148, Construct a bar, trellis and s, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsB;FORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Dr. Larry Kelly
Lot 35-FT
ZONING CASE NO. 148
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Dr. Larry Kelly, Lot 35-FT, Flying Triangle
Tract, 2 Pinto Road, for a conditional use permit under ARTICLE III,
Section 3.06, Front Yard Requirements, Ordinance No. 33 came on for
hearing on the 17th day of February, 1976 in the Council Chambers of the
Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California,
and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application,
the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report
as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr.
Larry Kelly,
is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 35-FT, Flying
Triangle Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills,
notice of the public hearing in connection with said
as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance Nc
Rolling Hills, California.
California, and that
application was given
33 of the City of
II.
The Couuiiission finds, further, that no person appeared at
said public hearing in connection with the application, and that no
communication, written or oral, had been received in favor or or in
opposition to the request.
III.
The Commission further finds that the applicant requests the
conditional use permit for construction of a Cal-Mor barn and trellis
sun shades in the front yard of his property, and has advised that the
construction has not been approved by the Architectural Committee, but
he is requesting approval of the location pending approval of the design.
Further, the applicant advised that all barns in his area are located
in the front yard because of configuration of properties and location
of residences on the lots. The Commission finds, therefore, that a
conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve substantial
property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone,
and that the granting of such conditional use permit would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same
vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use permit
shoudl be granted under ARTICLE III, Section 3.06, Front Yard Requirements,
Ordinance No. 33 to Dr. Larry Kelly, Lot 35-FT for construction of a barn
and trellis sun shades in the ront yard, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission