202, "An existing structure in fron, Application•
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
7plication for a) Change of Zoning
lb) Variance from Zoning Ordinance I
c) Conditional Use Permit _
ze .undersignedti Mr, & Mrs. Don L. Tuffli _ • ti3_zz •
NAME
.75 Eastfield Dr., Rolling Hills, 'Ca
STREET ADDRESS -
I ris /are the .owner(S) of
II `has 'permission of the owner.-
4 plaintiff
!gal description of property situated at
75 Eastfield•Drive
STREET ADDRESS
377-2625 or 378-9334 (George Shaw)
• 120 '�
• LOT
TELEPHONE NO..
Eastfield
TRACT
i-titions .-for_ extension of an .existing":non conformance fbr a 15' extension
. lfl t= u L h t 11 uii L. y -.t. u . • '
1. Such change is warranted because (State rests.ons
The existing structure already ex end lb' .into e rent 3,t rc
l.
The proposed extension_ is concealled from adjacent ,properties and roadways
•The floor elevation of theproposed extension is 7.t5" below' the 'level of
.Eastfield Rd.
II. Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extra-
ordinary circumstances or -conditions that do not apply generally to other
property or . class —of use in the -same vicinity and zone —(State -cir_cum- -
stances _
Th.e existing .strue.tu;0 ai e4uy eAteiit. .15into thefront yard.
Tn.e ,propQsea extension is conce.LLed from actaacent.,pxopexti;es and roadways,
ine floor elevation- of' the propose:a extension is '(.b below.the level of
Liastxieia d.
II
Such .change is ,necessary for_ -the _preservation_and-enjoyment. of a •sub-
stantialproperty right possessed by other property in the same vicinity
and zone (State reasons).
The proposed extension would create an improvement oz the property tnat
would maintain the high_ 'standards otr tn.e neighborhood,
IV. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in suchvicinity and z_o_ne where
property is located because -
The -proposed extension is concealled ,from adjacent properties‘ and roadways._,
(If additional space is needed, use reverse side of sheet)
•