412, Alterations & additions to exi, Staff Reports• •
£'ii O �OL ��IL�} �`INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
v
MEETING DATE: MAY 21, 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
ZONING CASE NO.1412
MR. GORDON SIU
9 CABALLEROS ROAD (LOT 32-SK)
REPRESENTATIVE: MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY
ENGINEERING
REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR TIME EXTENSION
Attached is a request by Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay
Engineering, for a one-year time extension for a Variance to the
side yard setback and Site Plan Review which was approved by the
Planning Commission on April 7, 1990, but, taken under jurisdiction
by the City Council. Resolution No. 90-8 was upheld by the City
Council on May 29, 1990.
Mr. McHattie cites the need for the extensionin order to fulfill
the requirements of the County of Los Angeles Department of
Building and Safety.
30
STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 14, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 412; Request for a Variance to encroach into the
side yard setback to construct additions to the existing
residence at 9 Caballeros Road, and to construct a retining wall
at 9 Caballeros (Lot 32-SK) and 1 Maverick Lane (Lot 31-SK); and
Site Plan Review to determine compatibility of the proposed
additions with the site at 9 Caballeros; Applicants: Gordon Siu
and Dr. Mansoor Mirsaidi
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of February 20, 1990,
continued the hearing on the matter to allow the applicant time to submit
documentation for an expanded variance request for consideration of
constructing a retaining wall within the side yard setbacks of the subject
site and neighboring lot. This expanded request is result of the subject
property's relationship to the northerly neigboring site, in that the
parties, Stinnett (former owner), Mirsaidi, and the Rolling Hills
Community Association, have legal agreement to utilize the easement
between the properties for vehicular access use, and correspondingly
requires construction of a new retaining wall that tranverses the mutual
property line. City staff, at the last meeting, requested that the
applicant submit a certified copy of the agreement. The Commission
inspected the site and easement area at their last field trip meeting.
Other issues discussed at the previous meeting are as follows:
1. The northerly residential addition requires variance relief to
encroach four (4') feet into the 35 foot side yard setback. The subject
site is somewhat narrow for an RAS-2 zoned lot, and thus, the requirement
of side yards consume essentially half the width of the parcel. The
applicant's design professional was requested to provide building pad
coverage calculations.
2. Grading plans have been revised to indicate that the 1,150
cut/fill balance will be completed above the location of the existing
stable that will remain. Furthermore, the applicant's representative
provided information that the existing retaining wall will be replaced to
not to encroach into any required yard setback.
3. Potential view impairment to abutting properties has been
resolved by the Commission site inspection, and the project,s design
profession has indicated that the southerly addition will be lowered to
present a "step-down" situation.
zc412
page 2
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission closely examine the proposed
project and potential impacts to the site and surrounding properties as
they relate in accordance with the zoning requirements addressing side
yard setback and development compatibility. In order before a variance
may be granted, the Commission must determine that there are special
circumstances applicable to the property, special privileges are not
granted, and it would not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property. Further, the Commission must consider site
plan review for the project and determine that findings required for site
plan review approval as set forth by the ordinance are satisfied. Should
the Commission approve the request, appropriate conditions can be attached
to mitigate impacts.
zc412#3
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 13, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 412; Request for a Zone Variance to encroach
into the side yard setback to construct additions to the
residence and Site Plan Review to determine compatibility of
proposed additions with the site located at 9 Caballeros
Road, Lot 32-SK; Owner: Gordon Siu
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of January 16, 1990,
continued the above -stated application to an adjourned meeting so as to
conduct a field trip to inspect the site and surrounding properties. The
applicant is requesting a variance to encroach four feet (4') into the
required 35 foot side yard setback to construct an addition to the
residence. Further, the project requires site plan review for
compatibility with the site.
Issues raised at the previous meeting included the following:
1. The property is somewhat narrow for an RAS-2 zoned parcel, and
the required side yards consume essentially half the width of the
lot.
2. Grading plans have been modified (1,150 CY) so as not to indicate
grading below the existing stable structure that will remain. The
applicant's representative has indicated to staff and Commission
that the existing retaining wall must be replaced, and will not
occur within required setbacks.
3. Potential view impairment to neighboring properties has been
resolved by site inspection of the Commission, and the southerly
addition will be lowered to create a step-down situation.
4. The matter of the property's relationship as it pertains to the
easement with the abutting parcel to the north has been resolved
with the Community Association. A copy of the agreement and site
plan has been submitted for the file.
zc412
page two
3. Proposed grading calls for a 1,360 CY cut/fill balance for the
project. Fill slopes will occur at the rear of the additions, and create
a pad area at the location of the existing barn to be removed. Cut slopes
are proposed lower down the property to create the new stable area.
Access to the stable is indicated along the northerly property line.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission closely examine the proposed
project and potential impacts to the site and surrounding properties as
they relate in accordance with the zoning requirements addressing side
yard setback and development compatibility. In order before a variance
may be granted, the Commission must determine that there are special
circumstances applicable to the property, special privileges are not
granted, and it would not be detrimental to he public welfare or injurious
to other property. Further, the Commission must consider site plan review
for the project and determine that findings required for site plan review
approval as set forth by the ordinance are satisfied. The Commission
should receive public testimony and continue the matter to an adjourned
meeting so as to inspect the site and surrounding properties.
zc412rh
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 9, 1990
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 412; Request for a Zone Variance to
encroach into the side yard setback to construct additions
to the residence and Site Plan Review to determine
compatibility of proposed additions with the site located at
9 Caballeros Road, Lot 32-SK; Owner: Mr. Gordon Siu
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission, at their scheduled meeting of December 12, 1989,
continued the above -stated application to an adjourned meeting so as to
conduct a field inspection of the site and -surrounding properties.
The variance request is
with an addition to the
size of the existing home
RAS-2, and somewhat narrow
35 foot side yard setbacks,
feet.
for a side yard encroachment of four feet (4')
residence. Proposed additions will double the
and require site plan review. The lot is zoned
and long. Taking into account for the required
the buildable property width would be about 70
Further issues raised during the meeting and to Staff are grading impacts
to the natural slope and, more recently, potential view impairment to
abutting properties. After reviewing the site, the Commission indicated
that modifications to the terrain as proposed should be discussed
further. Staff has been recently contacted by neighboring property owners
requesting clarification of the impacts of the additions as it pertains to,
view impairment. The applicant's representative has since submitted a
revised plan showing the retention of the existing barn and reducing the
planned grading by approximately 200 cubic yards. Staff would recommend
further discussion on this matter.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission closely examine the proposed
project and potential impacts to the site and surrounding properties as
they relate in accordance with the zoning requirements addressing side
yard setback and development compatibility. In order before a variance
may be granted, the Commission must determine that there are special
circumstances applicable to the property, special privileges are not,
granted, and it would not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property. Further, the Commission must consider site
plan review for the project and determine that findings required for site
plan review approval as set forth by the ordinance are satisfied.
zc412#2
M. MIRSAIDI FAMILY
#1 MAVERICK LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
January 3, 1990
By
Planning Commission of
The City Of Rolling Hills
California
Ref: Zoning Case No. 412
9 Caballeros Road
Rolling Hills, CA
Dear Members of the Commission:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
We have the following concerns related to this case.
1. The easement dispute: The owners of this property
initiated a litigation against Rolling Hills
Community Association and us requesting
modification of the easement on the Marverick Lane
side. The issue is settled and a specified amount
of funds have been placed in escrow for specific
easement modification.
We respectfully request that the Commission
conclude this issue prior to approving any
building activities.
2. Sail movements problem on this property:
a. The previous owners of this property
confided to us that they had significant
sail movements in and around the pool
area which they improved with geologist
help.
b. Presently there are significant surface
damages in the back yard and pool area.
c. Construction activities may aggravate the
problem.
d. Larger buildings generally increase the
disposal water.
e. The second septic tank on this property
is close to pool area.
Planning Commission Page 2
Our concern is that if any sail movements occur, there
will be immediate mispublicity causing adverse effect on
property values in this neighborhood. Also, Rolling Hills
City and Rolling Hills Community Association may get into
significant litigation problems.
We love to see property improvements in our
neighborhood. At the same time, we would like to make sure
the above mentioned issues do not cause adverse effects upon
our community and our property.
We appreciate your attention to these matters.
Yours truly,
M. Mirsaidi
•
DATE: December 4,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
APPLICATION NO.:
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
PRIOR CITY ACTIONS:
PROPERTY SIZE/
CONFIGURATION:
PRESENT DEVELOPMENT:
REOUEST:
STAFF REPORT
1989
Zoning Case No. 412
9 Caballeros Road, Lot 32-SK
RAS-2
Mr. Gordon Siu
Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering
December 2, 1989
2.263 acres (gross), Irregular shape
Single family residence with attached garage;
swimming pool, detached stable
A Variance to encroach into the side yard setback to
construct additions to the residence; Site Plan Review to
determine compatibility of the proposed additions with the
site.
REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF ISSUES
In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 17 (Zoning) and Ordinance
221 (Site Plan Review), Staff would identify the following issues for
discussion:
1. The applicant desires to construct residence additions that would
double the size of the presennt home (2,388 SF existing, 2,391 SF
proposed, 4,779 SF total). As proposed, the additions necessitate the
removal of the existing pool, and the plans call for the demolition of the
existing freestanding barn. A replacement stable is planned, however
new pool is not indicated on plans. Overall lot coverage standards are
not to be exceeded (7.1% structure, 4.0% flatwork, 11.1% total).
2. The extent of encroachment into the required side yard is four
(4') feet with a small portion of the proposed additions. The rest of the
additions will not encroach by following the setback line or constrain the
angular development. This property is somewhat narrow and long as
compared to other properties in the RAS-2 zone. Taking into account for
the required 35 foot side yards, the buildable property width would be
only about 70 feet.
zc412
page two
3. Proposed grading calls for a 1,360 CY cut/fill balance for the
project. Fill slopes will occur at the rear of the additions, and create
a pad area at the location of the existing barn to be removed. Cut slopes
are proposed lower down the property to create the new stable area.
Access to the stable is indicated along the northerly property line.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission closely examine the proposed
project and potential impacts to the site and surrounding properties as
they relate in accordance with the zoning requirements addressing side
yard setback and development compatibility. In order before a variance
may be granted, the Commission must determine that there are special
circumstances applicable to the property, special privileges are not
granted, and it would not be detrimental to he public welfare or injurious
to other property. Further, the Commission must consider site plan review
for the project and determine that findings required for site plan review
approval as set forth by the ordinance are satisfied. The Commission
should receive public testimony and continue the matter to an adjourned
meeting so as to inspect the site and surrounding properties.
zc412rh