Loading...
807, To construct 2-downward slopin, Application• I This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD ICI i i i 20120838497 Recorded/Fi ed n Offic a Records Recorder's Off'ce, Los Angeles County, California 0 IIIII!IIIIIVIIIIII m 0 00005895248 si II m 004033760 SEQ: 01 m 06/05/12 AT 04:46PM III DAR - Mail (Hard Copy) Ill I loll II H l I 111111 llllIl lII I Ii 110 1101 l Il Ill lIIl Hl lllH III IlH 110 llI II lIlIIII lIllHl I 11011 llI milliTHIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED PO%1f FEES: 45.00 TAXES: 0.00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 45.00 E548170 RECORDING REQUESTED BY ANC MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX i11 1.11 �t,i 14;1 !i 1 11; ll. ' 812:0818497' T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. ZONING CASE NO. 807 XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES I (We) the undersigned state I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 5 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE, (LOT 245 A -MS) ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said case: ZONING CASE NO. 807 XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES I (We) c rtif or •eclare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Sispature �iL Y1 i P. h . u\ P,Y\ Nape typed or frinte Address City/State all. 6149211 Signature 1,csP. e. N e typed or Addres City/State See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 1117 Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. tit' � is ems, st e n printer W,) v\413 kh ( . 6t0 -A V • � J State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On it \G‘ta.V IICAICh Ile , AO l- before me, otjurAi a 109') ire,pWfS-k-A, NotaY TlAblif, Personally pp , appeared �okm 6 IV �U� �',Yl 0 yvA 1 t-1 ScA who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) -is/ are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that -etc/ she/ they executed the same in itisfhher/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by irisf-hhe&- /their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS by hand an• offi Signature of Notary ( Seal) cc z o/b rcc�n!�^A rl CLAUDIA BERENICE ACOSTA COMM. #1884132 z Notary Public - California o Los Angeles County My Comm. Expires Mar, 26, 2014t • RESOLUTION NO. 1117 411 EQ-1 t 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF WALLS AND STABLE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A STABLE WITH CORRAL AND VARIANCES FOR 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS, ONE OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT ON A PROPERTY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, IN ZONING CASE NO. 807, AT 5 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE, (LOT 245-A-MS), ROLLING HILLS, CA, (NGUYEN). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (CEQA). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Daniel Nguyen with respect to real property located at 5 Buggy Whip Drive. The original application entailed a request for a Site Plan Review to grade 12,000 square foot area in the rear of the residence requiring 950 c.y. of cut and 950 c.y. of fill; construct a stable, corral and a guest house; repair an area previously containing wood fences and construct retaining block walls instead, as well as to construct additional retaining walls above the proposed structures. Conditional Use Permit was requested for 890 sq.ft. stable, 1,050 sq.ft. corral and 640 sq.ft. guest house. Variances were requested to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the net lot by 15.5% for a total of 55.5% disturbance; to construct walls that are 5' high along their entire length and to encroach with a portion of the most easterly (downslope) wall 12 feet into the 35-foot side setback. During the proceedings, and at the request of the City Council to verify the proposed grading and wall height, the applicant submitted revised grading calculations. The proposed grading for the stable, corral and guest house would be 633 cubic yards of cut and 633 cubic yards of fill and for the stable and corral only, it would be 520 cubic yards of cut and 520 cubic yards of fill. Further, the applicants' engineer confirm that the walls would be maximum 5' high with a 2:1 slope between them. Following City Council public hearing of February 27, 2012, the applicants on March 1, 2012 withdrew the request for a Conditional Use Permit for the guest house, and therefore this approval excludes said request. Section 2. Following Planning Commission's approval of the project the City Council took jurisdiction of the project. Pursuant to Section 17.54.015 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, a review hearing for cases taken under jurisdiction by the City Council shall be conducted as de novo hearings. Section 3. The City Council conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at an adjourned public hearing in the field on January 31, 2012 and at their regular meeting on February 27, 2012 and March 12, 2012. Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on January 12, 2012. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff, neighbors and applicant's architect and attorney and the City Council had reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 4. The property is currently developed with a 3,736 square foot residence, 1,008 square foot garage, 640 square foot swimming pool, service yard, trellis and entryway. Records show that the house and swimming pool were constructed in 1967. In 1975 approval was granted and building permits pulled for a 280 square foot stable and retaining wall. The permits expired, and there are no further records to indicate when and if those structures were constructed. Section 5. This project came to the City's attention as a complaint that a wall was being constructed in the rear of the lot and an inspection of the property was conducted. The applicant stated that he started to reconstruct walls that were there before, which were leaning and rotted. He begun working without permits. During the inspection staff observed remnants of an old foundation in the general location of the proposed stable as well as rotted wood beams. The building code no longer allows timber walls if they support a structure or surcharge and it is required that the area under consideration be brought to compliance with City's zoning and building codes. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 1 - Section 6. At the hearings, the neighbors 7 Buggy Whip Drive objected to the project citing loss of ttrivacy as their main objection, pedestrian and potential vehicular traffic along their property line as well as overdevelopment of the pad. 'They also expressed concerns regarding safety of the illegally constructed walls and their repair and practicability of the proposed access to the lower pad from the upper building pad. A neighbor at 1 Buggy Whip also objected to the application, citing the history of the walls and requesting assurance that they are constructed with the appropriate permits and according to building code. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 7 The City Council finds that the project qualifies as a categorical exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 8. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the grading for the stable, corral and walls, the City Council finds as follows: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed project complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The net lot area for development purposes is 77,374 square feet (2.09 acres gross). The development conforms to Zoning Code setbacks and lot coverage requirements, except for the small portion of a wall, which would encroach into the side setback. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. Although the disturbed area will exceed the maximum permitted, it is required for the stable, which is a requirement of the City that every lot be developed with a stable and corral or an area set aside for a future stable and corral be provided, and to correct an illegal walls condition on the lot. The proposed retaining walls are intended to provide a permanent solution to a longstanding issue of soil sloughing down slope, which was over time alleviated by fences. The fences became overwhelmed and deteriorated; the sloughing is now being controlled by temporary wood shoring walls. The heights of the proposed permanent retaining walls necessary to alleviate the problem will not exceed 5 feet. The problem if not corrected, could eventually affect neighboring properties. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. The applicant is utilizing an area of the lot that was previously developed with a small stable and retaining walls, but for which there are no records. The applicant revised their application and reduced the scope of structures several times since the initial submittal. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The structures will be screened. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structures will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences and will substantially utilize the existing relatively flat area for the new construction. C. The proposed activity is compatible with the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes the maintenance of strict grading practices to preserve the community's natural terrain. The Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance require a balanced cut and fill ratio and do not permit import or export of soil, except under special circumstances applicable to a property and with a discretionary permission by the Planning Commission. The project conforms to the grading requirements, Zoning Code setbacks and lot coverage requirements. D. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood and will substantially utilize the existing relatively flat area for the new construction. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed development will utilize the existing pathway to the new stable and existing driveway to the house will remain. F. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 2 - 411 • Section 9. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the•Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.070 (B) is required because it states that the lot disturbance shall be limited to 40.0% of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance because total disturbance of the net lot area is proposed to be 55.5%. With respect to this request for a Variance, the City Council finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to this property that do not apply generally to the other properties in the same zone. The property is unique in that the rear pad was created in the past without grading permits and was revealed only after the applicant cleared the vegetation in the area, and realized that wood fences and a paddock existed on a relative flat portion of the rear. Once the vegetation was removed, eroding of the rear area was observed. The additional disturbance became necessary to shore up the terraced area in the rear. The construction requires engineered retaining walls instead of the wood fences that currently exist. The remediation of the slope is also necessary for erosion control, thus contributing to the disturbance of the lot. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance. Many of the homes in the area are developed with stables and other accessory uses, and the area proposed for grading, a portion of which is already relatively flat, but which will be enlarged for the proposed construction, is conducive to such development, as there is no other area on the lot where a stable may be located. The construction of the walls is intended to alleviate the ongoing problem of erosion and provide a permanent solution, thereby preventing additional disturbance. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The additional graded area is on a portion of the lot which is not intrusive to surrounding properties, and will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs from nearby residences and from the street and trail so that the as graded condition will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an orderly fashion and in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the variance will not impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or the General Plan. Rather, the variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity, where the topography of the lots dictate grading requirements for property stabilization and erosion control. The overage requested is not substantial and does not undermine the spirit or intent of the Zoning Ordinance. E. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the contrary, absent a variance, the property owner would be deprived of the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity, as many stables on that street are located on a secondary pad below the main residence. Unique circumstances applicable to the subject property make it infeasible for the property owner to comply with Section 17.16.070. F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 10. Section 17.18 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a stable over 200 square feet and a corral over 550 square feet, provided the City approves a Conditional Use Permit. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of the stable would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, meets all the applicable code development standards for a stable, and the area is located in an area on the property that is adequately sized to accommodate the stable and adjoining corral. The proposed structure is appropriately located in that it will be sufficiently separated from nearby structures used for habitation or containing sleeping quarters both on and off the project site. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 3 - • • B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures' have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the proposed stable and corral orientation is not towards neighbors and its general location is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. Additional trees will be added to further screen the project from adjacent properties. The proposed stable is to be located on an already partially graded area, therefore preserving the natural terrain of the remaining of the property. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the stable complies with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over -built look. The lot is 2.09 acres in size and is sufficiently large to accommodate the proposed structure. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district and requires a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 17.18 of the Zoning Ordinance. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Section 11. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.150 F and G is required because it states that walls not to exceed 3-feet, under certain circumstances, may be located in setbacks and Section 17.16.190F state that wall may not exceed 5' on the average of 2 '/2 feet in height. The applicants request Variance to allow a portion of the wall to encroach 12 feet into the required 35-foot south side yard setback and to construct 5' high walls. With respect to this request for a Variance, the City Council finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to this property that do not apply generally to the other properties in the same zone. The property is unique in that the rear pad was created in the past without grading permits and was revealed only after the applicant cleared the vegetation in the area, and realized that wood fences and a paddock existed on a relative flat portion of the rear. Once the vegetation was removed, erosion of the rear area was observed. The additional disturbance became necessary to shore up the terraced area in the rear. The construction requires block retaining walls instead of the wood fences that currently exist. The remediation of the slope is also necessary for erosion control, which requires the up to 5' walls to adequately contain the slope. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance. Many of the homes in the area are developed with stables and other accessory uses, and the area proposed for grading, a portion of which is already relatively flat, but which will be enlarged for the proposed construction, is conducive to such development, as there is no other area on the lot where a stable and other structures may be located. The construction of the walls is intended to alleviate the ongoing problem of erosion and provide a permanent solution. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Wooden walls previously existed on the lot in vicinity of the proposed encroachment and the wall will be screened by vegetation. No neighbors came forth in opposition to the wall. The proposed wall will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an orderly fashion and in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the variance will not impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or the General Plan. Rather, the variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity, where the topography of the lots dictate grading requirements for property stabilization and erosion control and height of walls. The requested encroachment is not substantial and does not undermine the spirit or intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 4 - • • E. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the contrary, absent a variance, the property owner would be deprived of the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity, as there are several stables and retaining walls to hold up the stable pads in the vicinity on other properties. Unique circumstances applicable to the subject property make it infeasible for the property owner to comply with Section 17.16.150. F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 12. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 the City Council hereby approves the Site Plan Review application, Conditional Use Permit and Variances in Zoning Case No. 807 for grading of 520 cubic yards of cut and 520 cubic yards of fill, construction of a 890 sq.ft. stable and 1,050 sq.ft. corral, pool equipment area, two not to exceed 5' high retaining walls below the stable and corral, the lower of which would encroach 12 feet into the south side yard setback, one not to exceed 5' high retaining wall above the stable and a not to exceed 3' wall along the access way to the stable below the existing toe of slope of the upper building pad as shown on the Site Plan dated March 1, 2012, subject to the following conditions: A. The conditions of approval specified herein in this Resolution shall be printed on all construction plans and shall be at all times available at the construction site. B. The Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and Variances approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080, 17.38.080 and 17.42.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections. C. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. D. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan, including soils and geology studies as required by the Building Official. E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated March 1, 2012 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan and shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the City Council. All conditions of the Site Plan, Variance and CUP approvals, herein as applicable, shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings and complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. F. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 7,174 square feet or 9.3% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). G. The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork shall not exceed 11,030 square feet or 14.3%, of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% max). H. Grading shall not exceed 520 cubic yards of cut and 520 cubic yards of fill and must be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 43,000 square feet or 55.5% of the net lot area, in conformance with the Variance request. I. No wall may exceed 5-feet in height at any one point from the finished grade, as shown on the approved plan. The applicant shall explore alternative construction material for the retaining walls from the standard cement block. J. The stable building pad shall not exceed 4,250 square feet and the coverage shall not exceed 24.0%, which includes the 890 s.f. stable with portion of the covered porch and mechanical/pool equipment area. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 5 - • • q K. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing material requirements (RHMC 17.16.190), and all other Zoning and Building Code requirements. L. All utility lines to the stable shall be placed underground, subject to all applicable standards and requirements. M. The stable structure shall not exceed 890 square feet tfi 120 squar foot crovered porch, and shall meet all the requirements for construction of a stable incl ding the a ltural and tack room space. N. The access to the stable shall be unpaved and shall remain covered with dirt, wood chips or gravel. If located in the easement, it shall be approved by the RHCA. O. The corral area shall be not less than 1,000 square feet and shall be fenced in with a three -rail or equivalent fence. The surface of the corral and paddock, if not used for animal keeping, must remain permeable at all times. P. The applicant shall submit a detailed drainage plan including hydrology study to the drainage engineer. To the maximum extent practicable, additional drainage generated from the development shall be retained and dissipated on site. Prior to issuance of any grading permits and/or a building permit for the construction such approved plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and filing. Q. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to contribute to erosion or in any way affect an easement, trail or adjacent properties. The energy dissipaters shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails or easements. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and shall be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. R. The retaining walls shall be screened from views of the neighbors. Two copies of a landscaping plan shall be submitted to City for review and approval. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community. The trees, when planted, shall be a minimum 15 gallon containers or 24" box, so that the walls are sufficiently screened from adjacent properties. At maturity plants and trees shall not exceed the ridgeline of the stable as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the structures. Such plants shall be evergreen, to retain their fullness at all times. Plants and trees shall be planted in an offset manner so that not to result in a hedge like screen. S. In addition, all graded areas shall be vegetated utilizing to the greatest extent feasible mature native and drought resistant plants. The applicant shall deposit with the City a security in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan (including irrigation), plus 15% prior to issuance of a grading permit. Such security shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained security will be released by the City only after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. T. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, including roadway easements shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, fences, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. U. Minimum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permit prior to start of work. No final inspection shall be granted until all documentation is filed with the City. V. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. W. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within nearby roadway easements. Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 6 - 111 • �p X. The property owners shall be required to conforth with the Regional Water Quality Coritrdl Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water drainage facilities management. Y. The applicant shall comply with requirements for bonding for grading and all other requirements resulting from the review of the soils and geology reports. Z. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no -smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. AA. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: httn://www.wrh.noaa.eov/lox/main.nhn?suite=safety&Wage=hazard definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AB. All conditions of the Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance approvals, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit. AC. There shall be no dumping of any debris, trash, soil spoils, construction materials or any other matter into the canyon or elsewhere on the property. AD. Any modification to the project, including but not be limited to increase in grading quantities, limits of grading or disturbed area on the property that varies from this approval and which would be within the purview of staff's approval, shall be reviewed and approved by staff and reported to the Planning Commission and City Council. AE. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. AF. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. AG. The Rolling Hills Community Association review and approval is required. AH. Nothing in the above conditions precludes the owners from submitting an application to the City for a guest house in the future. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF MARCH 2012. Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem ATTEST: Asit Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 7 - s , STATE,OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) SS , The foregoing Resolution No. 1117 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF WALLS AND STABLE; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A STABLE WITH CORRAL AND VARIANCES FOR 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS, ONE OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT ON A PROPERTY DEVELOPED WITH A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, IN ZONING CASE NO. 807, AT 5 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE, (LOT 245-A-MS), ROLLING HILLS, CA, (NGUYEN). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (CEQA). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 12, 2012, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember Lay, Pernell and Mayor Pro Tern Hill. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmembers Black and Heinsheimer (recused). ABSTAIN: None. BUJ Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 1117 (5 Buggy Whip) - 8 - • 11.11A ,kos ovoi • REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses. or structures are required to be made , conforming or shall .be removed.. "Therefore, you maybe required to modify or remove any unauthorized or..unlawful rise or structure on'your. property prior to or in. conjunction with this application. ' In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the .City Council, any use or. structure which would require a discretionary permit hut which is conducted without the acquisition of s'.id permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. • PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S. ADDRESS:. TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO,I AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: Mrs 5 ,' kliip 310. 8V . 06, Lair/ 90 It I-i GA v'1 EMAIL:.. u r eore6r154. 1r 2316 :'ASSESSORS BOOK .NO. I PAGE P,P6 Prir6 PARCEL o1g+3 3 Maw C ue Pam:t7al p6Io5 VP41 310 3.78 . NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Pa., 6I1-o i11 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. This project proposes the construction of a new stable and guesthouse, retaining walls to support the above construction, and a new pergola adjacent to the existing swimming pool. The stable and guesthouse are permitted uses under the zoning ordinance. • S Will the proposed.use be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? The proposed stable and guesthouse uses are similar to other stables and guesthouses in the surrounding neighborhood and can therefore be deemed compatible with neighboring properties. • Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? The proposed stable and guesthouse are permitted uses under the zoning ordinance. They will have no negative impact on public health, safety and general welfare. FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check.payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. --12- • • VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition ofsaidpermit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS:. TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 316.89O • C '. 5 15, IAIhi" i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO,. 1 f rLltf 251aA'_ ASSESSORS BOOK NO: -5%a 01 PAGE AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE' NO: •3tp • 31fi PARCEL ai4- . Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. This project proposes the construction of two downslope retaining walls as well as a stable and guesthouse which will result in aggregate disturbed area in excess of 40%. -12- • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The construction of the two downslope retaining walls will take place in areas on the property which have already been disturbed by soil sluffing downslope. It is intended to alleviate the ongoing problem and provide a permanent solution, thereby preventing additional disturbance. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The proposed construction will enhance public welfare and safety by alleviating the sluffing problem, a problem which, if not corrected, could eventually affect neighboring properties. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- VARIANCE REQUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition ofsaid permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: mr Mrs gruel OWNER'S. ADDRESS:. TELEPHONE NO: ____ _��( . ' EMAIL: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: •J. 15I1t?G 9 w, hi lane LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO,. I I . fra' 237t fj :ASSESSORS BOOK. NO: v61 PAGE _ PARCEL 0145 AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: F +) 31 •...135 iPn I ulptegr85►r61iih call Describe in detail the, nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. This project proposes the construction of a 240 sq. ft. pergola with outdoor fireplace within the 50' front yard setback area. ----- Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance, Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The proposed pergola, which consists of four posts and an open trellis overhead, is intended to complement the existing house, pool and patio without compromising the views from the existing house. The existing house, which predates the 50' front yard setback rule, already encroaches in the front setback. Such change will not be ' materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The proposed pergola will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare because the existing topography of the site will shield it from public view. The pergola will have no impact on the property or improvements in the neighborhood. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition ofsaid permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: M('��j(II11P.Ii• OWNER`S. ADDRESS:. � �I� l�arr1 I1" f1II . ()A T.% TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS:ne- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. I in .e 9-57_ ASSESSORS BOOK NO: '51;1 PAGE • AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE' NO: nr i • EMAIL: reu ex1rtbrwrif: i PARCEL 0-5_ Describe in detail thenature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. This project proposes the construction of two downslope retaining walls which extend into the side yard setbacks and which exceed 5' in height. The proposed wall height varies up to a maximum of 8'. -12- • • Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The proposed retaining walls are intended to provide a permanent solution to a longstanding issue of soil sluffing downslope. The sluffing has been occurring for some time; it was originally alleviated by fences. The fences became overwhelmed and deteriorated; the sluffing is now being controlled by temporary wood shoring walls. The height of the proposed permanent retaining walls necessary to alleviate the problem exceeds 5'; the walls must also extend into the setbacks to alleviate the situation. Such .change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The proposed retaining walls will enhance public welfare and safety by alleviating the sluffing problem, a problem which, if not corrected, could eventually affect neighboring properties. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -13- REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made. conforming or shall be removed.. 'Therefore, you maybe required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on ,your property prior to or in. conjunction with this application. • In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the .City Council, any zise or. structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. • PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S. ADDDRESS:. TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: Mrs 316.86rD•0(nr LOT NO.. i )_ ��EMAIL: u P,tj �Q�Svr:. ASSESSORS BOOK NO. .04 I PAGE ispo_ixirtn MAictep Cove, 47W'2; oe PARCEL 0143 Vr e‘c• 611-0 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan.. Review: . This project proposes.the construction of a new stable, tackroom and guesthouse, retaining walls to support the above construction, and a new pergola adjacent to the existing swimming pool. -12- Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage No basement square footage is proposed SITE 'PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA: Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring' houses, The proposed uses (stable and guesthouse) conform to the general plan and zoning ordinance for this property, and conform to similar uses on surrounding properties. The proposed construction conforms to the size requirements and required setbacks. B How does- the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to' the maximuin extent feasible, existing natural . topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land Prins (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features: The general downsloping character of this property will remain; grading and excavation are limited to the area of the proposed development. Native vegetation will be preserved wherever possible and supplemented with additional compatible plantings to mitigate the visual impact of the proposed development. C. ' How does the site development plan follow natural'contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrainto maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be roundedand contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify ekisting drainage, or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The proposed development is intended to work with the topography of the property as it currently exists; the buildings will be tucked into the slope, and proposed grading will be balanced cut and fill. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. -13- • • Every effort will be made to preserve and protect the native vegetation; at the areas where construction disturbs the native plants new, compatible plant materials will be added to supplement and blend with the existing vegetation. E. How doesthe site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall, be. regarded as maximums and the , actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. ' This property is slightly in excess of two acres; proposed structural lot coverage will be less than 10%; total structural and flatwork coverage will be slightly in excess of 13%. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass withthe site, the natural terrain. and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the' existing setbacks of neighboring properties. ' The proposed' development (stable, tackroom and guesthouse) have been designed to blend with the topography and have minimal visual impact by tucking into the hillside. ,Care has been taken to assure that neighboring properties are not impacted by either view impairment or privacy infringement. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians' and 'vehicles? ' Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping. and other on -site parking or storage areas. • Vehicular circulation will be limited to carts on the existing dirt path leading past the guesthouse location to the stable location. Pedestrian access will be limited to the residents and service personnel. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The site development plan has been designed to conform to CEQA requirements. Impact on the environment will be limited to activities during construction; no long term impact to habitat, water quality, natural drainage courses, etc is anticipated. -14- 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented ar+ue and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 814 For: Mr frtt'S MIe) H5JllP11 Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application: Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING IIILLS -15- DATE 2_ WIL__ ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS _5 h ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES _e 6+a 7J . ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES' *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) EXISTING sq.ft. 3� 7 3 o sq.ft. sq.ft. 6/IL sq.ft. I00 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. (/ sq.ft. �0 sq.ft. C) sq.ft. PROPOSED 6 qqA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. a sq.ft. o sq.ft. /20 sq.ft. 4 sq.ft. I W sq.ft. 160 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. C10 sq.ft. _ (") sq.ft. SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, (i sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, h sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. /) sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. t sq.ft. SERVICE YARD '). sq.ft. OTHER BASEMENT AREA �) (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. (6 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. /7 sq.ft. sq.ft. /5 sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL SC) \V�l sq.ft. \)J\\' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. �) sq.ft. MO sq.ft. % sq.ft. 7 J )) sq.ft. 13&0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. (5 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1,q,0 sq.ft. !) sq.ft. l7 sq.ft. sq.ft. �. - sq.ft. 2 sq.ft. I.t % IO.q % sq.ft. 41.1) % _� sq.ft. sq.ft. 1,, % 10.1 % -5- 5 rjll it}.1 Whip - 11 57-11M13 ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) I) 09,0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. — ' 4sq.ft. Ala sq.ft. If.I % _I0 7 sq.ft. 4.1 % sq.ft. () sq.ft. sq.ft. 80 sq.ft. 5O10 4 661 sq.ft. (� sq.ft. )2.1096 sq.ft. sq.ft. d sq. ft. AO sq.ft. 0.i % 1.3�7 sq.ft. I.7 % sq.ft. 1.7 % 0 sq.ft. All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. —) 72Ca_. sq.ft. 4.4 % 49418sq.ft. 15.8 % 12 sq.ft. I1..6 % sq.ft. •'I . % cubic yards * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. -6- DATE 2• /3 . ') Z.C. NO. ADDRESS i r CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD OVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAT) AREA EXISTING PROPOSED AND STRTTCTTTRFS BUILDING PAD Aprlettsq ft 0 sq ft sq ft RESIDENCE _51/XLsq ft gLsq ft sq ft GARAGE I) 5 sq ft (� sq ft sq ft POOL/SPA sq ft (3 sq.ft. 6.__sq ft POOL EQUIPMENT0_sq ft r) sq.ft. 0sq ft CABANA/REC.RM 6 sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. D sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE 6 sq ft 00 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. STABLE 6 sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. () sq.ft. � SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq ft 6 sq ft SERVICE YARD iMO sq ft O sq.ft. 14.0 sq ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. D sq.ft.45 �% sq.ft. Accessory structures Ci sq ft �) sq ft 6sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED j D sq ft V sq ft (.) sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED io% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES () sq.ft. (from 1"page not including allowed deductions) OTHER i> sq.ft. TOTAL sq ft () sq ft6— sq ft Ws) sq ft __Qsq ft __,W1sq ft o sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. V sq.ft. 6 sq.ft. l) sq.ft. 0 sq ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 1(j sq ft (2sq ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq ft Not inrl attached trellises, Nnr inrl allowed deductions, and inrl the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % 61'1f)sq.ft. sq f '(o•? t3G sq ft -7- FEB 0 0 2013 City of Rolling Hills By tr lfnaY C6lent Information Nguyen Addition 5 Buggy Whip Lane Rolling Hills, Ca. 90274 Section Titk, Cover Sheet Loading and Soil Information Beam Specifications Header and Footing Specifications Enercalc Printouts Column Specifications Diaphragm Calculations Shear Wall Table Holdown T9hle Holdown Tab':.: frA Table of Contents n Package Project Inform 5 Buggy W hip L Rolling Hills, C Page # Comments: .I 2 3 4 5 13 14 16 22 23 All calculations conform to the 2007 CBC, 2006 IBC, and ASCE ;'-05 Bolton Engineering Corporation 25834 Na.rbonne Ave., Suite 210 Lomita, Ca. 90717 (31 Q) 325-5580 Issue and Revision Dales Calculations Issued 2/12/2013 Calculations Revised February 12, 2013 Job Number Project Manager Date Page Number 9019 Brad Moser 2/12/2013 1 of 23 Lo d n Infor ation Roof Loads Roofing Sheathing Framing Insulation Ceiling Misc. Wall ( Seismic only ) 10 psf 1.5 psf 2.5 psf 3.2 psf - 2.5 psf 1.3 psf = 5 psf Total DL = 21 psf Total i,„h. = 20 psf Total DL (Seismic �"`� 26 ps"f' , Basic Wind Speed Exposure Category End Zone of Wall End Zone of Roof Interior Zone of Wall Interior Zone of Roof End Zone of Windward Roof End Zone of Leeward Roof Interior Zone of Windward Roof Interior Zone of Leeward Roof End Zone of Windward Roof Overhang Interior Zone of Windward Roof Overhang Site Clasification Seismic Use Group Seismic Design Category Importance Factor Response Modification Factor System Overstrength Factor Spectral Response Short Period Spectral Response Long Period Soil information Foundation Designed for 2010 CBC Minimums Report Number Date Footing Depth Footing Width Soil Pressure 18 12 1500 Floor Loads Sheathing Framing Insulation Ceiling Misc. Wail ( Seismic only ) 2.3 psf 5 psf 3.2 psf 2.5 psf = 2 psf 10 Total DL 15 psf Total. LL_ -- LLJ11 y .,_ ..,,. = 40 psf Total DL ( Seismic) = 25 psf Wind Loading 100 mph 3 second gust = C A B C D E F G H Eoh Goh Seismic Loading D = ll = E R = 6.5, S5 = 2.11 SL = 0.99 in in psf Case 1 26.62 psf 10.00 psf 17.67 psf 10.00 psf -23.11 psf -16.09 psf -16.09 psf -12.22 psf -32.31 psf -25.29 psf Section 11.4.1 ASCE 7-05 Table 11.5-1ASCE 7-05 Section 11.6 ASCE 7-05 Section 11.5 ASCE 7-05 Case 2 A 0.00 psf B 0.00 psf C 0.00 psf D 0.00 psf E 0.00 psf F 0.00 psf G 0.00 psf H 0.00 psf Eoh 0.00 psf la oh 0.00 psf V = 0.217 W Table12.2-1 ASCE 7-05 Table12.2-1 ASCE 7-05 Seismic ground motion maps chapter 22 ASCE7-05 Seismic ground motion maps chapter 22 ASCE7-05 Job Number Project Manager Date Page Number 9019 Brad Moser 2/12/2013 2 of 23 Beam # Size Beam #1 5 1/8"x 15" Beam #2 6x14 Beam #3 6x14 Beam #4 5 1 /4"x16" Beam #5 5 1/4"x16" Beam #6 6x12 Beam #7 6x10 Beam #8 6x8 Beam #9 6x12 Beam #10 5 1/8"x 12" Beam Sp Grade and Type 24F-V4 Glue Lam No. 1 D.F.L. No. 1 D.F.L. 2.0E PSL 2.0E PSL No. 1 D.F.L. No. 1 D.F.L. No. 1 D.F.L. No. 1 D.F.L. 24F-V4 Glue Lam cficat ins Location Living Room East Bedroom West Bedroom Living Room Living Room West Bedroom West Bedroom East Bedroom West Bedroom Living Room Job Number Project Manager Date Page Number 9019 Brad Moser 2/12/2013 3 of 23 Size 6x6 Footing Width Footing Depth Minimum # Bars Size of Bars Grade and Type No. 1 D.F.L. Baer Specifications Lencth Level 3'-0" Roof Load Only Footing Specifications 12 in 18 in 1 Top and Bottom 4 Header # HDR1 Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure Maximum allowable load on footing Maximum point load on continuous footing Area of steel used for calculations Pad Footing Specifications epth Reber 18 No rebar required Job Number Project Manager Date Page Number 1500 psf 1500 plf 7144 # 0.20 in2 Maximum Load 6000 9019 Brad Moser 2/12/2013 4 of 23 Rev: 580001 User: KW.0601.7(1. Ver (c)1983-2003 °"E!,: ALC: • Description swAs 'dsas:r1 F.dtT.'il T it m?4s ,7 Section :' amo: Beare Width Beam Depth Member Type Load Dur. Fact Beam End Fi)A..y I� _.,/... i Full Length Ulnitorm Loads 1-^.-- 003® ,eering SoftW. .S rtronnca,,,, Beam 1 Title : Dsgnr: Description : Scope : General Timber Beam Pa?",.`.'AtTlturz uzl tom' Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019. a cw: C a l c u l ati o n s Code Ref: 1997/2001 NDS, 2000/2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000. Base allowables are user defined t e4d"','anzzi'ei�`'k4'p''^':k"wa Sim`if"i'1:�1J;p§«i3'vaimrg (125 in 5.000 in GluLam 1.000 Pin -Pin Center Span Left Cantilever Right Cantilever Douglas Fir, 24F - V4 Pb Base Allow Fv Allow Fc Allow E 22.00 ft Lu 4.00 ft Lu 4.00 ft Lu 2,400.0 psi 240.0 psi 650.0 psi 1,800.0 ksi a dTaca s„.;.A1U s10037, Su"..:,..a=4cvw:.u. .... .aci,1,144c ,.„;ga:.rraa lVAVAM,144.2saara6tulS.W.46i4i.r.;aazc*A„w,...,=.. usmi at au•,,. ^.. •., . Center DL 231.00 #/ft LL 220.00 #/ft Left Cantilever DL #/ft LL #/ft Right Cantilever Di. #/ft LL #/ft Summary Span= 2.2.00ft, Left Cant= 4.00ft, Right Cant= 4.00ft, Beam Width = 5.125in x Max Stress Ratio Maximum Moment Allowable Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment Max @ Left Support Max @ Right Support Max. M allow fb 1,703.63 psi Fb 2,336.15 psi Deflections ;v4,-^w.�w;,rvw,r eiE� 'arWwxzam:..x.uxAr�x Center Span... Dead Load -0.469 in 10.940 ft 562.6 Deflection ...Location ...Length/Deft Camber ( using 1.5 * D.L. Defl ) ... @ Center 0.704 in @ Left 0.394 in @ Right 0.401 in Stress Oates 163431443 o3.:4=1..4116.;"rd.°f=t1V1XW.7adtti4a .4i./.'i.Gc&�nY2V."� Bending Analysis Ck 22.210 Le Cv 0.973 Rb @ Center @ Left Support @ Right Support Shear Analysis Design Shea: Area Required Fv: Allowable Bearing @ Supports Max. Left Reaction Max. Right Reaction 0.000 ft 0.000 Max Moment 27.28 k-ft 0.00 k-ft 0.00 k-ft @ Left Support 6.63 k 27.618 in2 240.00 psi 0.729 : 1 27.3 k-ft 37.4 k-ft 27.28 k-ft at 11.060 ft 0.00 k-ft at 0.000 ft 0.00 k-ft 0.00 k-ft 37.41 fv 86.22 psi Fv 240.00 psi Total Load -0.916 in 11.060 ft 288.17 td 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Beam Design OK Depth = 15.in, Ends are Pin -Pin Maximum Shear * 1.5 Allowable Shear: Reactions... Left DL Right DL @ Left @ Right Camber: @ Left @ CentE'r @ Right 2.54 k 2.54 k Left Cantilever... Deflection ...Length/Defl Right Cantilever... Deflection ...Length/Defl Sxx 192.188 in3 Area CI 4960.998 Sxx Read 140.15 in3 0.00 in3 0.00 in3 @ Right Support 6.63 k 27.618 in2 240.00 psi Max Max 6.6 k 18.5 k 4.96 k 4.96 k 0.394 in 0.704 in 0.401 in 4.96 k 4.96 k Dead Load Total Load 0.263 in 0.513 in 365.E 187.3 0.267 in 0.522 in 359.3 184.0 76.875 in2 Allowable fb 2,336.15 psi 2,336.15 psi 2,336.15 psi 4.96 k Bearing Length Req'd 1.489 in 4.96 k Bearing Length Req'd 1.489 in Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : Rev: 5$0004 User: KW-0607970, Ver S.c.0 1-Dec•2003 (c)1983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software —STEMET.NES;V:MULIT.,f.x,s:.;;;casetaaa,PARETZETaksat>31ar.,s1t..arwt.a41,,,Is4w.sciuswaxs....44 ' Deseripfion Beam 1 General Timber Beam LQuery Values ITITIara11.117.72,15,V=t;.EMPAMTEVEraatuatietwwwtmetesatstauTEMWM71711malta.seatetran:Aeutauw M, V, & D @ Specified Locations Moment @ Center Span Location = 0.00 ft 0.00 k-ft @ Right Cant. Location = 0.00 ft 0.00 k-ft @ Left Cant. Location = 0.00 ft 0.00 k-ft Shear 4.96 k 4.96 k 4.96 k Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019.ecw:Calculations Deflection 0.0000 in 0.0000 in 0.0000 in Title : Dsgnr: Description Scope : r_____ (Rev 56000i,- - .....__ ��,�. User: KA •c, :„E,', . b'-sa 5.3.0, 1.Dec-2003 c)1931 20C:A FN'ErRRCAL.G Engineering Software @7.ri ,VaUsti.:i!.tr:;.:. 4.:YitEinAV.;.C.14,44giW,43.ert,az,K44.1"x iii aT&E si,T,r..s... ;„..7..7=:,R4141,e;amia xncua.r:;v: Dasc.ri ,i t r., BearrkCalculations 2-B tuber B am & Joint Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019.ecw:Calculations tnIuer ?ii,;,rAi;;et nformatiinn., 3od.e,Ref:.1997/2001 NDS; 2000/2003IBC;-2003 NFPA.5000:-Base-allowables.are usei:.defined , - mi. • .:, , ,. •,. �.:; .:. r s .mob, Beam 6� ' Beam 7 Beam 8 rt,F,,.4,a�...�:r>.t.zM�.::s,, �:Krl��,� a.;a �i+:r:C:�,e�u..aararr•mr,'+:~auu<bo au��>�a�; rr,xw Timber •'tctron Beam 'Ni51n Beam Depth i Le: Unr il...e ^ Lengthth Timber Grade Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 Fb - Basic avow psi 1,000.0 Fv - Basin Allow psi 180.0 Elastic Modulus ksi 1,700.0 Load DurationFactor 1.000 Member )'pE. Sawn Repetitive Status No at�sr zt.rarara; Beam 3 Bear l,r Bearr1 00 61�t 2 in 500 50b it 13.500 11.500 ft 0.00 0.00 , 6 �•1 Prllcrt"5�.25x16.0 PCII6h:5.25x16.0 3.500 0.00 Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 1,000.0 180.0 1,700.0 1.000 Sawn No r 16.000 0.00 Truss Joist - MacMillan, 2,900.0 290.0 2,000.0 1.000 Manuf/Pine No 5.250 16.000 0.00 Truss Joist - MacMillan, 2,900.0 290.0 2,000.0 1.000 Man uf/Pine No Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 1,000.0 180.0 1,700.0 1.000 Sawn No [Center Span E)a)<a, n i ,ih` r.?„r"ti.Cri`a�'l!T!:SKiTdit'?�S;Y'a�;`:•fr.E $SkiiYfY 's$"S`a�f'@ 1.7i� traw�°vt `s°i"„ C .Ytv'tXFSu...;,,, ...::,,r.Ye •.w Span ft 16.50 16.50 21.50 21.50 11,00 168.00 160.00 Dead Lore Live Load Point #1 DL. LL Cantilever Span Span Uniform Daad Load Uniform Live Load Point #1 t)i. LL n Y, #/ft 168,00 #/ft 160.00 lbs lbs ft ft #/ft #/ft lbs lbs ft 168.00 105.00 105.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 2,541.00 2,541.00 2,420.00 2,420.00 10.750 10.750 4.00 168.00 160.00 9.00 168.00 160.00 168.00 160.00 5.000 [ivRASUitS Ratio = 0.7642 0.8123 0.7114 0.7114 0.5682 S'e.nar ifimuazumma =Fx..aara�asvrauutxaasae��3... .. . • "' ,, Mmax () Cen:f-er in-k 126.00 133.95 462.13 462.13 43.20 7.87 7.99 8.25 10.75 10.75 4.66 4.00 -31.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 -68.88 0.00 754.2 801.8 2,063.1 2,063.1 568.2 95.2 987.0 987.0 2,900.0 2,900.0 1,000.0 1,000.0 Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK Bending OK 6x10 5.506 9.500 0.00 Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 1,000.0 180.0 1,700.0 1.000 Sawn No 8.00 42.00 40.00 6x6 5.500 7.500 0.00 Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 1,000.0 180.0 1,700.0 1.000 Sawn No 8.50 168.00 160.00 Cci)X:= ft Mmax l Ca idlever in-k fb : Actual Fb : Allowable fv : Actual Fv : Allowable I Reactions @ Left End DL I_L Max. DL+LL @ Right End DL LL Max. DLI-i_L psi psi psi psi 50.4 47.2 180.0 180.0 Shear OK Shear OK lbs lbs lbs lbs Ibs lbs 78.9 290.0 Shear OK 1,304.54 1,386.00 1,320.00 1,320.00 2,624.54 2,706.00 2,139.45 2,037.57 4,177.03 1,386.00 1,320.00 2,706.00 2,399.25 2,285.00 4,684.25 2,399.25 2,285.00 4,684.25 LDefieetiOnS Ratio OK Deflection OK Deflection OK m..; t°anfirraat:.§r.nacri..: .. s....rc........u....,,, i ...-47a. t;.0,..,waaw..,..,. ..,,Auczi. •.... sms....= .- - , ^ - - .,•.°.,....-- „^'.. , , . Center DL. Del in -0.126 -0.146 -0.395 -0.395 -0.015 1,576.3 1,354.8 654,0 654.0 in -0.139 -0.139 .-0.376 -0.376 1,422.6 1,422.6 686.7 686.7 in -0.265 -0.285 -0.770 -0.770 ft 8.184 8.250 10.750 10.750 747.9 693.9 335.0 335.0 78.9 290.0 Shear OK 48.0 180.0 Shear OK L/Defl Rath, Center 1_I_ De i L/Defl Ratio Center Total Def{ Location LJDefl Ratio 2,399.25 2,285.00 4,684.25 2,399.25 2,285.00 4,684.25 Deflection OK 8,557.0 -0.044 2,967.8 -0.059 5.104 2,232.3 0.0952 880.00 160.00 1,536.73 328.00 2,199.27 2,094.54 4,293.82 7.6 180.0 Shear OK 0.6894 35.55 4.25 0.00 689.4 1,000.0 Bending OK 43.4 180.0 Shear OK 656.73 168.00 714.00 680.00 1,394.00 168.00 714.00 160.00 680.00 328.00 1,394.00 Deflection OK Deflection OK Deflection OK -0.006 16,568.8 -0.006 17,397.3 -0.011 4.000 8,486.5 -0.060 1,699.3 -0.057 1,784.2 -0.117 4.250 870.3 Title : Dsgnr: Description: Scope : Rev: 5E.C)00e User: KW-Ot3E:76:::. 'Jar 5.6.0. .Dec_2003 Timber Beam & Joist (c)19t33-2GU'3 ENE riCAL.C. Lingineering Software DescripOon Beam Calculations 2-8 Cantilever DI.. Deft in 0.082 -0.081 Cantilevei LI_ Deft in 0.078 -0.077 Total Cap!. r.)F)i. in 0.160 -0.158 1.,/0e,,f1 "e.k) 598.5 1,364.7 Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019.ecw:Calculations LU' ar: v 0,;:a r•;', 'd.::r 5.6 0, 1-Dec-2003 (c)19iLi ?:!:':? 1.P.er:c:ALc Engineering Software,' YS�a'ax.„:;Kt;..^"'•f... 7.11''7I sz'4:;iKEil ..:i.'i:. '.Le: Beam CalccuisatiRcos 9 Title : Degnr: Description : Scope : Tuber Beam & Jost cw.+cranurswialAWus,.:a2044z1-111t1.mr.- aak Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019. acw: Calcu lation s � —ase —t" L ' ihniv.v. ",;':; : ,:i.lbei iniforn'➢afion #T�`:9e :.'v,:,W:r 1 as3?i;% :iosa .•..::�j( Beam 9 vc12 Balm W rtt: in 5.500 BP.aril l iw1ir� in 11 S00 Le: l Ini)r;3r.•, i L r noth ft 0 00 Timber Cradr; Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 Fb - Basis ;,I•ym psi 1,000.0 Fv - SRSIC Allow psi 180.0 F_lastir: Mnd,rgie I<st 1,70n•0 Load Dusetio-• Factor 1.000 Member .1- I1c' Seem Rep?t,t ivr. ::'tx cus N0 Center ',per- Data Span ft 16.00 Dead i.o.,i #/ft 168.00 Live Load #/ft 160 00 Cantilever Span Span ft 4,i,''3 Uniform Dead Load #/ft 168.00 Uniform Live toad #/ft 160.00 Results Ratio = 0.9735 -mod , 42UEU:1ZVI IT t=2:12.ELemAuxut yza,e, <_a,/k x3'vJt.:Laz na uct<at - _1v r....wL ,xa...:., ,,,,,,,,,.., :,n.S4.1,5 ffi'm.a,....-'-...-, -- sn.. ,.,ri,..,. •,,' „y�'x> Mmax @ Center in-k 118.02 @ ., - ft 7.'74 Mmax `- ;-;an;itever in-k -31.49 fb : Actual psi 973.5 Fb : Allcwoht:; psi 1,000.0 Bending 01C fir : Actue: psi 59.1 Fv : Ailowr,f:.ic: psi 180.0 Shear ORC Reactions wa:`..inw SIMEEffrVi ' ;:3Lrr_8ftt, '.'s.,..ur..Y.a:3tn�i.�.36' i'�..`.�.iPv a'sf�dS35.L` VfStrws':se3iXvF: r.. •s.m..we;:».,� 's+.>ti 1v.c u.w'xn,,..¢ @ Left En;i D'.. lbs 1,260.00 ibs 1,280.00 lbs 2,540.00 @ Right End DL lbs 2,100.00 lbs 2,000.00 Max r_;:+LI_ lbs 4,100.00 Defiection,i. Ratio OK ,.'s.','''»:w'°Z.;ii.IL;4;?'7,Z=r."3f.'CP ,14,1t ar an .azaw.v.ivsgl '"::.m,Gausss..r'.s 1,4,4vaa»xtvitarg. ,man••,•. t4;zawsaw. Center DL Del I_/Deft Ratio Center L i-.Get i_/Defl R�at�c Center o:al i,efl Locaticr. L./Defl Ratio in -0.178 1,079.8 in -0.199 964.4 in -0.377 ft 7.936 509.5 Cantilever IX Dell in 0.118 Cantilever :-L Defi in 0.112 Total Cant. Deft in 0.230 L/Defl Rath,. 418.0 RE V: Ver 5.3.0, 1-Dea-2003 Enginee!ina Software Beam CalculEi.H.)n 10 5.12 •; :••,,,q • `. • r Fpfity Title : Dsgnr: Description : Scope : General Timber Beam Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9013.ecw:Calculations . „ Code Ref: 1997/2001 NDS, 2000/2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000. Base allowables are user defined :,:immar.,...mIzaztAizmggimaya.0,Avnumozammr-,„tzb.zufdia, 12 Center Span 22.00 ft 5 . 2 .• Left Cantilever 4.00ft Right Cantilever 4.00ft Douglas Fir, 24F V4 Fb Base Allow Fv Allow Fc Allow E 2,400.0 psi 240.0 psi 650.0 psi 1,800.0 ksi Rill LAN,11.?th ii„ilrliform Loads ---mazzow.n.r!,-..'.,!;..:,6;44,3=134=13ZACIIMMAIMPh.!r,11351031=333EignlawaAwswiur,‘A.Aee.aikrAoy,,aa-Argwrea:4,.,,ermurvo.., DL 126.00 #/ft LI.. 120.00 #/ft 1.fif1•12,:i?rrilever DL. 126.00 #/ft LI.. 120.00 #/ft Fiji, C.,r0.ilever DL 12.6.00 #/ft LL 120.00 #/ft Lu Lu Lu 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Beam Design OK • ;Oft, Left Cant-, 4.00ft, Right Cant= 4.00ft, Beam Width = 5.125in x Depth = 12.in, Ends are Pin -Pin Max Ratio Moment ,6,1lowable Moment ;.;ative Moment eft Support Support ;'^; Low I 1,353.61 psi 2,388.86 psi k-ft -1.01 k-ft -1.97 k-ft •1 P7 k-ft 24.49 A,Vr,,IniF,!!::.,'!;:..,iifECNIONEZ/4713fle110274gferfklitagl!Vex C!!,!rli!:!1: Dead Load -0.421 in . 11.C:'..0 ft ..1..enpthiDefl 621.7 ;sing 1.5 * D.L. Defl ) 1Dr' 0.631 in 0.33,4 in q,1.4,1rHt 0.329 in Stress aer;dilg 22.210 0.995 (?;,:."/ ::,upport @ f..,:ucport Arer., 1=M3uired Fv: Supports it t'leaction e:leaction Le Rb 0.567 :1 13.9 k-ft 24.5 k-ft at 11.060 ft at 0.000 ft 61.29 psi 240.00 psi 0.000 ft 0,000 Max koment 13,87 k-ft '1.97 k-ft 1.97 k-ft @ Lett Support k 15.707 in2 240.00 psi 3.73 k 3.73 k Maximum Shear *1.5 Allowable Shear: Reactions... Left DL Right DL @ Left @ Right Camber: @ Left @ Center @ Right 1.89 k 1.89 k Total Load Left Cantilever... -0.897 in Deflection 11.060 ft ...Length/Defl 294.43 Right Cantilever... Deflection ...Length/Defl Sxx 123.000 in3 Cl 3733.635 Sxx Redd 69.70 in3 9.89 in3 9.89 in3 @ Right Support 3.77 1< 15.707 in2 240.00 psi Bearing Length Req'd Bearing Length Req'd Max Max 11E10 Dead Load 0.223 in 430.7 0.21.9 in 438.2 Area 61.500 in2 Allowable fb 2,388.86 psi 2,388.86 psi 2,388.86 psi 1.121 in 1.121 in 3.8 k 14.8 k 2.75k 2.75 k 0.334 in 0.631 in 0.329 in 3.73k 3.73 k Total Load 0.494 in 194.4 0.486 in 197.6 Title : Dsgnr: Description : Scope : Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 — User: K \A/C r 5.8.0, 1-Dec-2003 General 'Timber Beam s.iac Engineering Software rrlrMZEVZ.,FFErgriklNiV,Pua12f2fESSR,gaIWhTrP.Wfamvcr..t.u,zg.ox-ztxoawucr,Az,saatw4=azsu,vamo=,.v DeSC:rtiO4 Beam Calculation 10 Q0 en?' ' ,,lii ,,.; .:.;,•i'i NIgirdtg...: ml t . L. ggi=liffERWRINElleilESEIEW m12,,,twoegaiittievzimatmanavveaganualessurray, M , V. ,‘' El © Specified Locations Moment Shear 1; -,1)ter Span Location = 0.00 ft -1.97 k-ft :ii.i, Cant. Location = 0.00 ft -1.97 k-ft ':;.int. Location = 0.00 ft -1.97 k-ft 2.71 k 2.71 k 2.71 k 9019.ecw:Calculations Deflection 0.0000 in 0.0000 in 0.0000 in Span ft Dead • Canto'mr -tram 1,0;33;rr 31)Fd'i Title : Dstpir: Description : Scope , 5.8.0, 1-Dec-:3003 Timber Beam & Joist Engineeri,17, Software ; . ,137.X.'3337",cfW.J.WiaktultnrearaMiliir,-..c.waaww::“,freilt.,,u Header & Raftei. Calculations Job # Date: 11:02AM, 12 FEB 13 9019.eow:Calculations ------•-•-• - • Turic,f,4 *Al Information ...s,ode Ref: 1997/2.001 NDS, 2000/2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000. Base allowables are user defined . . HDRi RR1 •••••:,(..41, in 5.500 in 5.500 IZS:. I 'C,'• 1,• gth ft. 0.00 Tlmb Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 Fb - F.3,/.; i.' ;',' .3,i,,' psi 1,000.0 F'•( - ''r.t.,F (.• ,`,11•••?vt, psi 180.0 Eiast, 1rinri,t1:1.- ks 1,700 0 t_oe,d1.0, ii*. .c:tor 1.000 Mlemletti rip Sa'n'n T-le,.Ict •cr••• .., F." ',jS 10 ......... .. .4t3nte.1 Data 2x8 1.500 7.250 0.00 Douglas Fir - Larch, No.1 1,000.0 180.0 1,700.0 1.000 Sawn Repetitive t.trate:' 3." t, .Y.3., "IiIrlatENESEETMglifittenZIESW:IELVEINIXMLait Awo:fg arArsuzzzurdatimaaWRIMATUFM 3.00 7/ft it/ft 168.00 160.00 11.00 42.00 40.00 2, UtWitt:1,1985.... 4.00 Uniforin ear. .oad #/ft 42.00 Unifor.- #/ft 40.00 •-.- fb Fb fv : F1r psi psi psi psi 0.00 159.7 1,000.0 Bending OK 17.0 180.0 Shear ON -7.87 984.4 1,380.0 Bending OK 64.0 180.0 Shear OK React c,015 --imulazu t:::.: ,,•'i•'.,: ,,,,,.;.,.".........4,,...............maR,F=mrszernaam....4.,,,,,,.w...c.-aaa....ia.,,,r,........1.,,, - @ Lst1 r.: r. .'1.. lbs 252.00 200.45 lbs 240.00 220.00 1,/::., • i.' ....-,,L.L lbs 492.00 420.45 C& Right Si.r.: Di. lbs 252.00 429.55 Lt.. lbs 240.00 409.09 Ma. r;...-4-u- lbs 492.00 838.64 ---- - • -- Ratio OK Deflection OK wow:LT.1 rq um:,•.roAnymmoderuciurogredzatzsgramormarsolnownwzmwfoxfagouratwaramormummorzi................. in -0.117 1,126.6 in -0.163 811.2 in -0.280 ft 5.368 472.1 in 0.064 in 0.061 in 0.125 765.6 Cente DL. f.);. L/Uni' Centl-1 1_/t:Pt• Cent. Cantile /.••,• Total L'•,••• L/Dc,2': -0.002 15,242.5 -0.002 16,004.6 -0.005 1.500 7,807.1 [-R-eSt.6•13 Ratio = 0.1597 0.7133 IVIrnax Cer, n-l< 4.43 12,94 • (j.7) •••••- ft 1.50 5.15 '&tpC hi I S ped'Tic atone 1>; , Grads„ L (it) Wi pii W2 Plf P D!_ PL PLr CSI le/ d 2-2)0 110. 2 D.F.L. 8 12 12 1900 5 1800 0.9756 27 4>•.+ P\lo. 1 D.F.L. 8 12 12 2900 5 2800 0.9769 27, ?.;a!: No. 1 D.1 .L. 10 12 12 3800 5 3650 0.9753 22 fa;<f. \lo. 1 D.F.1., 10 12 12 9400 5 9400 0.7820 22 No{tee Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 13 of 23 C in pry 1cu it tions Diaphragm Level l I "X" Ards Sub -Diaphragms X Axis Diaphia„.7 Width Depth Grid Lines Wind Load Seismic Load/ "Diaphragm Left Right Bottom Top Left Right Left Right/ Shear (plf) D; .l 16.00 16.00 A B 2 3 1005 837 872 87 1 63 17;;;' 22.00 22.00 B C 1 4 1082 1082 '1648 164 75 D/: 16.00 16.00 C D 2 3 837 1005 872 872 63 11olr 1Vidth Depth Check Hole in Diaphragm Grid Lines Maximum Force Left Right Bottom Top At Corner # Block Diaphragm Nailing ° No / 8d @ 6" o.e. No 8d @ 6" o.c. No \\ 8d @ 6" o.e. Nailing Straping f.11aphragm Deflection at Cantilevered Diaphragms Diaphragm Specifications Blocked Calculated Deflection Allowable Deflection 0 NG NG Panels to be applied perpendicular to framing members Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Pate 2/12/2013 Page Number 14 of 23 t;rag,m Cakouliatt Diaphragm Love, ::1d: AxisroT�... ••••••••• Sub -Diaphragms X Axis Diap11!•j.e r Width Depth Grid Lines Wind Load Seismic Load Diaphragm Block Nailing Left Right Bottom Top Left Right Left Right Shear (plf) Diaphragm i% . 3.00 22.00 B C 1 2 220 220 225 225 10 No 8d @ 6" o.C. D,;. 16.00 54.00 A D 2 3 1131 1131 2942 2942 54 No 8d @ 6" o.Q. 1:)y: 3.00 22.00 B C 3 4 220 220 225 225 10 No 8d @ 6" 04 Hole if Width Depth D'laphr) Check Hole in Diaphragm Grid Lines Maximum Force Left Right Bottom Top At Corner it Nailing Straping Diaphragm Deflection at Cantilevered Diaphragms Diaphragm Specifications Blocked Calculated Deflection Allowable Deflection 0 NG NG Panels to be applied perpendicular to framing members Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 15 of 23 Grid Line Leval Diaphrs,tru v,;: Sei. a ia; Ds,s,irj Category Wind De3i•,3'r Wall aY "\ ' L ength' Height H/W Rat�a a heap,, ° feein ; . ni atio Grid. Line Darn and Loads Roof E 100 mph Exp. '.'5.00 \f Wind Load = 1005 # Seismic Load = 872 # Rho Factor = 1.30 Critical Load = Wind Total Length of S.W. This Line = 15 ft Shear Wall Data and l a: a Shear Calculations 2W/H BS Seismic 8.00 2.00 67 , 1.00 58 Wall # Dead Load pit .Wind Suction pit 1 460 ➢::S Win P Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Additional Distance Additional Distance Uplift Left Uplift Right Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right -168.95 0 0.00 0 0.00 -267 -267 S.W. Type Sill Plate 3° x 3" Washers A 2x Sill Plate Yes Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Seismic I:wild Load Additional Distance Additional Distance Wall Uplift Left p➢f Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right 460 0 0.00 0 0.00 -1605 Uplift Right Holdown Holdown Type Left Type Righti -1605 Not Req. Not Req. Notes: 7) AU pal ei : Oges to be edge nailed 2) Job Number 9019 sl Project Manager Brad Moser 4) Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 16 of 23 C iatl Grid Line Data and i...cads Grid Lme B Wind Load = 1919 # Level 1 ." Seismic Load = 2520 # .,...., Diaphragm Tye r., Root Rho Factor = 1.30 Seismic 1)(;i;:,ill Category = E Critical Load = Seismic Wind Design = 100 mph Exp. C Total Length of S.W. This Line = 15 ft Shear Wall Data and Base Shear Calculations Wad 4 Length Height H/W Ratio ES Wind 2W/H BS Seismic P•44: I YO'' Sill Plate Washers 3" x 3" 'i 5.00 1 10.00 2.00 128 1.00 168 1 2x Sill Plate Yes Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Additional Distance Additional Distance Wall ffi Dead Load pit Wind Suction plf Uplift Left Uplift Righ Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right 720 -337.90 0 0.00 0 0.00 573 573 Wall it Shear Wail Data and Uplift Calculations Seismic )mad Load Additional Distance Additional Distance Holdown Holdown Uplift Left Uplift Right pit Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right Type Left Type Righ 720 0 0.00 0 0.00 -1560 -1560 A A Notes: -9 Ali pale' L)c.ig to be edge nailed 2) 4) Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 17 of 23 Grid Lila Level Diaphr_3c7;i ;gyp;:: Seisrok: De i l C=clegory Wind Cle;,ilur S fl8. rj R 5e`'=� E9 Fr.�, F1 Q.�, 9 n: � ( zwif.1 1 C cukc �;io[lii s Gs j^'i Live Data and Loads 1 - Roof 100 mph Exp. C Wind Load = 1919 # Seismic Load = 2520 # Rho Factor = 1.30 Critical Load = Seismic Total Length of S.W. This Line = 15 ft Shear Wall Data and Base Shear Calculations Height H/W Rat o 213 Wind 2W/H t'S Seismic S.W. Type Sill Plate 3" x 3" Washers i 10.00 2.00 12.8 1.00 168 A 2x Sill Plate Yes Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Wall # Dead Load plf Wind Suction l;iif Additional Distance Additional Distance Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right 720 -337.90 0 0.00 0 0.000 Uplift Left Uplift Right 573 573 Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Seismic Dead Load Additional Distance Additional Distance Holdown Ho plf Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right Uplift Left Uplift Right Type Left T 120 0 0.00 0 0.00 -1560 -1560 A Notes: 1) At pa-ie;l 0ges to be edge nailed F) .) 4.) Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Pace Number 18 of 23 Grid Lino LevC:l Diaphrvgal Seismic De..Mf.ya category :Wind I)e i;°Ir, Eire' „,t'{ IIV ECalculations t +'i1i 1.inne Data and Loads Wind Load = 1005 # Seismic Load = 872 # Roof Rho Factor = 1.30 ▪ E Critical Load _ Wind ▪ 100 mph Exp. C Total Length of S.W. This Line = 8 ft Shear Wall Data and Base Shear Calculations Length hi 16ht 1-1/W R I) Sti Wind 2W/H 3.00 8.00 2.00 126 1.00 Wall # Dead Load plf 1 460 EBS Seismic S.W. Type Sill Plate 3" x 3r Washers 109 A 2x Sill Plate Yes Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Wind Suction t:a)f Additional Distance Additional Distance Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right -168.95 0 0.00 0 0.0C Uplift Left Uplift Righ 577 577 Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Seismic Dead Load Additional Distance Additional Distance Holdown Holdown pit Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right Uplift Left Uplift Right Type Left Tyr - Right 460 0 0.00 0 0.00 -232 -232 A Notca;s. 1) Ali parcel :>dgas to be edge nailed 2) 4) Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Dafe 2/12/2013 Page Number 19 of 23 Grid Lioc Level Diap in 7)41 Seismic Desiyp.ICategory Wind NIdgri r , T4 Of :. 6, 4 p (r1 u n Data and Loads Roof E 100 mph Exp. C Wind Load = 1570 # Seismic Load = 3391 # Rho Factor = 1.30 Critical Load = Seismic Total Length off S.W. This Line = 16 ft Shear Wall Data and Base Shear Calculations ._ 3" x 3" , Wall .i'; Length Height H/W RaUl.,, 5S Wind 2VV/H E$ Seismic S.W. Type , Sil. Plate Washers ;.50 N\ 8.00 2.00 101 1.00 219 B 3x Sri Plate . Yes 2 ' 0.00i 8.00 2.0C, 101 1.00 219 B3x Sill Plate YeS / . , f Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Wall # Dead Load phi Wind Suction plf Uplift Left Uplift,Rkghtl Additional Distance . Additional Distance Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right \ 486 -185.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 414 i ''' -4. 4 ,,( 2 486 -185.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 388 388 I l t \-,,, . • Shear Wail Data and Uplift Calculations Seismic Dead Load Additional Distance Additional Distance Holdown Holdown Wali it'Uplift Right pit Uplift Left Left Upift Right Right Uplift Left Type Left TyRe Rightl 1 486 0 0.00 0 0.00 657 657 A 2 486 0 0.00 0 0.00 584 584 A Notes: 1) AO. panel :c1s to be edge nailed ,+) Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 20 of 23 Grid Line Lave; Diephr,;r;ni T'yi.n Seismic Des*. Category ttegory Wind Design " --� (rk Line Data and Loads _ Root = C 100 mph Exp. C Wind Load Seismic Load Rho Factor Critical Load Total Length of S.W. This Lino Shear Wail Data and Base Shear Calculations 1570 # 3391 # 1.30 = Seismic 14ft Wail 1 Length Height H/W Rojo ri,&i WirKi 2V;/H D;:5 Seismic ,,�'�S.W. Tp� Sill Plate 3 x 3 P Washers J.50 ,, 8.00 2.00 116 1.00 251 y" B x Sill Plate Yes ' 2.002 B 3x Sill Plate Yes ��.UO w 8.00 116 1.00 251 � , Dead Load pit 486 486 Shear Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Wind Wind Suction pap Additional Distance Additional Distance Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right -185.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 -185.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 Shear,Wall Data and Uplift Calculations Seismir�A' Dead Load Additional Distance Additional ' DistanceJ-~` Holdown 11l,aA 4; E;fpllft Left Uplift: Right plf Uplift Left Left Uplift Right Right Type Left 1 486 0 0.00 0 0.00 1208 1208 A 2 486 0 0.00 0 0.00 843 843 A Uplift Left Uplift Right 640 508 Notes: panel axi ;les to be edge nailed 2) 3; 4) 4 6 640 508 Holdown Typpght Job Number 9019 Proiect Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 21 of 23 Sheer Wall Type A C) Shear Wall Schedule /:kr:;isrnic; Design Category D, E, or F Capacity Specifications 195 3/8" APA rated sheathing one face with 8d nails at 6" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 48" o.c. 2x sill plate 265 3/8" APA rated sheathing one face with 8d nails at 4" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 48" o.c. 3x sill plate 368 3/8" APA rated sheathing one face with 8d nails at 3" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 3x framing members at adjoining oanel edges 5/8" 41x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 32" o.c. 3x sill plate 3/8" APA rated sheathing one face with 8d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 480 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" cp x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate 15/32" APA rated sheathing one face with 10d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 578 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate 19/32" APA rated sheathing one face with 10d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. • F ,653 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" cp x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate H J 3/8" APA rated sheathing both faces with 8d nails at 3" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 735 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate 3/8" APA rated sheathing both faces with 8d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 960 3x framing members at adjoining •panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" tong Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate 15/32" APA rated sheathing both faces with 10d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 1155 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate 19/32" APA rated sheathing both faces with 10d nails at 2" o.c. edge and 12" o.c. field. 1305 3x framing members at adjoining panel edges 5/8" 4) x 12" long Anchor Bolts @ 16" o.c. 3x sill plate Notes 1) Where panels applied on both faces of a wall and nail spacing is less than 6 inches o.c. on either side, panel joints shall be offset to fall on different framing members, or framing shall be 3-inch nominal or thicker at adjoining panel edges and nails on each side shall be staggered. 2) Galvanized nails shall be hot dipped or tumbled. 3) Framing members or blocking required at all panel edges in shear wall. 4) All shear vvall values are based on 16" o.c. stud spacing. 5) 2 anchors minimum per shear wall. 6) Ail Framing members used in the construction of shear walls to be Douglas Fir Larch. Job Number 9019 Project Manager Brad Moser Date 2/12/2013 Page Number 22 of 23 • ---,-,-, , "1 • -. • . '1.1:1 "Ir pm " t 1.dif \e) %REA Table Hok Name Post FIDLI2-SDI:32.3 2-2X4 or 2-2x6 . . Notes 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 1 HDU4-SOS2.5 2-2X4 or 2-2x6 HDU5-SE):32,5 2-2X4 or 2-2x6 FIDU8-SDS2,5 4X6 1-1DU1 1 -SDS2.5 Fii-IDQ14-SDD2.5 4x8 Gx6 rc1;J me, be raised off 1,1e sill wi;ii no ,•:;.:"ut..:Ltri A/I;crews e Simpson SOS 1/4" x 2 1/2' p.:,st and sib. piAws are c'os,'„Ined octal- 5.i: al plans far anchor and footing requ'lemera.,. tti 1+10014 holdown type F. UsLi Simp,5oo SSTBL for shear walls with 3x sill plates. Connect doub'e holdown studs togeihor witt 24-16d sin;,:c.,r nails minimum. Holdown Type Holdown Name CS16 Strap MSTC40 Strap MSTC52 Strap MSTC66 Strap CMST14 Strap CMST12 Strap ^-•----.•-, S(F:concii Floor Holdown Table Required Length 1.2 32 Long 40" Long Long ' Long 7v.." Long 94" Long Notes 1) Centerline of strap to be center of rim joist. 2) Max/morn cleat span to be 16". 3) Ail nails La be common wire unless noted otherwise. 4) Minimum post required to be installed in upper and lower wall framing. 5) Connect double holdown studs together with 24-1e3d sinker nails minimum. Required Bolt 4'5 SSTB14 SSTB16 SSTB24 SSTB28 SST 1" dia. Threaded Rod Required Nails 3 26-8d or 22-10d 36-16O Sinkers 48-16d Sinkers 68-16d Sinkers 66-16d 86-16d ,c'TS Holdown Table Holdown 1"),ki-Jo i Ho -)down Name 11?..qub.e.:i Length 1'2 Required Nails 3 . • t G CS 16 Strap 32" Long 26-8d or22-10d H MSTC40 Strap 40' Long • 36-16d Sinkers — — MSTC52 Strap 52" Long 48-16d Sinkers J MSTC66 Strap 66" Long 68-16d Sinkers K CMST14 Strap 76" Long 66-16d _ L Notes 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) CIVIST1 2 Strap 94" Long 86-16d Centerline of strap to be center of rim joist. Mayirnom clear span to be 16". .(10 nails tc; be common wire unless noted attic. Minimum post required to be installed in upper rower vial! framing. Connet c'oubia holdown studs together with 24-10d since • nails minimum. Min. Required Post 4 2x4 or 2x6 2-2X4 or 2-2x6 4x4 4x4 4x4 4x6 Min. Required Post 4 2x4 or 2x6 2-2X4 or 2-2x6 4x4 4x4 4x4 4x6 Job Number Project Manager Date Page Number Capacity 1,969 # 3,143 # 4,073 # 6,263 # 7,575 # 11,025 # Capacity 1,279 # 2,250 # 3,000 # 1 4,245 # 4,868 # 6,926 # Capacity 1,279 # 2,250 # 3,000 # 4,245 # 4,868 # 6,926 # 9019 Brad Moser 2/12/2013 23 of 23 &lel Wiley qeed INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed Zoning Case No. GENERAL INFORMATION I 1. Applicant(s) RQ15661I 154 - k611i I e 4 Tel. ('a-) 37g* 139 Address ?t mglq cove- gzs st 'w'2 10Y5 cA 1°211- 2. Legal.Owner(s) Mlr MIS 0111161 Tel. (3Ia ) &1a •Q'r Address tJ Py& Whir Liirit,' Foiling EIjF 3. Project Address e- Assessor's Book No. 7W1 - " - I - al_ Lot No. I 4rai/+___13766, 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district 'Yf) . 6. Proposed project/use of site (e 3Tr ' Jkkk. Qu[ 4 ° hQl J V PROTECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 'T1, 040 Qr'O ' 8. Net lot area l/ . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of prop , e clusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 6401 B)(4),I' 'Z 279.6140i, a 4366 144I 10. Number of floors of construction OM& 11. Basement square footage11/4 • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage ,'Z) /76qI 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? tj/i 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? (1i 11 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? r10 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? ] Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? SQi Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? +% e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning ommission). Proposed? Proposed? f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? • g• Explain DorDoe driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? i Exp ain h. Does uncovered parkin area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? n�vl Explain i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? Stable and corral average vehicular access slope °v . j. Does property 2 cars? 11 Ph 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? 4. Amount fill • 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet f 3 O00 . Percentage of Net Lot Area lil j. r? °fp . 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet MO e3.Tnn. c°c dti 2 • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 11 /a 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. r�q 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. unzlerm 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. Site plan review required. Conditional Use Permit required: stable and guesthouse Variances required: pergola in front yard setback retaining wall height retaining walls in side yard setback ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. The site consists of approximately 2 acres with an existing graded pad with an existing single story residence and garage, and yard areas with pool and spa. The lot descends steeply in an easterly direction from the building pad approximately 100 ft to the bottom of a canyon. Sluffing of soil has occurred over time, requiring two temporary wood shoring walls approximately 50' east of the building pad. 3 • • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Surrounding properties are all single family residential on large lots, most with stables and guesthouses. Properties are all single story, some with basements. Zoning is RAS-2, single family residential with horsekeeping. Is the nronosed pi rolect consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan aO. Have any of the following studies been submitted? Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report Traffic Study Noise Study Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 4 Yes No _ Historical Report Archaeological Report _ Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, induding off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 5 !. • 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 6 Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Potentially Significant Impact:. Less The Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 0 0 0 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including ❑ 0 0 but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character 0 ❑ ❑ or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare ❑ 0 ❑119 which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ 0 0 resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ 0 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ . AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 ❑ applicable air quality plan? Less Than Potentially Significant • Less Than • • Significant With 'Significant No Impact Mitigation Imp, actImpact Incorporation b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially 0 0 ❑ to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any 0 ❑ 0 criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 111 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number 0 ❑ 1� ❑ of people? :v. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ❑ 0 through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or 0 ❑ ❑ other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected 0 ❑ 0 wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 ❑ 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 8 Potentially Significant Impact Lean . Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact y, CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ I:] ❑ of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ❑ ❑ of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ ❑ ❑ El resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ ❑ ❑ outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on ❑ ❑ ❑ the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 ❑ ❑ ea iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ iv) Landslides? 0 0 ❑ el b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 ❑ ❑ IS c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ❑ ❑ 0 PM that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 ❑ ❑ 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ❑ 0 ❑ el of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 9 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Vll. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 ❑� environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 ❑ 0 LE acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use ❑ plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ 0 ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere 0 ❑ ❑ with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ 0 loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? ti Potentially Significant Impact • Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste 0 ❑ 0 discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0 f interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ ❑ ❑ 131 the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of 0 ❑ 0 the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ 0 0 exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 ❑ 0 121 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ 0 ❑ as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ 0 structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ 0 loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or darn? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ ''' IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Potentially Significant Impact .. Lesss Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ s' b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ 0 ❑ R'13 resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important 0 ❑ ❑ 151 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ 0 0 excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons.to or generation of excessive 0 0 ❑ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels 0 0 ❑ f� in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 ❑ 0 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 ❑ ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ 0 ❑ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 12 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant. With Mitigation Significant No impact Incorporation Impact Impact tall. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 ❑ 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 0 0 0 ❑ 0 ss Fire protection? 0 0 0 la Police protection? 0 0 ❑ Schools? ❑ 0 0 13 Parks? 0 0 0 121 Other public facilities? 0 0 0 IN XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ 0 0 cr neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require 0 0 ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 13 • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 ❑ l relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either ❑ 0 0 an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ 0 ❑ supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ 0 ❑! applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 ! ❑ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 0 ❑ ❑ 1$1 drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 ❑ EEC project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 14 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? Potentially Significant Impact ❑ 0 d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair ❑ the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas the provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow 0 velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? Less' Than Significant ' Less Then With Mitigation Significant No incorporation' Impact Impact 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ 'cC Less Than . Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant . Mitigation Significant NO Impact. . Incorporation r Impact Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 ❑ ❑ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 ❑ ❑ will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 16 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: II� 1. Name of applicant: R1.155611 rifriV - 2. Address: ?) MAla CoveP 7-14 sm.. 191410 3. Phone Number: 3 1Q ' 31A. 1 3 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: I 7.Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hail). S. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date(D ' I I For de -17- • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are net contained on these lists. Date 'I6'1I For 4*&11 Ntio Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date S' W' ` II For 11. NI Applicant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -18- OWNER'S DE L.ARA 'ION • 1 (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoir':.g is true and correct. Executed at 5 A3N�9 this . ll day of urikks By: By: Address City , California, , 20 11 •�� . rAfILL Lisa . 1'a� Cytc 1027 `f NOT ; The .Owner's Declaration ..can...only be used,if this application is signed in California. If this application is. signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State. where the signature is fixed, or before another` tpfficer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property descr.`:'bed herein, and that the information accompanying this apPlication is true to the best of his (its) .knowled, j e and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. AFPLf ANT: Mr e t4r n I • REPR SENTATIVE: R1S 154 f r; • COMPANY NAME: fi COMPANY ADDRESS: .3 41a1 Cave. qaq 7n7 • ki COMPANY PHONE NO. ((,___)*4 O PROJECT ADDRESS: 5 DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING .CASE, NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: admoitition is completely understood. OWNER'S ACKNCWLEDGEME'! 'T I Property development in , Roiling Hills is.gov ;rned by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING • HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions en,lorced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the G!u.ty and the RHCA are completely .independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by£both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RiCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by IT the other. The suggested sequence of property develo met It is to obtain Cityapprovals first. ..• I; (We), the undersigned, acknowledge ,that he above ''statement.has been fully read and Wj Executed at`^.�COI� this I • \I day of.u,5•As Address ;City e R i1 . 1.5 . • ,`California •,.20 �1 ncQ 11; -H;115�