m00EL-I4.I4• RN.d Ann ►TiONJ To _THU I•t71✓nfc1 Jt.(CaR Pcrz•evr-as A ?AgmAt. 5n cizso Z— of 'T►ta ►sT►144 co✓>;rLEb (LliaJ'r pb261-} • T1-115 1201'' 100 IS APPnoXllvlrt-'T ns 5 r-z:)'r IJJTQ Tl 1i E 50'--0 '' Fr2-or fr S -T13A G•k. • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is . based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. Ttf t; srn1=ku ARC Fore- 'rota L vl kite t2orrn XISThiL1 o po2C,f-1 IS I J L-I ✓1= ,,px•T1S t a►J I Op THt GJT1tf TH-E. (A- -'.S o F T -t 125It2 JCf gRo1,11- sET13A c1c Maef 7E . kla A --I' may A ri-i To erTrtate ,P► -TK curb( pcsIS . pn cy.^Inri P"per • • Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because G� iJ4 op. ThI5 Vf4p-I 1qC" G 1WIA2 Oar DaTIZI►'Nrir-L, cornmuNimt lac -n1-le-ooF sT1w-Tutz, cowienrJS A J ' A t2-P- C X I STI kJ Le 1►J TIf - Fr2c»J r 196►2L h f t F�4 FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. • • CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Show cut and fill slopes by separate shadings or patterns. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. 14. Show outline of residence, any additional structures, and any basement areas. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 15. Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17). 16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate land contours with existing ground. 17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. 18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. 19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed;by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at C) SICIA this / (.7 day of By: By: , California , 49" > wW€' Address 1�I 4 c4 e7d z OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at 0.4f- , California, this / day of - " 7' By: By: 41 101,-//' Address `l ' NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: t1J fr(17 N •0141-LL DATE FILED / V I ' REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: 6, 215 COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: 1 OIL/ COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: tl/W ZONING CASE NO: 19 COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: f2A 11'7-615-D • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at , California, this day of ,19 SIGNATURE • • C1iy `� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 171 Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; , (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. August 26, 1999 Printed on Recycled Paper. • Property Line Easement Line Setback Line NET LOT AREA lizzzimzzezzi ROADWAY EASEMENT EXCLUDE 10 FEET AT PERIMETER PLUS ROADWAY EASEMENTS DATE • ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 1 # V tre r✓w1-19 Tlax, APPLICANT M R• • 14 U* 7Q 14 . L t— CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE (Fu-tvvz&I RECREATION COURT ( ) SERVICE YARD OTHER Cmr2 TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING 511- sq.ft. SZti sq.ft. 2911' sq.ft. 83� sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. a sq.ft. /2:31 sq.ft. 4 b 50 sq.ft. 8,3 % ''-3 % '220c, sq.ft. 11 4- sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 2q 8D sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE C . t % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE —I o3o sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE l 4--• 4• % PROPOSED b sq.ft. D sq.ft. „1;1' sq.ft. 53 3 sq.ft. o sq.ft. TOTAL 48, L22 sq.ft. sq.ft. SD sq.ft. /3 K I sq.ft. sq.ft. 4:5 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 10 0 sq.ft. 4-3O sq.ft. 32g1 sq.ft. �•3 % d sq.ft. 1 oD sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. ear 3 1 t -15 sq.ft. 3181 sq.ft. 22 2. sq.ft. sq.ft. ci9 G sq.ft. sq.ft. 1111 sq.ft. 4-111 sq.ft. 455 47 sq.ft. q.� % l 1,--i 11 sq.ft. skit • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS t Pi,►2-ruciuceSE paevap 12cm, APPLICANT Hau,aRav #r L..1 CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA `bi Z sq.ft. RESIDENCE 414-0 sq.ft. GARAGE 138o sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) iV5e, sq.ft. (F4,-4v rte. POOL D sq.ft. RECREATION COURT OTHER sq.ft. 5 * a sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 '1 t OC) sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE I PAD NO. 2 N /it, BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPERTY OWNER: H"412 HAw OWNER'S ADDRESS: 7 rorz-TiftiFs 13 n/2 • TELEPHONE NO: N to ) 3-77 - a aag PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 7 PCt-TU1 ESF r. to R-n LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. + 1 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL ►JI'z-LCo P • ?' Z2 Jet- I. M2C ti`7-gCn 170 4-2, ✓i L✓n • 134- 11J Tlnl CA- 927g0 (714) 7- s4570 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: T-HV.or rNFrL- prz oP©se--5 -to c6nlsTrt-uer ^NJ Alf 7c:.ITI n-L 111/4ro -GAAP re- � 11rz0e, tem. S. Au 19 A L- 14 k-et-n 'ja fh 5 ?X, ST'L ee S ('2 • A NJ Li id i -f Q F 1, 7 65- s• fi )5' pn.o Pas • Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: .) • SITE PLAN REVIEW CR'i RIA • Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. -r /.442.k. enetsw Fat,- T 1.=19 ivrio S7 ADt't-4. t0 u �.,t- a-1, t4Fl $4 -r Ot 6001A-141, f�1-A N Pt40 Zo s' oat 0c201 P4 v3 C e . Ce>m t�P"Ft v-! w rru "rl-EPl Su Czt-2-D01s GI 9r1OPOr1"}'1 $Gi l' 512w.. PO B. . How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. —ripe A'ba t2 przo lecr CZj a N p ui tt..)- t t-3 —t- t'tt 1-5A —Tb r2apAy Pun t,e4t t-at►v.) C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. ►�D Gt*-2PAoG t,►t2e1:7. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. ?l�k pnc t7 Prz i fr-zfr w t t- L 1,3 o-r a PPeeT L)C2r24bN tvl ts61, Ul t.ti o i i- °Asa ►T W LL. Not 640•134e. " 14 0- (Zu t?/�• t-- G LLA r 4'4i = d p T 4lPL C'oM t(1 0 to ►"f`i E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. - cat-u Pricoa=rorzo A'2QQC.1 03- 1 ¢.� blo Lutl.t. oe.Low `t pf2_ p.LLDt,uPFbt.e t t2 -1-4.1'e Gt-t-y Ql,prom►WA otzGtoi: Tom'- 14Pt'2-9�G,spfa ►=017,- FY-14-5T'1tZ t,. eVo I u u..ou.tC44 Cp# -rwe. C+Ur L P1+17 1-M204 CGut7XLP'-LemtwoS moo ap e,L u.i +4 T 44e 01044 Fleval F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. 13pG►[.g Fogy y' (ate-12 o4 1&'[ S11)4 t '1 -t- ?. C ►-4 u1 101-PN 1.104" ,wt' . w44.1L.. pr toioa GlepeCieuS eppe.to SPPGe t -r ► , Gb M 12041 L.0 i+ P E-1 Ci Id1 ZI tc` SI -4-t a . G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. -11-42 priesa 17 1:712-4106T wsu e Po t"-r:, FP -r fi 61 c-24014+to o A N t:3) Sp FQD-1 F -P71 vl5.4b-r21 1-3 S p 1-e t7 V izN I . H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. 'TO -r .* t 2T O lz D u l2- 11-1.5 Cx.0 L F2c4 e T 4Fi prIceaseo f-a'�1c11 �GT Co m FDf 1tnS -t'a - .4- Gp L t Fb'f2-1J 1 P- E.la u 11'701,1 r 1.r1-4 L C p 1A -EH ACC" , • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: GI 1 lD J G d / e/ Signature For: r►J/ZIe-e9 Ij • t Applicant • • CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL The, following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Show cut and fill slopes by separate shadings or patterns. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. 14. Show outline of residence, any additional structures, and any basement areas. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 15. Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17). 16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate land contours with existing ground. 17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. 18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. 19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. • • C1iy 0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 171 Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. August 26, 1999 Printed on Recycled Paper. • Property Line Easement Line Setback Line NET LOT AREA fir,,,//,r, . ./../t '/2 Residenc \\\"' 144.1 ROADWAY EASEMENT i EXCLUDE 10 FEET AT PERIMETER PLUS ROADWAY EASEMENTS • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 7 rot41U4i 1:320,17 APPLICANT It-Vi2 H CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA ' f01 J52 2 sq.ft. D sq.ft. 4'1 5-2 Z sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) of 5-2 Z sq.ft. o sq.ft. '411 SZ 2 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 2i'172• sq.ft. 1-723 sq.ft. f 7- A0 sq.ft. GARAGE 047 sq.ft. 53 3 sq.ft. [3 gd sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. e sq.ft. STABLE (ptrjt P-) o sq.ft. 4 sq.ft. 45-0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 1 o sq.ft. G sq.ft. e sq.ft. SERVICE YARD o sq.ft. I ad sq.ft. ) 6 o sq.ft. OTHER i7or-c1+ 2 3 I sq.ft. 4'30 sq.ft. 43a sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES 465-0 sq.ft. 3z I sq.ft. 16d sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL 0 • % • 3 % 14 • (1 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 0.3 % G • 3 % % DRIVEWAY 2-'2-06 sq.ft. I57$ sq.ft. 372I sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE —7-7 4 sq.ft. o sq.ft. 2-' sq.ft. G • I % 2 Z 2- sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. 1717 sq.ft. % 9 R sq.ft. sq.ft. 477 sq.ft. •$ % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 70 3e sq.ft. + 47 sq.ft. I I , °77 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE l $ • 4- % I a . o % 24- • % sq.ft. • • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 7 P011U1 9 l 11/4I!% 12-9' APPLICANT (A-' CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 401 2 2 sq.ft. RESIDENCE `} 7 40 sq.ft. GARAGE (3 " sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 4 S-d sq.ft. C, "K--' POOL o sq.ft. RECREATION COURT O sq.ft. OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 530 sq.ft. 716 o sq.ft. 460 PAD NO. 2 i4/Dr BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT 1 sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this / (o day of " _ J By: By: G� it , California, -> - 9^ LA,eLle-ceze WO-ed --7 O en Itts Address f\a-li25 C?da7< NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: J-`f . 6 /- . f J�1`}-C L DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( PROJECT ADDRESS: • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the. RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this day of By: By: cbly,(Ai-74,X Address , California scieeD 0,60A-t14_, Qdzs-a9- City • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) h , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at /� Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change day of California, this SIGNATURE Date Filed • • City OY iOL1 inv Jh/ S INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) 1)tJ1' O10 Hw Tel. (4O ) 377 9 &3 Address 7 PO -1 J( S0 12,f=►1O 12o • 2. Legal Owner(s) AIYI AS A-12 P Tel. ( Address 3. Project Address 7 I'6R-T(IGo SS.j= J3 4P 1449 Assessor's Book No. - Lot No. 4i 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: --i ►1 Aac_ltT161\1 CAN% cam m1-j'j'F—E) 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site A.OeiT7014 1 P %I.+ MC PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size G—f(I • 42_4 AG '> Get 029 48152:2, S. F 8. Net lot area I•II/ "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. 9. Total square footage of structures 4166-0 %i I'Q s• F- FnoPOS� S•j=. 10. Number of floors of construction O►J1 11. Basement square footage I-1 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form Printed on Recycled Pape, • • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? Il , $77 S. f . No -T+ V - m.Bye 61. 13.0aM • t My). R►� . 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? id0 17. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut D . Amount fill (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet O . Percentage of Net Lot Area 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4 17 4-0 S• 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. IVA 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. T con15 T - a3/2o00 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. SI __ pcidtt.1 l iNI IS f 41J'___±2oPast _A-1219tT1oNt _ l S _- C ►t.. I,00u s•f=. June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form 1-2 • ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 26. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. T TbPO(a (2J j' OF -litSI 11= 15 RAS 104-t-1}-r 1 V 6,L g1- L nwj bfFl* IS n /Al2-Y FOIL .'rm d9f2-4-'-'M . A In NG€ AtJt� 6A-r244tec1✓ V.x.IST sod T Vine-iVain/AySi L&/ 5 4 L k(Is'c14Pl • 27. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. _7_1tLs_I5 k c g4tr2 c9i1- . J kcicw -iz okaYu,1 Ir. 71). V-JSS 4 rof-IV6O5 . 13Or i 12. 1 o TTth Wf151-- • 13Fit a,.itn__rj1 Aft- an/ S- • ►'Z- S • 1 1-5 i iJ 'sore-rzetp.ittkiG f p-R 1 $ AIe ST ia1/0 S . R • 1S 28. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 29. Have any of the following studies been submitted? Geology Report _ Hydrology Report ✓ Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-3 Yet 7 No WA Historical Report _ Archaeological Report Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits _ Visual Analysis _ Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis _ Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, Tess than significant with mitigation, or Tess than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a Tess than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance. June 1,1999 Environmental Information Form 1-4 potentially. �s Shari; ignifiCant mitig000, Impact ; tncorporatiori : Issues: Less Thai Significant No; Impact „ • 'Impact' I. AESTHETICS —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 I°( b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 ❑ II not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 ❑ 7 quality of the site and its surroundings? / d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which 0 0 CICd would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 ❑ I� Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? / b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 0 0 Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ 0 ❑ l� which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 ❑ CR applicable air quality plan? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form. 1-5 Potentially Significant Impact Leis magi Significant With Less Than Mitigatidrr Significant,`' fncorpor4tion: Impact .. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 ❑ ❑ substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 ❑ ❑ any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 ❑ ❑ number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Er ❑ 0 ❑ IL( 0 0 0 LEI ❑ 0 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ 671/ e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting ❑ ❑ 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-6 . Less Phan • P(stentialiy, ,Significant With .'Less'I'l an Significant. ,.; Mitigation Significant Impact fncoiporation impact.. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 ❑ 0 of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 0 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ 0 0 resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ 0 ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? V I. GEOLOGY AND SOILS —Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 ❑ 0 on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. / ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ 0 ❑ Et iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ 0 0 IF( liquefaction? / iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 E b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ❑ 0 ❑tZr or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 Ig/ 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? 12( 637 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-7 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the' environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) • • Potaritiall Less Than Y Significant With Significant Mitigation Impact,:: " :incorporation.; O ❑ Less`"Chan Significant,• Impact', 0 irnpact,. Er ❑ 0 0 L� ❑ ❑ o iV o ❑ ❑ Er ❑ ❑ ❑ ICJ O 0 0 E( ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ C7 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-8 Less Than Potentially: ' ,.Significant WlF, si nifi hart .:Significant:. Mitigation • Significant. Inpacf < ,' .Incorporation lmpaCt VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 0 12( requirements? / b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0 [g' interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ Ig ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 ❑ 0 0 13 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 ❑ ❑ ❑ V June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-9 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X I. NOISE— Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially $1gnificant Impact Less `fhart Signifi,nt With Mft gation .... Incorparatio�i; Leas Than Significant No `: Impact Impact.': ❑ NJ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ i ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ rf( CI ❑ ❑ IV ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 2f ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ ❑ ❑ 6 / June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-10 XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction ofreplacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Potentially Less Than ` Significant ig• M. itigation Impact Incorporation • Less Than Significant No:; Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ 13 ❑ ❑ ❑ i ❑ ❑ ❑ i a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ m/ Police protection? 0 0 0 Cd Schools? ❑ 0 0 Parks? 0 0 0 IR/ Other public facilities? 0 0 0 l� XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ Er neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? / b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 ❑ 12 require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form Less Tlian Potentiaily Siigniii ant wth Less Than Significant MItlg tipn Signrficaiit No, Impact incorporation Impact Impact , XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 0 [J relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? / b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 CK service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 C� an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? / d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 V1 (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 la f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 ❑ l g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 !� supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Item XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project: / a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 d applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 Er wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 ❑ 0 C(/ drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 ❑ 0 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-12 Potential) ` Tha ' , y Significant Witn Significant Mitigation.,'. Incorporation e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 0 ❑ provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity 0 ❑ 0 to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ❑ ❑ ❑ IV ❑ 0 0 IJ ❑ 0 0 I ❑ 0 0 17 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form 1-13 NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 0 I� 2. Address: 7 PolzTUZI S>= I 'J}9 120 Uwl kile lI 'S) c4 3. Phone Number: (3(0) 377— `IGD ' 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 7 Po wTU12 poi -LA tfit u.5 cA 5. Local Agency (city/county): -G-1—( 4 C._A COLP-Prj > 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Halll. 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date Signature Applicant 1-14 PAi4-1- June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date 0).II(oIOU Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date '4 «lam ,uC2(194 Signatu For' Applicant 1-15 June 1, 1999 Environmental Information Form