612, Addition to existing SFR and e, CorrespondenceCry 0/ie0ii JJPP
September 27, 2002
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Mr. Howard Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: 7 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO.
612. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2001-08 GRANTING
EXTENSION
Dear Mr. Hall:
This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission approval of Zoning Case No. 612 expired
on March 21, 2002. Pursuant to Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code once the
approval expires, should you wish to proceed with the construction, you would have to re -file
based upon the same criteria as required for approval of the original project.
As per our conversation on September 23, 2002, you indicated that you might not pursue the
improvements as approved in Zoning Case No 612, but that you may scale down the project,
where it would not require Planning Commission's approval. We are ready to assist you in this
process.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Yolant'� Schwartz
Plannhg Director
Sincerely f/
///, E✓
Cc: Craig Nealis, City Manager
Rafael Bernal, District Engineering Associate, Los Angeles County Building and Safety
/f/ ....Jh i INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
January 10, 2002
Mr. Howard H. Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 612, a request for a Variance to permit a portion of a residence
to encroach into the front yard setback and request for Site Plan Review to
construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence for property
at 7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH), Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Mr. Hall:
This letter is to inform you that your approval for the construction in Zoning Case No. 612 will
expire on March 21, 2002. Resolution No 2001-08, under which a one-year extension was
granted from the original approval, states that unless construction on the applicable portions of
the structure have commenced by March 21, 2002, the approvals shall expire. Resolution No.
2001-08 is attached for your reference.
A new application and a new case before the Planning Commission will be required, should you
wish to proceed with the additions after March 21, 2002.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me.
Sincerely
Y91 nta Schwartz
cipal Planner
1.4
Printed on Recycled Paper.
City 0/ IEO//ifl i/I!S INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
March 23, 2001
Mr. Howard H. Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90724
SUBJECT: ONE-YEAR EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 612
Dear Mr. Hall:
This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on
March 20, 2001 approved by Resolution No. 2001-08, your request for a one-year
extension of Site Plan Review and Variance application in Zoning Case No. 612.
The new expiration date will be on March 21.2002 and unless you acquire permits
before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must
re -file based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit.
If you have any questions, please call me at (310) 377-1521..
Sincerely,
f
ili
5Lto
Yolanta Schwartz
Principal Planner
ENC: Resolution No. 2001-08
es
Printed on Recycled Pape!.
i •
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07,
APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT
YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION
AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 612.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. Howard Hall with respect to
real property located at 7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH), Rolling Hills,
requesting a one year time extension for a previously approved Variance to
encroach into the front yard setback and a Site Plan Review to permit the
construction of substantial additions at a single family residence that was
approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 2000-07 on March 21,
2000.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on March
20, 2001, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension
of time is necessary because the applicant was unable to find a qualified
contractor to perform the work.
Section 3. Based on information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2000-
07, dated March 21, 2000, to read as follows:
"The Variance and Site Plan approvals shall expire within two years from
the effective date of approval, as definedin Sections 17.38.070 (A) and 17.46.080
(A), unless construction on the applicable portions of the structure have
commenced within that time period."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No.
2000-07 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20 DAY • F S ` H 2001.
ALLAN RZTIIERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN I' ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
lee
•
40
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
• COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-08 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07, APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO
A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL
ADDITION AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE AT 7 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 612.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
March 20, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Robers.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
1-<,4
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
ON o/ leoftin
January 16, 2001
Mr. Howard Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 612
7 Portuguese Bend Road, ROLLING HILLS, CA (Lot 41 RH)
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07.
Dear Mr. Hall:
This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since the approval
of Zoning Case No. 612. Approvals will expire on March 21, 2001.
You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning
Commission in writing and request an extension prior to the expiration date.
The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling
Hills.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ivAI A, (.4,,,---"f
I/ CO
' Yolanta Schwartz
Principal Planner
Ca
Printed on Recycled Paper
•
C14 o/ ie0m4 Jd.'Pe
CERTIFIED MAIL
March 28, 2000
Mr. Howard H. Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
ZONING CASE NO. 612, 7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH)
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
Dear Mr. Hall:
This letter shall serve .to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution. on March 21, 2000 granting a Variance topermit..a portion of a
residence to encroach into the front yard setback. and granting Site Plan
Review to construct substantial additions to an existing: single family
residence for property at 7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH), Rolling Hills,
CA in Zoning Case No. 612. That action, accompanied by the record of the
proceedings before the Commission was reported to the City Council on
March 27, 2000.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective
thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an
appeal has been filed within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section
17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal,
the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its
proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the
Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will
become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of
Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County
Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07, specifying the
conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved
Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the
Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE
Printed on Rle;d
• •
FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a
copy of the Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each
additional page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any
conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are
met.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lola M. Ungar
Planning Director
Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL"
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. 612
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH), Rolling Hills, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 612
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
L
T Recorders Use Only
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles )
On before me,
personally
appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•
%,4 j5/ T4 4
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION AND GRANTING SITE
PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 612.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Howard H. Hall with
respect to real property located at 7 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 41-RH)
requesting a Variance to permit encroachment into the front yard setback to construct a
residential addition and Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to
a single family residence for a 5,085 square foot residence and a 1,380 square foot
attached garage. The request is consistent with previously approved but now expired
Zoning Case No. 563.
B. Zoning Case No. 563 was originally approved by the Planning.
Commission by Resolution No. 97-24 on October 21, .1997. The previous approval.
involved a 4,980 square foot residence and 1,380 square foot attached garage on : an
existing. lot.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
to consider the application on March 21, 2000. The applicant was notified of the hearing
in writing by first class mail. The applicant was in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property
and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from
making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in
the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires the front yard setback for every residential
parcel to be fifty (50) feet. The applicant is requesting to encroach up to a. maximum 4
feet into the 50 foot front yard setback to permit the encroachment of a 199 square foot
enclosure of a portion of an existing porch. With respect to this request for a Variance,
the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other
property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is at the corner of two streets,
one of which is the main thoroughfare Portuguese Bend Road, and the building pad is
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 1 OF 6
located close to both streets. The existing residence encroaches up to 5 feet into the front
yard setback.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but
which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
development and use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the shape of
the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this additional small
incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any greater incursion into the
front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and
zone in which the property is located. Allowing the proposed incursion into the front
yard setback will not allow any greater incursion than already exists. In addition,
development on this portion of the pad will allow a substantial portion of the more
environmentally significant rear portions of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 612 to permit the encroachment of a
105 square foot enclosure of a portion of an existing porch that will encroach a maximum
of 4 feet into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback, as indicated on the development plan
submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A,
subject to the conditions specified in Section 8 of this Resolution:
Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a' _ development plan to be
submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be
constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be
made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the
building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period.
With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with
the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning
Code setback and lot coverage requirements with the Variance approved in Section 5 of
this Resolution. The lot has a net square foot area of 48, 522 square feet. The proposed
residence (5,085 sq.ft.), garage (1,380 sq.ft.), porch (430 sq.ft.), and service yard (100 sq.ft.)
will have 7,445 square feet which constitutes 15.3% of the lot which is within the
maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a
relatively large lot with most of the proposed structures located below the road so as to
reduce the visual impact of the development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot
including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 2 OF 6
• •
(such as hillsides and knolls). The lot is relatively flat, grading will not be required, and
most of the mature trees will not be removed. Grading will only be done to provide
approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed residence and existing
neighboring residences.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the
west side (rear) of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves
several mature trees and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible
with and enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Although
the project will have a buildable pad coverage of 37.2%, the project will be located on a
relatively flat lot where significant portions of the .lot will be left undeveloped. The
development plans will minimize impact. on Portuguese Bend Road. The.
reconfiguration of the doors to the garage/workshop that currently faces Portuguese
Bend Road will face Blackwater Canyon Road and will minimizeimpact of the residence
from- Portuguese Bend Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in
Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project
is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this irregular -shaped
lot. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on
several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed
project will use existing driveway and replace and relocate a garage entrance for
vehicular access that will have less of an impact on Portuguese Bend Road.
H. The project conforms with the requirement of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 612z for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated
herein as Exhibit A and subject to the conditions contained in Section 8.
Section 8. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 5
and the Site Plan Review approved in Section 7 of this Resolution are subject to the
following conditions:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 3 OF 6
A. The Variance and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within
one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.38.070(A) and
17.46.080(A), unless construction on the applicable portions of the structure have
commenced within that time period.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and Site Plan
Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the approval shall be
suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall be subject to revocation;
provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has
failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days and has been provided additional notice
and a hearing prior to the revocation of the Permit.
C. All requirements ;of the Buildings Code of the City of Rolling Hills
and the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance must be complied with unless otherwise set
forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided
in these conditions.
E. Grading shall not be permitted for the proposed project.
F. ' The existing trees and shrubs along Blackwater Canyon Road shall
be trimmed and maintained for sight visibility and to, screen the garage/workshop.
G. Landscaping shall be designed so as not to obstruct views of
neighboring properties but, to obscure structures. Tall trees such as Eucalyptus and
Sequoia shall not be planted.
H. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the proposed building pad.
I. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the
maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes
automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers
slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water
efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
J. Residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 37.8%.
K. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality
management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county
and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows,
erosion, or land subsidence.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 4 OF 6
• •
L. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
site.
M. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project
N. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the
installation and maintenance of septic tanks.
O. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the
installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
P. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works. Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
Q. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010
of. the 1996• County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be preparedto
minimize erosion and to protect slopes andchannels to control stormwater pollution as
required by the County of Los Angeles.
R..Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of
Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, •
soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff
for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
S. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any
building or grading permit.
T. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
U. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
V. All conditions of these Variance and Site Plan approvals that apply must
be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County
of Los Angeles.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 5 OF 6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI� ` . C F 1�LARCH, 2000.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CI'I•Y CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-07 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A RESIDENTIAL ADDITION AND GRANTING SITE
PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 612.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
March 21, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:. Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte
and Chairman Roberts.
NOES:
None.
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-07
PAGE 6 OF 6
•
17.54.010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be tiled on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a.
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City.
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council .':..
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.
•
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to, File. an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision' of.::
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an, Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
76
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
•
17.54.030
If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall. deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing.,.
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal fora .
hearing before the City Council' to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event 'that .more than one appeal' is filed for
the same project,. the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard'''
at the same time.
17.54.060' Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be 'noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
77
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
•
1754.060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative,order,'or decision:, by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which bylaw a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to .be -taken, and,
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable :determinations of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the. City Council, or:, in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, Must be filed .within
thetime limits set .forth in the California Code :of .Civil' Procedure,,
Section 1094:6 • •
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
78 MAY 24,-1993
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
co
• Return Receipt showing to whom,
• Date, and Address of Delivery
TOTAL,Postage and Fees
O • Postmark or Date
co
0
LL
Sent t
P 852 865 324
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
to .�
P. State and ZIP ode
%V; //S. ( i1,:27L,
Postage L..) 5
Ya
N
a
STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE,
CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR•ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (see front)
1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address leaving
the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier.
(no extra charge)
2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of
the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article.
3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified mail number and your name and address on a return
receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space per-
mits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
adjacent to the number.
4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse
RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article.
5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. If return
receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811.
6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry.
1987-197-722
d SENDER:
o .Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
n+ •Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b.
N ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this
card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not
permit.
■ Write'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number.
• The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
0
a0i
0
0
a 3. Article Addressed to:
0
7 c�eJ� /epG��
�Oy
o i®/J;hS Al i/S, 90a7y
• 5. Received By: (Print Name)
-, — ()JAL1 l G' I � 1��,
6. Signature: (Addressee orAgent)
XCi
PS Formm3811, December 1994
I also wish to receive the
following services (for an
extra fee):
1. 0 Addressee's Address
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
4a. Article Number
p 85,2 g65. 3a 1-7
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered Certified
❑ Express Mail 0 Insured
❑ Retum Receipt for Merchandise 0 COD
7. Date of Delivery
8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested
and fee is paid)
Domestic Return Receipt
Thank you for using Return Receipt Service.
UNITED STATES P. •T.k . ERVICE
`Fist-Class.Mail
"P stage.&_Fees-Paid_ _
- _DsPS
h, . a Permit No. G 10-�
• Pr It your namer, Ad`ri�-afid ZIP Code-in_this.-b
co
4 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
P #2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
c, ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
P
1111„11,I1111,11,Ilitf,Iiti,i,I,IN1*1*11I!„fIf„I,iI,Ili„f
MAR 2 8 2000
CITY OF ROLLING RILLS
Ptv
Ci1y ol R0th JUL
i
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING
March 9, 2000
Mr. Howard H. Hall
7 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 612, a request for a Variance to permit a portion of a residence
to encroach into the front yard setback and request for Site Plan Review to
construct substantial additions to an existing single family residence for property
at 7 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 41-RH), Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Mr. Hall:
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted
above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be
processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly
suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the
application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 612 has been set for public hearing consideration by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. March 21. 2000.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must
attend to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, March 17,
2000. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerly,
Lola M. Ungar
Planning Director
cc: Mr. Enrico Pozzuoli, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper.
February 23, 2000
Ms. Lola M. Ungar
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Re: Application for 7 Portuguese Bend
Dear Ms. Ungar:
itgEHEJ
DEB 2 <29W
tt 1TY13F'fic.)1 LING IittL
deVI
The architect informs me that the reasons for delay in this application are because he
encountered processing problems at the county level. Also there were delays in getting the
report and certification from the soils engineer.
If further information is needed, please call me.
Very truly yours,
6.(7 9r
HOWARD H. HALL