Loading...
690, Add a master suite, enlarge th, Application• edy opeollin • VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mod fy or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. t PROPERTY OWNER: M�LTDx,1 Mt C I- U1 / Y OWNER'S ADDRESS: Cc' CALL: TELEPHONE NO.: .?%` 0' PROPERTY ADDRESS: CO C A b ALL ey,05 ; • CA' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. e) ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 1.**.p1 PAGE kb PARCEL t) AGENT'S NAME: t, iA T7 • AGENT'S ADDRESS: g e>152.0 ik1 ' Att ; 1 \)1 CIA Q 021 �✓ TELEPHONE NO.: IQ344' PA.44 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Vari ce °The A9pr ota ofi J fr? . ►'%,'fvItAF.GG 11A V'M4t,Y oote+ eWta at "Crk. TWO Giti, sfvuf C.AA Sli rise. 'The AAstoviNj co ilr ey,t5'11t.14 IACItio6 16 ll4tWite dkVte re.owr 'T JACK K, . 4 �� r2 0��►� .� -r � `n o� ' o mow s -rv.k . ex t51114c., 'hU1 JQi rl(► tim AO 5"Cp.Tt* let 1' T ;61. ;Met( t•tae AN A l ►f\ of .1 cJ ' FLAN) 1Iktb a tA•nog c otiRLU & 4T 'fl$ 544VrItAcu pktCtot'TECC . Ago wItrl. 14,00T ArQp At4y A90t-rtocAhm. fFaTr @ Printed on Recycled Paper Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance •Such change is based don the following described exceptio or extraordinary circumstances or onditions that do not apir IF, generally to other property in the samellEinity and zone. _114,ca Lc-r tmtavrjAe. tniorfas UOT \IJ \ ;11..!; wive Et%V) A Ike 1.146 M A410?..qi Tre e.y.cvt%a(,) Irbogoe- iv.tobve.--. -544,e rfdpwr 11.415MTherFtptia-r. •bSer Oft( t 12ills9c,MWAt.111..i 05(.3co 1461 1, 1),K pa.1,0 C.AI otrr ee orplworra rt.* \DC. ?AD CA CAI' Cot..)UNTIC*15/ 1146S MA NAG 1415 ri-o‘lacti_L,V?erI I ititc,e FON1714. ?IV Co errifki keDT COVE:Firtta5$ Alg *mita ve- a_Aoeuti4e,5, Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because rcol• st,5\hirncoi-k litaniwr rrgy,t5Th Toofi•r. "The rcom-r '17110 iliAciPoikc.4.tmervr 11,4cT 114a yr-Pcf- of "Me•ex.it,1it4t4 GAT-AcvS •AR9 1,1ot Pef-Carrilkoe, *KVA \ni.V41 FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. DATE • ZONING CASE NO. BUILDING AREAS NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE GARAGE . `?) SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE RECREATION COURT SERVICE YARD OTHER ifttlA5 NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING • ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL '))5.1(.0) sq.ft. q ►�� sq.ft. �►��� sq.ft. t2 036 ' sq.ft. .121 sq.ft. /54' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. '5V0 sq.ft. . quantities.) ✓, 1�J� sq.ft. % 2.24c2 sq.ft. t2, 2* sq.ft. RPsq.ft. OTHER PAVED sq.ft. DRIVEWAYS, EASEMENTS TOTAL FLATWORK ! 1 7 I sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE ILQ' 1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE tO, D4 q,ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE '►/t/. , sq.ft. 81*.s .ft. � i Z.'�6 'sq.ft. G11%l sq.ft. 421. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. %0 sq.ft. 4.551 sq.ft. % sq.ft. 1'4(M sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ���� • sq.ft. 78) 12 (010q.ft. 030s) 4'12:1°J sq.ft. c(3 ( a11.3 sq.ft. 421 sq.ft. A% sq.ft. sq.ft. 4°tL9 sq.ft. $10 sq.ft. 1.0 I - sq.ft. sq.ft. 1) WAD sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft./ .,r�, 2 S&sq.ft. I tee) %/ k4 % r 1✓1� i1 to sq.ft. i g2Q%LO sq.ft. sq.ft. DATE ZONINGS.SE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT CALCULATION OF BUILDING' PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 10. $1sq.ft. RESIDENCE 4i 21 f' sq.ft. GARAGE '11 > sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL 421 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( sq.ft. OTHER 1,1b . ►1O . sq.ft. lam' VIGE YAPP 4 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLEPAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( ) OTHER Cn,r7ePl sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 01? sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 24.k •TieVl 9 12 DATE T. 2 ' }' ZONING CASE NO. BUILDING AREAS NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE" GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE RECREATION COURT SERVICE YARD OTHER T k.,i, NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) • ADDRESS #19 C1\kr 1�,1.>~ /TD APPLICANT yM k..1( i N11 G I � l,l,r, MA Z.Y CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE EXISTING 14 ) PSsq.ft. %D sq.ft. 2, D sq.ft. 742 sq.ft. °121 sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, EASEMENTS TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE go sq.ft. sq.ft. /iN.0 sq.ft. �o sq.ft. r tj4.1i2 % 2.24S sq.ft. .� sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.. (c,O�5 sq.ft. 17. .2 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE kaC(..cf:1 sq.ft. TOTAL COVERAGE LI, % �u. �o�i✓ 20� C.Y. (ig PROPOSED ItAsq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ei1. sq.ft. #4kt%i sq.ft. TOTAL S,il.t) sq.ft. t, sq.ft. '411`�J,L9 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 4rVO sq.ft. sq.ft. �.� sq.ft. sq.ft. b,cl DC) sq.ft..GJ5 sq.ft. kp19_% %.01 —% 2.2 4sq.ft. 2:VP1 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 12 sq.ft. l 11,E lP sq.ft. 1.)2.4`I % ►2433sq.ft. . sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. C 34. 7 11, (0sq.ft. fit eg: eApt /7, /) DATE 1'2?` C4ZONING CASE. °'a%52 ADDRESS 0 19 C 1,A1102-D .5 APPLICANT miq i CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE • GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( ) OTHER 1 iir..\yUI TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( ) OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE C\, sq.ft. �0 Z. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. '(.Q ? sq.ft. sq.ft. "QX4 sq.ft. 451(0 110.19 sq.ft. `91� sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. '4W sq.ft. 2 ✓;tC9 % REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mod j61 or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structureon your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: M 11+10tA ItaGaLE jtiAM OWNER'S ADDRESS: #C Q Cl iAlrticoo i fiR t CA c=uO2" TELEPHONE NO: 12 tO' 4`.l0 6? Pi PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: (D CApht, ,1,l C4:P10,210i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: TZ 213e20 Kit 1G Ati114ur. CT rv1 CA. "10276 Ios '314; NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describein detail the nature of the proposed project,,,including; what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: FrOVSCT A -1)I ANw oirile. A isikhottME, oorre. A w 61.11 u11o14 -Ns rmt ► � 5 Fr-4,46e-1' fiec xit. 64- -no or Describe and delineate on plans any newbasement arealquare footage NI // t • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning. Commission must make an affirmative finding.. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses?: Explain howw it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. 'r1A6 ,Iscer I''? CotioeL r :1�`�._'► ►AcG'"C� +tsize \Arm me. oRtalt4 5'Ylioc "fti i Pg:o aC't i I It'y (Ames? �( rf'S r-vcott:'Tt , qP�` [ ✓ 'flu e1G�. 4rT NITA 11,ke yvriutwii c o' E'Pne4 B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum ..extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of thelot including surrounding native vegetation, 'mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project*eterves and integrates existing natural features. -MIs ce,kco.1 tYr \,r j`11.6 E$a i•tM „ .Stet Ot•WitAdtribt4 `'Cii 41.CTCYVp' ,. G How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to 'minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shalt not be approved. Gradedslopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain.:'. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course: Explain the nature and extent of the impact of . grading and proposed minimization on lots. ii V.SW.1, bLeA.1,9t `rN1"'t' 'T ' 6x Gowrot s \A/410R 'te .Q Pr' C014, 2-OUN �r ��a� - T tApu(A rp i �a �a�tG�T y1\Th e)1y11t ,4 Gc71.1•-roc D. To whatextent does the site development :plan preserve surrounding .native vegetation and supplement- it with. landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the: ruralcharacter of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas: Explain how theproject preserves 'native vegetation, integrates landscapingand creates buffers.: MptiliU6 VECot.TPCTI©1IS I '"re'fspf''A .1,14.170. -roar pVtlittiotA - ti 04-y ' ►t•pit , aVeF A /1.10AA.0 rtt'ri3at4 -AuGaT .r..eft+TAkrr 500fimw,iwreie.-44(.4. I.ka?Gtec w VFEATe s 67 AT('ot4. e:.TwOe.61 1461444x T iMit; 1 i How does the site development plan preservethe natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted . should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot' coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage,and percentages onneighboringlots. 5 AT Tom. .jigLtAtze 119 tt l tl ep. acttlitAG AT''146 pprnowl I Vats. ItAGcl-kotapi'f59 tWrco 15 c2a61;4t , wri to Tu Ktem ►/:nsA.tc.at IA (4't4 61,6'r At 4T Vie*. Retke2b I I& or . F is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain: and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare• with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. life-‘2/41616:490.-e,. a.. 6 ,reciAt 6 6 FM '1C „'""f QI9111l 'S ov6Facnit, 00661c.144IS To ext6TIfi1GIv '' .:Nitt I,r 1' T Cu) r ` Xc a1'S, G. ( Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway .location, . design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. 1'0l4.1 'F% 11430(26. Wl4Y WILL 114 ' 09%1" f LDgeptT 4T Yv rtFE 114E R9646‘ 'Pfafirrrh H. Does the site. development plan conform with she requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. `((f, •'C' kt L.`ifrre l •G ?i4. 1145 elTD/0400 #DOlntat`i Ian, No ✓1 14ActCANT Arica- I hereby ".certify that the statements furnished above; information required for the site plan review criteria eva statements and other information presented are true and Date: 4,4 Signat For: Applicant an' in attached exhibits, . presents the data and on to the best of .my ability; and, that the facts, ect to he best of my knowledge and belief. h�'Cu1J 1 Al Ci-tV4 �rtr� FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF. ROLLING HILLS' OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this ---Tok\. day of d( S, California, ��'�-�,t �% , 20 0 5( By: // // By: Address City fi://, NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: Mkt) tv ILA-tE[, CLACRI REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: 2ES,ZohitcA.1, CG f 9021 COMPANY PHONE NO. ((0 ) M'43149 PROJECT ADDRESS. CO C A FA 1u5jcs g02-. DATE FILED ' FEE: r191GI.14 C ct,t4, RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understoo Executed at this / day of By: 1 By: 71-14 , California ,20C' . • • City off Roiling JJ�P ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM. (To Be Completed By Applicant) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Date Filed Zoning Case No. GENERAL INFORMATION,, A� ,1 1. Applicant(s) 1'`,�k, k AI�ii���.►E, A/4r( Tel (hip___) ' (95(1)9 Address ,, cAU{Mt_fi �- , C, 4102 2. Legal Owner(s) Mi�1.01\4 tAlc el...t /114,Fi Tel. (31O) ' ( B( 9 Address 4 (0 C At2Aklt..,.0 ,ix)I 6i CA otr)21 - 3. Project Address 4° (..i ,�1�C �+�A 41T721.+ Assessor's Book No. 1 �� - , - €,C Lot No. t 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site ''41 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size II'oi 6. Net lot area �;' � It.9 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. 9. Total square footage of structures 10?) 10. Number of floors of construction it'`t.r► 11. Basement square footage I-1 February 2002 Environmental Information Form @Printed on Recycled I'>ip :r • • 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. a. b. c. d. e. f. 9- h. i. J. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? I Will the entire building structure require a new roof? hip i Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? Driveway Access and Parking: Is a new driveway accessway proposed? 1\10 (Requires Traffic Commission Review). Number of driveway(s) Existing? Proposed? (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). l Width of driveway(s) Existing? Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). . Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required, J Existing? ply/ Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? '3/ —114 (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). Has site plan been reviewed by Los Ancl s County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? N.13 Explain t�C=fit Does drimoy cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Attn Explain ' 1 'me 14c2os, 114cot I1 rowr •1 F"44.1., Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Explain Does v`ejhicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slo 0 of 25% or less? e2 D Stable and corral average vehicular access slope l %. Does property have an above ground garage with a imum capacity of 2 cars? c't With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? Proposed? d'MMe Proposed? %! 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut (C;° Amount fill eta . (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or re roposed to be added. �t -1 o Square feet . Percentage of Net Lot Area '-1. 2 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4 eG 1 S February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-2 • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. NA /A- 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 1 f 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. ,i-kt., 9 °t O © CA)GF, ! I COO .s �lj► ta1J 'N —114E Q441'1 *T",:A'; ° ,eal)' ar � Toff. ,1a2 t= o ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. ,}Cl i' . c.. 'sr_ . W rKt.1 r' ' '5Y10t.k. 1 €ixtmi c F. lb f c -s ?AA., pAp 04toe, 14es #poi 66T � �, : $ 4 � C�.. :�I,?':.W4 '-�"-.,�IF-�l,,y '(0 °ALL4c, r°~, "' ,�...:,'I'" G ,,. n 1'Mt .° 14*t LAr ®�p uJ Iii a cQTh W$G ti 'p 1 9 lic uir vE. 1-3 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 11A6 �.,=ILDOtAo t_r�(A rtz.oveAlt � e%t9?Eai�1,TIAl.. %�j0464x,G vrtc y �oc.0 .- r.v e"Fo ffgalsu t tS 11.5'- t�. ,t •TAL.. 1 T ►i-kbi rf.01AT ofty,a P.,wp 919! •(p'lb CPI -1 a �'�. c. -Tt-ke dttle Nt' Attp <,e-r ?yfr C: icr .. 41AI_ It T.eAr-vo a+` T fori : x 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? _ Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study _ Biological Study _ Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-4 Yes No N/A _ Historical Report Archaeological Report _ Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits _ Visual Analysis _ Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Issues: . AESTHETICS —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Potentiallyss Than SignificanSignificantSiLess Than gnificant With LSi nificant No Incorporation Impact Mitigation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ x 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XO 0 ❑ III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 ❑ applicable air quality plan? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-6 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0 substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0 any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 0 0 number of. people? X IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ 0 ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 0 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 0 ❑ [ protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 R I biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-7 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact V . CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 ❑ 0 of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? x b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 ❑ 0 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0 X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 ❑A . outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 0 X on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ 0 0 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 0 �C]� b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 X c). Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0 ig or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- CI 0 ❑ X 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 ❑ 0 use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-8 • • Potentially SiLess gnificantThanWith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 01-‹. environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0)1( acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to ( Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0 or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 ❑ 0 would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 ❑ X loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-9 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VIII, HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 ❑ requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 ❑ 0 site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ ❑ ❑ site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ❑ 0 ❑ X the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) .Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 ❑ 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ❑ 0 0 mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 ❑ which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, 0 0 0 injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 ❑ ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-10 • • IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING —Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, Local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific planor other land use plan? XI. NOISE— Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ 0 ❑1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑. ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 /X ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ CI )2( ❑ ❑ ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form Less • Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project: a) induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 0 �j necessitating the construction of replacement A. housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 ❑ `y the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? / ' XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 j Police protection? 0 ❑ 0 Schools? 0 0 0 i Parks? 0 0 0 Fi Other public facilities? ❑ 0 0 ^t XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 0 0 ❑ X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0 require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Nix February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-12 • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ 0 relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 ❑ 0 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ❑ 0 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Nog c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ 0 0 water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ 0 ❑ project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? I-13 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Potentially Significant Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ❑ 0 0 to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0 ❑ 0 regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 0 0 XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS —Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ 0 0 water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm ❑ 0 0 water runoff? c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas 0 0 0 from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo( work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 ❑ 0 the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause ❑ 0 0 significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ 0 ❑ velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm? g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 0 0 the project site or surrounding areas? )14 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-14 • Potentially Significant Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact 1-15 ❑ ❑ ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located op a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: Mi1./ ` R MICO A0C 2. Address: '�9 Cam• �t 5 plikeAW, v;3uqlrf...14-__ 9122,--Pe4 3. Phone Number: P " '4.1'" I'PL 9 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): CiktAt, I A C1 410,91.4 5. Local Agency (city/county): l Ok) ftCN LA- C l O'Ot4"CN( 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: �(Q1 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE 0 F CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date C2" t0'001" For Applicant miaow l ►\r.1 L MAW' l-16 February 2002 Environmental Information Form NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date ' to` 0'f For Sig Applicant � t'fo�� ;� / [c�ll� ��.�ir CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date 7' 10 For Sign 1 Applicant 1-17 r l ivioN fc,& v4 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • A.R.M. MAPPING SERVICE 203 Argonne Avenue # 141, Long Beach, California 90803 phone (562) 434-2835 fax(562) 434-4301 AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the attached radius map correctly depicts the required data obtained from record of the Planning Department of the City of Rolling Hills. I further hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and under the penalty of perjury, the attached ownership list correctly shows the latest names and addresses on the Los Angeles County Assessor records as of May 12, 2004. I also acknowledge that any errors in this information will constitute an incomplete application and may invalidate its approval. hAiv\S Michel Pauls STATE Of. °"AUNTY SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE 1 tiF THIS DAY QF... — , �d NOTARY P116LtC CAROL BENSONu(y COMM. #1356045 NOTARY PUBLIC, CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Expires JUNE 8, 2006 ti'L„ • • Dist. Office 12.02 Sheet 1 of 1 County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION GEOLOGIC REVIEW SHEET 900 So. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 TEL. (626) 458-4925 Tract / Parcel Map Parent Tract Site Address 6 Caballeros Road Geologist Coastline Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. Soils Engineer Same as above Processing Date on Plan 9/15/05 Grading P.C. No. Unknown Building P.C. No. 0509200045 Geologic Report(s) Dated 3/16/05 (1290-1214) Soils Engineering Report(s) Dated 3/30/05 (2158C-094) Geology and Soils Engineering Report(s) Dated 12/07/05 (2158C-115) Additional Reports Reviewed Lot(s) Location City of Rolling Hills APN 7567-018-008 Developer/Owner Mabry Engineer/Arch. Parsa and Associates For: Addition (1034 ft.2) over basement (1243 ft.2) DISTRIBUTION 1 Dist. Office 1 Geologist Soils Engineer 1 GMED File LDD - Grading Action: _Plan is recommended for approval from a geologic standpoint, subject to conditions below. X Plan is not recommended for approval for reasons below. Remarks/Conditions: 1. All recommendations of the consulting geologist must be incorporated into the design or shown as notes on the plans. 2. The plan must be specifically approved by the consultant geologist by manual, original signature and date on each sheet prior to approval by the Geology Section. Submit two (2) sets for review. 3. Show all proposed corrective measure"1 son the plan: fill slope, keying and benching details, etc. 4. The Soils Engineering review dated v< < 0 3 is attached. NOTE TO BUILDING AND SAFETY PLAN CHECKER/CITY OF ROLLING HILLS: This review is for the building plans only. The proposed grading (fill slope) shown on the building plans has not been addressed by the geotechnical consultants and is not considered in this review. If review of a grading plan is required, please submit plans under a current grading plan application. NOTE TO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES: Review of these plans has not considered upgrade or installation of an on -site sewage disposal system for the proposed improvement with regards to site stability. Prepared by Reviewed by G,' Kari P:1Gmepub\Geology Review\Forms\Form06.doc 5/31/05 Date January 25, 2006 `M Address: Telephone: Fax: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING DIVISION SOILS ENGINEERING REVIEW SHEET 900 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 (626) 458-4925 (626) 458-4913 Additions with Basement Location Developer/Owner Engineer/Architect Soils Engineer Geologist 6 Caballeros Road, City of Rolling Hills Mabry Parsa and Associates Coast Geotechnical Consultants (2158C-094) George Devries Building Plan Check No. 0509200045 Review of: Building Plan Dated By Processing Center 9/15/05 Soils Engineering and Geologic Report Dated 12/7/05 Soils Engineering Report Dated 3/30/05 Geologic Report Dated 3/16/05 Previous review sheet dated 10/18/05 District Office 12.02 Job Number B372001 Sheet 1 of 1 DISTRIBUTION: Drainage _ Grading 1 Geo/Soils Central File 2 District Engineer 1 Geologist 1 Soils Engineer 1 Engineer/Architect ACTION: Building plan is not recommended for approval. REMARKS: 1. Per the soils engineer, shoring (via underpinning piles) will be required to support the existing footings adjacent to the proposed basement. Show the recommended mitigation measures on the building plans as necessary. 2. The Soils Engineer of record must review the building plans and sign and stamp the plans in verification of his recommendations. Original manual signature and wet stamp are required. 3. Submit two sets of building plans to the Soils Section for verification of compliance with County codes and policies. 4. Requirements of the Geology Section are attached. 5. Include a copy of this review sheet with your response. NOTE(S) TO THE PLAN CHECKER/BUILDING AND SAFETY ENGINEER: A. PER THE SOILS ENGINEER, ON -SITE SOILS HAVE A M ANSION POTENTIAL. B. PER THE SOILS ENGINEER, ON -SITE SOILS SHALL CORROSIVE, UNLESS CHEMICAL TEST RESULTS ARE SUBMITTED INDICATING OTHERWI fitrepared by Date 2/1/06 NOTICE: Public safety, relative to geotechnical subsurface exploration, shall be provided In accordance with current codes for excavations, inclusive of the Los Angeles County Code, Chapter 11.46, and the State of California, Title 6, Construction Safety Orders. Gan:cabalerous-6-bp